Figures
Abstract
Cyclophilins, a type of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, function as important molecular chaperones in a series of biological processes. However, the expression pattern and signal transduction pathway of cyclophilins are still unclear. Here, we showed that the promoter of OsCYP2 could function as a tissue-specific promoter by GUS staining. Moreover, we found that the promoter sequence contained not only core elements but also inducible elements. Then, the ABA-responsive element was used for cDNA library screening, and the transcription factor MYC2-like was identified by a yeast one-hybrid assay and confirmed through an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Furthermore, the relative expression showed that MYC2-like was induced by abscisic acid. In addition, MYC2-like overexpression enhanced salt tolerance in transformants and partially restored the cyp2-RNAi line. In summary, we explored a novel transcriptional signal mediated by MYC2-like, a potential regulator of salt stress-related physiological processes in rice.
Citation: Liu H, Cui P, Zhang B, Zhu J, Liu C, Li Q (2022) Binding of the transcription factor MYC2-like to the ABRE of the OsCYP2 promoter enhances salt tolerance in Oryza sativa. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0276075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276075
Editor: Binying Fu, Institute of Crop Science, CHINA
Received: June 11, 2022; Accepted: September 28, 2022; Published: October 14, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ18C130001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31301272). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Introduction
Salt, drought, cold and toxic metals in the soil are major environmental factors that affect the geographical distribution of plants in nature and limit plant productivity in agriculture. Abiotic stresses are often unfavorable or stressful for plant growth and development [1]. Conversely, crops undergo a series of morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes to adapt to these stress conditions during their lifetimes [2, 3]. The development of crops with elevated levels of salt tolerance is therefore highly desirable. How plants sense stress signals and adapt to adverse environments are fundamental biological questions. To date, there have been many constraints in the complexity and low genetic variance of quantitative traits during previous genetic modifications [4, 5]. With the development of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics resources, a large array of stress-responsive transcription factors has been identified with functional research in crops [6–8]. Most importantly, promoter structure analysis and yeast one-hybrid assays have been applied as efficient technologies in transcription factor studies [9–11].
Basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins are a superfamily of transcription factors that bind as homodimers and/or heterodimers to a consensus hexanucleotide sequence called the E-box (5’-CANNTG-3’). Among the different types of E-boxes, the most common palindromic G-box (5’-CACGTG-3’) provides a core consensus site for the recognition of bHLH transcription factors [12]. In addition, flanking nucleotides outside of the hexanucleotide core sequence and loop residue in bHLH transcription factors could affect the binding specificity [13, 14]. To date, a series of MYC2-like transcription factors containing bHLH domains have been well characterized in crops as crucial regulatory components in diverse abiotic and biotic stress responses [15, 16]. More importantly, there is some evidence that bHLH transcription factors mediate hormone signaling to regulate crop biological processes [17, 18].
Therefore, novel stress-inducible genes/proteins can help to reveal the unknown molecular mechanisms of complex traits in abiotic stress tolerance. In a previous study, cyclophilin 2 (CYP2), as a molecular chaperone, was shown to confer salt tolerance in rice by modulating the activities of antioxidant enzymes at the translational level [19]. Moreover, we hope to elucidate the precise regulatory mechanism underlying the key transcription factors involved in this signaling pathway. Here, we present the expression pattern of OsCYP2 and characterize its transcriptional signal mediated by MYC2-like, a potential regulator of salt stress-related physiological processes via abscisic acid (ABA) signaling in rice.
Materials and methods
Cloning and analysis of the OsCYP2 promoter
Wild type seeds (Oryza sativa L. cv. Aichi-ashahi) were germinated with distilled water in a dark incubator at 30 °C and cultured at 32 °C/28 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h/8 h (light/dark). The total DNA of seedlings was extracted from the wild type according to the modified CTAB method. An upstream 1156 bp fragment of OsCYP2 was amplified by specific primers (S1 Table in S1 File) and then used to substitute the promoter that can drive GUS in pCAMBIA1301 to construct a pOsCYP2:GUS plasmid (S1 Fig in S1 File). The cis elements of the promoter were predicted by PLACE [20].
Histochemical GUS assay
The pOsCYP2:GUS vector was transformed into the wild type by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 according to a previously described method with minor modification [21]. GUS activity was conducted with various tissues (seed, leaf, stem and root) of wild type and transformants via histochemical staining by 0.5 mg/mL X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide), which contained 80 mM phosphate buffer, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.1% Triton X-100, and one drop of N,N-dimethyl formamide. All the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hr and rinsed for 30 min with a series of 50%, 75%, and 100% ethanol. Then, these samples were soaked in 75% ethanol for analysis and photography.
