Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton 2019

9. Constructional meaning and compositionality

From the book Semantics - Interfaces

  • Paul Kay and Laura A. Michaelis

Abstract

one of the major motivations for constructional approaches to grammar is that a given rule of syntactic formation can sometimes, in fact often, be associated with more than one semantic specification. For example, a pair of expressions like purple plum and alleged thief call on different rules of semantic combination. The first involves something closely related to intersection of sets: a purple plum is a member of the set of purple things and a member of the set of plums. But an alleged thief is not a member of the intersection of the set of thieves and the set of alleged things. Indeed, that intersection is empty, since only a proposition can be alleged and a thief, whether by deed or attribution, is never a proposition. This chapter describes the various ways meanings may be assembled in a construction-based grammar.

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
Downloaded on 21.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110589849-009/html
Scroll to top button