Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 27, 2017

Patrones de ergatividad en el español peninsular

  • Victor Lara EMAIL logo

Abstract

Western Peninsular Spanish possesses a type of causative construction in which an intransitive lexeme is used as transitive. Specifically, the verbs caer (‘to fall’), quedar (‘to stay’) and entrar (‘to enter) can induce a direct object in detriment of the standard verbs tirar (‘to throw’), dejar (‘to leave’) and meter (‘to put in’). This phenomenon (called lability) has not been investigated in depth for Spanish and, with this paper I attempt to pinpoint its current geographical extension as well as the semantic factors that favour the transitivisation of these verbs.

Referencias

Ackerman, Farrell & John Moore. 2001. Proto-properties and grammatical encoding. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra & Robert Dixon (eds). 2000. Changing valency. Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627750Search in Google Scholar

ALCyL: véase Alvar, Manuel. 1999.Search in Google Scholar

ALEANR: véase Alvar, Manuel. 1979–1983.Search in Google Scholar

ALEC-MAN: véase García Mouton, Pilar & Francisco Moreno Fernández. 1988–1994.Search in Google Scholar

Alvar, Manuel. 1979–1983. Atlas lingüístico y etnográfico de Aragón, Navarra y Rioja (ALEANR). Zaragoza: CSIC.Search in Google Scholar

Alvar, Manuel. 1996. Manual de dialectología hispánica. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Alvar, Manuel. 1999. Atlas lingüístico de Castilla y León. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León.Search in Google Scholar

Ariza, Manuel. 2008. Estudios sobre el extremeño. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Search in Google Scholar

Baños Baños, José Miguel. 2009. Sintaxis del latín clásico. Madrid: Liceus.Search in Google Scholar

Bassols de Climent, Mariano. 1956. Sintaxis latina. Madrid: CSIC.Search in Google Scholar

Bilous, Rostyslav. 2012. Transitivity revisited: an overview of recent research and possible solutions. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. Cambridge: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Cano, Rafael. 2004. Historia de la lengua española. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2009. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin. In The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case, 307–346, eds. Jóhanna Barddal & Shobhana Chelliah. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.17cenSearch in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology, syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie Bernard. & Maria Polinsky (ed.). 1993. Causatives and transitivity. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.23Search in Google Scholar

COSER: véase Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 1988–2016.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2008. Direct and indirect explanations of typological regularities: the case of alignment variations. Folia linguistica 42: 1–38.10.1515/FLIN.2008.1Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2014. P-liability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics 52: 911–944.10.1515/ling-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael, Timor Maisak & Solmaz Merdanova. 2012. Causatives in Agul. In Argument structure and grammatical relations, 55–113, ed. Masayoshi Shibatani. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.126.04danSearch in Google Scholar

Davis, Cary. 1968. The indirect object of possession in Spanish. The USF Language Quarterly 1968: 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

De Benito, Carlota. 2015. Las construcciones con se desde una perspectiva variacionista y dialectal. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar

Dumitrescu, Domnita. 1990. El dativo posesivo en español y rumano. Revista Española de Lingüística 20: 403–429.Search in Google Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1985. A grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Elvira, Javier. 2001. Intransitividad escindida en español: el uso auxiliar de ser en español medieval. Estudios de lingüística 15: 201–245.10.14198/ELUA2001.15.09Search in Google Scholar

Elvira, Javier. 2012. Construcciones y significado: aspectos diacrónicos de la transitividad en español. In Corrientes de estudio en semántica y pragmática históricas. In Corrientes de estudio en semántica y pragmática históricas, 1–28, ed. Ricardo Maldonado. Madrid: Instituto Menéndez Pidal.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 1988–2016. Corpus Oral y Sonoro del Español Rural (COSER). http://www.uam.es/coser/.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1317–1397, eds. Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 2006. Del Cantábrico a Toledo: el “neutro de materia” hispánico en un contexto románico y tipológico I. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 1: 67–118.10.54166/rhle.2007.02.02Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 2007. Del Cantábrico a Toledo: el “neutro de materia” hispánico en un contexto románico y tipológico II. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 2: 29–81.10.54166/rhle.2007.02.02Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 2011. La lengua de Castilla y la formación del español. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Frago, Juan Antonio. 1993. Historia de las hablas andaluzas. Madrid: Arco Libros.Search in Google Scholar

García Mouton, Pilar & Francisco Moreno Fernández. 1988–1994. Atlas Lingüístico (y etnográfico) de Castilla-La Mancha. http://www2.uagh.es/alecman.Search in Google Scholar

García Mouton, Pilar. 1994. Lenguas y dialectos de España. Madrid: Arco Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The origin of NP split ergativity. Language 66: 261–296.10.2307/414887Search in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52: 945–1002.10.1515/ling-2014-0013Search in Google Scholar

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.39Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In Syntax and semantics. The grammar of causative constructions, 80–120, ed. Masayoshi Shibatani. Nueva York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice. 1982. Georgian and the unaccusative hypothesis. Linguistics 58: 290–306.10.1353/lan.1982.0028Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and transitivity, 87–121, eds. Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Heidinger, Steffen. 2014. The persistence of labile verbs in the French causative-anticausative alternation. Linguistics 52: 1003–1024.10.1515/ling-2014-0014Search in Google Scholar

Hetzron, Robert. 1976. On the Hungarian causative verb and its syntax. In The grammar of causative constructions, 371–398, ed. Masayoshi Shibatani. Nueva York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368842_015Search in Google Scholar

Hewitt, George. 1987. Georgian: ergative or active? Lingua 71: 319–340.10.1016/0024-3841(87)90077-5Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson (ed.). 1982. Syntax and semantics. Studies in transitivity. Nueva York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368903Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez Fernández, Ángel & Mercedes Tubino Blanco. 2014. Variación sintáctica en la causativización léxica. Revista española de lingüística 44: 7–38.Search in Google Scholar

