Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 6, 2018

Inter-Ethnic Friendship and Hostility between Roma and non-Roma Students in Hungary: The Role of Exposure and Academic Achievement

  • Tamás Hajdu ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Gábor Kertesi and Gábor Kézdi

Abstract

This study examines friendship and hostility relations between Roma students and the ethnically homogeneous non-Roma majority in Hungarian schools. Using data on friendship and hostility relations of 15-year-old students from 82 schools, the study focuses on the interaction between exposure to the other ethnic group and academic achievement of Roma students. High-achieving Roma students are shown to have significantly more friends and fewer adversaries than low-achieving ones, due to better inter-ethnic relations while having similar within-ethnic group relations. As a result, higher exposure to Roma students translates to more friendship and less hostility from non-Roma students in environments where more of the Roma students have higher achievement. Therefore, policies helping the achievement of Roma students can have immediate as well as long-term positive effects. Simulations suggest that a mixed policy of desegregation and closing the achievement gap may best foster positive inter-ethnic relations.

JEL Classification: J15; I24

Funding statement: Our research was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFI-101409 project, ‘The role of parenting and networks in human capital formation’). Gábor Kertesi gratefully acknowledges support from the CEU Institute for Advanced Study. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  1. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. 2014. “The Perils of Peer Effects.” Labour Economics 30 (October): 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

Bernát, Anikó, Attila Juhász, Péter Krekó, and Csaba Molnár. 2013. “The Roots of Radicalism and Anti-Roma Attitudes on the Far Right.” TARKI Working paper.Search in Google Scholar

Bifulco, Robert, Jason M. Fletcher, and Stephen L. Ross. 2011. “The Effect of Classmate Characteristics on Post-Secondary Outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3 (1): 25–53. doi:10.1257/pol.3.1.25.Search in Google Scholar

Boda, Zsófia, and Bálint Néray. 2015. “Inter-Ethnic Friendship and Negative Ties in Secondary School.” Social Networks 43: 57–72. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Carrell, Scott E., Mark Hoekstra, and James E. West. 2015. “The Impact of Intergroup Contact on Racial Attitudes and Revealed Preferences.” Working Paper 20940. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w20940.Search in Google Scholar

Carrell, Scott E., Bruce I. Sacerdote, and James E. West. 2013. “From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? the Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation.” Econometrica 81 (3): 855–82. doi:10.3982/ECTA10168.Search in Google Scholar

Currarini, Sergio, Matthew O. Jackson, and Paolo Pin. 2010. “Identifying the Roles of Race-Based Choice and Chance in High School Friendship Network Formation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (11): 4857–61. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911793107.Search in Google Scholar

Echenique, Federico, and Roland G. Fryer. 2007. “A Measure of Segregation Based on Social Interactions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (2): 441–85. doi:10.1162/qjec.122.2.441.Search in Google Scholar

Flashman, Jennifer. 2012. “Different Preferences or Different Opportunities? Explaining Race Differentials in the Academic Achievement of Friends.” Social Science Research 41 (4): 888–903. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, Jason M., Stephen L. Ross, and Yuxiu Zhang. 2013. “The Determinants and Consequences of Friendship Composition.” Working Paper 19215. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w19215.Search in Google Scholar

Fordham, Signithia, and John U. Ogbu. 1986. “Black Students’ School Success: Coping with the ‘Burden of “Acting White.”’.” The Urban Review 18 (3): 176–206. doi:10.1007/BF01112192.Search in Google Scholar

FRA, and UNDP. 2012. The Situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

Fryer, Roland G., and Paul Torelli. 2010. “An Empirical Analysis of ‘Acting White.’.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (5): 380–96. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

