Abstract
Hydration of water affects the dynamics and in turn the activity of biomacromolecules. We investigated the dependence of the librational oscillations and the dynamical transition on the hydrating conditions of two globular proteins with different structure and size, namely β-lactoglobulin (βLG) and human serum albumin (HSA), by spin-label electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) in the temperature range of 120–270 K. The proteins were spin-labeled with 5-maleimide spin-label on free cysteins and prepared in the lyophilized state, at low (h = 0.12) and full (h = 2) hydration levels in buffer. The angular amplitudes of librations are small and almost temperature independent for both lyophilized proteins. Therefore, in these samples, the librational dynamics is restricted and the dynamical transition is absent. In the small and compact beta-structured βLG, the angular librational amplitudes increase with temperature and hydrating conditions, whereas hydration-independent librational oscillations whose amplitudes rise with temperature are recorded in the large and flexible alpha-structured HSA. Both βLG and HSA at low and fully hydration levels undergo the dynamical transition at about 230 K. The overall results indicate that protein librational dynamics is activated at the low hydration level h = 0.12 and highlight biophysical properties that are common to other biosamples at cryogenic temperatures.
Introduction
Since the seminal work of Frauenfelder and coworkers, it is well accepted that biomacromolecule dynamics is affected by the hydration level of the medium, and this plays a key role in regulating several molecular aspects of the structure/function relationship in biosystems [1,2,3,4]. A molecular motion whose characteristics depend on the water content is the librational motion, consisting of rapid vibrations of small amplitude [5,6]. Librational oscillations are readily detected at low, cryogenic temperatures, such as those reached with liquid nitrogen down to 77 K or with helium below 77 K, when large-amplitude motions are suppressed. They are present also at higher physiological temperatures and are relevant for functionally important processes in biosamples. Indeed, librations can be involved in the transitions among conformational substates in proteins, in ions conduction, and ligand migration within macromolecules; also, librations in the lipid environment can be coupled to solvent-mediated transitions in membrane proteins [3,4,7,8,9,10]. Rapid librations are also important for the cryopreservation of biological tissues and genetic materials [11].
Librational motion has been found to occur in several proteins, including soluble globular proteins, membrane proteins, and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) [4,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], nucleic acids [22,23], lipid bilayers [24,25,26,27,28,29,30], and natural membranes [7,8,10]. The low-temperature librational dynamics in biosystems is properly studied by using X-ray diffraction and neutron scattering techniques [1,3,4,6,17,20,23,28] and methods of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy [19,21,24,25,29]. Other spectroscopic techniques, such as Raman [25,31], Mossbauer [3,4], dielectric relaxation [4,23,32], and nuclear magnetic resonance [33,34] as well as differential scanning calorimetry [32] and computational investigations (e.g., [7,20,22,35]) have provided findings on low-temperature dynamics at different time, length, and energy scales.
Interesting insights into the librational motion of various hydrated supramolecular complexes and non-biological samples are obtained from neutron and EPR techniques. Indeed, the temperature dependence of the mean-square atomic displacement 〈r 2〉 in scattering measurements [3,4,6,20,28,35] is quite similar to that of the mean-square angular amplitude 〈α 2〉 measured by EPR [18,19,21,25,27,29]. Both 〈r 2〉 and 〈α 2〉 are first weakly and linearly dependent on temperature and then increase sharply at a temperature T d called dynamical transition temperature. The nature of the dynamical transition is a discussed topic in the biophysics literature [3,18,20]. It has been associated with the transition from harmonic vibrations to anharmonic large-amplitude motions [e.g., ref. 20], and depending on the sample type and experimental conditions, T d lies in the 190–240 K interval.
Quite generally, in biosamples, the librational dynamics is restricted and the dynamical transition is absent in the dry state, whereas the librations and the transition are activated by the presence of water molecules [4,12,13,14,15,17,20,21,28,30]. Within this contest, in the literature, there are data which link the characteristics of the librational motion to the hydrating conditions of biosystems having different structure and function. The findings vary widely. Indeed, significant differences have been found in the dynamics of proteins [4,14,17] and in that of proteins and nucleic acids [22,23] as a function of water content. Moreover, at the same level of hydration, small differences are observed in the mean square displacements of diverse sized globular proteins, whereas a greater motional flexibility is detected in the IDP tau compared to the globular folded maltose binding protein [16]. Also, Dzuba and coworkers reported that the temperature differently affected the dynamics of lysozyme and that of IDP casein both in the dehydrated and hydrated state [21].
