Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptome analysis of Tamarix ramosissima leaves in response to NaCl stress

  • Yahui Chen,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Guangyu Wang,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    Current address: Department of Forest Resources Management, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Affiliation Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Hongxia Zhang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Validation

    Current address: College of Agriculture, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China

    Affiliation The Engineering Research Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China

  • Ning Zhang ,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    ecologyjiang@gmail.com (JJ); zhangningswing@outlook.com (NZ); 3614@ldu.edu.cn (ZS)

    Affiliation Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Jiang Jiang ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation

    ecologyjiang@gmail.com (JJ); zhangningswing@outlook.com (NZ); 3614@ldu.edu.cn (ZS)

    Current address: Faculty of Foresty, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Affiliation Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

  • Zhizhong Song

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Visualization

    ecologyjiang@gmail.com (JJ); zhangningswing@outlook.com (NZ); 3614@ldu.edu.cn (ZS)

    Affiliation The Engineering Research Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China

Abstract

Halophyte Tamarix ramosissima. Lcdcb (T. ramosissima) are known as the representative of Tamarix plants that are widely planted in salinized soil. However, molecular mechanisms towards salt tolerance and adaptation are largely rare. In this study, we carried out RNA-sequence and transcriptome analysis of T. ramosissima in response to NaCl stress, screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and further verified by qRT-PCR. Results showed that 105702 unigenes were spliced from the raw data of transcriptome sequencing, where 54238 unigenes were retrieved from KEGG, KOG, NR, and SwissProt. After 48 hours of NaCl treatment, the expression levels of 6374 genes were increased, and 5380 genes were decreased in leaves. After 168 hours, the expression levels of 3837 genes were up-regulated and 7808 genes were down-regulated. In particular, 8 transcription factors annotated to the KEGG Pathway were obtained, involving the WRKY and bZIP transcription family. In addition, KEGG pathway annotation showed that expression of 39 genes involved in ROS scavenging mechanisms were significantly changed, in which 21 genes were up-regulated and 18 genes were down-regulated after 48 hours as well as 15 genes were up-regulated and 24 genes were down-regulated after 168h. Simultaneously, the enzyme activities of SOD and POD were significantly enhanced under NaCl treatment, but the enzyme activity of CAT was not significantly enhanced. Moreover, WRKY, MYB and bZIP may participate in the process of salt resistance in T. ramosissima. This study provides gene resources and a theoretical basis for further molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in T. ramosissima.

1. Introduction

Salinized soil has high salt content and poor soil physical and chemical properties, which seriously hindered the growth and development of plants [1]. Salinized soil contains a lot of Na+ type salt which can destroy the stability of protein and membrane, and produces osmotic stress and ion poisoning to initiate reactive oxygen ROS (reactive oxygen species) signals in the cell, make dysfunction of the cell, affect the growth of plants, and causes plant death in severe cases [2]. In the past decades, the area of salinized soil has continued to expand due to global human activities and climate changes. Favorably, it is becoming a hotspot to carry out afforestation, restore salinized soil and improve the ecological environment in salinized soil areas.

In recent years, RNA-Seq technology has been widely used to study molecular mechanisms of plant resistance to adverse stresses, including salt stress [3, 4]. Previous studies showed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) would be produced in multiple cell compartments, including chloroplasts [5], mitochondria [6], and peroxisomes [7] under salt stress conditions. A relatively low concentration of ROS is known as an important signal molecule to regulate the normal plant growth and responses to abiotic stresses [8, 9]. However, excessive accumulation of ROS can adversely cause cell oxidative damage [10]. To adapt to ROS damage, higher plants have evolved corresponding regulatory mechanisms to maintain the stability of life activities. Notably, ROS scavenging enzymatic systems, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), are prone to play important roles to adapt to undesired abiotic stresses [11]. In addition, plants can also take advantage of the ascorbic acid- reduced glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle, which contains APX, glutathione reductase (GR) and AsA, and GSH, and so on, to eliminate the damage of ROS [12].

