Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii in cerebrospinal fluid and blood

  • Xiaohong Shi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xiaohong Shi, Hong Wang

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Laboratory Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Hong Wang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xiaohong Shi, Hong Wang

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Laboratory Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Xin Wang,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Huaiqi Jing,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Ran Duan,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Shuai Qin,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Dongyue Lv,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Yufeng Fan,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Zhenzhou Huang,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Kyle Stirling,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America

  • Lei Zhang,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China, Institute for Medical Dataology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China

  • Jiazheng Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    wangjiazheng1210@163.com

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Laboratory Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) caused nosocomial infections generate significant comorbidity and can cause death among patients. Current treatment options are limited. These infections pose great difficulties for infection control and clinical treatment. To identify the antimicrobial resistance, carbapenemases and genetic relatedness of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood, a total of 50 nonrepetitive CSF isolates and 44 blood isolates were collected. The resistance phenotypes were determined, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to examine the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance. Finally, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted to determine the genetic relatedness of these isolates. It was observed that 88 of the 94 collected isolates were resistant to imipenem or meropenem. Among them, the blaOXA-23 gene was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene, with an observed detection rate of 91.5% (86/94), followed by the blaOXA-24 gene with a 2.1% detection rate (2/94). Among all carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) observations, isolates with the blaOXA-23 gene were resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Interestingly, isolates positive for the blaOXA-24 gene but negative for the blaOXA-23 gene showed an imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant phenotype. The MLST analysis identified 21 different sequence types (STs), with ST195, ST540 and ST208 most frequently detected (25.5%, 12.8% and 11.7%, respectively). 80 of the 94 isolates (85.1%) were clustered into CC92 which showed a carbapenem resistance phenotype (except AB13). Five novel STs were detected, and most of them belong to CRAB. In conclusion, these findings provide additional observations and epidemiological data of CSF and blood A. baumannii strains, which may improve future infection-control measures and aid in potential clinical treatments in hospitals and other clinical settings.

Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is a non-fermentative, Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that often causes disease among immunocompromised patients [1]. In recent years, A. baumannii has become an important bacterium to identify when treating and controlling infectious diseases because of its remarkable ability to evolve and develop extensive drug resistance to many antibiotics [2]. A. baumannii is often found in hospitals and causes a variety of nosocomial infections and iatrogenic diseases, including bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, meningitis and wound infections [3]. Among them, microbiological results identifying bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood [4, 5] are referred to as critical values because these laboratory values may indicate a possibly urgent and life-threatening situation for patients in which treatment protocols indicate a need for immediate therapy. Therefore, the presence of A. baumannii strains in CSF and blood is an essential critical value to identify for practitioners, because this can pose great difficulties for clinical treatment options.

Carbapenems are considered to be the most effective antibiotics against many multidrug-resistant bacteria [6]. However, the increase in the number of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates has recently become a global concern. CHINET surveillance data have shown that from 2005 to 2018, the resistance of A. baumannii to imipenem and meropenem has increased by approximately two-fold [7, 8]. The production of carbapenemase is one of the most common and important mechanisms for A. baumannii resistance to carbapenems. OXA-type carbapenemase (mainly OXA-23, OXA-24, OXA-48, OXA-51 and OXA-58) are most frequently found. Among them, OXA-23, OXA-24, OXA-48 and OXA-58 are acquired carbapenemases, whereas OXA-51 is intrinsic to A. baumannii strains [911]. In addition, because the related coding genes are located in transferable genetic elements and can spread among A. baumannii and even into other bacteria [12, 13], New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producers have also shown significant importance for worldwide prevalence [14, 15].

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has been widely used to determine genetic relatedness and for molecular epidemiological studies of A. baumannii [16, 17]. Previous molecular epidemiological studies have shown that CC92 is highly prevalent throughout China, and it is the clonal complex (CC) with the widest global distribution [18, 19].