In this work, we focus on the effects of the hydration level on the librational dynamics of two model globular soluble proteins, namely β-lactoglobulin (βLG) and human serum albumin (HSA). βLG is the most abundant protein in the milk of different mammalians, not including humans, and it is involved in the binding and transport of hydrophobic and amphiphilic molecules [36]. HSA is the principal extracellular protein with a high concentration in blood plasma where it performs several functions, and in particular binds, stores, and delivers to target sites a wide variety of exogenous and endogenous molecules, drugs, and metals [37]. The two proteins have different structures, mainly α-helical for HSA and β-sheets for βLG, and size (162 residues, 18.4 kDa for βLG and 585 residues, 66 kDa for HSA) (Figure 1).
![Figure 1
Crystal structure of βLG (PDB ID 3NPO; [38]) and HSA (PDB ID 1AO6; [39]). Cysteins in the proteins are indicated with the ball-and-stick model. The structure of 5-MSL is also given.](/document/doi/10.1515/bmc-2022-0007/asset/graphic/j_bmc-2022-0007_fig_001.jpg)
We aim at investigating the angular librations and detecting the dynamical transition in the proteins in the lyophilized state, at low (h = 0.12) and full (h = 2) hydration levels in aqueous buffer, where the degree of hydration, h, is defined as the weight ratio of water to protein. The study has been carried out in the temperature range of 120–270 K by using spin-label EPR on proteins covalently spin-labeled with the maleimide nitroxide derivative 5-MSL on the single free cysteine residue located at the protein–water interfaces: Cys121 in βLG and Cys34 in HSA.
The EPR results show similarities and differences in the low-temperature librational dynamics of βLG and HSA under different hydrating conditions.
Materials and methods
Materials
Fatty acid-free and globulin-free albumin from human serum (HSA, type A-3782, purity approximately 99%), beta lactoglobulin from bovine milk (βLG, type L3908, purity > 90%), the nitroxide derivative of maleimide, and 3-maleimido-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy (5-MSL) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) solution (10 mM and pH 7.4), also from Sigma-Aldrich, was used throughout to prepare all the protein solutions.
Sample preparation
Proteins were spin-labeled covalently on the unique free sulfhydryl group by reaction with the spin-label 5-MSL as reported elsewhere [10,40]. Briefly, 5-MSL dried down from ethanol was mixed with the proteins in solution (protein concentration = 5 mM) at a five-fold molar excess. The mixtures were incubated for 24 h at 4°C with gentle stirring. Excess free spin label was then separated from the spin-labeled proteins by extensive dialysis at 4°C against the same buffer until no free spin-label was detected in the EPR spectra of the dialysis medium. After covalent labeling, proteins were prepared in the freeze-dried lyophilized state, at low (h = 0.12) and full (h = 2) hydration levels in DPBS, where the hydration level h = g water/g protein is expressed as gram of water per gram of protein.
EPR
EPR measurements were carried out on an ESP-300 9 GHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with a ER 4111VT temperature controller and with a ER4201 TE102 rectangular cavity (both from Bruker). Standard 3 mm EPR quartz sample tubes were centered in the cavity and spectra were recorded on heating from 120 to 270 K by evaporating liquid nitrogen. The following spectrometer settings were used: 100 kHz field modulation frequency, 2–3 Gp–p peak-to-peak modulation amplitude, 10 mW microwave power, 332.5 mT central magnetic field, 11 mT in 3 min sweep width rate, and 82 ms time constant. Spectra were accumulated several times to improve signal-to-noise ratio.
Data reproducibility were assessed by repeating the experiments two or three times.
Results and discussion
EPR spectra of spin-labeled βLG and HSA: temperature and hydrating conditions affect the spectral anisotropy
EPR spectra, at selected temperatures, of spin-labeled βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL in the lyophilized, low and fully hydrated states are reported in Figure 2.
EPR spectra at selected temperatures of βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL at differing hydration states: lyophilized and low hydration and full hydration levels.
