Abstract
With over 150,000 implantations performed over the world, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a surgical technique, which largely competes with open surgery valve replacement for an increasing number of patients. The success of the procedure favors the research toward synthetic valve leaflet materials as an alternative to biological tissues, whose durability remains unknown. In particular, fibrous constructions have recently proven to be durable in vivo over a 6-month period of time in animal sheep models. Exaggerated fibrotic tissue formation remains, however, a critical issue to be addressed. This work investigates the design of a composite fibrous construction combining a woven polyethylene terephthalate (PET) layer and a non-woven PET mat, which are expected to provide, respectively, strength and appropriate topography toward limited fibrotic tissue ingrowth. For this purpose, a specific equipment has been developed to produce non-woven PET mats made from fibers with small diameter. These mats were assembled with woven PET substrates using various assembling techniques in order to obtain hybrid fibrous constructions. The physical and mechanical properties of the obtained materials were assessed and valve samples were manufactured to be tested in vitro for hydrodynamic performances. The results show that the composite fibrous construction is characterized by properties suitable for the valve leaflet function, but the durability of the assembling is however limited under accelerated cyclic loading.
Author Statement
Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.
Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.
References
[1] McCabe JM, Huang PH, Cohen DJ, Blackstone EH, Welt FG, Davidson MJ, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous femoral access for delivery of large-bore cardiovascular devices (from the PARTNER Trial). Am J Cardiol 2016;117:1643–50.10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Cribier A. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006–8.10.1161/01.CIR.0000047200.36165.B8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, De Backer O, Delgado V, Arai T, Ziegelmueller J, et al. Outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2579–89.10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Dijkman PE, Fioretta ES, Frese L, Pasqualini FS, Hoerstrup SP. Heart valve replacements with regenerative capacity. Transfus Med Hemother 2016;43:282–90.10.1159/000448181Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M, Sleilaty G, Lafont A, Latrémouille C, et al. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:579–84.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Kiefer P, Gruenwald F, Kempfert J, Aupperle H, Seeburger J, Mohr FW, et al. Crimping may affect the durability of transcatheter valves: an experimental analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:155–60.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Alavi SH, Groves EM, Kheradvar A. The effects of transcatheter valve crimping on pericardial leaflets. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1260–6.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Dvir D. Half of transcatheter heart valves show degeneration within 10 years of TAVI. EuroPCR 2016. Session: tuesday 17 May 11.20–12.20, Late-breaking trials, registries and innovations.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Vaesken A, Heim F, Chakfe N. Fiber heart valve prosthesis: influence of the fabric construction parameters on the valve fatigue performances. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;40:69–74.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Cao H, McHugh K, Chew SY, Anderson JM. The topographical effect of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds on the in vivo and in vitro foreign body reaction. J Biomed Mater Res 2010;93A:1151–9.10.1002/jbm.a.32609Search in Google Scholar
[11] Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Buján J, Palomares D, Carrera-San Martín A. Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Biomaterials 1998;19:669–75.10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00162-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 1998;19:2235–46.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00115-XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005;2:103–17.10.1586/17434440.2.1.103Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Vaesken A, Pelle A, Pavon-Djavid G, Rancic J, Chakfe N, Heim F. Heart valves from polyester fibers: a preliminary 6-month in vivo study. Biomed Eng/Biomed Tech 2018;63:271–8.10.1515/bmt-2016-0242Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Tian F, Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Yokoyama Y, Estrada GG, et al. Quantitative analysis of cell adhesion on aligned micro- and nanofibers. J Biomed Mater Res 2008;84A:291–9.10.1002/jbm.a.31304Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Lowery JL, Datta N, Rutledge GC. Effect of fiber diameter, pore size and seeding method on growth of human dermal fibroblasts in electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) fibrous mats. Biomaterials 2010;31:491–504.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Sanders JE, Cassisi DV, Neumann T, Golledge SL, Zachariah SG, Ratner BD, et al. Relative influence of polymer fiber diameter and surface charge on fibrous capsule thickness and vessel density for single-fiber implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2003;65:462–7.10.1002/jbm.a.10525Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Hodgkinson T, Yuan XF, Bayat A. Electrospun silk fibroin fiber diameter influences in vitro dermal fibroblast behavior and promotes healing of ex vivo wound models. J Tissue Eng 2014;5:1–13.10.1177/2041731414551661Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Haller N, Hollweck T, Thierfelder N, Schulte J, Hausherr JM, Dauner M, et al. Noninvasive analysis of synthetic and decellularized scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering. ASAIO J 2013;59:169–77.10.1097/MAT.0b013e31827db6b6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H, Sienkiewicz M. Fabrication of polyurethane and polyurethane based composite fibres by the electrospinning technique for soft tissue engineering of cardiovascular system. Mater Sci Eng 2015;C46:166–76.10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Amoroso NJ, D’Amore A, Hong Y, Rivera CP, Sacks MS, Wagner WR. Microstructural manipulation of electrospun scaffolds for specific bending stiffness for heart valve tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 2012;8:4268–77.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] Heim F, Durand B, Chakfe N. Textile heart valve prosthesis: manufacturing process and prototype performances. Text Res J 2008;78:1124–31.10.1177/0040517508092007Search in Google Scholar
[23] Heim F, Gupta B. Textile heart valve prosthesis: the effect of fabric construction parameters on long term durability. Text Res J 2009;79:1001–13.10.1177/0040517507101457Search in Google Scholar
[24] Kwon IK, Kidoaki S, Matsuda T. Electrospun nano- to microfiber fabrics made of biodegradable copolyesters: structural characteristics, mechanical properties and cell adhesion potential. Biomaterials 2005;26:3929–39.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Wong SC, Baji A, Leng S. Effect of fiber diameter on tensile properties of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone). Polymer 2008;49:4713–22.10.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.022Search in Google Scholar
[26] Bhat G, Malkan S. Polymer-laid web formation. In: Russel SJ, editor. Handbook of nonwovens. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd. 2007:143–200.10.1533/9781845691998.143Search in Google Scholar
[27] Dutton KC. Overview and analysis of the meltblown process and parameters. J Text Apparel Technol Manage 2008;6:1–24.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Nayak R, Padhye R, Arnold L, Kyratzis IL, Truong YB, Peeters G, et al. Mechanism of nanofibre fabrication by meltblowing. Appl Mech Mater 2012;217:207–12.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.207Search in Google Scholar
[29] Ristovski N, Bock N, Liao S, Powell SK, Ren J, Kirby GT, et al. Improved fabrication of melt electrospun tissue engineering scaffolds using direct writing and advanced electric field control. Biointerphases 2015;10:011006.10.1116/1.4914380Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Brown T, Dalton P, Hutmacher D. Melt electrospinning today: an opportune time for an emerging polymer process. Prog Polym Sci 2016;56:116–66.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.01.001Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
