Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 18, 2016

Immunoassay interference caused by heterophilic antibodies interacting with biotin

  • Michel J. Vos EMAIL logo , Jan M.M. Rondeel , G. Sophie Mijnhout and Erik Endert

Corresponding author: Michel J. Vos, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, PO box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kroll MH, Elin RJ. Interference with clinical laboratory analyses. Clin Chem 1994;40:1996–2005.10.1093/clinchem/40.11.1996Search in Google Scholar

2. Levinson SS, Miller JJ. Towards a better understanding of heterophile (and the like) antibody interference with modern immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 2002;325:1–15.10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00275-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Creighton WD, Lambert PH, Miescher PA. Detection of antibodies and soluble antigen-antibody complexes by precipitation with polyethylene glycol. J Immunol 1973;111:1219–27.10.4049/jimmunol.111.4.1219Search in Google Scholar

4. Bjerner J, Olsen KH, Børmer OP, Nustad K. Human heterophilic antibodies display specificity for murine IgG sub-classes. Clin Biochem 2005;38:465–72.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Heijboer AC, Ijzerman RG, Bouman AA, Blankenstein MA. Two cases of antiruthenium antibody interference in modular free thyroxine assay. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:263–4.10.1258/acb.2009.008258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Ando T, Yasui J, Inokuchi N, Usa T, Ashizawa K, Kamihara S, et al. Non-specific activities against ruthenium cross-linker as a new cause of assay interference in an electro-chemilluminescent immunoassay. Intern Med 2007;46:1225–9.10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0188Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Rulander NJ, Cardamone D, Senior M, Snyder PJ, Master SR. Interference from anti-streptavidin antibody. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013;137:1141–6.10.5858/arpa.2012-0270-CRSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Waghray A, Milas M, Nyalakonda K, Siperstein AE. Falsely low parathyroid hormone secondary to biotin interference: a case series. Endocr Pract 2013;19:451–5.10.4158/EP12158.ORSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Barbesino G. Misdiagnosis of Graves’ Disease with apparent severe hyperthyroidism in a patient taking biotin megadoses. Thyroid 2016;6:860–3.10.1089/thy.2015.0664Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Chen T, Hedman L, Mattila PS, Jartti L, Jartti T, Ruuskanen O, et al. Biotin IgM antibodies in human blood: a previously unknown factor eliciting false results in biotinylation-based immunoassays. PLoS One 2012;7: e42376.10.1371/journal.pone.0042376Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-9-5
Accepted: 2016-9-13
Published Online: 2016-10-18
Published in Print: 2017-6-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0786/html
Scroll to top button