On the whole, the spectra are anisotropic powder patterns typical of immobilized nitroxides and indicative of covalent spin-label binding to the proteins. Moreover, the spectral lineshapes change only a little with temperature and hydrating conditions. Specifically, at the lowest temperatures, the spectra of both proteins are characterized by large spectral widths and broad lines with the spectral anisotropy changing in the order: lyophilized < low hydration < full hydration. For lyophilized proteins, the spectral anisotropy moderately reduces and the linewidths narrow only at the highest temperatures. For hydrated proteins, from T > 200 K, the spectra progressively narrow and achieve sharper lineshapes at the highest temperatures, more in the fully hydrated conditions than in the low hydrated conditions.
Hydration influences the 2〈A zz 〉 temperature dependence for βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL
A quantitative evaluation of the influence of hydration on the spectral anisotropy can be obtained from the temperature dependence of the motionally averaged 14N-hyperfine splitting, 2〈A zz 〉, that is the separation between the outer resonances in the EPR spectra (Figure 2). This spectral parameter reflects the amplitude and the rate of motion in all motional regimes of the EPR timescale [41]. It correlates with the spectral anisotropy: the larger the anisotropy, the greater the 2〈A zz 〉; it also relates to the mean-square angular amplitude of librational motion (equation (1) given in Section Hydration level impacts on the 〈α 2〉 temperature dependence for βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL): a decrease in 2〈A zz 〉 corresponds to an increase in the librational amplitudes [5,42].
By comparing the temperature dependence of 2〈A zz 〉 in the two panels in Figure 3, it can be seen that the hyperfine separation has an almost constant value of about 6.90 mT in both lyophilized proteins, although it slightly decreases in βLG on increasing the temperature.
Temperature dependence of the outermost hyperfine separation, 2〈A zz 〉, for βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL at differing hydration conditions: lyophilized (triangles), low hydration (circles), and full hydration (squares).
Moreover, the 2〈A zz 〉 temperature dependence in the proteins at low and full hydration levels is not monotonic: for T < 200 K, the 2〈A zz 〉 values increase with temperature, more rapidly in HSA than in βLG; for T ≥ 200 K, the 2〈A zz 〉 values decrease with temperature as a result of progressive motional narrowing by librations [42]. The rate of this decrease is similar for HSA at low and full hydration whereas it increases with hydration for βLG; the two fully hydrated proteins show the same temperature decrease in the 2〈A zz 〉 values.
The almost temperature independence of 2〈A zz 〉 in the lyophilized proteins indicates that the mobility is restricted in the dry state; in contrast, the mobility intensifies (i.e., 2〈A zz 〉 decreases) in the high temperature regime for both hydrated proteins, the extent being hydration independent for HSA, whereas it increases with hydration for βLG. These findings clearly indicate that protein dynamics is activated in the presence of a low number of water molecules.
The increase in 2〈A zz 〉 in the low-temperature interval for the two spin-labeled proteins at low and full hydration levels is anomalous. Most probably it is due to the contribution to the outer hyperfine splitting from the environmental polarity [41,43] and the temperature dependence of the hydrogen-bonded water [44]. A similar behavior has been reported for fully hydrated HSA complexed with stearic acids [45] or prepared in different amount of hydration water molecules [46], and on lipid membranes spin-labeled in the upper hydrocarbon region [24].
Hydration level impacts on the 〈α 2〉 temperature dependence for βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL
From the motionally averaged hyperfine splittings, 2〈A zz 〉, can be derived the mean-square angular amplitude of librations, 〈α 2〉, for the spin labeled proteins according to the following equation [5,42]:
where A
xx
and A
zz
are the principal values of the hyperfine interaction tensor.
The temperature dependence of 〈α 2〉 for the βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL samples are reported in Figure 4.
Temperature dependence of the mean-square librational amplitude, 〈α 2〉, for βLG/5-MSL and HSA/5-MSL at differing hydration conditions: lyophilized (triangles), low hydration (circles), and full hydration (squares). Inset: Difference, Δ〈α 2〉 = 〈α 2〉 (hydrated) − 〈α 2〉 (lyophilized), between 〈α 2〉 values for the hydrated (fully and low) and lyophilized proteins.
