Keywords
intensive instruction
distributed practice
spacing
How to Cite
Number of views: 842
Number of downloads: 828
Abstract
The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide a general overview of recent research on time distribution and second language (L2) learning with special implications for classroom settings. Several studies have been performed to examine how to best distribute the hours of L2 practice to maximize learning by comparing conditions that promote intensive exposure versus others in which L2 input or instruction is more widely spaced. Findings from these studies are relevant not only for practical purposes but also for theory development. This review provides a summary of recent studies as well as suggestions for pedagogical practice. Additionally, it identifies areas for future research concerning the effect of time distribution on L2 learning.
Funding
This work was supported by Grant PID2019-110536GB-I00. I would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their invaluable feedback and also Radha Chandy for her help organizing the data.
References
Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2015). Second language vocabulary acquisition under two different types of instruction: The effects of concentrated and distributed introduction in immediate and delayed retention. ES Revista De Filologia Inglesa, 36, 7-25. https://core.ac.uk/reader/211105905
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716410000172
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). MIT Press.
Bui, G., Ahmadian, M. J., & Hunter, A-M. (2019). Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System, 81, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006
Carpenter, S. K., & Mueller, F. E. (2013). The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning. Memory & Cognition, 41, 671-682. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0291-4
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 655-680. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587881
Collins, L., & White, J. (2011). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 106-133. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240858
DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.). Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15-32). Routledge.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885)
French, L. M., Gagné, N., & Collins, L. (2020). Long-term effects of intensive instrucion on fluency, comprehensibility and accentedness. Journal of Second Lanuage Pronunciation, 6(3), 380-401. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20026.fre
Kasprowicz, R. E., Marsden, E., & Sephton, N. (2019). Investigating distribution of practice effects for the learning of foreign language verb morphology in the young learner classroom. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 580-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12586
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022). The effects of spaced practice on second language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12479
Koval, N. G. (2019). Testing the deficient processing account of the spacing effect in second language vocabulary learning: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(05), 1103-1139. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716419000158
Koval, N. G. (2022). Testing the reminding account of the lag effect in L2 vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000370
Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Erdfelder, E., & Dickhäuser, O. (2014a). The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary. Instructional Science, 42, 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2
Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Kapler, I. V., & Wiseheart, M. (2014b). Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: The optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 729-741. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0394-1
Li, M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2019). Distribution of practice effects in the acquisition and retention of L2 Mandarin tonal word production. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12580
Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Making the minutes count in L2 teaching. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863903
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2020). Teaching and learning L2 in the class-room: It’s about time. Language Teaching, 53(4), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000454
Lotfolahi, A. R., & Salehi, H. (2017). Spacing effects in vocabulary learning: Young EFL learners in focus. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1287391. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2017.1287391
Macis, M., Sonbul, S., & Alharbi, R. (2021). The effect of spacing on incidental and deliberate learning of L2 collocations. System, 103, 9102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102649
Meara, P. M. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Lognostics.
Miles, S. W. (2014). Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning. System, 42, 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.014
Muñoz, C. (2012). Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning. Multilingual Matters.
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677-711. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263114000825
Nakata, T., & Elgort, I. (2021). Effects of spacing on contextual vocabulary learning: Spacing facilitates the acquisition of explicit, but not tacit, vocabulary knowledge. Second Language Research, 37(2), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320927764
Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y. (2019a). Effects of massing and spacing on the learning of semantically related and unrelated words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263118000219
Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y. (2019b). Mixing grammar exercises facilitates long term retention: Effects of blocking, interleaving, and increasing practice. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12581
Nakata, T., Tada, S., McLean, S., & Kim, Y. E. (2021). Effects of distributed retrieval practice over a semester: Cumulative tests as a way to facilitate second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 248-270. https://0.1002/tesq.596
Nakata, T., & Webb, S. (2016). Does studying vocabulary in smaller sets in-crease learning? The effects of part and whole learning on second language vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 523-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263115000236
Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211-266). John Benjamins.
Rogers, J. (2015). Learning second language syntax under massed and distributed conditions. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 857-866. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.252
Rogers, J. (2017). The spacing effect and its relevance to second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw052
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2020). Input spacing and the learning of L2 vocabulary in a classroom context. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 616-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818805251
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2021). Does it matter when you review? Input spacing, ecological validity, and the learning of L2 vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 1138-1156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263120000236
Schuetze, U. (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs. long-term memory. Language Teaching Re-search, 19(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541726
Schuetze, U., & Weimer-Stuckmann, G. (2011). Retention in SLA lexical processing. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.460-472
Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(3), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010845
Serfaty, J., & Serrano, R. (2022). Lag effects in grammar learning: A desirable difficulties perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 513-550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000631
Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00591.x
Serrano, R. (2012). Is intensive learning effective? In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive expo-sure experiences in second language learning (pp. 3-22). Multilingual Matters.
Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text? TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 971-994. https://doi.org/10.1002/TESQ.445
Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2021). Time distribution and intentional vocabulary learning through repeated reading: A partial replication and extension. Language Awareness. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/096 58416.2021.1894162
Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.02.001
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programs. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541748
Snoder, P. (2017). Improving English learners’ productive collocation knowledge: The effects of involvement load, spacing, and intentionality. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 140-164. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1277
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 11-32.
Stern, H. H. (1985). The time factor and compact course development. TESL Canada Journal, 3(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v3i1.471
Suzuki, Y. (2017). The optimal distribution of practice for the acquisition of L2 morphology: A conceptual replication and extension. Language Learning, 67(3), 512-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12236
Suzuki, Y. (2018). The role of procedural learning ability in automatization of L2 morphology under different learning schedules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263117000249
Suzuki, Y. (2019). Individualization of practice distribution in second language grammar learning. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(2), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.18023.suz
Suzuki, Y. (2021a). Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(4), 969-995. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000187
Suzuki, Y. (2021b). Optimizing fluency training for speaking skills transfer: Comparing the effects of blocked and interleaved task repetition. Language Learning, 71(2), 285-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/LANG.12433
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017a). Effects of distributed practice on the proceduralization of morphology. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 166-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815617334
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017b). Exploratory research on second language practice distribution: An Aptitude × Treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716416000084
Suzuki, Y., & Hanzawa, K. (2022). Massed task repetition is a double-edged sword for fluency development: An EFL classroom study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 536-561. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000358
Suzuki, Y., & Sunada, M. (2020). Dynamic interplay between practice type and practice schedule in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263119000470
Suzuki, Y., Eguchi, M., & de Jong, N. (2022a). Does the reuse of constructions pro-mote fluency development in task repetition? A usage-based perspective. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3103
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2019). The desirable difficulty frame-work as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 713-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12585
Suzuki, Y., Yokosawa, S., Aline, D. (2022b). The role of working memory in blocked and interleaved grammar practice: Proceduralization of L2 syntax. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 671-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913985
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, E. (2014). About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Volume 60: The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 113-189). Elsevier Academic Press.
White, J., & Turner, C. (2005). Comparing children’s oral ability in two ESL pro-grams. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(4), 491-517. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.4.491
Xu, X., Padilla, A. M., & Silva, D. (2012). The time factor in Mandarin language learning: The four-week intensive versus the regular high school semester. The Language Learning Journal, 42(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.677054
Yamagata, S., Nakata, T., & Rogers, J. (2022). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000225
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.