In the present study, the antimicrobial resistance, carbapenemases, and genetic relatedness of 94 A. baumannii isolates obtained from CSF and blood at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong, China) was investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance, carbapenemases, and genetic relatedness of the A. baumannii isolates obtained from CSF and blood in a hospital in Shandong, China.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This study focused only on bacteria and did not include any human materials or patient information. The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University exempted this study from review and the Review Board also waived the requirement for informed consent.

Bacterial isolates

A total of 94 nonrepetitive A. baumannii isolates were obtained from CSF (n = 50) or blood (n = 44) samples of patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong, China). The samples used in this study were obtained from 2014 to 2019. Among the CSF isolates, one isolate was collected in 2014, four in 2015, 17 in 2016, 15 in 2017, five in 2018, and eight in 2019. Forty-one of these isolates were obtained from neurosurgery, six isolates from the ICU, and three from other wards. Regarding the A. baumannii isolates samples obtained from blood, 12 were collected in 2016, 13 in 2017, 11 in 2018, and eight in 2019. Twenty-eight blood isolates were obtained from the ICU, six blood isolates from neurosurgery, four from hematopathology, and six from other hospital wards. The CSF or blood specimens were collected from patients with suspected bacterial meningitis or blood stream infections (BSIs) according to CDC criteria [20]. All isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker, Germany) and further verified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of 16S rDNA sequencing [21]. PCR products were sequenced by Tsingke BioTech Co., Ltd., followed by sequence alignment via the NCBI database.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

All A. baumannii strains were tested for susceptibilities to 14 antibiotics, including ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, minocycline, tigecycline, colistin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, using a Vitek-2 compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy, France) with AST-N-335 cards. The results were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria, except for tigecycline, in which case the results were evaluated from the adapted United States Food and Drug Administration breakpoints.

PCR experiments

PCR assays were conducted using conventional PCR amplification. The target genes included the blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-58, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, and blaKPC genes. Table 1 shows the sequences used for primer design and the annealing temperatures. Positive amplicons were randomly selected for sequencing to verify the amplicons sequences.

thumbnail
Table 1. Primers used with their respective annealing temperatures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.t001

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

MLST analyses were performed using the Oxford scheme [16]. Amplification reactions were carried out as described previously [19, 26]. The sequence types (STs) and allelic profiles were analyzed using MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/info/primers_Oxford.shtml). The newly identified STs were submitted to the MLST database curator for approval, and an ST number was assigned. A minimum-spanning tree using the allelic difference between isolates of the seven housekeeping genes was constructed using BioNumerics (Applied Math).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. The chi-square tests were performed to compare the differences of resistance rates and the distributions of carbapenem-resistance genes between CSF isolates and blood isolates. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Antibiotic susceptibilities

The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 94 A. baumannii strains are shown in Table 2, Fig 1, and the S1 Table. In general, more than 90% of the A. baumannii isolates were resistant to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, 88 of 94 A. baumannii isolates were CRAB isolates. Among them, 86 isolates were resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Two isolates showed a meropenem-resistant but imipenem-sensitive phenotype. The changes in resistance rates of imipenem were observed to decrease from 89.7% in 2016 to 89.3% in 2017, and then increased to 93.8% in 2018 and 2019. For meropenem, the resistance rates were observed to increase from 89.7% in 2016 to 96.4% in 2017, and then decreased to 93.8% in 2018 and 2019. Most isolates (over 89%) were found to be resistant to these six antibiotics each year from 2016 to 2019 (Fig 1). Because only one strain was isolated in 2014 and only four strains in 2015, we omitted these results from our analysis. A total of 77.7% of the isolates were resistant to tobramycin, 75.5% were resistant to levofloxacin, 59.6% were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 52.1% were resistant to cefepime and 45.7% were resistant to cefoperazone/sulbactam. However, the resistance rates for levofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and cefoperazone/sulbactam were observed to increase year by year from 2017 to 2019. In contrast, the resistance rates for minocycline and tigecycline were only 19.1% and 7.4%, respectively, which decreased year by year from 2017 to 2019. All isolates were sensitive to colistin. No statistically significant differences were observed between CSF and blood isolates among all antibiotics tested in this study.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Antibiotic resistance rates from 2016 to 2019.

