Skip to main content
Log in

Thrips (Thysanoptera) associated with two morphological forms of Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis)

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine thrips abundance, species composition, sex ratio and seasonal dynamics of these insects on two morphological forms of Andean lupin (epigonal and semiepigonal). Thrips were studied in the lupine plants sown at two dates at the Experimental Research Station at Pawlowice, near Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland, during two growing seasons (2011–2012). The experiment was designed as a split-plot with four replicates for each morphological form and time of sowing. For the determination of thrips species’ composition, plants were collected from the central part of each plot when lupin was at the full blooming stage. In the laboratory, plants were shaken over a sheet of white paper. Once in each season thrips were also collected with a sweep net. In the laboratory larvae and adults were identified to species level and separated into males and females. During the whole lupin growing season, insects were also counted weekly on 10 consecutive plants in the middle row of each plot. Frankliniella intonsa, Thrips major and Aeolothrips intermedius were the dominant species in the full blooming stage of both semiepigonal and epigonal forms of Andean lupin. Thrips tabaci also occurred in greater numbers. There were no significant differences between numbers of thrips and number of species occurring on semiepigonal and epigonal plants sown at the same time. In the most numerous species, like F. intonsa and T. major, mainly females occurred in their population. In the population of A. intermedius males were abundant. Thrips occurring in Lupinus mutabilis, irrespective of the used form of lupin or sowing time, had one peak of abundance, i.e., the last ten days of June and the first ten days of July, when plants were at the blooming stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atakan E. & Özgür A.F. 2001. Preliminary investigation on damage by Frankliniella intonsa to cotton in the Cukurova region in Turkey, Section VII: control strategies, pp. 221–224. In: Marullo R. & Mound L.A. (eds), Thrips and Tospoviruses: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera, 2-7th July, Reggio Calabria, Italy, 390 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbuceanu D. & Vasiliu-Oromulu L. 2013. Host associations of Thysanoptera with Medicago sativa. Romanian Journal of Biology -Zoology 58(1): 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bere´s P.K., Kucharczyk H. & Kucharczyk M. 2013. Thrips abundance on sweet corn in southeastern Poland and the impact of weather conditions on their populations dynamics. Bulletin of Insectology 66(1): 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournier A. 1983. Les thrips. Biologie Importance Agronomique. INRA, Paris, 128 pp. ISBN-10: 2853404641, ISBN-13: 978-2853404648

    Google Scholar 

  • Caligari P.D.S., Römer P., Rahim M.A., Huyghe C., Neves-Martins J. & Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E.J. 2000. The potential of Lupinus mutabilis as a crop, pp. 569–574. In: Knight R. (ed.), Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century, Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4385-1 54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clements J.C., Sweetingham M.S., Smith L. & Francis G. 2008. Crop improvement in Lupinus mutabilis for Australian agriculture -progress and prospects, pp. 244–250. In: Palta J.A. & Berger J.B. (eds), Lupins for Health and Wealth, Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, 14-18 September, International Lupin Association, Canterbury New Zealand, 551 pp. ISBN: 0-86476-153-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A.W. 1994. Pests and plant injury on lupins in the south of England. Crop Protection 13(3): 201–2010. DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(94)90079-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gas M. 2014. Wpływ wybranych czynników agrotechnicznych na rozwój i plonowanie łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus rnutabilis Sweet) [The influence of selected agronomic factors on the development and yielding of Andean lupine (Lupinus rnutabilis Sweet)]. PhD thesis, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 148 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzold T., Elmadfa I., Gross R., Wink M., Hartmann T. & Witte L. 1983. Quinolizidine alkaloids in seeds of Lupinus mutabilis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31(5): 934–938. DOI: 10.1021/jf00119a003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He S., Nielsen M.C. & Fagan L.L. 2009. Diversity and seasonal fluctuation of thrips species on yellow tree lupin (Lupinus arboreus). New Zealand Plant Protection 62: 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson B.J.F., Fleetwood J.G. & Zand-Moghaddan A. 1976. Lupin, an arable food crop for temperate climates. Plant Foods for Man 2(1/2): 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurej M., Kucharczyk H., Twardowski J.P. & Kozak M. 2014. Thrips (Thysanoptera) associated with narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L., 1753) intercropped with spring triticale (X Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus, 1927). Romanian Agricultural Research 31: 337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurej M. & Twardowski J. 2004. Przylzence (Thysanoptera) wys-tepujace na pszenzycie jarym uprawianym wspolrzednie z lubinem zoltym [Thrips (Thysanoptera) occurring in spring triticale intercropped with yellow lupine]. Acta Sci. Polon. Agricult. 3(2): 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk W.D.J. 1984. Ecologically selective coloured traps. Ecol. Entomol. 9(1): 35–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1984.tb00696.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk W.D.J. 1996. Thrips Naturalists’ Handbook 25. The Richmond publishing Co. Ltd, 70 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0855463076, ISBN-10: 0855463074

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobro S., Teksdal A.E. & Andersen A. 2000. Cereals as host plants for thrips (Thysanoptera) in Norway. Norw. J. Entomol. 47(1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppa P. 1969. The sex index of some species of thrips living on cereals plants. Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 35(2): 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucharczyk H., Bereśs P.K. & Daąbrowski Z.T. 2011. The species composition and seasonal dynamice of thrips (Thysanoptera) populations on maize (Zea mays L.) in southeastern Poland. J. Plant Prot. Res. 51(3): 210–216. DOI: 10.2478/v10045-011-0036-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T. 1973. Thrips: Their Biology, Ecology and Economic Importance.Academic Press, London, 349 pp. ISBN-10: 0124471609, ISBN-13: 978-0124471603