Karantzola, Eleni & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2014. On the relation between labilisations and neuter gender: evidence from Greek diachrony. Linguistics 52: 1025–1059.10.1515/ling-2014-0015Search in Google Scholar

Kehayov, Petar & Virve Vihman. 2014. The lure of lability: a synchronic and diachronic investigation of the labile pattern in Estonian. Linguistics 52: 1061–1105.10.1515/ling-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Hee-Su. 2012. Transitives, causatives and passives in Korean and Japanese. In Argument structure and grammatical relations, 241–255, ed. Masayoshi Shibatani. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.126.11kimSearch in Google Scholar

Klimov, Georgij. 1977. Tipologija jazykovaktivnogo stroja. Moscú: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 1999a. May he prosper in offspring and wealth: a few jubilee remarks on the typology of labile verbs and Sanskrit púsyati ‘prosper; makes prosper’. In Tipologija i teorija jazyka: at opisanija k ob”jasneniju K 60-letiju A. E. Kibrika, 224–244, eds. Ekaterina Rakhilina & Yakov Testelets. Moscú: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury,Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 1999b. Split causativity: remarks on correlations between transitivity, aspect and tense. In Tense, aspect, transitivity and causativity. Essays in honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov, 21–43, eds. Werner Abraham & Leonid Kulikov. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.50.06kulSearch in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2003. The labile syntactic type in a diachronic perspective: the case of Vedic. Journal of linguistics 26: 93–112.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2014. Typology of labile verbs: focus on diachrony. Linguistics 52: 871–877.10.1515/ling-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Lara, Víctor. 2012. Ustedes instead of vosotros and vocês instead of vós: an analysis through the Linguistic Atlas of the Iberian Peninsula (ALPI). Dialectologia Special Issue 3: 57–93.Search in Google Scholar

Lara, Víctor. 2016. La expresión del futuro en las lenguas romances de la Península Ibérica. Boletín de la Real Academia Española XCVI (Cuaderno CCCXIV): 529–558.Search in Google Scholar

Larjavaara, Meri. 2000. Présence ou absence de l’objet : limites du possible en français. Helsinki: Academia Scientirum Fennica.Search in Google Scholar

Laroche, Emmanuel. 1962. Un ergative en indo-europeen d’Asie Mineure. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 57: 23–43.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Ergative and active traits in Latin. In Relational gramar, 243–267, ed. Frans Plank. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110848731.243Search in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2004. Lability of verbs and its relations to verb meaning and argument structure (based on data from Indo-European, Arabic, Turkish and other languages). Vortrag beim LENCA-2-Symposium an der Universität Kasan, 11.14.5.2004: http://www.ksu.ru/conf/LENCA-2/187.rtf (último acceso: 20 de diciembre de 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2009. Towards a typology of labile verbs: lability versus derivation. In New challenges in typology: transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 247–268, eds. Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2010. Lability and spontaneity. In Transitivity: form, meaning, acquisition and processing, 237–255, eds. Patrick Brandt & Marco García. Ámsterdam / Filadelfia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.166.10letSearch in Google Scholar

Letuchiy, Alexander. 2015. Historical development of labile verbs in modern Russian. Linguistics 53: 611–647.10.1515/ling-2015-0012Search in Google Scholar

McMillion, Alan. 2006. Labile verbs in English: their meaning, behaviour and structure. Estocolmo: University of Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1931. Essai de chronologie des langues indo-européennes, la theorie du feminine. Bullentin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 32: 1–28.10.1017/CBO9780511695261.004Search in Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1575–1630, eds. Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 2005. Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Instituto Menéndez Pidal.Search in Google Scholar

Merlan, Francesca. 1985. Split intransitivity: functional oppositions in intransitive inflection. In Grammar inside and outside the clause, 324–362, eds. Johanna Nichols & Anthony Woodbury. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mondéjar, José. 1991. Dialectología andaluza. Granada: Don Quijote.Search in Google Scholar

Montero, Pilar. 2006. El extremeño. Madrid: Arco Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Narbona, Antonio. 2003. El español hablado en Andalucía. Sevilla: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1969. Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazonavii. In Jazykovye universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, 106–114, ed. Igor Vardul. Moscú: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John, Rinke Colen, Charlotte Gooskens, Peter Kleiweg & Therese Leinonen. 2010. GabmapA Web Application for Dialectology. Groningen: University of Groningen. http://www.gabmap.nl/.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, José Joaquim. 1945. Compêndio de gramática histórica portuguesa. Lisboa: Livraria Clássica Editora.Search in Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. 2004. Gramática histórica del español. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusativity hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistic society, 157–189. Chicago: Berkeley University.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2011. Licensing of instrumental case in Hindi / Urdu causatives. Nordlyb 38 : 49–85.10.7557/12.2230Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Said, Manoel. 1931. Gramática histórica da língua portuguesa. Río de Janeiro: Livraria Académica.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.). 1976. Syntax and semantics. The grammar of causative constructions. Nueva York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368842Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66: 221–260.10.2307/414886Search in Google Scholar

Visser, Fredericus. 1970. A historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Max, Alan Yates & Nicolau Dols. 1999. Catalan: a comprenhensive grammar. Londres: Routledge.10.4324/9780203300275Search in Google Scholar

Wolfram, Wolfram & Natalie Schilling-Estes. 2003. Dialectology and Linguistic Diffusion. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 713–735, eds. Brian Joseph & Robert Janda. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch24Search in Google Scholar

Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1970. Dialectología española. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-11-27
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter BmgH Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dialect-2017-0005/html
Scroll to top button