Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 6, 2016

Quality of reporting of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical laboratory journals

  • Valentina Pecoraro EMAIL logo , Rita Banzi and Tommaso Trenti

Corresponding author: Valentina Pecoraro, Laboratory of Toxicology, Clinical Pathology and Advanced Diagnostic, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ospedale Sant’Agostino Estense, Via Pietro Giardini 1355, 41126, Modena, Italy; and Laboratory of Drug Regulatory Policies, I.R.C.C.S. – Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy, Phone: +390593961467

  1. Author contributions: All authors contributed to the execution of the review. VP and TT conceived and designed the study. VP designed and implemented the search strategies. VP and RB selected studies, assessed validity, and extracted data. VP and RB evaluated the data. All authors interpreted the data, prepared the full review and contributed to its revision, interpretation of results, and approval. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383:267–76.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-XSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bossuyt PM. The quality of reporting in diagnostic test research: getting better, still not optimal. Clin Chem 2004;50:465–6.10.1373/clinchem.2003.029736Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:W1–12.10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Br Med J 2015;351:h5527.10.1136/bmj.h5527Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47–54.10.1136/eb-2013-101637Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM. Reporting the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative 10 years on. Clin Chem 2013;59:917–9.10.1373/clinchem.2013.206516Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189–202.10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-2-29
Accepted: 2016-2-29
Published Online: 2016-4-6
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0164/html
Scroll to top button