Abstract
Erasmus Darwin’s writings, which laid the foundation for his grandson Charles’s concepts of variation, natural selection, heredity, and the survival of the fittest, constituted a province of knowledge that colored and deeply troubled John Keats’s thinking. The impact of Darwinian tenets upon Keats’s imagination is most apparent in the verse epistle to John Hamilton Reynolds in the poet’s terrible vision of “an eternal fierce destruction,” a lurid scene almost directly transferable from Darwin’s The Temple of Nature. Keats’s poetry and epistolary prose are not innocent of an apprehension of the harsh reality of a state of nature that is “red in tooth and claw,” nor does Keats’s thought shy away from confronting the disturbing potential of the “geological sublime,” a fascination with the ancient history of the earth and the subversive idea that creatures occupy an ephemeral and insignificant place within its vast temporal continuum. We can tease out from Keats’s poems and letters a pattern of coping with these harsh facts of life by abstracting or anaesthetizing oneself. Keats’s strategy of evasion or withdrawal constitutes his authentic aesthetic and ethical response to the sublime horrors that a Darwinian or geological model of reality, when scrutinized by Keats’s imagination, might prompt, even if it cannot fairly be described as a remedial measure.
Works Cited
Almeida, Hermione de. Romantic Medicine and John Keats. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.D. “Keats and Kamchatka.” Notes and Queries 196 (1951): 340–46.10.1093/nq/CXCVI.aug04.340aSearch in Google Scholar
Bayley, John. “Keats and Reality.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48 (1962): 91–125.Search in Google Scholar
Blackstone, Bernard. The Consecrated Urn: An Interpretation of Keats in Terms of Growth and Form. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1959.Search in Google Scholar
Bode, Christoph. “Hyperion, The Fall of Hyperion, and Keats’s Poetics.” The Wordsworth Circle 31.1 (2000): 31–37.10.1086/TWC24044192Search in Google Scholar
Bush, Douglas. “Keats and His Ideas.” English Romantic Poets: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. M.H. Abrams. New York: Oxford UP, 1960. 326–39.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Erasmus. The Essential Writings of Erasmus Darwin. Ed. Desmond King-Hele. London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
–––. The Temple of Nature (1803). London: Scolar P, 1973.Search in Google Scholar
“Darwinism.” The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Web. Oxford UP. October 28, 2013. <http://dictionary.oed.com/>Search in Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “The Dead-End of Formalist Criticism.” Blindness and Insight: Essays on the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd ed. London: Methuen, 1983. 229–45.Search in Google Scholar
Ende, Stuart A. Keats and the Sublime. New Haven: Yale UP, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
Evert, Walter H. Aesthetic and Myth in the Poetry of Keats. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1965.10.1515/9781400879601Search in Google Scholar
Fairchild, Hoxie N. “Keats and the Struggle-For-Existence Tradition.” PMLA 64 (1949): 98-114.10.2307/459672Search in Google Scholar
Goellnicht, Donald C. The Poet-Physician: Keats and Medical Science. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Gray, Erik. The Poetry of Indifference from the Romantics to the Rubaiyat. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H. “Spectral Symbolism and the Authorial Self: An Approach to Keats’s Hyperion.” Essays in Criticism 24.1 (1974): 1–19.10.1093/eic/XXIV.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Heringman, Noah. Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Hillier, Russell M. “Coleridge’s Dilemma and the Method of ‘Sacred Sympathy’: Atonement as Problem and Solution in The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.” Papers on Language and Literature 45.1 (2009): 1–29.Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, Noel. Science and Sensation in Romantic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511484292Search in Google Scholar
James, D.G. The Romantic Comedy. London: Oxford UP, 1948.Search in Google Scholar
Keats, John. The Letters of John Keats, 1814–1821. Ed. Hyder Edward Rollins. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1958.Search in Google Scholar
–––. The Poems of John Keats. Ed. Jack Stillinger. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap P of Harvard U, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
King-Hele, Desmond. Erasmus Darwin and the Romantic Poets. London: Macmillan P, 1986.10.1007/978-1-349-18098-1Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Marjorie. Keats’s Life of Allegory: The Origins of a Style. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, G.M., ed. John Keats: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. “The Meaning of ‘Hyperion.’” John Keats: A Reassessment. Ed. KennethSearch in Google Scholar
Muir. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 1958. 102–22.Search in Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Twilight of the Idols, or How to Philosophize with a Hammer. Trans. Duncan Large. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Perkins, David. The Quest for Permanence: The Symbolism of Wordsworth, Shelley, and Keats. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1959.10.4159/harvard.9780674424180Search in Google Scholar
Piper, H.W. The Active Universe: Pantheism and the Concept of Imagination in the English Romantic Poets. London: University of London-Athlone P, 1962.Search in Google Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama. Dark Interpreter: The Discourse of Romanticism. London: Cornell UP, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. Keats and Embarrassment. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1974.Search in Google Scholar
Roe, Nicholas. John Keats and the Culture of Dissent. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1998.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198186298.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Robert M. Keats: The Religious Sense. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
Sharp, Ronald A. Keats, Skepticism, and the Religion of Beauty. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein (1818). Ed. Maurice Hindle. London: Penguin, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Sperry, Stuart M. Keats the Poet. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. The Opposing Self: Nine Essays in Criticism. London: Secker and Warburg, 1955.Search in Google Scholar
Waldoff, Leon. Keats and the Silent Work of Imagination. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, Daniel P. Keats’s Poetry and the Politics of the Imagination. London: Associated UP, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph Anthony, Jr. The Romantics on Milton: Formal Essays and Critical Asides. Cleveland: The P of Case Western Reserve U, 1970.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. The Questioning Presence: Wordsworth, Keats, and the Interrogative Mode in Romantic Poetry. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Yeats, William Butler. The Collected Poems of W.B. Yeats: A New Edition. Ed. Richard J. Finneran. New York: Macmillan, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
© 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