Fuller-Rowell, Thomas E., and Stacey N. Doan. 2010. “The Social Costs of Academic Success across Ethnic Groups.” Child Development 81 (6): 1696–713. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01504.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, Tamás, Gábor Kertesi, and Gábor Kézdi. 2014. “Roma Fiatalok a Középiskolában. Beszámoló a TÁRKI Életpálya-Felmérésének 2006 És 2012 Közötti Hullámaiból [Roma Students in Secondary Schools. Report from the Hungarian Life Course Survey of TARKI, Waves 2006-12].” In Társadalmi Riport [Social Report], edited by T. Kolosi and I.G. Tóth, 265–302. Budapest: TÁRKI.Search in Google Scholar

Hiller, Timo. 2017. “Friends and Enemies: A Model of Signed Network Formation.” Theoretical Economics 12 (3): 1057–87. doi:10.3982/TE1937.Search in Google Scholar

Huitsing, Gijs, Marijtje A. J. van Duijn, Tom A. B. Snijders, Peng Wang, Miia Sainio, Christina Salmivalli, and René Veenstra. 2012. “Univariate and Multivariate Models of Positive and Negative Networks: Liking, Disliking, and Bully–Victim Relationships.” Social Networks 34 (4): 645–57. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Matthew O. 2014. “Networks in the Understanding of Economic Behaviors.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (4): 3–22. doi:10.1257/jep.28.4.3.Search in Google Scholar

Kemény, István. 2004. “A Magyarországi Cigány Népesség Demográfiája [The Demography of the Hungarian Gypsy Population].” Demográfia 47 (3–4): 335–46.Search in Google Scholar

Kemény, István, and Béla Janky. 2006. “Roma Population of Hungary 1971–2003.” In Roma of Hungary, edited by I. Kemény, 70–225. East European Monographs. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kertesi, Gábor, and Gábor Kézdi. 2011a. “Roma Employment in Hungary after the Post-Communist Transition.” Economics of Transition 19 (3): 563–610. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0351.2011.00410.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kertesi, Gábor, and Gábor Kézdi. 2011b. “The Roma/Non-Roma Test Score Gap in Hungary.” The American Economic Review 101 (3): 519–25. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.519.Search in Google Scholar

Kertesi, Gábor, and Gábor Kézdi. 2016. “On the Test Score Gap between Roma and Non-Roma Students in Hungary and Its Potential Causes.” Economics of Transition 24 (1): 135–62. doi:10.1111/ecot.12076.Search in Google Scholar

Kézdi, Gábor, and Éva Surányi. 2009. A Successful School Integration Program: An Evaluation of the Hungarian National Governments School Integration Program, 2005–2007. Budapest: Roma Education Fund.Search in Google Scholar

Kisfalusi, Dorottya. 2016. “The Quality of Inter- and Intra-Ethnic Friendships among Roma and Non-Roma Students in Hungary.” Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 7 (1): 3–26.10.14267/CJSSP.2016.01.01Search in Google Scholar

Lőrincz, László. 2016. “Interethnic Dating Preferences of Roma and Non-Roma Secondary School Students.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (13): 2244–62. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1160769.Search in Google Scholar

Patacchini, Eleonora, and Yves Zenou. 2016. “Racial Identity and Education in Social Networks.” Social Networks 44: 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.Search in Google Scholar

Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.Search in Google Scholar

Simonovits, Gábor, and Gábor Kézdi. 2016. “Economic Hardship Triggers Identification with Disadvantaged Minorities.” The Journal of Politics 78 (3): 882–92. doi:10.1086/685586.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Sanne, Ineke Maas, and Frank van Tubergen. 2014. “Ethnic Ingroup Friendships in Schools: Testing the by-Product Hypothesis in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden.” Social Networks 39: 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Székelyi, Mária, György Csepeli, and Antal Örkény. 2001. “Attitudes and Stereotypes of Hungarian Police toward Gypsies.” In Ethnic Minorities and Interethnic Relations in Context, edited by P. Karen and A. Örkény, 217–28. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Váradi, Luca. 2014. Youths Trapped in Prejudice: Hungarian AdolescentsAttitudes Towards the Roma. Wiesbaden: Springer Science & Business.10.1007/978-3-658-05891-3Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0289).


Published Online: 2018-10-06

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0289/html
Scroll to top button