In particular, transcription factors are the most important regulators for plants to respond to various abiotic stresses [13]. In details, reports are focused on the involvement of transcription factors of WRKY [14], bHLH [15], bZIP [16] NAC [17], MYB [18], AP2/ERF [19] under salt stress. In cotton, the WRKY transcription factor gene GhWRKY34 was induced by salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis [20]. In Paspalum notatum, the WRKY transcription factor genes are involved in regulating the expression of SOD and related oxidoreductase genes to adapt to salt stress [21]. Notably, Tamarix plants have evolved a complex regulatory network for a long time to adapt to the adverse abiotic stresses [22]. T. hispida is often used as a biological material to explore the molecular mechanisms towards salt stress tolerance. Overexpression of the T. hispida ThCOL2 gene can regulate the activity of protective enzymes and reduce the accumulation of O2− and H2O2 that enhanced the ROS scavenging ability and improved the adaptability of transgenic T. hispida under salt stress [23]. Overexpression of ThbZIP1 enhanced the activity of POD and SOD, increased the content of soluble sugar and soluble protein that further improved salt tolerance in transgenic T. hispida [24]. T. ramosissima usually grows in arid and semi-arid regions with high salt content [25]. Moreover, low concentration (<100mM) NaCl promoted while high concentration (≥200mM) NaCl stress inhibited the growth of T. Ramosissima [26]. Liu and her colleagues found that T. ramosissima exhibited the strongest salt tolerance among 3 Tamarix species, including Tamarix gansuensis H.Z.Zhang, Tamarix leptostachys Bunge, and Tamarix ramosissima. Lcdcb, and T. ramosissima were chosen as the representative species of Tamarix plants for further mechanisms studies.

In this study, we performed high-throughput transcriptome sequencing in T. ramosissima under NaCl stress and screened and verified DEGS at the transcriptional level. This study lays a theoretical basis to reveal molecular mechanisms towards salt tolerance in Tamarix plants, and provides gene resources for further variety breeding of salt-tolerant Tamarix plants.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant materials

T. ramosissima seedlings were provided by the Dongying Experimental Station of Shandong Academy of Forestry Sciences. Experiments were completed at the Key Laboratory of Forest Tree Genetic Breeding and Biotechnology of the Ministry of Education of Nanjing Forestry University from October 2019 to March 2021. 5-month-old T. ramosissima seedlings with uniform growth were transferred to a 24-well hydroponic box (size: 40cm*30cm*16cm), supplemented with 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution, and then placed in a greenhouse that was maintained at 26 ± 2°C (day) whose relative humidity stays between 40% and 55% for 1 month after training before treatment. The culture solution was changed every 3rd day.

2.2 NaCl treatment

In the control group (CK), seedlings were suffered with 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution. In the treatment group, seedlings were cultured in 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution, supplemented with 200 mM NaCl. 8 plants were used in each group, and the experiments were repeated 3 times. The culture solution was changed every 3rd day. The leaf samples were collected at 0h, 48h, and 168h, respectively, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then moved to a -80°C refrigerator for storage.

2.3 Phenotype and antioxidative enzyme activity analysis in T. ramosissima leaves

Leaves of T. ramosissima were collected after 0h, 48h and 168h of NaCl treatment, respectively, and the distribution of salt secretion on the leaf surface was observed using a JSZ6S stereo microscope (Jiangnan, China). The activities of SOD [27], POD [28] and CAT [29] were determined and analyzed, according to the description of the commercial Extraction Kits (Jiancheng Limit Co., Nanjing, China).

2.4 Transcriptome sequencing

The frozen leaf samples were used for 3-generation high-throughput transcriptome sequencing, using Illumina HiSeq4000, in Guangzhou GENE Denovo Company. The purified PCR products were analyzed by pair-end sequencing (PE150) on the platform according to standard operations, and then fastp was used for quality control [30]. The original data was first filtered to obtain clean reads, then assembled [31]. These assembled fragments without N terminal obtained by reading overlap are used as the assembled Unigene, and then use Blast2 GO [32] and KOBAS [33] to obtain Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation. The Illumina raw sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Short Reads Archive (SRA) database under accession number SRP356215.

2.5 Screening methods for differentially expressed genes

DESeq2 software was used to analyze the reads count data to obtain the final correct FDR value (FDR value means BH corrected p value) [34]. A corrected p value of <0.05 is considered to be significantly enriched. Based on the results of the difference analysis, genes with FDR value <0.05 and |log2FC| > 1 are considered to be significantly different genes.

2.6 Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of DEGs

Eight putative genes (Unigene0104732, Unigene0028215, Unigene0083695, Unigene0069097, Unigene0090596, Unigene0024962, Unigene0007135 and Unigene0088781) were randomly selected to verify the accuracy of the RNA-Seq results by the qRT-PCR technique. The total RNA was extracted with Omega RNA Extraction Kit (Shanghai, China), and then reverse-transcribed the 1-strand cDNA by using the PrimerScript RT Master Mix Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Specific primers of DEGs are designed via the Primer-BLAST server (S1 Table). qRT-PCR samples were labelled with PowerUp SYBR Green Master mix reagent (Thermo Fisher, China) and then performed on ABI ViiA 7 Real-time PCR system (ABI, USA). A total of 3 biological repeats were performed, each with 4 technical repetitions. Actin was used as the internal reference gene, and the relative expression level was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.