T/C: ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; P/T: piperacillin/tazobactam; CAZ: ceftazidime; CSL: cefoperazone/sulbactam; FEP: cefepime; IPM: imipenem; MEM: meropenem; TOB: tobramycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; LEV: levofloxacin; MNO: minocycline; TGC: tigecycline; COL: colistin; SXT: sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.g001

thumbnail
Table 2. Resistance rates of A.

baumannii isolates obtained from CSF and blood.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.t002

Distribution of carbapenem-resistance genes

All isolates were screened for the presence of carbapenem-resistance genes (Table 3). In the 94 A. baumannii isolates, all of them harbored the intrinsic blaOXA-51 gene. In contrast, none of them had blaOXA-48, blaOXA-58, blaNDM-1, or blaKPC genes. The blaOXA-23 gene was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene, with a 91.5% (86/94) detection rate, followed by the blaOXA-24 gene in only two (2.1%) isolates. No statistically significant differences were observed between CSF and blood isolates for all detected carbapenem-resistance genes.

In this study, all of the isolates with blaOXA-23 or blaOXA-24 genes were carbapenem- resistant. Among them, isolates with the blaOXA-23 gene were resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. However, isolates positive for the blaOXA-24 gene but negative for the blaOXA-23 gene showed an imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant phenotype.

MLST profiles

MLST analysis revealed a total of 21 different STs, including 16 existing STs and five novel STs. The novel STs were submitted for ST assignment and included ST1967, ST1968, ST1969, ST1970 and ST1971. The profiles of the newly identified ST types are listed in Table 4. Among them, 89.4% (84/94) were represented by 11 main STs (having ≥2 isolates), and the prevalent STs were ST195, ST540, and ST208, accounting for 25.5% (24/94), 12.8% (12/94), and 11.7% (11/94), respectively (Fig 2 and the S2 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Minimum-spanning tree of 94 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from CSF and blood based on MLST.

Each ST is represented by a circle sized in proportion to the number of isolates represented by that ST, isolates within the pink shaded area are the CC92 isolates, and the number of allelic differences between STs is indicated on the branches. The detailed MLST profiles can be seen in the S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.g002

thumbnail
Table 4. Allelic profiles of the novel STs found in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.t004

ST195 was also the dominant ST in samples obtained from years 2016, 2017 and 2019. However, in 2018, this ST did not appear, and the dominant ST was changed to ST540 and ST191. ST540 and ST208 isolates were found in every year from 2016 to 2019, but the ratio changed year by year (Fig 3). Although the ST191 strain was not found in CSF or blood from 2014 to 2016, it emerged in 2017 and even rose to 25% in 2018. For other minor ST types, the distributions were varied across different years. For instance, the ratio of ST369 isolates increased from 3.4% in 2016 to 10.7% in 2017. In 2018, this type of strain was not observed but the ratio rose to 12.5% in 2019. Because only one strain was isolated in 2014 and four strains in 2015, we omitted these results from our analysis.

thumbnail
Fig 3. MLST population analysis over the different years.

(A) ST in all 94 isolates. (B) ST distribution in 2016. (C) ST distribution in 2017. (D) ST distribution in 2018. (E) ST distribution in 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.g003

Twelve STs representing 85.1% (80/94) of the isolates were clustered into CC92, with up to 18 different allelic profiles and 56 different isolates being represented. In addition, 9 individual STs accounted for 14 isolates. The detailed MLST profiles are presented in the S2 Table.

Molecular epidemiological characteristics

All of the isolates grouped into CC92 were carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, except for one isolate (AB13). These isolates were also not sensitive to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin,or levofloxacin but had variable susceptibilities to cefoperazone/sulbactam, tobramycin, minocycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. In contrast, all of the carbapenem-sensitive Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) isolates belonged to individual STs, except for one isolate (AB13). These isolates were also sensitive to the other 12 antibiotics tested in this study.