The plots of 〈α 2〉 give results consistent with those of 2〈A zz 〉. Indeed, from Figure 4 it can be seen that in the lyophilized proteins, the angular amplitude maintains small and constant values of about 6–7° in βLG and about 3° in HSA in the whole temperature range. In the hydrated proteins, after an initial constant and low 〈α 2〉 values, the angular librational amplitude starts to rise rapidly at the same temperature of about 230 K in both HSA and βLG. The temperature behavior of 〈α 2〉 in both proteins at h = 2 is similar to that recorded for spin-labeled stearic acids associated with HSA [45] and βLG [47]. The different temperature dependence of the mean-square librational amplitude between lyophilized and hydrated proteins (i.e., restricted vs activated) is in accordance with previous results obtained with EPR [15,19,21]. It is also in agreement with neutron scattering data of the mean-square atomic displacement [3,14,16,17,20].
From the EPR results in Figure 4, another feature can be pointed out for βLG: at the lowest temperatures, the librational amplitudes increase with hydration level in the order: low hydration ≈ full hydration < lyophilized state, whereas at the highest temperatures they become larger in the order: lyophilized < low hydration < full hydration. In other words, hydration water hinders βLG dynamics at low temperatures and favors it at high temperatures. A similar behavior is reported for the barel-like green fluorescent protein [17] and, to a minor extent, for other proteins such as lysozyme [14] and myoglobin [3], as well as for lipid membrane model systems [30], where the most dehydrated sample has higher dynamics at low temperatures than the hydrated sample and vice-versa.
The effect of the solvent on the librational amplitudes can be better seen from the plots of the difference of the mean-square angular amplitude, Δ〈α 2〉, between the hydrated (fully and low) and the lyophilized proteins as a function of temperature reported in the insets of Figure 4. These plots show more clearly how the presence of water molecules affects the protein librational dynamics: the rise in 〈α 2〉 vs temperature is hydration-dependent in βLG, whereas it occurs at the same rate in the low and fully hydrated HSA. Our results on HSA are in reasonably good agreement with previous findings obtained by EPR and saturation transfer EPR at room temperature, which reported hydration-independent outer hyperfine splitting and rotational correlation time for the spin-labeled protein at h > 0.2–0.5 [46]. For comparison, it is worth to mention other studies. A neutron study on model systems formed by various homomeric polypeptides showed that i) the dynamics is restricted in the dry samples; ii) in some hydrated samples, the motional contribution does not depend on the hydration at h ≥ 0.2, whereas in some other cases, the librational fluctuations are enhanced with temperature by increasing the water content [48]. Moreover, similarities in the temperature dependence of the librational oscillations have been reported for three proteins of diverse size, namely RNase (124 residues, ≈14 kDa), myoglobin (153 residues, ≈17 kDa), and maltose binding protein (387 residues, ≈43 kDa), at the same water content [16]. In contrast, significant differences have been found in the dynamics of lysozyme, t-RNA, and DNA [22,23] or of green fluorescent protein and lysozyme [17] at different degrees of hydration. Also, the presence of water molecules affects the dynamics of folded proteins (such as myoglobin and lysozyme) more than that of IDPs (such as tau and casein) [16,21].
Dynamical transition in hydrated proteins
As already mentioned in the previous paragraph, at a variance with lyophilized proteins that do not undergo the dynamical transition, both βLG and HSA at low and fully hydration levels show a rapid increase in the mean-square angular amplitude at the same T d ≈ 230 K. T d is therefore independent from protein type and hydration level. While in literature there is a general consensus with the fact that the dynamics is restricted to harmonic oscillations and the dynamical transition is absent in the dry state (e.g., [20] and references therein), there are however cases in which T d varies as a function of sample type and it is either dependent or independent on the amount of hydration water molecules. For example, fully hydrated bilayers with interdigitated chains (unsaturated lipids) manifest the dynamical transition at higher (lower) temperature than ester-linked, saturated symmetrical chain phosphatidylcholines [26,29,49], whereas hydrated lysozyme undergoes the dynamical transition at lower T d than the IDP casein [21]. Also, the dynamical transition occurs at the same temperature in the three differently sized proteins, RNase, myoglobin, and maltose binding protein, at the same water content [16]. A clear hydration dependent decrease in T d is observed for tRNA [22], whereas T d is almost unchanged in lysozyme [14] and in lipid bilayers [30] in buffer at various levels of hydration.
