Abstract
This is a conceptual work about the form-finding of a hybrid tensegrity structure. The structure was obtained from the combination of arch-supported membrane systems and diamond-type tensegrity systems. By combining these two types of structures, the resulting system features the “tensile-integrity” property of cables and membrane together with what we call “floating-bending” of the arches, a term which is intended to recall the words “floating-compression” introduced by Kenneth Snelson, the father of tensegrities. Two approaches in the form-finding calculations were followed, the Matlab implementation of a simple model comprising standard constant-stress membrane/cable elements together with the so-called stick-and-spring elements for the arches, and the analysis with the commercial software WinTess, used in conjunction with Rhino and Grasshopper. The case study of a T3 floating-bending tensile-integrity structure was explored, a structure that features a much larger enclosed volume in comparison to conventional tensegrity prisms. The structural design of an outdoor pavilion of 6 m in height was carried out considering ultimate and service limit states. This study shows that floating-bending structures are feasible, opening the way to the introduction of suitable analysis and optimization procedures for this type of structures.
References
[1] Sakantamis K, Popovic Larsen O. The cocoon method: a physical modelling tool for designing tensegrity systems. Int J Space Struct. 2004;19(1):11–20.10.1260/026635104322988335Search in Google Scholar
[2] Shigematsu M, Tanaka M, Noguchi H. Form finding analysis of tensegrity membrane structures based on variational method. In: Proceedings of IASS-IACM 2008 Spanning Nano to Mega (28-31 May 2008, Ithaca, New York, US). 2008Search in Google Scholar
[3] Luchsinger RH, Pedretti M, Reinhard A. Pressure induced stability: from pneumatic structures to Tensairity. J Bionics Eng. 2004;1:141-148.10.1007/BF03399470Search in Google Scholar
[4] Snelson K. The art of tensegrity. Int J Space Structures. 2012;27:71-80.10.1260/0266-3511.27.2-3.71Search in Google Scholar
[5] Arcaro V. A simple procedure for shape finding and analysis of fabric structures. UNICAMP-FEC http://arcaro.org/tension/main.htm. 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Favata A, Micheletti A, Podio-Guidugli P, Pugno NM. Geometry and self-stress of single-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene via a discrete model based on a 2nd-generation REBO potential. J Elas. 2016;125:1–37.10.1007/s10659-015-9568-8Search in Google Scholar
[7] http://www.wintess.comSearch in Google Scholar
[8] Peña DM, Llorens I, Sastre R, Crespo D, Martinez J. Application of tensegrity to tensile-textile constructions: formfinding and structural analysis. In: Proceedings of IASS Symposium 2010 Spatial Structures – Permanent and Temporary (8-12 November 2010, Shanghai, China). 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Micheletti A, Tensegrity modules with orthogonal struts. In: Proceedings of IASS Symposium 2007 Architectural Engineering – Towards the Future Looking to the Past, (3-6 December 2007, Venice, Italy). 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Micheletti A, Cadoni D. Design of single-layer floating-compression tensegrities. In: Proceedings of 10eColloque National en Calcul des Structures (9-13 May 2011, Giens, France). 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Minimalistic Lightweight Construction: Temporary Pavilion in Noda. Detail. 2012;10:1086-8.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Cadoni D, Micheletti A. Structural performances of single-layer tensegrity domes. Int J Space Struct. 2012;27(1-2):167-78.10.1260/0266-3511.27.2-3.167Search in Google Scholar
[13] Gupta SS, Tan YY, Chia PZ, Pambudi CP, Yogiaman C, Tracy KJ. Knit tensegrity shell structures. In: Proceedings of IASS Symposium 2019 Form and Force (7-10 October 2019, Barcelona, Spain). 2019.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Micol Palmieri et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