3 Results

3.1 Phenotype and antioxidative enzyme activity analysis in T. ramosissima leaves

In the CK group, there was no salt secretion in the leaves of T. ramosissima at 0h, 48h and 168h. However, leaves began to excrete a small amount of salt at 48h under 200 mM NaCl treatment, and the salt secretion reached the maximum amount at 168h under NaCl treatment (Fig 1). These findings showed that the amount of salt secretion in leaves increased along with the prolongation of NaCl treatment time.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Salt secretion from T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl stress.

[Leaf salt secretion are checked in the leaves of T. ramosissima at 0h, 48h and 168h under 200mM NaCl treatment (The red labels indicate the salt secretion products)].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g001

The activities of SOD, POD and CAT in the leaves of T. ramosissima showed an increasing trend under 200mM NaCl for 48h and 168h, compared with the control group. In particular, the activities of SOD and POD were significantly higher than those of the control group after either 48h or 168h. The CAT activity increased slightly but had no significant change, compared with the control group (Fig 2). These results showed that SOD and POD activities under salt stress in the leaves of T. ramosissima.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Changes of SOD, POD and CAT enzyme activities in leaves of T. ramosissima under salt stress.

(Note: The different letters indicate significant differences at the p value < 0.05. The graph illustrates the changes of enzyme activities in SOD, POD and CAT compared with CK group at 48h and 168h after 200mM NaCl treatment).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g002

3.2 Sequencing quality analysis

Using IlluminaHiSeq4000, obtained multiple high-quality bases at 0h, 48h and 168h were obtained in T. ramosissima leaves under 200mM NaCl stress, and Q20 reached more than 95%, and Q30 reached more than 90% and the GC content is above 44% (Table 1), indicating that the quality of the transcriptome sequencing is relatively high, which is reliable for further analysis.

3.3 Unigene basic notes

Results showed that a total of 105,702 Unigenes were spliced in this study. There are 53,385, 46062, 31587, and 36087 Unigenes with gene annotations in the Nr, KEGG, KOG, and SwissProt databases, respectively, and a total of 27,670 Unigenes were simultaneously screened with annotations in the four major databases (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Annotation diagrams obtained form 4 major databases.

(Distribution map of 4 major databases annotated to genes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g003

3.4 Quantitative expression analysis of DEGs

Taking the CK group as the control, the transcription data of T. ramosissima under NaCl stress treatment at 0h, 48h and 168h were compared and analyzed, respectively. DEGs were screened with the standard of FDR value <0.05, p value <0.05 and |log2FC| > 1 after correction. In the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h comparison group, a total of 11,754 gene expression levels were detected, in which 6374 genes were up-regulated and 5380 genes were down-regulated under NaCl treatment. In the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h comparison group, a total of 7768 gene expression changes were detected, in which 2542 genes were induced and 5226 genes were reduced under NaCl treatment (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Analysis of DEGs.

(The differentially expressed genes were up-regulated and down-regulated in the comparison groups of CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h and CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g004

3.5 GO analysis of DEGs

Through GO annotation analysis, the above-mentioned DEGs can be divided into 3 categories: biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions, and a total of 51 different classification groups were observed (Fig 5). In detail, in the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h comparison group, the up-regulated genes were slightly more than the down-regulated genes, while in the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h comparison group, the down-regulated genes were significantly more than the up-regulated genes. In the broad category of biological process, DEGs are mainly concentrated in cellular process, metabolic process, single-organism process and response to stimulus (Table 2). In the molecular function category, DEGs are mainly concentrated in catalytic activity, binding, transporter activity and structural molecule activity (Table 3). Among the major categories of cell components, DEGs are mainly enriched in cell, cell part, organelle and membrane (Table 4). In addition, the number of up-regulated DEGs was significantly lower and the overall number of DEGs decreased, along with the time of NaCl treatment. We speculate that T. ramosissima leaves may respond to high NaCl stress by affecting the expression level of related DEGs at the transcription level.

thumbnail
Fig 5. GO enrichment analysis of DEGs.

(The first and outer circle: the top 20 GO terms are enriched, outside the circle is the scale of the number of genes. Different colors represent different Ontologies. The second circle: the number of the GO term in the background gene and the Q value. The more genes, the better the bars. Long, the smaller the Q value, the darker the color. The third circle: the bar graph of the ratio of up-regulated genes, the dark color represents the proportion of up-regulated genes, and the light color represents the proportion of down-regulated genes. The specific value is displayed below. The fourth and inner circle: the ratio of each GO term Rich Factor value (number of differential genes in this GO term divided by all numbers), background grid lines, each grid represents 0.1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g005

thumbnail
Table 2. GO enrichment analysis of the biological process of DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. GO enrichment analysis of molecular function of DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. GO enrichment analysis of cellular component of DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.t004

