Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics in the trenches

A multifaceted analysis of the stem cell debate

  • Published:
Stem Cell Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing understanding of stem cell biology has opened up the possibility of using cell transplantation to treat a large variety of diseases. The medical need to identify optimal therapies is being challenged, however, by some members of society who seek to impose on this scientific quest their views—generally associated with particular religious beliefs—of what constitutes allowable research. This conflict mirrors earlier battles, extending over 150 years, between those implementing inoculation and vaccination to protect against smallpox and those who felt this to be unethical for religious reasons. For the many individuals who might benefit from the potential of stem cell medicine, such prolonged debate is unacceptable.

In this review, conflicts in this debate are examined by holding opponents of embryonic stem cell (ESC) research to the standards applied to the science. The challenge of identifying optimal cells for tissue repair is juxtaposed with misrepresentations of stem cell science by those opposed to ESC research. Absolutist views on ethics are juxtaposed with examples of the bad science and unethical acts that occur when dogmatic religious filters and definitions of human-ness are forced upon scientific discussions. Finally, after considering how opponents of ESC research may, ironically, enhance commercial demand for cells derived from fetuses aborted for personal reasons of the mother, 10 proposals are offered that would—if followed by all participants in this debate—produce more ethically balanced discussions and a more comprehensive body of data from which evidence-based conclusions can be drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young MJ, Ray J, Whiteley SJ, Klassen H, and Gage FH. Neuronal differentiation and morphological integration of hippocampal progenitor cells transplanted to the retina of immature and mature dystrophic rats. Mol Cell Neurosci 2000;16:197–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klassen HJ, Ng TF, Kurimoto Y, et al. Multipotent retinal progenitors express developmental markers, differentiate into retinal neurons, and preserve light-mediated behavior. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4167–4173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies JE, Huang C, Proschel C, Noble M, Mayer-Proschel M, and Davies SJA. Astrocytes derived from glial restricted precursor cells promote spinal cord repair. J Biology 2006; in press.

  4. Lu P, Jones LL, and Tuszynski MH. BDNF-expressing marrow stromal cells support extensive axonal growth at sites of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2005;191:344–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill CE, Proschel C, Noble M, et al. Acute transplantation of glial-restricted precursor cells into spinal cord contusion injuries: survival, differentiation, and effects on lesion environment and axonal regeneration. Exp Neurol 2004;190:289–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hess DC, Hill WD, Martin-Studdard A, Carroll J, Brailer J, and Carothers J. Bone marrow as a source of endothelial cells and NeuN-expressing cells after stroke. Stroke 2002;33:1362–1368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borlongan CV, Evans A, Yu G, and Hess DC. Limitations of intravenous human bone marrow CD133+ cell grafts in stroke rats. Brain Res 2005;28;1048:116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, et al. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med 2000;6:1229–1234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Willenbring H, Akkari Y, et al. Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature 2003;422:897–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weimann JM, Charlton CA, Brazelton TR, Hackman RC, and Blau HM. Contribution of transplanted bone marrow cells to Purkinje neurons in human adult brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100(4):2088–2093.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weimann JM, Johansson CB, Trejo A, and Blau HM. Stable reprogrammed heterokaryons form spontaneously in Purkinje neurons after bone marrow transplant. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:959–966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.micatholicconference.org/pdf/focus/focus_200108-StemCellResearch.pdf. Michigan Catholic Conference, Volume 29, No. 3, August 2001.

  13. Stem cell reality check. Human Life of Washington. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.humanlife.net/stemcellrealitycheck.html

  14. Stem cell reality check #1. Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/bioethic/stemfax1.htm

  15. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, and Retik AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006; in press.

  16. Rudin J. The Baptizing of America: The Religious Right’s Plans for the Rest of Us. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Evangelical scientists refute gravity with new ‘intelligent galling.’ The Onion 2005; August 17. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512.

  18. Pacholczyk T. Making sense out of bioethics: a spectacular stem cell scandal. The Diocese of Scranton, Pennsylvania. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.dioceseofscranton.org/You%20Should%20Know/StemCellScandal.asp. Accessed April 2006.

  19. Howard B. Neuroscientist priest speaks with TC on the latest bioethical issues. Texas Catholic Online http://texascatholic.com/default.asp?NodeId=891.AccessedApril2006.

  20. “Life on the balance.” Online postings. Open Book 2005; May 27. Retrieved April 2006 from http://amywelborn.typepad.com/openbook/2005/05/life_on_the_bal.html

  21. White AD. Chapter XII.10, “Theological opposition to inoculation, vaccination and the use of anesthetics,” in A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. 1896. Available at http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/whitewtc.html or http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/White/

  22. Philipkoski K. Stem-cell patient roasts lawmaker. Wired 2005; June 20. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/1,67728-1.html

  23. http://www.mocatholic.org/StemCell-Cloning/Columbia KOFC.pdf. Ends vs. Means, by Thomas A. Szyszkiewicz, 2005.

  24. Treatments from adult stem cells. Oregon Right to Life 2006. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.ortl.org/stem-cell-cloning/treatments.php

  25. Neill S. The human touch. The Catholic Virginian 2006; January 30 (Editorial). Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.catholicvirginian.org/archive/2006/2006vol81iss7/pages/editorials.htm

  26. www.cathmed.org/newsroom/current/frcstemcell.pdf. Stem Cell Research, Cloning & Human Embryos, by Dr. Tadeusz Pacholezyk (Family Research Council).

  27. Kelly K. Expert debunks myths of embryonic stem-cell research. The Catholic Key 2001. Retrieved April 2006 from http://catholickey.org/index.php3?gif=news.gifόde=viewissue=20050415→ticle_id=3389

  28. Gilmer T. SCI restoration: the nose knows. New Mobility Magazine 2005; May. Retrieved April 2006 from http://www.newmobility.com/review_article.cfm?id=1007⇂tion=browse

  29. Amador MJ and Guest JD. An appraisal of ongoing experimental procedures in human spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29:70–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Genetics, Aba Institute for Biomedical Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 14642, Rochester, NY

    Mark Noble PhD

Authors
  1. Mark Noble PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Noble PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noble, M. Ethics in the trenches. Stem Cell Rev 1, 345–376 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/SCR:1:4:345

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/SCR:1:4:345

Keywords

Search

Navigation