Abstract
Gait analysis is an important and useful part of the daily therapeutic routine. InvestiGAIT, an inertial sensor-based system, was developed for using in different research projects with a changing number and position of sensors and because commercial systems do not capture the motion of the upper body. The current study is designed to evaluate the reliability of InvestiGAIT consisting of four off-the-shelf inertial sensors and in-house capturing and analysis software. Besides the determination of standard gait parameters, the motion of the upper body (pelvis and spine) can be investigated. Kinematic data of 25 healthy individuals (age: 25.6±3.3 years) were collected using a test-retest design with 1 week between measurement sessions. We calculated different parameters for absolute [e.g. limits of agreement (LoA)] and relative reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)]. Our results show excellent ICC values for most of the gait parameters. Midswing height (MH), height difference (HD) of initial contact (IC) and terminal contact (TC) and stride length (SL) are the gait parameters, which did not exhibit acceptable values representing absolute reliability. Moreover, the parameters derived from the motion of the upper body (pelvis and spine) show excellent ICC values or high correlations. Our results indicate that InvestiGAIT is suitable for reliable measurement of almost all the considered gait parameters.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the students who took part in the experiments.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
References
[1] Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217–238.10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Azad P. Visual perception for manipulation and imitation in humanoid robots. Cognitive systems monographs 4. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-04229-4Search in Google Scholar
[3] Barak Y, Wagenaar RC, Holt KG. Gait characteristics of elderly people with a history of falls: a dynamic approach. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 1501–1510.10.2522/ptj.20050387Search in Google Scholar
[4] Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307–309.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001Search in Google Scholar
[5] Bolink SAAN, Naisas H, Senden R, et al. Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system. Med Eng Phys 2016; 38: 225–231.10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assessment 1994; 6: 284–290.10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284Search in Google Scholar
[7] Cole MH, van den Hoorn W, Kavanagh JK, et al. Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces. PLoS One 2014; 9: e98395.10.1371/journal.pone.0098395Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Coutts F. Gait analysis in the therapeutic environment. Man Ther 1999; 4: 2–10.10.1016/S1356-689X(99)80003-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1033–1039.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Fong DT-P, Chan Y-Y. The use of wearable inertial motion sensors in human lower limb biomechanics studies: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel) 2010; 10: 11556–11565.10.3390/s101211556Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] Greene BR, McGrath D, O’Neill R, O’Donovan KJ, Burns A, Caulfield B. An adaptive gyroscope-based algorithm for temporal gait analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010; 48: 1251–1260.10.1007/s11517-010-0692-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Schega L. A cognitive dual task affects gait variability in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Exp Brain Res 2014; 232: 3509–3513.10.1007/s00221-014-4039-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Taylor WR, Singh NB, Schega L. Towards clinical application: repetitive sensor position re-calibration for improved reliability of gait parameters. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 1146–1148.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Hamacher D, Singh NB, Van Dieen JH, Heller MO, Taylor WR. Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review. J R Soc Interface 2011; 8: 1682–1698.10.1098/rsif.2011.0416Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test–retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 2004; 19: 288–297.10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00069-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Horak FB, Mancini M. Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson’s disease using body-worn sensors. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 1544–1551.10.1002/mds.25684Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] Horak F, King L, Mancini M. Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 461–470.10.2522/ptj.20140253Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Hsu Y-L, Chung P-CJ, Wang W-H, et al. Gait and balance analysis for patients with Alzheimer’s disease using an inertial-sensor-based wearable instrument. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2014; 18: 1822–1830.10.1109/JBHI.2014.2325413Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Hundza SR, Hook WR, Harris CR, et al. Accurate and reliable gait cycle detection in Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2014; 22: 127–137.10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2282080Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Ijmker T, Lamoth CJ. Gait and cognition: the relationship between gait stability and variability with executive function in persons with and without dementia. Gait Posture 2012; 35: 126–130.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait Posture 2008; 28: 1–15.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Kavanagh JJ, Morrison S, James DA, Barrett R. Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2863–2872.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Mannini A and Sabatini AM. Gait phase detection and discrimination between walking-jogging activities using hidden Markov models applied to foot motion data from a gyroscope. Gait Posture 2012; 36: 657–661.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Mariani B, Hoskovec C, Rochat S, Bula C, Penders J, Aminian K. 3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2999–3006.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[25] Meldrum D, Shouldice C, Conroy R, Jones K, Forward M. Test-retest reliability of three dimensional gait analysis: including a novel approach to visualising agreement of gait cycle waveforms with Bland and Altman plots. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 265–271.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.130Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 137–142.10.1093/ageing/32.2.137Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Moe-Nilssen R. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1377–1385.10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90231-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors (Basel) 2014; 14: 3362–3394.10.3390/s140203362Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[29] Orlowski K, Loose H. Evaluation of KINECT and SHIMMER sensors for detection of gait parameters. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 2013: 157–162.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Orlowski K, Loose H, Eckardt F, Edelmann-Nusser J, Witte K. Evaluation of gait parameters determined by InvestiGAIT against a reference system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 2016: 256–262.10.5220/0005783502560262Search in Google Scholar
[31] Reininga IHF, Stevens M, Wagenmakers R, Bulstra SK, Groothoff JW, Zijlstra W. Subjects with hip osteoarthritis show distinctive patterns of trunk movements during gait-a body-fixed-sensor based analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 3.10.1186/1743-0003-9-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[32] Richards JG. The measurement of human motion. A comparison of commercially available systems. Hum Movement Sci 1999; 18: 589–602.10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00023-8Search in Google Scholar
[33] Sabatini AM. Quaternion-based strap-down integration method for applications of inertial sensing to gait analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005; 43: 94–101.10.1007/BF02345128Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Schwesig R, Kauert R, Wust S, Becker S, Leuchte S. Reliabilitätsstudie zum Ganganalysesystem RehaWatch. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomed Eng 2010; 55: 109–115.10.1515/bmt.2010.025Search in Google Scholar
[35] Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–428.10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] Simon SR. Quantification of human motion: gait analysis-benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. J Biomech 2004; 37: 1869–1880.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] Spain RI, St. George RJ, Salarian A, et al. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture 2012; 35: 573–578.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Thaler-Kall K, Peters A, Thorand B, et al. Description of spatio-temporal gait parameters in elderly people and their association with history of falls: results of the population-based cross-sectional KORA-Age study. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 256.10.1186/s12877-015-0032-1Search in Google Scholar
[39] Wentink EC, Schut VGH, Prinsen EC, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. Detection of the onset of gait initiation using kinematic sensors and EMG in transfemoral amputees. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 391–396.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Whittle MW. Clinical gait analysis: a review. Hum Movement Sci 1996; 15: 369–387.10.1016/0167-9457(96)00006-1Search in Google Scholar
[41] Zijlstra A, Goosen JHM, Verheyen CCPM, Zijlstra W. A body-fixed-sensor based analysis of compensatory trunk movements during unconstrained walking. Gait Posture 2008; 27: 164–167.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