3.6 KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs in T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl stress KEGG pathway analysis showed that 1762 and 1366 DEGs were annotated in the comparison group of CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h and CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h, respectively (Fig 6), which directly reflected the changes of gene expression in leaves of T. ramosissima under NaCl stress. Among the top 10 KEGG pathways from the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h comparison group, Ribosome (ko03010) annotated to 435 DEGs, accounting for 24.69%, followed by biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (ko01110), phytopathogen interaction (ko04626), phenylpropane biosynthesis (ko00940), plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075) and plant MAPK signaling pathway (ko04016), respectively, annotated to 416 (23.61%), 88 (4.99%), 69 (3.92%), 69 (3.92%) and 59 3.35% DEGs. Among the top 20 pathways from the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h comparison group, the metabolic pathway (ko1100) was annotated to 614 DEGs, accounting for 44.95%, followed by the Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (ko01110), Ribosomes (ko03010), Oxidative phosphorylation (ko00190), Plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075) and Plant pathogen interaction (ko04626), respectively, annotated to 351 (25.70%), 296 (21.67%), 104(7.61%), 72 (5.27%) and 63 (4.61%) DEGs. In summary, DEGs are significantly enriched on the KEGG pathway, such as metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and plant hormone signal transduction, in T. ramosissima under NaCl treatment.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Top 10 pathway analysis.

(Distribution of differentially expressed genes in the top 10 KEGG pathway in the CK-0hv.s.NaCl-48h and CK-0hv.s.NaCl-168h comparison groups).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g006

3.6 Analysis of antioxidant DEGs in T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl stress

Results showed that the expression of 39 ROS scavenging-related DEGs in the leaves of T. ramosissima were changed under salt treatment (Table 5). Notably, there were 21 up-regulated genes and 18 down-regulated genes from the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-48h comparison group. The largest number of up-regulated genes is GST (7), followed by POD (4), CAT (4), APX (3), GR (2) and SOD (1). The largest number of down-regulated genes is GST (8), followed by POD (4), SOD (3), APX (2) and GPX (1). In the CK-0h v.s. NaCl-168h comparison group, there were 15 up-regulated genes and 24 down-regulated genes. In particular, the largest number of up-regulated genes are CAT(3), APX(3) and GST(3), followed by SOD(2), POD(2), and GR(2). The largest number of down-regulated genes is GST(12), followed by POD(6), SOD(2), APX(2), CAT(1) and GPX(1) (Fig 7). These results showed implying that the antioxidant mechanism might be initially enhanced in T. ramosissima leaves accompanied with corresponding physiological responses to resist NaCl stress during the first 48 hours. However, the antioxidant mechanism might be initially inhibited in T. ramosissima leaves under a long time (168 h) of NaCl treatment, just to adapt to salt stress.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Antioxidant mechanism related genes under NaCl treatment in T. ramosissima.

(Notes: GR, glutathione reductase; GST, glutathione S-transferases; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, Catalases; POD, peroxidase; SOD, Superoxide dismutase. The number of up-regulated and down-regulated activities of each enzyme in the reactive oxygen species scavenging mechanism shown in the figure in the comparison of CK V.S. NaCl-48h and CK V.S. NaCl-168h).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.g007

3.7 Analysis of transcription factor DEGs in T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl stress

Transcription factors play a major role in regulating plant growth and adaptation to adverse environments, including salt stress. In this study, According to the transcriptome sequencing of T. ramosissima leaves, many transcription factors were discovered. In this study, we did select 8 statically significant DEGs, which were specifically observed and annotated in the KEGG database. In particular, 5 WRKY (ko04626 and ko04016) annotated genes were responsive to NaCl treatment. In particular, the expression levels of Unigene0010090, Unigene0077293 and Unigene0079542 exhibited a downward trend at 0h, 48h and then an upward trend at 168h. The expression level of Unigene0014406 and Unigene0024962 continuously increased until 168h. In addition, 3 bZIP transcription factors were annotated to the KEGG pathway (ko04016, ko01100, ko01110, ko01200, ko01212, ko04146, ko00071, ko00640, ko00410, ko01040, ko00592 and ko04075). The expression level of Unigene0026888 and Unigene0008868 exhibited a downward trend at 48h and then an upward trend at 168h, while Unigene0010561 showed a downward trend at 48h and then an upward trend at 168h (Table 6).

3.8 Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of differential expression

We further randomly selected 8 DEGs involved in salt stress for qRT-PCR verification (S2 Table). Results showed that the expression level of Unigene0104732, Unigene0083695 and Unigene0069097 were induced at 48h but reduced at 168h, while genes of Unigene0090596, Unigene0007135 and Unigene0088781 were decreased at 48h but increased at 168h. Notably, Unigene0024962 was continuously increased while Unigene0028215 was continuously decreased under NaCl stress. These qRT-PCR verification results are completely consistent with the expression trends observed from the transcriptome sequencing analysis (S1 Fig). Nonetheless, the transcriptome data obtained in this study is accurate and reliable.