Five novel STs were identified in this study. All four ST1967 isolates were obtained from CSF and were non-sensitive to any β-lactam antibiotics or quinolones. For ST 1968 isolates, five were non-sensitive to 13 antibiotics (except colistin) tested in this study, but the other isolate (AB13) was sensitive to tobramycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and colistin. The ST1970 isolate was non-sensitive to 12 antibiotics (except tigecycline and colistin) tested in this study, whereas the ST1971 isolate was sensitive to all antibiotics. ST1969 contained two isolates (AB29 and AB70). Both of these isolates possessed the blaOXA-24 gene and were resistant to meropenem but sensitive to imipenem.

The blaOXA-23 gene was more prevalent than the blaOXA-24 gene, but the detection rates were altered among different STs. All isolates in CC92 (containing 12 STs) carried the blaOXA-23 gene (except one isolate in ST208). In contrast, the blaOXA-23 gene was detected in only 50% (7/14) of isolates of individual STs. None of the isolates in ST373, ST377, ST712, ST1969, or ST1971 possessed this gene.

Discussion

CSF and blood infection of A. baumannii (especially for CRAB) may be life-threatening and present great obstacles for effective clinical treatments [4, 5]. Our present study offers insights into the molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii from CSF and blood.

CHINET surveillance data have shown that, in China, from 2005 to 2018, the resistance rate of A. baumannii for imipenem and meropenem increased from 32.9% to 71.7% and from 41.3% to 78.1%, respectively [7, 8]. Compared to those of the surveillance data, the resistance rates of A. baumannii for imipenem and meropenem in our present study were 91.5% and 93.6%, respectively, which were more than twofold higher than the surveillance data in 2005 and more than 10% higher than those in 2018. For CSF and blood infections, the recommended doses of antibiotics are usually higher and require longer courses of treatment than for superficial infections. This may have contributed to the higher drug-resistance rates in our study than those reported in CHINET surveillance data, which also include superficial infections. In addition, the CHINET surveillance data [7, 8, 27, 28] have demonstrated that the resistance rate of A. baumannii to meropenem is slightly higher than that to imipenem. This is similar to our present observations and results. In fact, our results also support the view that imipenem is more bactericidal [29] and has a higher Time>MIC value [30] than that of meropenem against A. baumannii. In contrast, the resistance rate to tigecycline was only 7.4%, and all isolates showed a colistin-sensitive phenotype. The resistance rates of these two drugs were far below those of carbapenem and the other antibiotics tested in the present study. In this hospital, the frequencies of the usages of tigecycline and colistin were 10 times and 492 times lower than those of carbapenems. This may have contributed to the low resistance rates of these two antibiotics. Additionally, because of these low resistance rates, tigecycline may serve as a preferred therapeutic agent to control CRAB infections in this hospital (S3 Table). Although colistin also had a low resistance rate in our present study, fewer patients were treated by this antibiotic, as its side effects of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity [31].

To investigate the mechanism of carbapenem resistance, carbapenemase-encoding genes were assessed in the present study. Our results showed that the blaOXA-23 gene was present in most CRAB isolates but was absent in all CSAB isolates, which suggests that blaOXA-23 represents the primary mechanism underlying carbapenem resistance of CRAB isolated from CSF and blood. The blaOXA-23 gene was also found to be the most important mechanism underlying carbapenem resistance in CRAB in China [19, 26] and some other countries [3234]. In addition, in our present study, the blaOXA-24 gene was found to be another mechanism behind carbapenem resistance, as blaOXA-24-positive but blaOXA-23-negative isolates in this study showed meropenem-resistance but imipenem-sensitive characteristics. BlaOXA-24-positive A. baumannii strains have been reported in many countries [11, 35, 36], especially in Spain, where blaOXA-24 has been shown to be the most prevalent gene [11]. Interestingly, even though most blaOXA-24-positive isolates have been reported to be resistant to both imipenem and meropenem, in our experiment, blaOXA-24-positive strains showed an imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant phenotype. Some molecular biological mechanisms have been reported in many Gram-negative bacteria to explain this imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant phenomenon. For example, the transmission of blaIMP-6 and blaCTX-M-2 plasmids [37], as well as the absence of OmpK35 and the frame shift mutation in OmpK36 [38], has been shown to be important mechanisms for imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ISMRKP) strains. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, however, substrate specificities of efflux pumps lead to different drug resistance characteristics. As a specific substrate, meropenem can be extruded by many efflux pumps, but imipenem is not affected by these efflux systems [39]. As a result, some imipenem-sensitive but meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were detected. However, few studies have examined this mechanism against A. baumannii. Both of these strains were found to belong to a novel ST (ST1969) in our present study. Hence, this molecular mechanism for A. baumannii strains requires further investigation.

