Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 13, 2018

Assessing matrix, interferences and comparability between the Abbott Diagnostics and the Beckman Coulter high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays

  • Peter A. Kavsak EMAIL logo , Paul Malinowski , Chantele Roy , Lorna Clark and Shana Lamers

Abstract

Background:

Analytical evaluation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, with particular attention to imprecision, interferences and matrix effects, at normal cTn concentrations, is of utmost importance as many different clinical algorithms use concentration cutoffs <10 ng/L for decision-making. The objective for the present analytical study was to compare the new Beckman Coulter hs-cTnI assay (Access hsTnI) to Abbott’s hs-cTnI assay in different matrices and for different interferences, with a focus on concentrations <10 ng/L.

Methods:

The limit of blank (LoB) and the limit of detection (LoD) were determined in different matrices for the Beckman hs-cTnI assay. Passing-Bablok regression and difference plots were determined for 200 matched lithium heparin and EDTA plasma samples for the Beckman assay and 200 lithium heparin samples for the Abbott assay. Both EDTA and heparin plasma samples were also evaluated for stability under refrigerated conditions, for endogenous alkaline phosphatase interference and for hemolysis and icterus.

Results:

The Beckman hs-cTnI assay LoB was 0.5 ng/L with the following range of LoDs=0.8–1.2 ng/L, with EDTA plasma yielding lower concentrations as compared to lithium heparin plasma (mean difference=−14.9%; 95% CI=−16.9 to 12.9). Below 10 ng/L, lithium heparin cTnI results from the Beckman assay were on average 1.1 ng/L (95% CI=0.7 to 1.5) higher than the Abbott results, with no difference between the methods when using EDTA plasma (mean difference =−0.1 ng/L; 95% CI=−0.3 to 0.2). Low cTnI concentrations were less effected by interferences in EDTA plasma.

Conclusions:

The Access hsTnI method can reliably detect normal cTnI concentrations with both lithium heparin and EDTA plasma being suitable matrices.


Corresponding author: Dr. Peter A. Kavsak, McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, 711 Concession Street Hamilton, L8V 1C3 ON, Canada; and Core Laboratory, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Phone: 905-521-2100

Acknowledgments

Beckman Coulter for the supplies and funding to perform this study.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Dr. Kavsak has received grants/reagents/consultant/advisor/honoria from Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Diagnostics Division Canada, Beckman Coulter, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Randox Laboratories, Roche Diagnostics and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. McMaster University has filed patents with Dr. Kavsak listed as an inventor in the acute cardiovascular biomarker field. This analytical study was funded by Beckman Coulter.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kavsak PA, MacRae AR, Yerna MJ, Jaffe AS. Analytic and clinical utility of a next-generation, highly sensitive cardiac troponin I assay for early detection of myocardial injury. Clin Chem 2009;55:573–7.10.1373/clinchem.2008.116020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Kavsak PA, Wang X, Ko DT, MacRae AR, Jaffe AS. Short- and long-term risk stratification using a next-generation, high-sensitivity research cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay in an emergency department chest pain population. Clin Chem 2009;55:1809–15.10.1373/clinchem.2009.127241Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Kavsak PA, Xu L, Yusuf S, McQueen MJ. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement for risk stratification in a stable high-risk population. Clin Chem 2011;57:1146–53.10.1373/clinchem.2011.164574Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Kavsak PA, Hill SA, Bhanich Supapol W, Devereaux PJ, Worster A. Biomarkers for predicting serious cardiac outcomes at 72 hours in patients presenting early after chest pain onset with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem 2012;58:298–302.10.1373/clinchem.2011.172064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lippi G, Ferrari A, Gandini G, Gelati M, Lo Cascio C, Salvagno GL. Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;56:157–61.10.1515/cclm-2017-0350Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Masotti S, Prontera C, Musetti V, Storti S, Ndreu R, Zucchelli GC, et al. Evaluation of analytical performance of a new high-sensitivity immunoassay for cardiac troponin I. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:492–501.10.1515/cclm-2017-0387Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Kavsak PA, Jaffe AS, Greene DN, Christenson RH, Apple FS, Wu AH. Total analytic error for low cardiac troponin concentrations (≤10 ng/L) by use of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay. Clin Chem 2017;63:1043–5.10.1373/clinchem.2017.271361Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Badertscher P, Cupa J, et al. Direct comparison of 4 very early rule-out strategies for acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Circulation 2017;135:1597–611.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025661Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Chapman AR, Anand A, Boeddinghaus J, Ferry AV, Sandeman D, Adamson PD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2017;135:1586–96.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Kavsak PA, Shortt C, Ma J, Clayton N, Sherbino J, Hill SA, et al. A laboratory score at presentation to rule-out serious cardiac outcomes or death in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chim Acta 2017;469:69–74.10.1016/j.cca.2017.03.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kavsak P, Roy C, Malinowski P, Mark CT, Scott T, Clark L, et al. Macrocomplexes and discordant high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations. Ann Clin Biochem 2017:4563217734883. doi: 10.1177/0004563217734883.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Kavsak PA, Worster A, Hill SA, MacRae AR, Jaffe AS. Analytical comparison of three different versions of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay over 10 years. Clin Chim Acta 2017;475:51–5.10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kavsak PA, Beattie J, Pickersgill R, Ford L, Caruso N, Clark L. A practical approach for the validation and clinical implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay across a North American city. Pract Lab Med 2015;1:28–34.10.1016/j.plabm.2015.02.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Herman DS, Ranjitkar P, Yamaguchi D, Grenache DG, Greene DN. Endogenous alkaline phosphatase interference in cardiac troponin I and other sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassays that use alkaline phosphatase activity for signal amplification. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1118–21.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Simons J, Beach L, Clark L, Kavsak PA. Matrix and bilirubin interference for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Clin Chim Acta 2015;442:49–51.10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-12-4
Accepted: 2018-1-17
Published Online: 2018-3-13
Published in Print: 2018-6-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1122/html
Scroll to top button