4. Discussion

Tamarix plants have evolved a series of complex mechanisms to resist and adapt to salt stress in the long term. In particular, Tamarix plants have typical multicellular salt glands, which can reduce plant damage from ion poisoning, which is one of the important morphological characteristics of Tamarix plants to adapt to the saline environment [25]. In this study, electron microscopy analysis showed that leaf salt secretion increased with the prolongation of NaCl treatment, suggesting that T. tamariska may alleviate and respond to the toxicity of salt stress via the salt secretion pathway, thereby adapting to the adverse long-term salt stresses.

The response of plants under salt stress is quite complex that needs multiple gene families and regulatory mechanisms involved in many biological pathways, including metabolism, signal transduction, energy production and transportation, ion penetration and transportation [35]. A comprehensive transcriptome analysis of T. ramosissima plants helps to reveal the molecular mechanisms of Tamarix plants in response to salt stress.

4.1 Enhanced active oxygen scavenging capacity in T. ramosissima

Plants are usually affected by various unfavorable environmental factors, including salt stress, that results in a large amount of ROS accumulation. In this present study, 39 ROS scavenging-related DEGs were significantly regulated under NaCl stress, implying that ROS scavenging mechanisms were indispensable for T. ramosissima plants under NaCl stress.

SOD, POD and CAT enzymes are involved in ROS scavenging in plant cells. Under abiotic stresses, expression of SOD, POD and CAT related genes are prone to be up-regulated [36]. Notably, the expression level of the TaSOD1.7 gene in leaves increased significantly, and the salt tolerance of transgenic wheat was enhanced [37]. In this study, 1 SOD, 4 POD and 4 CAT related genes were induced, while 3 SOD and 4 POD related genes are down-regulated at 48 h of NaCl treatment. Even168 hours after finishing NaCl treatment, there are still 2 SOD, 2 POD and 3 CAT related genes were up-regulated and 2 SOD, 6 POD and 1 CAT related genes were down-regulated. Together, these genes mentioned above may contribute to the increased enzyme activities of SOD and POD in T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl treatment.

Both APX and GPX are the key enzymes for enzymatically removing ROS, protecting cells by catalyzing H2O2, and playing an important role in plant adversity stress. APX family genes are involved in plant tolerance to drought, heat, salt, oxidation and biological stresses [38]. In this study, the expression of 3 APX related genes was up-regulated and 2 genes were down-regulated under NaCl treatment. However, only one GPX related gene was down-regulated. We guess that APX and GPX genes in T. ramosissima leaves may respond to salt stress in different ways.

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) is involved in detoxification and antioxidant defence, protecting plants from different abiotic stresses and adversities, and playing multiple roles in plant growth and development [3942]. In particular, GST was involved in salt stress and GST-related genes are non-sensitive to low and medium NaCl (≤100 mM) concentration but are sensitive to high NaCl (≥200 mM) stress [39, 46]. In this study, 3 GST related genes were up-regulated and 8 genes were down-regulated in the leaves at 48 h, and 3 genes were up-regulated and 12 genes were down-regulated at 168 h, implying that there may exist both positive and negative regulation of GST in T. ramosissima under NaCl stress, and the negative regulation may be the dominant.

GR is one of the plant antioxidant enzymes and a flavoprotein oxidoreductase, which exists in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, and plays an important role in the elimination of ROS in the process of plant oxidative stress [43]. The expression of Oryza sativa GR3 [44] and Jatropha JcGR [45] are all up-regulated under salt stress. Similar to the previous studies, two GR related genes were up-regulated in T. ramosissima leaves under NaCl stress. We speculate that GR might be involved in the adaptation of T. ramosissima to NaCl stress in a positive direction.

