Abstract
Background: In fetal surveillance, fetal heart rate changes are assessed using cardiotocography (CTG). Standard procedures used in the quantification of heart rate variability (HRV) are seldom applied as CTG does not deliver beat interval durations with the same accuracy as the electrocardiogram (ECG). Thus little is known about the interdependency of standard HRV measures prenatally.
Materials and methods: Using fetal magnetocardiography (FMCG: the magnetic equivalent of the fetal ECG), we investigated standard HRV measures in a homogenous group of 20 healthy fetuses. Ten HRV measures were analyzed in 60 five-minute RR interval time series derived from FMCG acquisitions (16th–40th week of gestation).
Results: Using regression analysis, we found a clear dependency on gestational age and mean RR interval for measures from the time and frequency domains as well as for a measure for complexity. Correlation analysis revealed a strong interdependency of the measures, in particular within the specific domains. An adequate description of fetal HRV may be achieved using the standard deviation from the time domain, the high frequency band (0.15–0.40 Hz) from the frequency domain and approximate entropy as a complexity measure.
Conclusion: The results indicate that different characteristics of fetal HRV are embedded in the different domains.
References
[1] Camm AJ, Malik M, Bigger T, et al. [Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology]. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation1996; 93: 1043–1065.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Courtemanche M, Talajic M, Kaplan D. Multiparameter quantification of 24-hour heart rate variability. IEEE Comput Cardiol 1992; 299–302.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Hirsch M, Karin J, Akselrod S. Heart rate variability in the fetus. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, editors. Heart rate variability. New York: Futura Publishing 1995: 517–531.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Janssen MJA, Swenne CA, de Bie J, Rompelman O, van Bemmel JH. Methods of heart rate variability analysis: which tachogram should we use? Comput Methods Programs Biomed1993; 41: 1–8.10.1016/0169-2607(93)90061-OSearch in Google Scholar
[5] Lange S, Van Leeuwen P, Geue D, Hatzmann W, Grönemeyer D. Influence of gestational age, heart rate, gender and time of day on fetal heart rate variability. Med Biol Eng Comput2005; 43: 481–486.10.1007/BF02344729Search in Google Scholar
[6] Pillai M, James D. The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol1990; 76: 812–816.10.1097/00006250-199011000-00017Search in Google Scholar
[7] Pincus SM, Viscarello RR. Approximate entropy: a regularity measure for fetal heart rate analysis. Obstet Gynecol1992; 79: 249–255.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Street P, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol1991; 165: 515–523.10.1016/0002-9378(91)90277-XSearch in Google Scholar
[9] Van Leeuwen P, Geue D, Lange S, Hatzmann W, Grönemeyer, D. Changes in the frequency power spectrum of fetal heart rate in the course of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn2003; 23: 909–916.10.1002/pd.723Search in Google Scholar
[10] Van Leeuwen P, Lange S, Bettermann H, Grönemeyer D, Hatzmann W. Fetal heart rate variability and complexity in the course of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev1999; 54: 259–269.10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00102-9Search in Google Scholar
[11] Visser GH, Dawes GS, Redman CW. Numerical analysis of the normal human antenatal fetal heart rate. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1981; 88: 792–802.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb01305.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