Construction of bait yeast strain and testing for aureobasidin A (AbA) expression
Based on cis elements of the promoter, the ABA responsive element (ABRE) target sequence (p62) was used as a bait, and the mutant sequence (p63) was used as a negative control. Two antiparallel oligonucleotide sequences (S1 Table in S1 File) of ABRE cis elements with HindIII and XhoI overhanging sticky ends were synthesized, and then, the oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated into the linearized pAbAi vector. Recombinant plasmids were linearized through BstBI and transformed into Y1H to generate bait reporter yeast strains. The minimal inhibitory concentration of AbA was used to bait the reporter yeast strain.
Yeast one-hybrid assay
The preconstructed cDNA library was transformed into the Y1H bait strain (pBait-AbAi) using the Yeastmaker Transformation System 2 (Clontech, Cat. No. 630439) [22]. The transformation reaction was spread on SD/-Leu plates with minimal inhibitory concentration of AbA. The candidate clones were restreaked onto SD/-Leu/AbA at least three times to generate a single colony. To eliminate duplicate clones, we conducted yeast colony PCR with Matchmaker Insert Check PCR Mix 2 (Clontech, Cat. No. 630497). The prey vectors that showed a single band in yeast colony PCR were isolated by an Easy Yeast Plasmid Isolation Kit (Clontech, Cat. No. 630467) and sequenced using T7 primers. For verification of positive interactions, each prey should be transformed into bait and mutant bait strains on selective media with side-by-side positive and negative controls.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
The transcription factor MYC2-like was cloned into pET28a for electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs). The recombinant vector was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 competent cells, and the fusion protein was purified with a Magnehis Protein Purification Kit (Promega, Cat. No. V8500). The samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE and western blots with His tag antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The oligonucleotides containing three tandem copies of the elements are listed in S1 Table in S1 File and labeled by a Biotin 3’ End DNA Labeling Kit (Thermo, Cat. No. 89818). EMSAs were conducted using a Light Shift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. 20148) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Transcript level of MYC2-like under salt and ABA induction
Wild type seedlings were cultivated as previously described. Samples were treated with 150 mM NaCl and 50 μM ABA. The transcript level of MYC2-like was determined by quantitative RT-PCR after treatment for 2 hr, 12 hr and 24 hr. The primers for MYC2-like are listed in S1 Table in S1 File. Three replicates were used for each sample and assayed according to reference [23].
Construction of MYC2-like overexpression transformants in wild-type and cyp2-RNAi lines
The recombinant vector p1300-Ubiquitin-myc2-like was constructed and then transformed into the wild-type and cyp2-RNAi line L3-61 [22] through the A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 to create overexpression transformants. Plant transformation was performed according to a previously described method with minor modification [21]. Ten-day-old independent transformants of MYC2-like overexpression in wild-type and cyp2-RNAi lines were identified by quantitative RT-PCR.
Physiological and biochemical assays of transformants
For evaluation of the salt response of transformants, 10-day-old seedlings of the wild type, MYC2-like overexpression in wild type, MYC2-like overexpression in cyp2-RNAi and cyp2-RNAi groups were treated with 150 mM NaCl for 24 hr in three replications. Fresh leaves (0.5 g) were ground and homogenized in 10 ml of precooled potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The mixture was centrifuged and used for the determination of various antioxidant enzymes. The physiological and biochemical indices were measured according to reference [24] and included superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline. In addition, fresh leaves (0.5 g) were digested with H2SO4 and H2O2 and then used to analyze the sodium and potassium ion contents through atomic absorption spectrophotometry [25].
Results
Promoter cloning and cis element analysis
The recombinant vector that contained an upstream 1156 bp fragment of OsCYP2 was identified by double digestion with BamHI and BglII (S2 Fig in S1 File). Furthermore, data regarding predicted cis-acting regulatory elements are listed in S2 Table in S1 File. This promoter not only contains core elements (TATA, CAAT and GATA box) but also contains inducible elements (ABRE and MYBR) that respond to abiotic stresses.
GUS staining and transcript level analysis of OsCYP2
In GUS staining, the results of the histochemical assay showed that four tissues (seed, leaf, stem and root) of transformants were stained blue, which were induced by the promoter of OsCYP2 (Fig 1E–1H), but not in the wild type (Fig 1A–1D). In particular, GUS activity was higher in seeds and stems than in other tissues, indicating that the promoter of OsCYP2 could function as a tissue-specific promoter.
A-D: seed, leaf, stem and root of wild type; E-H: seed, leaf, stem and root of the pOsCYP2:GUS transgenic plants.