ST540, ST195, and ST208 were three major STs for A. baumannii isolated from CSF and blood in our present study. Among them, ST195 and ST208 are two dominant STs currently found in China [4042]. In the present study, ST 195 was also the dominant ST in 2016, 2017, and 2019. However, no ST195 isolates were found in 2018. Although ST540 is not the main ST observed in China, our data shown that ST540 was not only one of the three common STs but also the predicted founder of the CC for A. baumannii isolated from blood and CSF. ST208 isolates were detected every year from 2016 to 2019, but the ratio changed year by year. High detection rates of CC92 A. baumannii isolates in CSF and blood, as well as a high correlation between CC92 and carbapenem-resistance characteristics, were found in the present study. This is consistent with some other studies that have suggested that CC92 is the largest and most geographically diverse CC, which is widespread in many countries [40], including China [26]. As CC92 is a widespread variant that has advantages in acquiring resistance determinants and surviving in the nosocomial environment [19], this may have contributed to the high correlation between CC92 and carbapenem resistance characteristics in our present study.

We also observed a total of five novel STs. Among them, two novel STs were classified into CC92 and others were individual STs. As 13 of the 14 isolates in the five novel STs were identified as CRAB, close attention should be paid toward these novel STs to identify and further limit both transmission and outbreaks.

Conclusions

In summary, we examined and described the molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii from CSF and blood in a hospital in Shandong, China. A high level of carbapenem resistance was detected. The majority of the isolates were carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), which carried the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase gene and belonged to MLST CC92. Five novel STs were detected, and most of them were CRAB, some of which belonged to CC92. Collectively, our findings offer new epidemiological data of CSF and blood A. baumannii strains, which may help to improve infection control measures and clinical treatments in hospitals.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of the tested antimicrobial agents.