4.2 Responsive transcription factors under NaCl treatment ins T. ramosissima

Transcription factors are indispensable for plants to respond to abiotic stresses [13]. WRKY is one of the most important transcription factor families, which has been verified to participate in a variety of metabolic processes and plays an important role in the regulation of transcriptional reprogramming related to plant biological and abiotic stress responses [4648]. In this study, Unigene0024962, which encodes a WRKY transcription factor, was up-regulated by NaCl treatment, while Unigene0079542 was decreased at 48 h but increased at 168 h, which is consistent with the previous reports in WRKY family genes in soybean [49] and Reaumuria trigyna [50]. The expression of CaWRKY27 in pepper was down-regulated by NaCl stress [51], which is in contrast to our findings. Notably, Unigene0014406 was continuously induced by NaCl treatment, suggesting that this gene may be inevitably involved in the response of T. ramosissima to salt stress. In addition, bZIP transcription factors play an important regulatory role in plant growth and environmental stress response [52, 53]. The expression of Unigene0008868 was significantly up-regulated by NaCl treatment, which is consistent with that of Huang’s findings in ramie, implying that the bZIP transcription factor plays an important regulatory role in response to salt stress [54]. Moreover, MYB is one of the most diversified transcription factor families in plants in terms of quantity and function, which plays important roles under abiotic stresses [55, 56]. In this study, the expression level of Unigene0088781 decreased in the first 48 hours and then increased in a long time under NaCl treatment, suggesting that this gene may be active, especially during a specific period under salt stress. Similar findings were also observed in Medicago sativa seedlings [57] and Rosa rugosa petals [58].

5. Conclusions

The raw data of transcriptome sequencing of T. ramosissima leaves in response to NaCl stress was spliced into 105702 Unigenes, and 54238 annotated Unigenes were retrieved in the 4 major functional databases of KEGG, KOG, NR and SwissProt. The expression profiles of DEGs are slightly different between short time (48h) and long time (168) treatments. In particular, ROS scavenging genes and transcription factor encoding genes (including WRKY, MYB and bZIP family) are sensitive to NaCl treatment with distinct regulatory statuses. This study provides the theoretical basis and gene resource for further molecular mechanisms towards salt tolerance in T. ramosissima.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Verification of DEGs by qRT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.s001

(PDF)

S2 Table. Randomly select 8 differentially expressed genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265653.s004

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This work was jointly supported by the following grants: the Agricultural Variety Improvement Project of Shandong Province (2019LZGC009).