Screening a cDNA library and rescuing a prey plasmid
Four types of Y1H strains (p62-AbAi, p63-AbAi, p53-AbAi, and pAbAi) were constructed and used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of AbA. The results showed that neither the positive control Y1H (p53-AbAi) nor the negative control Y1H (pAbAi) can grow on SD/-Ura with 150–750 μg/L AbA. The effective inhibitory effects were validated at 750 μg/L for Y1H [p62-AbAi] and Y1H [p63-AbAi] for cDNA library screening (S3 Fig in S1 File). For a further step, sixteen colonies were obtained on SD/-Leu/AbA plates by library scale transformation of the Y1H [p62-AbAi] strain. Among them, twelve colonies showed good growth after streaking three times on SD/-Leu/AbA media plates (S4 Fig in S1 File). The results of yeast colony PCR showed that 10 colonies (Nos. 3, 5–8, 9, 11, 12, 14–16) had one band, except for No. 12 (two bands) (S5 Fig in S1 File). In distinguishing positive from false interactions, the results showed that candidate prey (No. 11) could grow on selective media plates (Fig 2), indicating a genuine interaction compared to other false interactions (S6 Fig in S1 File). Furthermore, a MYC2-like protein (Gene ID: 4349484) was identified by sequencing and BLAST.
SD/-Leu: synthetically defined medium with dropout leucine, SD/-Leu+AbA: synthetically defined medium with dropout leucine and plus 750 μg/L Aureobasidin A; Y1H (p62-AbAi): bait strain; Y1H (p63-AbAi): mutant bait strain.
MYC2-like protein binds to ABREs in vitro
To investigate the in vitro interaction between MYC2-like protein and the ABRE, we identified a His-tagged fusion MYC2-like protein although SDS-PAGE and western blotting (S7 Fig in S1 File). The results of EMSAs showed that MYC2-like protein could directly bind to biotin-labeled probes with a shift band by comparison to unconjugated and biotin-mutated probes (Fig 3). In addition, the signal shift observed can be prevented by competition from 200-fold molar excess unlabeled probes.
1: no MYC2-like protein for biotin labeled probe (p62) to bind, establishes the position of an unshifted probe band; 2: the MYC2-like protein was incubated with the biotin labeled probe (p62); 3: 200-fold excesses of unlabeled probes were used for competition; 4: biotin labeled mutant probe (p63) were used as a negative control.
MYC2-like was induced by salt and ABA
To better understand the expression pattern of MYC2-like in response to salt and ABA, we detected the transcript level with a series of treatments (Fig 4). The expression of MYC2-like could be induced both by salt and ABA at 2 h, 12 h and 24 h. Furthermore, the expression demonstrated a different trend. For NaCl treatment, the transcript level gradually decreased over time from 2–24 hr; however, the maximal expression occurred at 12 hr under ABA treatment.
Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Phenotypic characterization and physiological responses to salt stress of transformants
Based on the results of qRT-PCR (S8 Fig in S1 File), three independent lines with MYC2-like overexpression in wild type and MYC2-like overexpression in cyp2-RNAi were selected for salt tolerance analysis. After treatment for 24 hr, the leaves of each line showed wilting, especially the wild type, and cyp2-RNAi (L3-61) exhibited even more sensitivity to salt stress (Fig 5). Obviously, MYC2-like overexpression (L1-4) resulted in better growth conditions, which implied that this gene partially restored the cyp2-RNAi (L2-4) phenotype under salt stress (Fig 5). The SOD, POD, and CAT activities in MYC2-like overexpression transformants were significantly increased by 44.6%, 73.2% and 68.4%, respectively, compared to that of the wild type (Fig 6A–6C). Similar results were exhibited in cyp2-RNAi and MYC2-like overexpression plants with the cyp2-RNAi background. In addition, the MDA and proline contents suggested that MYC2-like overexpression may result in better resistance to salt stress by reducing lipid peroxidation (Fig 6D and 6E). However, there were no significant differences in the Na+/K+ ratio among these lines under control conditions and NaCl treatment, suggesting that MYC2-like cannot adapt to salt stress selectively through Na+ and K+ uptake (Fig 6F).
Values are mean ± standard deviation followed by the same letter did not significantly differences at P≤0.05 according to least significant difference test.