T/C: ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; P/T: piperacillin/tazobactam; CAZ: ceftazidime; CSL: cefoperazone/sulbactam; FEP: cefepime; IPM: imipenem; MEM: meropenem; TOB: tobramycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; LEV: levofloxacin; MNO: minocycline; TGC: tigecycline; COL: colistin; SXT: sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Allelic profiles of the A. baumannii strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Antibiotics used for the CRAB treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247418.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Duochun Wang and Tao Xiao for some helpful comments on our manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Hu Y, He L, Tao X, Meng F, Zhang J. Biofilm may not be Necessary for the Epidemic Spread of Acinetobacter baumannii. Scientific reports. 2016;6:32066. Epub 2016/08/26. pmid:27558010; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4997352.
  2. 2. Fournier PE, Vallenet D, Barbe V, Audic S, Ogata H, Poirel L, et al. Comparative genomics of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS genetics. 2006;2(1):e7. Epub 2006/01/18. pmid:16415984; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1326220.
  3. 3. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2008;21(3):538–82. Epub 2008/07/16. pmid:18625687; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2493088.
  4. 4. Chapman CN, Otis CN. From critical values to critical diagnoses: a review with an emphasis on cytopathology. Cancer cytopathology. 2011;119(3):148–57. Epub 2011/04/22. pmid:21509947.
  5. 5. Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2002;126(6):663–9. Epub 2002/05/30. pmid:12033953.
  6. 6. Biglari S, Alfizah H, Ramliza R, Rahman MM. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase and cephalosporinase genes among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia. Journal of medical microbiology. 2015;64(Pt 1):53–8. Epub 2014/11/09. pmid:25381148.
  7. 7. Hu FP, Guo Y, Zhu DM, Wang F, Jiang XF, Xu YC, et al. Resistance trends among clinical isolates in China reported from CHINET surveillance of bacterial resistance, 2005–2014. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2016;22 Suppl 1:S9–14. Epub 2016/03/24. pmid:27000156.
  8. 8. Hu F, Guo Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Jiang X, et al. Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2019;38(12):2275–81. Epub 2019/09/04. pmid:31478103.
  9. 9. Evans BA, Amyes SG. OXA β-lactamases. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2014;27(2):241–63. Epub 2014/04/04. pmid:24696435; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3993105.
  10. 10. Nowak P, Paluchowska P. Acinetobacter baumannii: biology and drug resistance—role of carbapenemases. Folia histochemica et cytobiologica. 2016;54(2):61–74. Epub 2016/06/09. pmid:27270503.
  11. 11. Dahdouh E, Gómez-Gil R, Pacho S, Mingorance J, Daoud Z, Suárez M. Clonality, virulence determinants, and profiles of resistance of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates obtained from a Spanish hospital. PloS one. 2017;12(4):e0176824. Epub 2017/04/28. pmid:28448572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5407824.
  12. 12. Pagano M, Martins AF, Barth AL. Mobile genetic elements related to carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Brazilian journal of microbiology: [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. 2016;47(4):785–92. Epub 2016/08/16. pmid:27522927; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5052331.
  13. 13. Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2018;31(4). Epub 2018/08/03. pmid:30068738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6148190.
  14. 14. Chen Y, Zhou Z, Jiang Y, Yu Y. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in China. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2011;66(6):1255–9. Epub 2011/03/15. pmid:21398294.
  15. 15. Azimi L, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR, Owlia P, Rastegar Lari A. Characterization of Carbapenemases in Extensively Drug Resistance Acinetobacter baumannii in a Burn Care Center in Iran. International journal of molecular and cellular medicine. 2015;4(1):46–53. Epub 2015/03/31. pmid:25815282; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4359705.
  16. 16. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, Rodríguez-Valera F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2005;43(9):4382–90. Epub 2005/09/08. pmid:16145081; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1234098.
  17. 17. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PloS one. 2010;5(4):e10034. Epub 2010/04/13. pmid:20383326; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2850921.
  18. 18. Runnegar N, Sidjabat H, Goh HM, Nimmo GR, Schembri MA, Paterson DL. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a single institution over a 10-year period. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2010;48(11):4051–6. Epub 2010/08/27. pmid:20739495; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3020849.
  19. 19. Ruan Z, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Zhou H, Zhou Z, Fu Y, et al. Wide distribution of CC92 carbapenem-resistant and OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in multiple provinces of China. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2013;42(4):322–8. Epub 2013/08/31. pmid:23988720.
  20. 20. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. American journal of infection control. 1988;16(3):128–40. Epub 1988/06/01. pmid:2841893
  21. 21. Hao H, Liang J, Duan R, Chen Y, Liu C, Xiao Y, et al. Yersinia spp. Identification Using Copy Diversity in the Chromosomal 16S rRNA Gene Sequence. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147639. Epub 2016/01/26. pmid:26808495; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4726496.
