Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 1, 2005

Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities

  • Volkher Scharnhorst , Joke Apperloo , Henk Baadenhuijsen and Huib L. Vader

Abstract

Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.


Present address: Clinical Chemistry and Hermatology Laboratory, Atrium Medical Center, P.O. Box 4446, 6401 CX Heerlen, The Netherlands; Corresponding author: Volkher Scharnhorst, Clinical Laboratory, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands Fax: +31-45-5766973,

References

1 Kristiansen J, Christensen JM. Traceability and uncertainty in analytical measurements. Ann Clin Biochem 1998; 35:371–9.10.1177/000456329803500305Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2 Panteghini M, Ceriotti F, Schumann G, Siekmann L. Establishing a reference system in clinical enzymology. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001; 39:795–800.10.1515/CCLM.2001.131Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Siekmann L, Bonora R, Burtis CA, Ceriotti F, Clerc-Renaud P, Ferard G, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. Part 1. The concept of reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:631–4.10.1515/CCLM.2002.109Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4 EU Lex. Directive 98/79 EC on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Off J L 1998;331:1–37.Search in Google Scholar

5 Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Clerc-Renaud P, Ferrero CA, Ferard G, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. Part 2. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of creatine kinase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:635–42.10.1515/CCLM.2002.110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Clerc-Renaud P, Ferrero CA, Ferard G, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. Part 3. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of lactate dehydrogenase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:643–8.10.1515/CCLM.2002.111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Ferard G, Ferrero CA, Franck PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 4. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of alanine aminotransferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:718–24.10.1515/CCLM.2002.124Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8 Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Ferard G, Ferrero CA, Franck PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 5. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of aspartate aminotransferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:725–33.10.1515/CCLM.2002.125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9 Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Ferard G, Ferrero CA, Franck PF, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 6. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of gamma-glutamyl transferase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:734–8.Search in Google Scholar

10 Siekmann L, Bonora R, Burtis CA, Ceriotti F, Clerc-Renaud P, Ferard G, et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 7. Certification of four reference materials for the determination of enzymatic activity of gamma-glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase and creatine kinase according to the IFCC reference procedure at 37 degrees C. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:739–45.10.1515/CCLM.2002.127Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Müller MM. Implementation of reference systems in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2000; 46:1907–9.10.1093/clinchem/46.12.1907Search in Google Scholar

12 Cobbaert C, Weykamp C, Baadenhuijsen H, Kuypers A, Lindemans J, Jansen R. Selection, preparation, and characterization of commutable frozen human serum pools as potential secondary reference materials for lipid and apolipoprotein measurements: study within the framework of the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. Clin Chem 2002; 48:1526–38.10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1526Search in Google Scholar

13 Baadenhuijsen H, Steigstra H, Cobbaert C, Kuypers A, Weykamp C, Jansen R. Commutability assessment of potential reference materials using a multicenter split-patient-sample between-field-methods (twin-study) design: study within the framework of the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. Clin Chem 2002; 48:1520–5.10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1520Search in Google Scholar

14 Franck PF, Steen G, Lombarts AJ, Souverijn JH, van Wermeskerken RK. Multicenter harmonization of common enzyme results by fresh patient-pool sera. Clin Chem 1998; 44:614–21.10.1093/clinchem/44.3.614Search in Google Scholar

15 Muller MM. Reference materials: general aspects and IFCC strategy. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Clin Biochem 1998; 31:433–6.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-9-1
Accepted: 2004-9-7
Published Online: 2005-6-1
Published in Print: 2004-12-1

©2004 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 23.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261/html
Scroll to top button