References

  1. 1. Cheng Y, Yang P, Zhao LH, Priyadarshani SVGN, Zhou Q, Li ZY, et al. Studies on genome size estimation, chromosome number, gametophyte development and plant morphology of salt-tolerant halophyte Suaeda salsa. BMC plant biology. 2019; 19(1): 473. pmid:31694537
  2. 2. Acosta-Motos J, Ortuño M, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco M, Hernandez J. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy (Basel). 2017; 7(1): 18.
  3. 3. Li SF, Fan CM, Li Y, Zhang JH, Sun JS, Chen YH, et al. Effects of drought and salt-stresses on gene expression in Caragana korshinskii seedlings revealed by RNA-seq. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17(1): 200. pmid:26951633
  4. 4. Bahieldin A, Atef A, Sabir SM, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of the wild barley (H. spontaneum) leaf transcriptome under salt stress. Comptes rendus. Biologies. 2015; 338(5): 285–297. pmid:25882349
  5. 5. Dietz K, Turkan I, Krieger-Liszkay A. Redox- and Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Signaling into and out of the Photosynthesizing Chloroplast. Plant physiology (Bethesda). 2016; 171(3): 1541–1550. pmid:27255485
  6. 6. Huang SB, Van Aken O, Schwarzländer M, Belt K, et al. The Roles of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Cellular Signaling and Stress Response in Plants. Plant physiology (Bethesda). 2016; 171(3): 1551–1559. pmid:27021189
  7. 7. Sandalio LM, Romero-Puertas MC. Peroxisomes sense and respond to environmental cues by regulating ROS and RNS signalling networks. Annals of botany. 2015; 116(4): 475–485. pmid:26070643
  8. 8. Fancy NN, Bahlmann AK, Loake GJ. Nitric oxide function in plant abiotic stress. Plant cell and environment. 2017; 40 (4): 462–472. pmid:26754426
  9. 9. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010; 33(4): 453–467. pmid:19712065
  10. 10. Grant JJ, Loake G, J. Role of reactive oxygen intermediates and cognate redox signaling in disease resistance. Plant Physiol. 2000; 124(1): 21–29. pmid:10982418
  11. 11. Zhang X, Zhang L, Chen Y, Wang S, Fang Y, Zhang X, et al. Genome-wide identification of the SOD gene family and expression analysis under drought and salt stress in barley. Plant growth regulation. 2021; 94(1): 49–60.
  12. 12. Gupta M, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J, Clijsters H. Copper affects the enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and its related metabolites in the roots of Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiologia plantarum. 1999; 106(3): 262–267.
  13. 13. Yao W, Wang S, Zhou B, Jiang T, Li CY. Transgenic poplar overexpressing the endogenous transcription factor ERF76 gene improves salinity tolerance. Tree physiology. 2016; 36(7): 896–908. pmid:26941290
  14. 14. Wang S, Wang J, Yao WJ, Li RH, Jiang JY. Expression patterns of WRKY genes in di-haploid Populus simonii x P. nigra in response to salinity stress revealed by quantitative real-time PCR and RNA sequencing. Plant Cell Rep. 2014; 33: 1687–1696. pmid:24969399
  15. 15. Chen HC, Hsieh-Feng V, Liao PC, Cheng WH, Liu LY, Yang YW et al. The function of OsbHLH068 is partially redundant with its homolog, AtbHLH112, in the regulation of the salt stress response but has opposite functions to control flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2017; 94(4): 531–548. pmid:28631168
  16. 16. Yan F, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Liu Y. De novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of salt-, alkali-, and drought-responsive genes in Sophora alopecuroides. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1): 423. pmid:32576152
  17. 17. Li M, Chen R, Jiang Q, Sun X, Zhang H, Hu Z. GmNAC06, a NAC domain transcription factor enhances salt stress tolerance in soybean. Plant Molecular Biology. 2021; 105: 333–345. pmid:33155154
  18. 18. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Fan CJ, Wei YC, Zhong CL. Genome-wide analysis of MYB transcription factors and their responses to salt stress in Casuarina equisetifolia. BMC plant biology. 2021; 21(1): 328. pmid:34238224
  19. 19. Zhang J, Shi S Z, Jiang Y, Zhong F, Chen YH. Genome-wide investigation of the AP2/ERF superfamily and their expression under salt stress in Chinese willow (Salix matsudana). Peer J. 2021; 9(6): e11076. pmid:33954030
  20. 20. Zhou L, Wang NN, Gong SY, Lu R, Li Y, Li XB. Overexpression of a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) WRKY gene, GhWRKY34, in Arabidopsis enhances salt-tolerance of the transgenic plants—ScienceDirect. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015; 96: 311–320. pmid:26332661
  21. 21. Qu XH, Zeng HX. Transcriptome Difference Analysis of Paspalum notatum in Response to Salt Stress. Molecular Plant Breeding(in Chinese). 2019; 17: 3515–3523.
  22. 22. Zhu JK. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell. 2016; 167(2): 313–324. pmid:27716505
  23. 23. Lei X, Tan B, Liu Z et al. ThCOL2 Improves the Salt Stress Tolerance of Tamarix hispida. Frontiers in plant science. 2021; 12: 1–13. pmid:34079567
  24. 24. Wang Y, Gao C, Liang Y, Wang C, Yang C, Liu G. A novel bZIP gene from Tamarix hispida mediates physiological responses to salt stress in tobacco plants. Journal of plant physiology.2010; 167(3): 222–230. pmid:19853962
  25. 25. Wilson H, Mycock D, Weiersbye IM. The salt glands of Tamarix usneoides E. Mey. ex Bunge (South African Salt Cedar). International journal of phytoremediation. 2017; 19(6): 587–595. pmid:27739879
  26. 26. Lu Y, Lei JQ, Zeng FJ, Xu LS, Peng SL, Gao Hh et al. Effects of NaCl treatment on growth and Ec-ophysiology Characteristics of Tamarix ramossisma. Journal of Desert Research (in Chinese). 2014; 34: 1509–1515.
  27. 27. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971, 44(1): 276–287. pmid:4943714
  28. 28. Chance B, Maehly A C. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press. 1955, 2: 764–775.
  29. 29. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro[M]. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press. 1984; 105: 121–126. pmid:6727660
