Abstract
Background: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is widely used for the monitoring of glycemic balance in diabetic patients and has also been proposed as a tool for the diagnostic of diabetes mellitus. Accordingly, HbA1c quantification must be performed using robust, reliable and efficient methods. Here are reported the results of the evaluation of a new high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system for HbA1c quantification, the D-100TM system from Bio-Rad Laboratories.
Methods: The analytical performances of the method as well as the influence of the most frequent interferences regarding HbA1c assays (e.g., labile HbA1c, carbamylated hemoglobin, high HbF) have been tested.
Results: Intra- and between-assay CVs were respectively lower than 0.93% and 1.46% (HbA1c results expressed in NGSP units) and lower than 1.67% and 2.27% (HbA1c results expressed in IFCC units). The linearity proved to be excellent from 15 mmol/mol (3.5%) to 184 mmol/mol (19.0%) (r=0.999). The results were well correlated with those obtained by another HPLC method (VARIANTTM II Hemoglobin A1c Program reorder pack 270-2101NU-Bio-Rad): HbA1c[VARIANTTM II, mmol/mol]=1.013×HbA1c[D-100TM, mmol/mol]+0.637 (r=0.993, n=2000). The D-100TM system provided results consistent with IFCC-assigned external quality control samples and the presence of labile HbA1c, carbamylated hemoglobin and HbF did not interfere with HbA1c measurement.
Conclusions: The D-100 TM system proved to be a robust and reliable method for HbA1c measurement suitable for routine practice in clinical chemistry laboratories.
References
1. The International Expert Committe. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1327–34.10.2337/dc09-9033Search in Google Scholar
2. Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Kirkman MS, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2011;57:e1–47.10.1373/clinchem.2010.161596Search in Google Scholar
3. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86.10.1056/NEJM199309303291401Search in Google Scholar
4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–53.10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6Search in Google Scholar
5. Hoelzel W, Weykamp C, Jeppsson JO, Miedema K, Barr JR, Goodall I, et al. IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: a method-comparison study. Clin Chem 2004;50:166–74.10.1373/clinchem.2003.024802Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Jeppsson JO, Kobold U, Barr J, Finke A, Hoelzel W, Hoshino T, et al. Approved IFCC reference method for the measurement of HbA1c in human blood. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:78–89.10.1515/CCLM.2002.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Sacks DB. Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem 2011;57:205–14.10.1373/clinchem.2010.148841Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Weykamp CW, Mosca A, Gillery P, Panteghini M. The analytical goals for hemoglobin A1c measurement in IFCC units and National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program Units are different. Clin Chem 2011;57:1204–6.10.1373/clinchem.2011.162719Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Lin CN, Emery TJ, Little RR, Hanson SE, Rohlfing CL, Jaisson S, et al. Effects of hemoglobin C, D, E, and S traits on measurements of HbA1c by six methods. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:819–21.10.1016/j.cca.2011.12.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2015 by De Gruyter
