Skip to main content
Log in

Ontogenic and sexual differences in pituitary GnRH receptors and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization induced by GnRH

  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiments were designed in order to elucidate the participation of the developing hypophysis in determining the changing sensitivity of gonadotrophins to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) during ontogeny in the rat. To that end, we chose two well defined developmental ages that differ markedly in sexual and ontogenic characteristics of hypophyseal sensitivity to GnRH, 15 and 30 d. In order to study sex differences and the role of early sexual organization of the hypothalamus, experiments were carried out in males, females, and neonatally androgenized females (TP females). We evaluated (1) the characteristics of pituitary GnRH receptors, and (2) associated changes in GnRH-induced mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ (a second messenger involved in gonadotropins exocytosis).

We measured binding characteristics of the GnRH analog d-Ser(TBu)6-des-Gly10-GnRH ethylamide in pituitary homogenates. We found that K ds did not vary among the different sex groups. Total number and concentration of receptors decreased in the female rat from 15–30 d of age, whereas in the male and TP female, receptors/pituitary increased, and the concentration/mg tissue did not change. Also, at 30 days of age, males presented higher content and concentration of receptors than females, and higher content than TP females. In order to evaluate if developmental and sexual differences in pituitary sensitivity to GnRH might be expressed through variations in the intracellular Ca2+ signal, we studied the mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ induced by GnRH (1 × 10−8 to 1 × 10−11 M) in a suspension of dispersed pituitary cells in the six groups. In cells from 15-d-old females, Ca2+ response was greater than in 30-d-old females at the doses of 10−8 to 10−10 M, indicating that in the infantile female rat activation of highly concentrated GnRH receptors is reflected in an increase in signal transduction mediated by Ca2+. In males and in female rats androgenized at birth, there was also a decrease in the magnitude of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization induced by GnRH (10−8 to 10−10 M) from 15–30 d of age, even though the concentration of GnRH receptors did not change in the same period.

In conclusion, the present results suggest that high sensitivity to GnRH, which has been described in the female infantile rat, may be related to elevated concentration of hypophyseal receptors coupled to an increase of intracellular calcium response to GnRH, both parameters decreasing as the rat matures. In males, the greater sensitivity that has been described for GnRH at 30 d in comparison to 15 d is paralleled by an increase in the total number of GnRH receptors per pituitary (and not in their concentration), but not in an increase in the magnitude of Ca2+ mobilization induced by GnRH. On the other hand, neonatal sexual organization of the hypothalamus is involved in the differential expression of GnRH receptors, but does not modulate mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ induced by the decapeptide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becu-Villalobos, D., Lacau-Mengido, I. M., and Libertun, C. (1990). Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 10, 473–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ojeda, S. R. and Urbanski, H. F. (1994). In: The Physiology of Reproduction. Knobil, E. and Neill, J. (eds.) Raven, New York, pp. 363–409.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becu-Villalobos, D., Lacau de Mengido, I. M., and Libertun, C. (1989). Dev. Brain Res. 47, 181–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ojeda, S. R., Jameson, H. E., and Mc Cann, S. M. (1977). Endocrinology 100, 440–451.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Debeljuk, L., Arimura, A., and Schally, A. V. (1972). Endocrinology 90, 585–589.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aubert, M. L., Begeot, M., Winiger, B. P., Morel, G., Sizonenko, P. C., and Dubois, P. M. (1985). Endocrinology 116, 1565–1576.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hompes, P. G. A., Vermes, I., Tilders, F. J. H., and Schoemaker, J. (1982). Neuroendocrinology 35, 8–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakubowski, M., Blum, M., and Roberts, J. L. (1991). Endocrinology 128, 2702–2708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dutlow, C. M., Rachman, J., Jacobs, T. W., and Millar, R. P. (1992). J. Clin. Invest. 90, 2496–2501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harter, D. E. and Ramirez, V. D. (1985). Neuroendocrinology 40, 476–482.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalkin, A. C., Bourne, G. A., Pieper, D. R., Regiani, S., and Marshall, J. C. (1981). Endocrinology 108, 1658–1664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, V., Clayton, R., Knox, G., and Catt, K. J. (1981). Endocrinology 108, 2086–2092.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorner, G. (1981). Vitam. Horm. 38, 325–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stojilkovic, S. S., Reinhart, J., and Catt, K. J. (1994). Endocr. Rev. 15, 462–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortmann, O., Stojilkovic, S. S., Cesnjaj, M., Emons, G., and Catt, K. J. (1992). Endocrinology 131, 1565–1568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ortmann, O., Merelli, F., Stojilkovic, S. S., Schultz, K. D., Emons, G., and Catt, K. J. (1994). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 48, 47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Debeljuk, L., Arimura, A., and Schally, A. V. (1972). Endocrinology 90, 1499.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Naish, S. J., Brawer, J., Robaire, B., and Ruf, K. B. (1986). Biol. Reprod. 34, 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duncan, J. A., Dalkin, A. C., Barkan, A., Regiani, S., and Marshall, J. C. (1983). Endocrinology 113, 2238–2236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fink, G. and Henderson, S. R. (1977). J. Endocrinol. 73, 157–164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barraclough, C. A. and Turgeon, J. L. (1974). In: Endocrinologie Sexuelle de la Periode Perinatale. Forest, M.G. and Bertrand, J. (eds.) INSERM, Paris, pp. 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chiappa, S. A. and Fink, G. (1977). J. Endocrinol. 73, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, H. T. (1988). Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 57, 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomic, M., Cesnjaj, M., Catt, K. J., and Stojilkovic, S. S. (1994). Endocrinology 135, 1762–1771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishizaki, T., Walent, J. H., Kowalchyk, J. A., and Martin, T. F. J. (1992). J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23,972–23,981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stojilkovic, S. S., Stutzin, A., Izumi, S.-I., Dufour, S., Torsello, A., Virmani, et al. (1990). New Biol. 3, 272–283.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chamson-Reig, A., Lux-Lantos, V., Tesone, M., and Libertun, C. (1997). Endocrine. 6, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Attardi, B. and Happe, H. K. (1986). Endocrinology 119, 274–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, J. M., Yasumoto, T., and Cronin, M. J. (1987). Life Sci. 103, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Naor, Z. (1990). Endocr. Rev. 11, 326–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grynkiewicz, G., Poenie, M., and Tsien, R. Y. (1985). J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440–3450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Libertun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacau-Mengido, I.M., Iglesias, A.G., Lux-Lantos, V. et al. Ontogenic and sexual differences in pituitary GnRH receptors and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization induced by GnRH. Endocr 8, 177–183 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:8:2:177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:8:2:177

Key Words

Navigation