For T > T
d, the data in Figure 4 are described by an Arrhenius law of the form
Arrhenius plots characterizing the temperature dependence of the librational amplitude, 〈α 2〉, in the high temperature regime for βLG and HSA at different hydrating conditions. Dashed lines are linear regressions of the data.
The E a values are similar for low and fully hydrated HSA, increase with hydration level in βLG (i.e., E a [low hydrated βLG] < E a [fully hydrated βLG]), and are similar for the two fully hydrated proteins. In any sample, in close agreement with literature [18,33,34], at the dynamical transition, βLG and HSA cross the low-energy barriers in the range of 15–30 kJ/mol.
Conclusion
In this study we have addressed the effect of hydration water on the librational dynamics and the dynamical transition of surface labeled βLG and HSA by using EPR in the temperature range of 120–270 K. In spite of the different structures, shapes, and sizes, the two proteins share same aspects that characterize their low-temperature librations. For the proteins in the lyophilized state, the librational oscillations are small and temperature-independent, and the dynamical transition is absent. For proteins, both in the low and in the fully hydrated conditions, the angular librational amplitudes increase rapidly at the same dynamical transition temperature of about 230 K where they cross low energy barriers of about 20 kJ/mol. For the different structure flexibility, the proteins are differently affected by the hydrating water level at temperatures higher than T d: the compact β-structured βLG show librational amplitudes which became progressively larger with hydration, whereas the loosened packed α-structured HSA shows hydration-independent librational oscillations.
The spin-label EPR results obtained at cryogenic temperatures deepen the biophysical characterization of soluble proteins that are normally studied at higher temperatures. They indicate that protein dynamics is activated in the presence of a low number of hydrating water molecules. Some properties evidenced in this study in βLG and HSA are common to a variety of frozen hydrated samples, including lipid membranes and non-biological polymers, and would imply that they are typical of the low-temperature behavior of samples around 200 K independently from their structure and functioning.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by University of Calabria.
-
Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available on request.
References
[1] Frauenfelder HG, Petsko A, Tsernoglou D. Temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction as a probe of protein structural dynamics. Nature. 1979;280:558–63.10.1038/280558a0Search in Google Scholar
[2] Rupley JA, Careri G. Protein hydration and function. Adv Protein Chem. 1991;41:37–172.10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60197-7Search in Google Scholar
[3] Fenimore PW, Frauenfelder H, McMahon BH, Young RD. Bulk-solvent and hydration-shell fluctuations, similar to alpha- and beta-fluctuations in glasses, control protein motions and functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14408–13.10.1073/pnas.0405573101Search in Google Scholar
[4] Frauenfelder H, Chen G, Berendzen J, Fenimore PW, Jansson H, McMahon BH, et al. A unified model of protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:5129–34.10.1073/pnas.0900336106Search in Google Scholar
[5] Dzuba SA. Libration motion of guest spin probe molecules in organic glasses: CW-EPR and electron spin echo study. Spectrochim Acta A. 2000;56:227–34.10.1016/S1386-1425(99)00234-6Search in Google Scholar
[6] Gabel F, Bicout D, Lehnert U, Tehei M, Weik M, Zaccai G. Protein dynamics studied by neutron scattering. Quart Rev Biophys. 2002;35:327–67.10.1017/S0033583502003840Search in Google Scholar
[7] Wood K, Plazanet M, Gabel F, Kessler B, Oesterhelt D, Tobias J, et al. Coupling of protein and hydration-water dynamics in biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:18049–54.10.1073/pnas.0706566104Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[8] Fitter J, Lechner RE, Dencher NA. Interactions of hydration water and biological membranes studied by neutron scattering. J Phys Chem B. 1999;103:8036–50.10.1021/jp9912410Search in Google Scholar
[9] Guzzi R, Bartucci R, Sportelli L, Esmann M, Marsh D. Conformational heterogeneity and spin-labeled -SH groups: pulsed EPR of Na,K-ATPase. Biochemistry. 2009;48:8343–54.10.1021/bi900849zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Guzzi R, Bartucci R, Marsh D. Heterogeneity of protein substates visualized by spin-label EPR. Biophys J. 2014;106:716–22.10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] Taylor MJ, Weegman BP, Baicu SC, Giwa SE. New approaches to cryopreservation of cells, tissues, and organs. Transfus Med Hemother. 2019;46:197–215.10.1159/000499453Search in Google Scholar
