Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 14, 2020

The traceback method and the early constructicon: theoretical and methodological considerations

  • Nikolas Koch EMAIL logo , Stefan Hartmann and Antje Endesfelder Quick

Abstract

Usage-based approaches assume that children’s early utterances are item-based. This has been demonstrated in a number of studies using the traceback method. In this approach, a small amount of “target utterances” from a child language corpus is “traced back” to earlier utterances. Drawing on a case study of German, this paper provides a critical evaluation of the method from a usage-based perspective. In particular, we check how factors inherent to corpus data as well as methodological choices influence the results of traceback studies. To this end, we present four case studies in which we change thresholds and the composition of the main corpus, use a cross-corpus approach tracing one child’s utterances back to another child’s corpus, and reverse and randomize the target utterances. Overall, the results show that the method can provide interesting insights—particularly regarding different pathways of language acquisition—but they also show the limitations of the method.


Corresponding author: Nikolas Koch, Institute for German as a Foreign Language, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany, E-mail:

References

Ambridge, Ben & Elena Lieven. 2011. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975073Search in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin & Danielle Matthews. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning. The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19. 241–248.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin & Elena Lieven. 2009. Repetition and reuse in child language learning. In Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Ouali Hamid & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic language: Volume II: Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, functional explanations, 297–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.83.04banSearch in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(41). 17284–17289.10.1073/pnas.0905638106Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21. 2–24.10.1080/01690960400001721Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6). 843–873.10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 2009. First language acquisition, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806698Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2004. Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474466011Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3). 437–474.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437Search in Google Scholar

Koch, Nikolas. 2019. Schemata im Erstspracherwerb: Eine Traceback-Studie für das Deutsche. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110623857Search in Google Scholar

Kol, Sheli, Bracha Nir & Shuly Wintner. 2014. Computational evaluation of the Traceback method. Journal of Child Language 41(1). 176–199.10.1017/S0305000912000694Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Julian M. Pine & Helen D. Barnes. 1992. Individual differences in early vocabulary development: Redefining the referential-expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language 19(2). 287–310.10.1017/S0305000900011429Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares & Michael Tomasello. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30. 333–370.10.1017/S0305000903005592Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Dorothé Salomo & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20. 481–507.10.1515/COGL.2009.022Search in Google Scholar

McCauley, Stewart M. & Morten H. Christiansen. 2017. Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3). 637–652.10.1111/tops.12258Search in Google Scholar

McCauley, Stewart M. & Morten H. Christiansen. 2019. Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review 126(1). 1–51.10.1037/rev0000126Search in Google Scholar

Miorelli, Luca. 2017. The development of Morpho-syntactic competence in Italian-speaking children: A usage-based approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northumbria University. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/39990.Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Anthonissen Lynn. 2020. Individuality in complex systems: A constructionist approach. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 185–212.10.1515/cog-2019-0033Search in Google Scholar

Pine, Julian M. & Lieven Elena. 1993. Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: Individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech. Journal of Child Language 20. 551–571.10.1017/S0305000900008473Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Street, James A. & Dąbrowska Ewa. 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120(8). 2080–2094.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527678Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2006. Acquiring linguistic constructions. In William Damon, Richard M. Lerner, Deanna Kuhn & Robert S. Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language, 255–298. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0206Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2007a. A usage-based approach to child language acquisition. In Benjamin Bergen, Vyvyan Evans & Jörg Zinken (eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader, 834–848. London: Equinox.10.3765/bls.v26i1.1123Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2007b. Cognitive linguistics and first language acquisition. In Dirk Geeraerts & Cuyckens Hubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 1092–1112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0041Search in Google Scholar

Vogt, Paul & Elena Lieven. 2010. Verifying theories of language acquisition using computer models of language evolution. Adaptive Behavior 18(1). 21–35.10.1177/1059712309350970Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2020-0045).


Received: 2020-07-20
Accepted: 2020-11-23
Published Online: 2020-12-14
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cllt-2020-0045/html
Scroll to top button