Discussion
An important feature of salt stress is that the hyperosmotic signal causes the accumulation of the phytohormone ABA, which in turn elicits many adaptive responses in crops. Therefore, crops have developed a series of alterations in physiology and biochemistry at the transcriptional and translational levels to offset the adverse effects that will allow them to avoid stress conditions [26]. There are two types of stress-responsive genes: functional and regulatory genes [27]. In a previous study, a cyclophilin chaperone named OsCYP2 was shown to promote resistance to abiotic stresses, especially salt stress, when overexpressed [19]. However, the transcriptional mechanism of this signaling pathway is unclear. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the expression pattern and promoter sequence of OsCYP2 to provide more pivotal information to elucidate the mechanism of transcriptional regulation in response to salt stresses. A 1156 bp fragment upstream of OsCYP2 was cloned and was shown to function as a tissue-specific promoter, which is especially efficient in induction in seeds and stems (S2 Fig in S1 File and Fig 1). It was implied that the different regulatory regions of the promoter may be responsible for tissue-specific expression [28].
Cis elements of promoters play an important role in the activation and suppression of gene expression in the transcriptional regulatory process, which depends on specific binding sequences for proteins [29, 30]. The ABA responsive element (ABRE, PyACGTGGC), including various types of DNA core sequences (G-box, CE3, hex3 and motif III), is the major binding site for ABA-regulated transcription factor targets [31]. The interaction between transcription factors and ABREs has been demonstrated to play a critical role in ABA-mediated responses [12, 31]. In a previous study, the expression of OsCYP2 could be induced by several abiotic stresses and ABA [19]. Notably, 5 ABREs were found in the OsCYP2 promoter sequence. Then, a MYC2-like transcription factor was identified to bind the ABRE by yeast one-hybrid and EMSAs (Figs 2 and 3).
There are two types of plant growth responses to salinity: the osmotic phase and ionic phase [32]. First, organic solutes accumulate in the cytosol and organelles at high salt concentrations to balance the osmotic pressure of the ions in the vacuole. Second, plant salt tolerance is mainly associated with low maintenance of the cytosolic Na+/K+ ratio [33, 34]. According to our results, MYC2-like overexpression could elevate the content of proline in transformants compared to the wild type in the presence of 150 mM NaCl, but there were no significant differences in the Na+/K+ ratio among these lines (Fig 6). However, MYC2-like overexpression transformants showed higher activity of antioxidative enzymes in reactive oxygen species scavenging. Therefore, we speculated that the MYC2-like gene increases resistance to salt stress by increasing the activity of antioxidative enzymes and post-translational regulation in transformed plants rather than selectively through Na+ and K+ uptake.
Conclusions
To date, a clear understanding of the perception of salt and the signaling pathway has helped us to develop crop cultivars resistant to salinity and use salt-affected lands for productive cultivation. The identification and characterization of interactive transcription factors expressed under salt-responsive promoter elements could provide a promising approach for genetic breeding. In summary, our results indicated that OsCYP2 is involved in salt stress resistance through a novel transcriptional signal mediated by the MYC2-like transcription factor regulated in rice. More importantly, this molecule is a potential regulator that can provide a foundation in these sophisticated regulatory mechanisms to salt stress response and genetic improvement in rice.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Songlin Ruan (Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for providing the rice seeds.
References
- 1. Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Ynag S, Herrera-Estrella LR, Xu G, et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020; 63: 635–674. pmid:32246404
- 2. Amaral MN, Arge LWP, Benitez LC, Danielowski R, Silveira SFS, Farias DR, et al. Differential expression of photosynthesis-related genes and quantification of gas exchange in rice plants under abiotic stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016; 38: 1–11.
- 3. Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16: 86. pmid:27079791
- 4. Tester M, Bacic A. Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiol. 2005; 137: 791–793. pmid:15761207
- 5. Varshney RV, Bansal KC, Aggarwal PK, Datta SK, Craufurd PQ. Agricultural biotechnology for crop improvement in a variable climate: hope or hype? Trends Plant Sci. 2011; 16: 363–371. pmid:21497543
- 6. Li W, Yu D, Yu J, Zhu D, Zhao Q. Functional analysis of maize silk-specific ZmbZIP25 promoter. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19: 822. pmid:29534529
- 7. Yang W, Ju Y, Zou L, Shang L, Li X, Li X, et al. OsHsfB4d binds the promoter and regulates the expression of OsHsp18.0-CI to resistant against Xanthomonas Oryzae. Rice. 2020; 13: 28. pmid:32462553
- 8. Zhang H, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Guo D, Zhao X, Gao W, et al. StWRKY13 promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis in potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021; 49: 102–114. pmid:34794538
- 9. Ding Y, Zhu J, Zhao D, Liu Q, Yang Q, Zhang T. Targeting cis-regulatory elements for rice grain quality improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 705834. pmid:34456947
- 10. Li C, Yan C, Sun Q, Wang J, Yuan C, Mou Y, et al. The bHLH transcription factor AhbHLH112 improves the drought tolerance of peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21: 540. pmid:34784902
- 11. Wani SH, Anand S, Singh B, Bohra A, Joshi R. WRKY transcription factors and plant defense responses: latest discoveries and future prospects. Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 40: 1071–1085. pmid:33860345
- 12. Toledo-Ortiz G, Huq E, Quail PH. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell. 2003; 15: 1749–1770. pmid:12897250
- 13. Massari ME, Murre C. Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eukaryotic organisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 429–440.