  30. 30. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34(17): i884–i890. pmid:30423086
  31. 31. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29(7): 644–652. pmid:21572440
  32. 32. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(18): 3674–3676. pmid:16081474
  33. 33. Mao X, Tao C, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(19): 3787–3793. pmid:15817693
  34. 34. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014; 15(12): 550. pmid:25516281
  35. 35. Wicker T, Schlagenhauf E, Graner A, Close TJ, Keller B, Stein N. 454 sequencing put to the test using the complex genome of barley. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7(1): 275. pmid:17067373
  36. 36. Noctor G, Reichheld J, Foyer CH. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2018; 80: 3–12. pmid:28733165
  37. 37. Jiang WQ, Yang L, He YQ, Zhang HT et al. Genome-wide identification and transcriptional expression analysis of superoxide dismutase (SOD) family in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Peer J. 2019; 7(2): e8062. pmid:31763072
  38. 38. Lazzarotto F, Teixeira FK, Rosa S, B, Dunand C, Fernandes CL et al. Ascorbate peroxidase-related (APx-R) is a new heme-containing protein functionally associated with ascorbate peroxidase but evolutionarily divergent. The New phytologist. 2011; 191(1): 234–250. pmid:21352234
  39. 39. Hao YC, Xu SS, lyu ZF, Wang HW, Sun SL. Comparative Analysis of the Glutathione S-Transferase Gene Family of Four Triticeae Species and Transcriptome Analysis of GST Genes in Common Wheat Responding to Salt Stress. International journal of genomics. 2021, 2021(2), 1–11. pmid:33681347
  40. 40. Nianiou-Obeidat I, Madesis P, Kissoudis C et al. Plant glutathione transferase-mediated stress tolerance: functions and biotechnological applications. Plant cell reports. 2017; 36(6):791–805. pmid:28391528
  41. 41. Horváth E, Bela K, Gallé G, Riyazuddin R, Csomor G et al. Compensation of Mutation in Arabidopsis glutathione transferase (AtGSTU) Genes under Control or Salt Stress Conditions. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020; 21(7):2349. pmid:32231125
  42. 42. Ding N.; Wang A.; Zhang X, Wu Y, Wang R, Cui H, et al. Identification and analysis of glutathione S-transferase gene family in sweet potato reveal divergent GST-mediated networks in aboveground and underground tissues in response to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biology. 2017; 17(1): 225. pmid:29179697
  43. 43. Alscher RG. Biosynthesis and antioxidant function of glutathione in plants. Physiologia plantarum. 1989; 77(3): 457–464.
  44. 44. Wu TM, Lin WR, Kao YT, Hsu YT, Yeh CH, Hong CY et al. Identification and characterization of a novel chloroplast/mitochondria co-localized glutathione reductase 3 involved in salt stress response in rice. Plant Molecular Biology. 2013; 83(4–5): 379–390. pmid:23783412
  45. 45. Deng Z, Zhao M, Liu H, Wang YK, Li DJ. Molecular cloning, expression profiles and characterization of a glutathione reductase in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015; 96: 53–63. pmid:26232647
  46. 46. Han D.; Zhang Z.; Ding H.; Chai LJ, Liu W, Li HX et al. Isolation and characterization of MbWRKY2 gene involved in enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2018; 13(1): 163–172.
  47. 47. Chen F, Hu Y, Vannozzi A, Wu KC, Cai HY, Qin Y et al. The WRKY Transcription Factor Family in Model Plants and Crops. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2017; 36(4–6): 311–335.
  48. 48. Dai Z, Wei M, Zhang BX, Yuan Y, Zhang BF. VuWRKY, a group I WRKY gene from Vaccinium uliginosum, confers tolerance to cold and salt stresses in plant. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2021; 147: 157–168.
  49. 49. Wang Y, Jiang L, Chen J, Lei T, Guo C. Overexpression of the alfalfa WRKY11 gene enhances salt tolerance in soybean. PloS one. 2018;13(2): e192382. pmid:29466387
  50. 50. Du C, Zhao P, Zhang H, Li N, Zheng L, Wang Y. The Reaumuria trigyna transcription factor RtWRKY1 confers tolerance to salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2017; 215: 48–58. pmid:28527975
  51. 51. Lin J, Dang FF, Chen YP, Guan DY, He SL. CaWRKY27 negatively regulates salt and osmotic stress responses in pepper. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2019; 145: 43–51. pmid:31665666
  52. 52. Li Z, Chao JT, Li XX, Li GB, Liu GS. Systematic Analysis of the bZIP Family in Tobacco and Functional Characterization of NtbZIP62 Involvement in Salt Stress. Agronomy (Basel). 2021; 11(1): 148.
  53. 53. Zhao P, Ye M, Wang RQ, Wang DD, Chen Q. Systematic identification and functional analysis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) bZIP transcription factors and overexpression of potato bZIP transcription factor StbZIP-65 enhances salt tolerance. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020; 161: 155–167. pmid:32512099
  54. 54. Huang C, Zhou J, Jie Y, Xing H, Zhong Y, Yu W et al. A Ramie bZIP Transcription Factor BnbZIP2 Is Involved in Drought, Salt, and Heavy Metal Stress Response. DNA and cell biology. 2016; 35(12): 776–786. pmid:27845851
  55. 55. Shen X, Guo XW, Guo X, Zhao D, Zhao W, Chen J et al. PacMYBA, a sweet cherry R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance and pathogen resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017; 112: 302–311. pmid:28126679
  56. 56. Wei Q, Zhang F, Sun F, Luo Q, Wang R, Hu R et al. A wheat MYB transcriptional repressor TaMyb1D regulates phenylpropanoid metabolism and enhances tolerance to drought and oxidative stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant science (Limerick). 2017; 265: 112–123. pmid:29223332
  57. 57. Dong W, Gao T, Wang Q, Chen J, Lv J, Song Y. Salinity stress induces epigenetic alterations to the promoter of MsMYB4 encoding a salt-induced MYB transcription factor. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020; 155: 709–715. pmid:32862020
  58. 58. Jiang X, Li S, Ding A, Zhang Z, Liu Q. The Novel Rose MYB Transcription Factor RhMYB96 Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 2018; 36: 406–417.