[12] Doster W, Cusack S, Petry W. Dynamical transition of myoglobin revealed by inelastic neutron scattering. Nature. 1989;337:754–6.10.1038/337754a0Search in Google Scholar
[13] Fitter J. The temperature dependence of internal molecular motions in hydrated and dry alpha-amylase: the role of hydration water in the dynamical transition of proteins. Biophys J. 1999;76:1034–42.10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77268-1Search in Google Scholar
[14] Roh JH, Curtis JE, Azzam S, Novikov VN, Peral I, Chowdhuri Z, et al. Influence of hydration on the dynamics of lysozyme. Biophys J. 2006;91:2573–88.10.1529/biophysj.106.082214Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[15] Scarpelli F, Bartucci R, Sportelli L, Guzzi R. Solvent effect on librational dynamics of spin labelled haemoglobin by ED- and CW-EPR. Eur Biophys J. 2011;40:273–9.10.1007/s00249-010-0644-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Gallat F-X, Laganowsky A, Wood K, Gabel F, van Eijck L, Wuttke J, et al. Dynamical coupling of intrinsically disordered proteins and their hydration water: comparison with folded soluble and membrane proteins. Biophys J. 2012;103:129–36.10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] Nickels JD, O’Neill H, Hong L, Tyagi M, Ehlers G, Weiss KL, et al. Dynamics of protein and its hydration water: neutron scattering studies on fully deuterated GFP. Biophys J. 2012;103:1566–75.10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Marsh D, Bartucci R, Guzzi R, Sportelli L, Esmann M. Librational fluctuations in protein glasses. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2013;1834:1591–5.10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Golysheva EA, Shevelev GY, Dzuba SA. Dynamical transition in molecular glasses and proteins observed by spin relaxation of nitroxide spin probes and labels. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:064501.10.1063/1.4997035Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Schirò G, Weik M. Role of hydration water in the onset of protein structural dynamics. J Phys Condens Matter. 2019;31:463002.10.1088/1361-648X/ab388aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Maslennikova NA, Golysheva EA, Dzuba SA. Evidence for an ordering transition near 120 K in an intrinsically disordered protein, Casein. Molecules. 2021;26:5961.10.3390/molecules26195971Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] Roh JH, Briber RM, Damjanovic A, Thirumalai D, Woodson SA, Sokolov AP. Dynamics of tRNA at different levels of hydration. Biophys J. 2009;96:2755–62.10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3895Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[23] Khodadadi S, Roh JH, Kisliuk A, Mamontov M, Tyagi M, Woodson SA, et al. Dynamics of biological macromolecules: not a simple slaving by hydration water. Biophys J. 2010;98:1321–6.10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4284Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[24] Erilov DA, Bartucci R, Guzzi R, Marsh D, Dzuba SA, Sportelli L. Librational motion of spin-labeled lipids in high-cholesterol containing membranes from echo-detected EPR spectra. Biophys J. 2004;87:3873–81.10.1529/biophysj.104.046631Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] Surovtsev NV, Ivanisenko NV, Kirillov KY, Dzuba SA. Low-temperature dynamical and structural properties of saturated and monounsaturated phospholipid bilayers revealed by Raman and spin-label EPR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:8139–44.10.1021/jp3038895Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Aloi E, Oranges M, Guzzi R, Bartucci R. Low-temperature dynamics of chain labeled lipids in ester- and ether-linked phosphatydilcholine membranes. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:9239–46.10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07386Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Syryamina VN, Dzuba SA. Dynamical transitions at low temperatures in the nearest hydration shell of phospholipid bilayers. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:1026–32.10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10133Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Peters J, Marion J, Natali F, Kats E, Bicout DJ. The dynamical transition of lipid multilamellar bilayers as a matter of cooperativity. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:6860–8.10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b05167Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] Aloi E, Guzzi R, Bartucci R. Unsaturated lipid bilayers at cryogenic temperature: librational dynamics of chain-labeled lipids from pulsed and CW-EPR. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:18699–705.10.1039/C9CP03318ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Aloi E, Bartucci R. Influence of hydration on segmental chain librations and dynamical transition in lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes. 2022;1864:183805.10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183805Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] Surovtsev NV, Salnikov ES, Malinovsky VK, Sveshnikova LL, Dzuba SA. On the low-temperature onset of molecular flexibility in lipid bilayers seen by Raman scattering. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:12361–5.10.1021/jp801575dSearch in Google Scholar