- 14. Nair SK, Burley SK. Recognizing DNA in the library. Nature. 2000; 404: 715–717. pmid:10783871
- 15. Wang H, Ding C, Du H, Liu H, Wang Y, Yu D. Identification of soybean MYC2-like transcription factors and overexpression of GmMYC1 could stimulate defense mechanism against common cutworm in transgenic tobacco. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014; 36: 1881–1892. pmid:24863293
- 16. Li X, Yu B, Wu Q, Min Q, Zeng R, Xie Z, et al. OsMADS23 phosphorylated by SAPK9 confers drought and salt tolerance by regulating ABA biosynthesis in rice. PLoS Genet. 2021; 17: e1009699. pmid:34343171
- 17. Wang T, Wang S, Wang Y, Li J, Yan F, Liu Y, et al. Jasmonic acid-induced inhibition of root growth and leaf senescence is reduced by GmbHLH3, a soybean bHLH transcription factor. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2020; 100: 477–487.
- 18. Wu H, Ren Z, Zheng L, Guo M, Yang J, Hou L, et al. The bHLH transcription factor GhPAS1 mediates BR signaling to regulate plant development and architecture in cotton. Crop J. 2021; 9: 1049–1059.
- 19. Ruan SL, Ma HS, Wang SH, Fu YP, Xin Y, Liu WZ, et al, (2011) Proteomic identification of OsCYP2, a rice cyclophilin that confers salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings when overexpressed. BMC Plant Biology. 11, 34. pmid:21324151
- 20. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 297–300. pmid:9847208
- 21. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 1994; 6: 271–282. pmid:7920717
- 22. Cui P, Liu HB, Ruan SL, Ali B, Gill RA, Ma HS, et al. A zinc finger protein, interacted with cyclophilin, affects root development via IAA pathway in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017; 59: 496–505. pmid:28267270
- 23. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
- 24. Liu D, Pei ZF, Naeem MS, Ming DF, Liu HB, Khan F, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid activates antioxidative defence system and seedling growth in Brassica napus L. under water-deficit stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2011; 197: 284–295.
- 25. Munns R, Wallace PA, Teakle NL, Colmer TD. Measuring Soluble Ion Concentrations (Na+, K+, Cl−) in Salt-Treated Plants. In: Sunkar R. (eds) Plant Stress Tolerance. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), Humana Press. 2010; 639: 371–382. pmid:20387059
- 26. Singhal P, Jan AT, Azam M, Haq QMR. Plant abiotic stress: a prospective strategy of exploiting promoters as alternative to overcome the escalating burden. Front. Life Sci. 2015; 9: 52–63.
- 27. Schwarzer W, Spitz F. The architecture of gene expression: integrating dispersed cis-regulatory modules into coherent regulatory domains. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2014; 27: 74–82. pmid:24907448
- 28. Lü S, Gu H, Yuan X, Wang X, Wu AM, Qu L, et al. The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of a rice metallothionein gene reveals different regulatory regions responsible for tissue-specific and inducible expression in transgenic Arabidopsis. Transgenic Res. 2007; 16: 177–191. pmid:17146614
- 29. Hernandez-Garcia CM, Finer JJ. Identification and validation of promoters and cis-acting regulatory elements. Plant Sci. 2014; 217–218: 109–119. pmid:24467902
- 30. Liu JH, Peng T, Dai W. Critical cis-acting elements and interacting transcription factors: key players associated with abiotic stress responses in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014; 32: 303–317.
- 31. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R, Maruyama K, Parvez MM, Seki M, et al. AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel AREB dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 3470–3488. pmid:16284313
- 32. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008; 59: 651–681. pmid:18444910
- 33. Gupta A, Shaw BP. Biochemical and molecular characterisations of salt tolerance components in rice varieties tolerant and sensitive to NaCl: the relevance of Na+ exclusion in salt tolerance in the species. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020; 48: 72–87. pmid:32727653
- 34. Gupta A, Shaw BP, Sahu BB. Post-translational regulation of the membrane transporters contributing to salt tolerance in plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021; 48: 1199–1212. pmid:34665998