  22. 22. Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, et al. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2006;27(4):351–3. Epub 2006/03/28. pmid:16564159.
  23. 23. Li Y, Guo Q, Wang P, Zhu D, Ye X, Wu S, et al. Clonal dissemination of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing an OXA-23 β-lactamase at a teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi. 2015;48(1):101–8. Epub 2014/05/28. pmid:24863499.
  24. 24. Chang Y, Luan G, Xu Y, Wang Y, Shen M, Zhang C, et al. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a Chinese teaching hospital. Frontiers in microbiology. 2015;6:910. Epub 2015/09/22. pmid:26388854; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4555021.
  25. 25. Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2011;70(1):119–23. Epub 2011/03/15. pmid:21398074.
  26. 26. Fu Y, Zhou J, Zhou H, Yang Q, Wei Z, Yu Y, et al. Wide dissemination of OXA-23-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clonal complex 22 in multiple cities of China. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2010;65(4):644–50. Epub 2010/02/16. pmid:20154023.
  27. 27. Xiao YH, Giske CG, Wei ZQ, Shen P, Heddini A, Li LJ. Epidemiology and characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in China. Drug resistance updates: reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2011;14(4–5):236–50. Epub 2011/08/03. pmid:21807550.
  28. 28. Hu F, Zhu D, Wang F, Wang M. Current Status and Trends of Antibacterial Resistance in China. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2018;67(suppl_2):S128–S34. Epub 2018/11/14. pmid:30423045.
  29. 29. Novelli A, Adembri C, Livi P, Fallani S, Mazzei T, De Gaudio AR. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and imipenem in critically ill patients with sepsis. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2005;44(5):539–49. Epub 2005/05/06. pmid:15871639.
  30. 30. Kuti JL, Florea NR, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Pharmacodynamics of meropenem and imipenem against Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24(1):8–15. Epub 2004/01/27. pmid:14740783.
  31. 31. Loho T, Dharmayanti A. Colistin: an antibiotic and its role in multiresistant Gram-negative infections. Acta medica Indonesiana. 2015;47(2):157–68. Epub 2015/08/12. pmid:26260559.
  32. 32. Merino M, Poza M, Roca I, Barba MJ, Sousa MD, Vila J, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of a multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii expressing OXA-23 carbapenemase in Spain. Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, NY). 2014;20(4):259–63. Epub 2013/12/18. pmid:24328852.
  33. 33. Zowawi HM, Sartor AL, Sidjabat HE, Balkhy HH, Walsh TR, Al Johani SM, et al. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in the Gulf Cooperation Council States: dominance of OXA-23-type producers. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2015;53(3):896–903. Epub 2015/01/09. pmid:25568439; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4390656.
  34. 34. El Bannah AMS, Nawar NN, Hassan RMM, Salem STB. Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Egypt: Clonal Spread of blaOXA-23. Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, NY). 2018;24(3):269–77. Epub 2017/08/08. pmid:28783427.
  35. 35. Castanheira M, Wanger A, Kruzel M, Deshpande LM, Jones RN. Emergence and clonal dissemination of OXA-24- and OXA-58-producing Acinetobacter baumannii strains in Houston, Texas: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2008;46(9):3179–80. Epub 2008/09/05. pmid:18768660; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2546771.
  36. 36. Todorova B, Velinov T, Ivanov I, Dobreva E, Kantardjiev T. First detection of OXA-24 carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Bulgaria. World journal of microbiology & biotechnology. 2014;30(4):1427–30. Epub 2013/11/30. pmid:24287943.
  37. 37. Kayama S, Shigemoto N, Kuwahara R, Ishino T, Imon K, Onodera M, et al. The first case of septicemia caused by imipenem-susceptible, meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2013;33(5):383–5. Epub 2013/09/05. pmid:24003434; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3756248.
  38. 38. Kayama S, Koba Y, Shigemoto N, Kuwahara R, Kakuhama T, Kimura K, et al. Imipenem-susceptible, meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing OXA-181 in Japan. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2015;59(2):1379–80. Epub 2014/12/17. pmid:25512424; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4335852.
  39. 39. Masuda N, Sakagawa E, Ohya S, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Nishino T. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2000;44(12):3322–7. Epub 2000/11/18. pmid:11083635; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC90200.
  40. 40. Karah N, Sundsfjord A, Towner K, Samuelsen Ø. Insights into the global molecular epidemiology of carbapenem non-susceptible clones of Acinetobacter baumannii. Drug resistance updates: reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2012;15(4):237–47. Epub 2012/07/31. pmid:22841809.
  41. 41. Huang G, Yin S, Gong Y, Zhao X, Zou L, Jiang B, et al. Multilocus Sequence Typing Analysis of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Chinese Burns Institute. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016;7:1717. Epub 2016/11/25. pmid:27881972; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5101237.
  42. 42. Qu J, Du Y, Yu R, Lü X. The First Outbreak Caused by Acinetobacter baumannii ST208 and ST195 in China. BioMed research international. 2016;2016:9254907. Epub 2016/05/05. pmid:27144176; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4842041.