[32] Jansson H, Swenson J. The protein glass transition as measured by dielectric spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804:20–6.10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.06.026Search in Google Scholar
[33] Lewandowski JR, Halse ME, Blackledge M, Emsley L. Direct observation of hierarchical protein dynamics. Science. 2015;348:578–81.10.1126/science.aaa6111Search in Google Scholar
[34] Busi B, Yarava JR, Bertarello A, Freymond F, Adamski W, Maurin D, et al. Similarities and differences among protein dynamics studied by variable temperature nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation. J Phys Chem B. 2021;125(9):2212–21.10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10188Search in Google Scholar
[35] Zanatta M, Tavagnacco L, Buratti E, Bertoldo M, Natali F, Chiessi E, et al. Evidence of a low-temperature dynamical transition in concentrated microgels. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaat5895.10.1126/sciadv.aat5895Search in Google Scholar
[36] Kontopidis G, Holt C, Sawyer L. Beta-lactoglobulin: binding properties, structure, and function. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87:785–96.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73222-1Search in Google Scholar
[37] De Simone G, di Masi A, Ascenzi P. Serum Albumin: a multifaced enzyme. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10086.10.3390/ijms221810086Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[38] Loch J, Polit A, Gorecki A, Bonarek P, Kurpiewska K, Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M, et al. Two modes of fatty acid binding to bovine betalactoglobulin: crystallographic and spectroscopic studies. J Mol Recognit. 2011;24:341–9.10.1002/jmr.1084Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] Sugio S, Kashima A, Mochizuki S, Noda M, Kobayashi K. Crystal structure of human serum albumin at 2.5 A resolution. Protein Eng Des Sel. 1999;12(6):439–46.10.1093/protein/12.6.439Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Pantusa M, Sportelli L, Bartucci R. Spectroscopic and calorimetric studies on the interaction of human serum albumin with DPPC/PEG:2000-DPPE membranes. Eur Biophys J. 2008;37:961–73.10.1007/s00249-008-0314-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] Marsh D. Spin-Label electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. 1st edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.10.1201/9780429194634Search in Google Scholar
[42] Van SP, Birrel GB, Griffith OH. Rapid anisotropic motion of spin labels models for motion averaging of the EPR parameters. J Magn Reson. 1974;15:444–59.10.1016/0022-2364(74)90147-4Search in Google Scholar
[43] Marsh D. Spin-Label EPR for determining polarity and proticity in biomolecular assemblies: transmembrane profiles. Appl Magn Reson. 2010;37:435–54.10.1007/s00723-009-0078-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[44] Johnson ME. Apparent hydrogen bonding by strongly immobilized spin-labels. Biochemistry. 1981;20:3319–28.10.1021/bi00515a001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] De Simone F, Guzzi R, Sportelli L, Marsh D, Bartucci R. Electron spin echo studies of spin-labeled lipid membranes and free fatty acids interacting with human serum albumin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:1541–9.10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.02.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] Marzola P, Cannistraro S. Hydration and protein dynamics: an ESR and ST-ESR spin labelling study of Human Serum Albumin. Appl Magn Reson. 1992;3:1045–60.10.1007/BF03166172Search in Google Scholar
[47] Guzzi R, Rizzuti B, Bartucci R. Dynamics and binding affinity of spin-labeled stearic acids in β‑lactoglobulin: Evidences from EPR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:11608–15.10.1021/jp3074392Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Schirò G, Caronna C, Natali F, Cupane A. Molecular origin and hydration dependence of protein anharmonicity: an elastic neutron scattering study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:10215–20.10.1039/c003482gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[49] Aloi E, Bartucci R. Interdigitated lamellar phases in the frozen state: spin- label CW- and FT- EPR. Biophys Chem. 2019;253:106229.10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106229Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2022 Erika Aloi et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
