Abstract
The grounding of semiotics in the finiteness of cognition is extended by examining the assumption that cognition can be compared or described. To this end, the two means by which qualitative values for cognition are putatively derived – introspection and observation – are framed in terms of the semiosic field as metacognition and trans-metacognition. These recovery functions are seen to be complex and mutable, dependent on context and habitus rather than objective encapsulation of past thought. An alternative view of cognitive similarity is offered: that recovery functions stabilize a mythology of cognition that facilitates its allocation by important discourses such as psychology, neurology, philosophy, and indeed semiotics. These superstructural discourses, in turn, operate to shape the context and habitus of new agents, including the proliferation of recovery functions. To formalize this cyclically determinative process, a concept of semioformation is introduced that locates the ontogeny of agents among the cumulative externalities of other agents. Determination, rather than description, is therefore posited as the effect of the assignment of qualitative or equivalence values to cognition. With this in mind, technology is highlighted as a critical area in which to examine recovery functions and semioformation. In particular, the category of the real is seen as undergoing rapid mutation.
References
Baudrillard, J. 1994 [1981]. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9904Search in Google Scholar
Berger, R. 1972. La mutation des signes. Paris: Denoël.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507Search in Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 2012 [1874]. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.10.4324/9780203202883Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1959. A review of B. F. Skinner’s. Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1). 26–58.10.2307/411334Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977 [1975]. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996 [1927]. Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit. New York: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1977. The medium is the message/Interviewer: R. Moore. Monday Conference, ABC Radio National. http://www.allreadable.com/3d76Kk8V (accessed 1 August 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1951. Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60. 20–43.10.2307/2181906Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173452Search in Google Scholar
Shackell, C. 2018. Finite cognition and finite semiosis: A new perspective on semiotics for the information age. Semiotica,2018(222). doi:10.1515/sem-2018-0020.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