    Google Scholar 

  • Murai T. 1988. Studies on the ecology and control of flower thrips, Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom). Bull. Shimane Agric. Expt. Stn. 23. 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Gene Technology Regulation 2013. The Biology of Lupinus L. (lupin or lupine). Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing, 64 pp. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/ internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/biologylupin2013-toc/ $FILE/biologylupin2013-2.pdf (accessed 01.02.2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petterson D.S. 1998. Composition and food uses of lupins, pp. 353–384. In: Gladstones J.S., Atkins C.A. & Hamblin J. (eds), Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production and Utilization, CAB International Wallingford, UK, 544 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0851992242, ISBN-10: 0851992242

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin B.R. 1972. A revision of the flower-living genus Odontothrips Amyot & Serville (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 26(9): 371–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobożniak M. 2013. The species composition, harmfulness and selected aspects of the occurrence and feeding preference of thrips (Thysanoptera) on pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rolniczego im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie: Rozprawy 514 (391), 153 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobożniak M. & Sobolewska M. 2011. Biodiversity of thrips species (Thysanoptera) on flowering herbs in Cracow, Poland. J. Plant Prot. Res. 51(4): 393–398. DOI: 10.2478/v10045-011-0064-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RaspudiČ E., IveziČ M., Brmež M. & Trdan S. 2009. Distribution of Thysanoptera species and their host plants in Croatia. Acta Agricult. Sloven. 93(3): 275–283. DOI: 10.2478/v10014-009-0016-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley D.G., Joseph S.V., Srinivasan R. & Diffie S. 2011. Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. J. Integr. Pest Manage. 1(2): 1–9. DOI: 10.1603/IPM10020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera M. & Gallegos P. 2001. Plagas del chocho, Capitulo IV. pp. 31–35. In: Caicedo C. & Peralta E. (eds), El cul-tivo de chocho Lupinus mutabilis Sweet: fitonutrición, en-fermedades y plagas, en el Ecuador, Boletín Técnico 103, INIAP/FUNDACYT, Quito, Ecuador, 67 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E. & Augiewicz J. 2004. Cytogenetics studies of Andean lupin, pp. 79-85. In: van Santen E. & Hill G.D. (eds), Wild and Cultivated Lupins from the Tropics to the Poles, Proc. 10th Int. Lupin Conf., 19-24 June 2002, Laugar-vatn, Iceland, 382 pp. ISBN: 0864761236

    Google Scholar 

  • Stawiński S. & Rybiński W. 2001. Domestication of Andean lupine by means of mutation. 4th European Conference on Grain Legumes, AEP, Kraków, Poland, 223 pp. ISBN: 2950949142

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassen R. 2003. Die Terebranten Thysanopteren Europas und des Mittelmeer-Gebietes. In: Dahl F. (ed.), Die Tier-welt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile 74, Goecke and Evers, Keltern, 277 pp. ISBN: 3931374580, 9783931374587

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetingham M.W., Clements J., Buirchell B.J., Sipsas S., Thomas G., Quealy J., Jones R., Francis C. & Smith C.G. 2006. Preliminary breeding and development of Andean lupin for Australian agriculture, pp. 32–34. In: van Santen E. & Hill G.D. (eds), México, where Old and New World Lupins Meet, Proceedings of the 11th International Lupin Conference. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 4-9 May 2005. International Lupin Association, Canterbury, New Zealand, 433 pp. ISBN: 0-86476-165-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Šmatas R. 2009. Species structure and sex ratio of thrips (Thysanoptera) on winter rye (Secale cereale). Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 96(4): 260–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šmatas R., Tamosiunas K. & Danyte V. 2013. Diversity and sex ratio of thrips (Thysanoptera) species in winter wheat in Lithuania. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 100(3): 289–292. DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2013.100.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasiliu-Oromulu L. 2002. The dynamics of the sex ratio index of thrips populations in mountainous meadows, pp. 315–324. In: Marullo R. & Mound L.A. (eds), Thrips, Plants, Tospoviruses: The Millennial Review, 2-7th July 2001, Reg-gio Calabria, Italy, 390 pp. ISBN: 0975020609

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierbergen G., Kucharczyk H. & Kirk W.D.J. 2010. A key to the second instar larvae of the Thripidae of the Western Palearctic region. Tijdschr. Entomol. 153. 99–160. DOI: 10.1163/22119434-900000294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C.L., Lin F.C., Chiu Y.C. & Shih H.T. 2010. Species of Frankliniella Trybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from the Asian-Pacific Area. Zool. Stud. 49(6): 824–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawirska I. 1969. Fauna of Thysanoptera in flower soft leguminous plants in Poland. Prace Naukowe, Instytut Ochrony Ro´slin 11(2): 41–79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was carried out with the financial support of the National Centre for Research and Development, Poland, under project 12-0147-10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek P. Twardowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurej, M., Kucharczyk, H., Twardowski, J.P. et al. Thrips (Thysanoptera) associated with two morphological forms of Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis). Biologia 70, 935–942 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0106

Key words

Navigation