Abstract
The way cells respond to radiation or chemical exposure that damages deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is important because induced lesions left unrepaired, or those that are misrepaired, can lead to mutation, cancer, or lethality. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved mechanisms that repair damaged DNA directly, such as nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, homology-based recombinational repair, or nonhomologous end joining, which promote survival and reduce potential deleterious effects (1). However, at least eukaryotic cells also have cell cycle checkpoints capable of sensing DNA damage or blocks in DNA replication, signaling the cell cycle machinery, and causing transient delays in progression at specific phases of the cell cycle (2; see ref. 3 for a review). A related but more primitive system may exist in prokaryotes (4–7). These delays are thought to provide cells with extra time for mending DNA lesions before entry into critical phases of the cell cycle, such as S or M, events that could be lethal with damaged DNA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., and Siede, W. (1995) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
Hartwell, L. H. and Weinert, T. A. (1989) Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246, 629–634.
Nyberg, K. A., Michelson, R. J., Putnam, C. W., and Weinert, T. A. (2002) Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 617–656.
Bridges, B. A. (1995) Are there DNA damage checkpoints in E. coli? Bioessays 17, 63–70.
Autret, S., Levine, A., Holland, I. B., and Seror, S. J. (1997) Cell cycle checkpoints in bacteria. Biochimie 79, 549–554.
Opperman, T., Murli, S., Smith, B. T., and Walker, G. C. (1999) A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9218–9223.
Sutton, M. D., Smith, B. T., Godoy, V. G., and Walker, G. C. (2000) The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 479–497.
Hartwell, L. H., and Kastan, M. B. (1994) Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 266, 1821–1828.
Garvik, B., Carson, M., and Hartwell, L. (1995) Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6128–6138.
Toczyski, D. P., Galgoczy, D. J., and Hartwell, L. H. (1997) CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90, 1097–1106.
Canman, C. E., Wolff, A. C., Chen, C. Y., Fornace, A. J., Jr, and Kastan, M. B. (1994) The p53-dependent G1 cell cycle checkpoint pathway and ataxia-telangiectasia. Cancer Res. 54, 5054–5058.
Meyer, K. M., Hess, S. M., Tlsty, T. D., and Leadon, S. A. (1999) Human mammary epithelial cells exhibit a differential p53-mediated response following exposure to ionizing radiation or UV light. Oncogene 18, 5795–5805.
Kim, S. T., Xu, B., and Kastan, M. B. (2002) Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 16, 560–570.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Lieberman, H.B., Hopkins, K.M. (2004). Methods to Induce Cell Cycle Checkpoints. In: Lieberman, H.B. (eds) Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 241. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-646-0:3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-646-0:3
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-115-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-646-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols