Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Leptin improves the in vitro development of preimplantation rabbit embryos under oxidative stress of cryopreservation

  • Tarek A. Alshaheen,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Animal and Fish Production, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

  • Mohamed H. H. Awaad,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

  • Gamal M. K. Mehaisen

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    gamoka@cu.edu.eg

    Affiliation Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

Abstract

Vitrification is an economically effective method for embryo cryopreservation in human and livestock animals; however, it carries the risk of damage by the exposure to severe oxidative stress. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of leptin at different levels on the in vitro development of fresh and vitrified preimplantation embryos in a rabbit model. Normal embryos at morulae stage were randomly cultured for 2 h with 0, 10, 20 or 100 ng/mL of leptin, then were cultured for further 48 h as freshly or after vitrification. Thereafter, developed blastocysts form the best leptin level in fresh and vitrified embryos along with their controls were allocated to analyze the pro-oxidant (malondialdehyde, MDA; nitric oxide, NO), antioxidant (total antioxidant capacity, TAC; superoxide dismutase, SOD; glutathione peroxidase, GPx), apoptotic (Bcl-2 associated X protein, BAX; heat shock 60kD protein member 1, HSP60; tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα) and developmental (sex determining region Y box protein 2, SOX2; Nanog homeobox protein, NANOG; Octamer-binding protein 4, OCT4) biomarkers. Results indicate that expanding and hatching rates of embryos were significantly higher at 20 ng/mL leptin than the other levels, while vitrification had an independent suppression effect on the in vitro development rates. The MDA and NO were significantly higher, while TAC, SOD and GPx were significantly lower in the vitrified than fresh embryos. In contrast, leptin treatment significantly decreased the pro-oxidant biomarkers and increased the antioxidant biomarkers in both fresh and vitrified embryos. Vitrification significantly increased the antiapoptotic biomarkers, and decreased the developmental biomarkers in embryos. In contrast, leptin decreased the BAX and TNFα, increased the HSP60, and moreover, ameliorated the reduction of developmental biomarkers in the vitrified embryos. These results conclude that leptin could be used as antiapoptotic and antioxidant promotor to support the in vitro embryonic development, particularly under oxidative stress emerged from cryopreservation programs.

Introduction

Embryo cryopreservation is widely used as an assisted reproductive technology for the preservation, reconstitution and distribution of valuable and/or endangered livestock populations [1,2]. Vitrification is an economically and effective simple method for embryo cryopreservation avoiding the mechanical damage of ice crystals [3,4]. In rabbits, embryo vitrification techniques have been studied and developed using various cryoprotectant solutions, carriers and devices, and also resulting in various in vitro development and in vivo survival rates [5,6]. However, the safe routine application of embryo vitrification may remain at a great challenge due to the risk of damage by exposure to suboptimal conditions during ex vivo manipulation and embryo cryopreservation per se [69].

Previous works has demonstrated that in vitro produced and vitrified embryos could be injured by the exposure to oxidative stress through induction of membrane lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, cellular anti-ROS-defense suppression, metabolism disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell death and apoptosis [7,1014]. It was found that vitrification suppressed the expression of cellular antioxidant enzyme system such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-s-transferase (GST) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) [7,15]. Recent studies reported that vitrification and oxidative stress negatively affected the embryo expression of several proteins encoded by developmentally-related-genes such as gap junction protein alpha 1 (GJA1), nanog homeobox protein (NANOG) and octamer-binding protein 4 (OCT4) [7,15,16]. Moreover, other reports correlated the low developmental competence of embryos to the presence of some pro-oxidant proteins such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) [7] and some apoptotic proteins like Bcl-2 associated X protein (BAX), heat shock 60kD protein member 1 (HSP60) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) [17,18].

Leptin is an obese (ob) gene encoded hormone mainly secreted by adipocyte cells and has a wide role in the regulation of body weight, obesity, appetite and energy balance [19,20]. There is much evidence that leptin also serves as a modulator of steroidogenesis, sexual maturation, fertility and other reproductive functions [2125]. In addition, leptin and its receptors have been expressed in the granulosa, cumulus and luteal cells, oocytes and embryos of various animals such as buffalo [26,27], bovine [28,29], porcine [30,31] and mouse [20,32], and in human [33]. In this context, Kawamura et al. [20] found that culture of mouse preimplantation embryos with 100 ng/mL leptin increased the proliferation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) cells and promoted the development of embryos to expanded and hatched blastocysts. In contrast, Herrid et al. [34] found the same beneficial effect of leptin at 10 and 100 ng/mL levels on embryo development in mouse and sheep species but based on the leptin concentration and embryonic developmental stage. More recently, Kšinanová et al. [32] suggested that leptin promotes survival rather than apoptosis when it was supplemented in vitro at levels of 10 ng/mL to preimplantation embryos recovered from obese or normal mouse females. Furthermore, Panda et al. [27] reported that leptin supplementation at 10 ng/mL to oocytes and zygotes of buffalo increased their blastocyst rate accompanying with upregulation of some developmental genes such as OCT4, hyaluronidase synthetase 2 (HAS2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and leptin receptor (LEPR).

Although leptin could be used to promote the in vitro development of embryos, the hypothesis that leptin can protect preimplantation embryos against the deleterious effects of oxidative stress during in vitro culture and cryopreservation has not been reported in the literatures. Therefore, the current study was conducted to evaluate the effect of leptin at different levels on the in vitro development of fresh and vitrified preimplantation embryos in a rabbit model. In addition, the effect of leptin on the expression of some pro-oxidant, antioxidant, apoptotic and developmental biomarkers were further assessed in the fresh and vitrified rabbit embryos.

Materials and methods

Animals and ethical statement

Fifty nulliparous, 4.5–5 m old and 2.5–3.0 kg BW, New Zealand White rabbit does and 10 bucks were obtained from the Station of Agricultural Experiments, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University for the current work. During the experimental period, all rabbits were housed individually in cages settled in a semi-closed pen system, and supplied with galvanized-steel feeders and automatic drinking nipples. Rabbits were kept in identical environmental conditions (light alternating on a cycle of 16L:8D h and temperature range of 16–20 °C) and provided with identical commercial diet (18.4% crude protein, 3.1% ether extracts, 12.7% crude fiber, 8.5% ash and 1.26 MJ/kg metabolizable energy) and free access to water.

All experimental procedures in the present study were reviewed and approved by the ethical board of Cairo University-Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (CU-IACUC). The approval number for this study is: CU-II-F-14-19. The method of sacrificing animals in the present study was applied by slitting the neck for cutting the carotid arteries, jugular veins, esophagus and trachea, without severing the spinal cord or the head, while the animal is alive.

Embryo collection, treatments and experimental design

Rabbit does were stimulated for receptivity by an i.m. injection of 40 IU eCG (Gonaser, HIPRA Laboratories, S.A., Girona, Spain) 60 h before insemination. Each rabbit doe was artificially inseminated with 0.5 ml of semen pools previously recovered from the bucks and assessed for at least more than 70% motility, less than 15% abnormality and a concentration of approximately 10x106 sperm/mL; according to the methods described by [35]. Immediately after insemination, rabbit does were induced for ovulation by an i.m. injection with 0.2 mL solution that contained 0.8 μg buserelin acetate (Receptal, MSD Animal Health, New Cairo, Egypt). At 70 h post insemination, rabbit does were sacrificed and embryos were collected from uterine horns at room temperature by using flushing medium [1 L Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals S.A., Egypt) containing 0.132 g calcium chloride, 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) and 0.1% antibiotics (10,000 units penicillin-G and 10 mg streptomycin per ml; penicillin–streptomycin solution 100X, BioShop Canada Inc.)]. Only the normal embryos (compact morula with intact mucin coat and zona pellucida) obtained from each rabbit doe were randomly distributed in 4-well embryo culture dishes (Nunc A/S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde Site, Denmark), 10–15 embryos per well. Each well contained 1 mL of tissue culture medium (TCM 199, Sigma), provided with 20% fetal calf serum (Sigma) and 0.1% antibiotics, and supplemented with either 0, 10, 20 or 100 ng/mL of recombinant rabbit leptin (#CYT507, BioShop Canada Inc.). Embryos were cultured with leptin for 2 h at 38.5°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity. After that, embryos of each leptin level were either transferred directly to fresh culture media (Fresh embryos) or cultured after implementation of a vitrification/devitrification protocol (Vitrified embryos) as described below. After 48 h of embryo culture, the in vitro development rates to expanded and hatched blastocyst stages were recorded. Thereafter, the developed blastocysts form the best leptin level in fresh and vitrified embryos along with their controls (0 ng/mL) were harvested for further analysis of pro-oxidant, antioxidant, apoptotic and developmental biomarkers as mentioned below. A schematic diagram of the experimental procedures is shown in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. A schematic diagram of the experimental procedures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246307.g001

Vitrification/Devitrification protocol

Embryos were vitrified in two steps according to the protocol described in a previous work [36]. In brief, embryos were first plated for 2 min in a vitrification medium consisting of 12.5% (v/v) of both dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO, Sigma) and ethylene glycol (EG, Sigma) added to flushing solution as mentioned above. Then embryos were plated for 1 min in a solution consisted of 20% (v/v) of both DMSO and EG in flushing solution before loading into 0.25 mL-volume plastic straws (IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, France). The straws were sealed and directly immersed into liquid nitrogen (LN2). Devitrification of embryos was performed immediately by taking out the straws from LN2 and immersing directly in water bath at 20°C for 10–15 s. The embryos were expelled from the straws into a plate containing 0.33 M sucrose (Sigma) dissolved in DPBS solution for 5 min, then washed in another plate containing DBPS solution only for another 5 min.

In vitro development rates

All rabbit females in the present study were successfully ovulated and a total of 1089 embryos were recovered in 10 recovery sessions (5 females per session, two sessions at 3 days interval per week). In each recovery session, abnormal embryos were discarded and only normal embryos at morulae stage were randomly distributed for leptin and vitrification treatment groups and then cultured as previously stated. Nine hundred eighty one normal embryos in total were found suitable in all recovery sessions and they were randomly allocated into 135+155, 109+100, 137+138 and 104+105 as fresh + vitrified embryos for 0, 10, 20 and 100 ng/mL leptin groups, respectively. The fresh and vitrified/devitrified embryos in each leptin level were examined during culture period using stereo microscope at 7-45X magnification (ZTX-PW7045, Ningbo ProWay Optics & Electronics Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China). After the first 24 h of incubation, the percentage of morula reached to expanded blastocyst stage was considered as the expanding rate of initial cultured embryos. After the second 24 h of incubation, the number of hatching and hatched blastocysts were recorded and calculated as the hatching rates of initial cultured embryos, respectively. Images of the developmental stages obtained from cultured embryos in the current study are shown in S1 Fig.

Pro-oxidant and antioxidant biomarkers assay

Based on the preliminary results obtained from the in vitro development rates, 60 hatched blastocysts (divided equally into 6 biological replicates) were harvested from either fresh or vitrified embryo groups in both leptin levels (0 and 20 ng/mL). Embryos in each replicate were homogenized according to the methods described in a recent work [15]. Briefly, embryos were subjected to freeze-thaw cycles to break down the embryo cells through washing three times with 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, BioShop Canada Inc.) and collecting by centrifugation at 1030 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then collected and the total protein was quantified on the principle of biuret colorimetric reaction [37], according to the kit’s protocol (MBS2540542, MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, USA), in order to normalize all data to the protein concentration in each sample. After that, the malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) as pro-oxidant biomarkers, and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) as antioxidant biomarkers were assayed in the supernatant. All determinations were performed following instructions of colorimetric assay kits ((MBS822354, MBS480450, MBS2540515, MBS841580 and MBS480417 for MDA, NO, TAC, SOD and GPx assays, respectively; MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, USA), and the measurements were obtained using an automatic scanning spectrophotometer (Model-CE1010, Cecil Instruments Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The average inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) were 8.0% and 11.9% for MDA, 6.1% and 7.5% for NO, 5.6% and 8.3% for TAC, 12.1% and 9.2% for SOD, and 9.4% and 10.0% for GPx, respectively.

Apoptotic and developmental biomarkers assay

As described above, the supernatant was also used for the assessment of some apoptotic biomarkers such as bcl-2 associated X protein (BAX), heat shock 60kD protein member 1 (HSP60) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and some developmental biomarkers such as sex determining region Y box protein 2 (SOX2), nanog homeobox protein (NANOG) and octamer-binding protein 4 (OCT4). These proteins were determined according to the manufacturer’s protocols using specific ELISA kits (MBS732916, MBS2707501, MBS700705, MBS2511080, MBS763634 and MBS2502128 for BAX, HSP60, TNFα, SOX2, NANOG and OCT4 assays, respectively; MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, USA). The measurements were recorded by an automated ELISA (Model 550 Microplate Reader, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., USA), and data were normalized to the protein concentration in each sample. The average inter- and intra-assay CV for ELISA tests were 6.1% and 9.7% for BAX, 7.8% and 10.1% for HSP60, 5.8% and 7.1% for TNFα, 10.1% and 9.7% for SOX2, 8.4% and 8.5% for NANOG, and 6.0% and 8.5% for OCT4, respectively.

Statistical analysis

A binary probit link with binomial error distribution was established in a generalized linear model to analyze the main effects of leptin levels (0, 10, 20 and 100 ng/mL), vitrification treatment (fresh ad vitrified embryos) and their interactions on the parameters of in vitro development rates. Data of pro-oxidant, antioxidant, apoptotic and developmental biomarkers were subjected to one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences between the 4 embryo groups (fresh embryos or vitrified embryos cultured without or with 20 ng/mL leptin). The significance of means was detected by Duncan’s multiple-range tests, and the significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results of in vitro development are expressed as means ± standard error (SE), while data of biomarkers are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS-22.0 Software Package (IBM corp., NY, USA, 2013).

Results

Embryo in vitro development rates

The overall data of in vitro developmental rates of fresh and vitrified embryos cultured with different levels of leptin are presented in Fig 2. There were no significant interactions between the leptin and vitrification treatments for the analysed variables of development. The expanding rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the embryos cultured with 20 ng/mL leptin (93% and 74% in the fresh and vitrified embryos, respectively) than the other groups (76, 72 and 60% in the fresh embryos and 54, 58 and 42% in the vitrified embryos cultured with 0, 10 and 100 ng/mL leptin, respectively). In addition, the hatching rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the embryos cultured with 20 ng/mL leptin (88% and 68% in the fresh and vitrified embryos, respectively) than the other groups (70, 67 and 54% in the fresh embryos and 47, 52 and 36% in the vitrified embryos cultured with 0, 10 and 100 ng/mL leptin, respectively). As shown in Fig 2, the vitrification treatment significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the expanding and hatching rates of embryos in all leptin groups.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Data of in vitro expanding (A) and hatching (B) blastocyst rates of fresh and vitrified rabbit embryos cultured with different levels of leptin.

Bars represent the mean ± standard error (SE) and the different superscripts (a, b, c, d) indicate the significant differences between means (P<0.05). Number of initial cultured embryos per fresh/vitrified treatment group were 135/155, 109/100, 137/138 and 104/105 embryos for 0, 10, 20 and 100 ng/mL leptin groups, respectively. Expanding and hatching rates were calculated as percentages of expanded and hatched blastocysts from the initial cultured morulae embryos, respectively, in each treatment group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246307.g002

Pro-oxidant and antioxidant biomarkers

The results of pro-oxidant and antioxidant biomarkers in fresh and vitrified embryos treated with 0 or 20 ng/mL leptin are presented in Fig 3. It was observed that vitrification of embryos without leptin treatment significantly (P < 0.05) increased the pro-oxidant levels compared to their levels in the control fresh embryos (1.12±0.195 vs. 0.71±0.057 nM/mg MDA and 4.36±0.231 vs. 3.46±0.212 μM/mg NO, respectively). While culture of embryos with 20 ng/mL leptin decreased the pro-oxidant levels in both fresh (0.52±0.076 nM/mg MDA and 3.22±0.345 μM/mg NO) and vitrified (0.81±0.061 nM/mg MDA and 3.57±0.275 μM/mg NO) embryos, compared to their controls (Fig 3A). On the other hand, leptin significantly (P < 0.05) promoted the activation of antioxidant biomarkers in fresh embryos (7.29±0.708 vs. 5.76±0.326 U/mg TAC, 2.40±0.202 vs. 1.65±0.201 U/mg SOD and 2.70±0.278 vs. 1.59±0.150 mU/mg GPx in the embryos cultured with 20 ng/mL leptin vs. control embryos, respectively). In contrast, vitrification treatment significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the antioxidant biomarkers (3.36±0.297 or 3.82±0.345 U/mg TAC, 0.47±0.026 or 0.85±0.092 U/mg SOD and 0.49±0.047 or 0.95±0.102 mU/mg GPx in the vitrified embryos treated with 0 or 20 ng/mL leptin, respectively) compared to the fresh control embryos (Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Data of pro-oxidant biomarkers (A) and antioxidant biomarkers (B) of fresh or vitrified rabbit embryos cultured with or without leptin.

Bars represent the mean as per mg of total protein ± standard deviation (n = 6). Bars with different letters (a, b, c, d) are significantly different (P<0.05). Pro-oxidant biomarkers: malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide (NO); Antioxidant biomarkers: total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246307.g003

Apoptotic and developmental biomarkers

The results of apoptotic and developmental biomarkers in fresh and vitrified embryos treated with 0 or 20 ng/mL leptin are shown in Fig 4. Vitrification of embryos significantly (P < 0.05) increased the BAX, HSP60 and TNFα apoptotic proteins in the embryos treated or not treated with leptin in comparison with the fresh control embryos (Fig 4A). In contrast, leptin treatment significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the levels of the apoptotic biomarkers in fresh embryos (2.43±0.358 vs. 3.91±0.239 pg/mg BAX, 0.80±0.110 vs. 1.15±0.089 pg/mg HSP60 and 7.79±0.683 vs. 10.70±0.619 pg/mg TNFα in embryos cultured with 20 vs. 0 ng/mL leptin, respectively). In vitrified embryos, culture with leptin significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the levels of BAX and TNFα which highly expressed by vitrification (6.73±0.713 vs. 8.39±0.608 pg/mg BAX and 18.02±1.619 vs. 25.96±1.281 pg/mg TNFα in embryos cultured with 20 vs. 0 ng/mL leptin, respectively), while HSP60 was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by leptin (2.78±0.327 vs. 1.95±0.146 pg/mg in embryos cultured with 20 vs. 0 ng/mL leptin). On the other hand, leptin significantly (P < 0.05) increased the expression of the examined developmental proteins in the fresh embryos (0.25±0.025 vs. 0.10±0.010 ng/mg SOX2, 0.06±0.004 vs. 0.04±0.003 ng/mg NANOG and 0.09±0.008 vs. 0.07±0.004 ng/mg OCT4 in embryos cultured with 20 vs. 0 ng/mL leptin, respectively). After vitrification, the developmental biomarkers were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased compared to the fresh control embryos; however, the previous culture with 20 ng/mL leptin ameliorated the reduction in these developmental biomarkers (0.08±0.008 vs. 0.04±0.004 ng/mg SOX2, 0.05±0.005 vs. 0.02±0.002 ng/mg NANOG and 0.06±0.006 vs. 0.05±0.004 ng/mg OCT4 in embryos cultured with 20 vs. 0 ng/mL leptin, respectively, Fig 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Data of apoptotic biomarkers (A) and developmental biomarkers (B) of fresh or vitrified rabbit embryos cultured with or without leptin.

Bars represent the mean as per mg of total protein ± standard deviation (n = 6). Bars with different letters (a, b, c, d) are significantly different (P<0.05). Apoptotic biomarkers: Bcl-2 associated X protein (BAX), heat shock 60kD protein member 1 (HSP60), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα); Developmental biomarkers: Sex determining region Y box protein 2 (SOX2), Nanog homeobox protein (NANOG), and Octamer-binding protein 4 (OCT4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246307.g004

Discussion

Since approving the vitrification techniques as properly considerable methods for cryopreservation of mammalian embryos [38], many attempts have been made in the last two decades to technically improve such methodologies and/or to overcome the oxidative-induced damage during the processing of embryos. We recently found that culture of rabbit embryos with antioxidant materials such as melatonin [39] and retinol [15] can protect embryos from the oxidative stress and support the in vitro development of embryos. In addition, the in vitro developmental capacity of vitrified embryos were maintained by pre-culture of embryos with melatonin for 2 h before vitrification [7]. Many studies also indicated that leptin could be used to promote the in vitro development of embryos; however, these studies have been focused on the morphological aspects while other aspects and protective effects of leptin against oxidative stress during in vitro and cryopreservation conditions have not been sufficiently explored. Previous studies showed that the half-life of leptin in human and rats was determined in a range of 25–71 min [34,40]. Therefore, in the present study, rabbit embryos at the morulae stage were cultured with different levels of leptin for 2 h and then were allowed for further development as fresh or after vitrification to evaluate the morphological aspects of embryonic development in vitro and to explore the expression of some pro-oxidant, antioxidant, apoptotic and developmental biomarkers in the fresh and vitrified rabbit embryos.

Our results demonstrated that the addition of leptin at 20 ng/mL significantly improved the expanding and hatching rates while the higher leptin concentration (100 ng/mL) decreased the expanding and hatching rates compared to the free-leptin group in both fresh and vitrified embryos (Fig 2). These results are consistent with previous studies that reported a concentration-dependent effect of leptin on embryonic development in various species [20,31,32,34]. It was reported that competent blastocysts can release higher leptin molecules in culture media compared to arrested embryos of human [33]. The beneficial effect of leptin on the embryonic development was attributed by many researchers to the increased ICM and TE cell number which is directly correlated with embryo quality and viability [20,31,41]. Irrespective of leptin treatment, the vitrification treatment in the present study significantly decreased the expanding and hatching rates of cultured embryos (57 and 51%, respectively) compared to the fresh embryos (78 and 71%, respectively). These results are comparable with other studies in rabbits. For example, a recent study reported that vitrification of morulae embryos using cryotop or calibrated plastic inoculation loop devices resulted in hatching of 62% of vitrified embryos vs. 95% in fresh embryos [6]. Compared to this study, the lower hatching rates of vitrified embryos in our study may be due to using a carrier (0.25 mL straws) with a high volume and velocity of vitrification. Also, the low rate of hatched embryos in fresh embryos in our study could be attributed to the higher dose of eCG used for does receptivity that can affect the quality of recovered embryos [42]. The low development of embryos after vitrification was also documented in previous studies and was attributed to the damage induced by oxidative stress [7,8,1014]. In addition, Vajta [38] explained that the number of surviving blastomeres in the devitrified embryos may be insufficient for the re-expansion of the blastocoelic cavity and the consequent developmental events.

Leptin was previously reported as antioxidant and free radical scavenger in a rat model suffer from oxidative stress [43,44]. There is only one study reported a positive effect of leptin on cryopreserved men sperm which was induced by the activation of certain antioxidant enzymes [45]. The results of the present study displayed an increase in the levels of MDA and NO as pro-oxidant biomarkers due to the vitrification treatment, while the TAC, SOD and GPx antioxidant biomarkers were significantly decreased. Similar results have been reported previously in vitrified embryos of rabbit [7]. In contrast, leptin treatment before vitrification maintained the levels of MDA and NO at similar levels to that obtained in the fresh embryos. Furthermore, leptin promoted the activation of antioxidant biomarkers in the fresh embryos, and increased SOD and GPx activity in the vitrified embryos treated with leptin compared to those vitrified embryos without leptin (Fig 3). It was also concluded that leptin resistance in lean swine fetuses negatively affected the antioxidant homeostasis and increased the oxidative stress, contributing to low aspects in the reproductive efficiency and embryo viability [46]. In addition, leptin would independently regulate the transcription of 5’-AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) in the mitochondria which, in turn, control the energy metabolism, ROS production and oxidative stress [47]. Furthermore, the antioxidative effects of leptin on embryos could be attributed to the overexpression of the redox-sensitive transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is the main regulator for the antioxidant enzymes system [48,49]. We did not determine Nrf2 in the present study; nevertheless, it was concluded by other works that Nrf2 was overexpressed in vitrified rabbit embryos cultured with antioxidant compounds [7]. This transcription factor has an important role to restore the other antioxidant enzymes of embryos to be more tolerant against oxidative stress and more competent for development [50].

Embryos exposed to in vitro and vitrification conditions show low capability of blastulation and expanding [16] due to a strong reduction in the inner cell mass [51]. Earlier studies reported that such conditions may switch on/off some developmentally important genes that play a pivotal role in the regular development and expanding of preimplantation embryos [5254]. In the present study, some pro-apoptotic and developmental biomarkers were also determined for the first time by ELSA assay in our experimental groups. The negative effects of cryopreservation on embryo expression of developmental genes were well documented previously in porcine [55], mouse [56,57] and human [58,59]. Our results also revealed an increase in the apoptotic proteins along with a decrease in the developmentally proteins due to the negative effects of vitrification treatment on rabbit embryos not previously treated with leptin (Fig 3). In contrast, the positive effect of leptin on fresh embryos in the present study could be attributed to the antiapoptotic action of leptin via downregulation of P53 and MAP kinase pathways which consequently reduce genetic expression of apoptotic proteins like Caspase3, TNFα and BAX [43,60,61]. Furthermore, culture of embryos with leptin before vitrification ameliorated the reduction in the developmental biomarkers induced by the vitrification in the present study (Fig 4B). Such corrective effect of leptin was also demonstrated against apoptosis incidence in hepatocytes of oxidative-injured liver [44]. Moreover, Zheng et al [62] reported that antiapoptotic effect of leptin on cardiomyocytes could be triggered by increasing the antioxidant defense, particularly the SOD activity.

It is known that HSP60 may assist the polypeptides of mitochondrial matrix for refolding and proper assembly under stress conditions [63]. In contrast, it is also suggested that HSP60 release in the extra-mitochondrial cytosol may regulate apoptosis of intact cells through binding to BAX and accelerating caspase-3 activation [64,65]. Results in the current study indicate that culture of embryos with leptin before vitrification significantly increased the level of HSP60 compared to the other groups. This result may support a hypothesis that leptin can restore embryos under cryopreservation conditions to be more tolerant to the oxidative stress through more expression of HSP60 [66]. The increased HSP60 in these embryos may, in turn, facilitate the proper folding of imported mitochondrial proteins and prevent their denaturation [67].

In conclusion, the addition of leptin at 20 ng/mL to the culture media improved the in vitro development rates including expanding and hatching rates of fresh and vitrified rabbit embryos. Leptin seems to act directly via the activation of the antioxidant system of embryos. While vitrification induces high levels of apoptotic BAX, HSP60 and TNFα biomarkers in embryos, the pre-culture of embryos with leptin has antiapoptotic effect on the vitrified embryos, and moreover, ameliorates the reduction of the developmental biomarkers such as SOX2, NANOG and OCT4 proteins in the vitrified embryos. Furthermore, leptin may protect the vitrified embryos against oxidative stress via promoting the HSP60 biomarker to support the mitochondrial function. These results indicate that leptin could be used as antiapoptotic and antioxidant promotor to support the development of cultured rabbit embryos under in vitro study conditions. Further in vivo studies are needed to confirm the positive effects of leptin on the embryonic development when cryopreservation programs are implemented in rabbit species.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Developmental stages obtained from cultured rabbit embryos in the current study.

(A) Compacted morulae embryos recovered from rabbit does 70 h post insemination. (B) Examples of expanding blastocysts obtained after 24 h of embryo culture. (C, D, E and F) Hatched/hatching blastocysts obtained after 48 h of culture in the fresh embryo group without leptin, vitrified embryo group without leptin, fresh embryo group with 20 ng/mL leptin and vitrified embryo group with 20 ng/mL leptin, respectively. Images were captured using a digital video camera (Cohu, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) connected to a stereo zoom microscope at magnification of 45X (scale bar: 100 μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246307.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for their support during this study.

References

  1. 1. Pereira RM, Marques CC. Animal oocyte and embryo cryopreservation [Internet]. Cell and Tissue Banking. Cell Tissue Bank; 2008. pp. 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9075-2 pmid:18496769
  2. 2. Prentice JR, Anzar M. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocyte for conservation of animal genetics. Vet Med Int. 2011;2011: 146405. pmid:20886016
  3. 3. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196°C by vitrification. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 1985;313: 573–575. pmid:3969158
  4. 4. Dobrinsky J. Cryopreservation of swine embryos: A chilly past with a vitrifying future. Theriogenology. 2001;56: 1333–1344. pmid:11758887
  5. 5. Arav A, Natan Y. The near future of vitrification of oocytes and embryos: looking into past experience and planning into the future. Transfus Med Hemotherapy. 2019;46: 182–186. pmid:31244586
  6. 6. Marco-Jiménez F, Jiménez-Trigos E, Almela-Miralles V, Vicente JS. Development of cheaper embryo vitrification device using the minimum volume method. PLoS One. 2016;11: 1–9. pmid:26848960
  7. 7. Mehaisen GMK, Saeed AM, Gad A, Abass AO, Arafa M, El-Sayed A. Antioxidant capacity of melatonin on preimplantation development of fresh and vitrified rabbit embryos: morphological and molecular aspects. Fraidenraich D, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0139814. pmid:26439391
  8. 8. Tatone C, Di Emidio G, Vento M, Ciriminna R, Artini PG. Cryopreservation and oxidative stress in reproductive cells. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26: 563–567. pmid:20230330
  9. 9. Ramos-Ibeas P, Heras S, Gómez-Redondo I, Planells B, Fernández-González R, Pericuesta E, et al. Embryo responses to stress induced by assisted reproductive technologies [Internet]. Molecular Reproduction and Development. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2019. pp. 1292–1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23119 pmid:30719806
  10. 10. Combelles CM, Gupta S, Agarwal A. Could oxidative stress influence the in-vitro maturation of oocytes? Reprod Biomed Online. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK; 2009;18: 864–880. pmid:19490793
  11. 11. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3: 28. pmid:16018814
  12. 12. Poprac P, Jomova K, Simunkova M, Kollar V, Rhodes CJ, Valko M. Targeting free radicals in oxidative stress-related human diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;38: 592–607. pmid:28551354
  13. 13. Maity P, Bindu S, Dey S, Goyal M, Alam A, Pal C, et al. Melatonin reduces indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal cell apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial oxidative stress and the activation of mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. J Pineal Res. 2009;46: 314–323. pmid:19220725
  14. 14. Pop-Busui R, Sima A, Stevens M. Diabetic neuropathy and oxidative stress. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006;22: 257–273. pmid:16506271
  15. 15. Elomda AM, Saad MF, Saeed AM, Elsayed A, Abass AO, Safaa HM, et al. Antioxidant and developmental capacity of retinol on the in vitro culture of rabbit embryos. Zygote. Cambridge University Press; 2018;26: 326–332. pmid:30289099
  16. 16. Gómez E, Caamaño JN, Bermejo-Alvarez P, Díez C, Muñoz M, Martín D, et al. Gene expression in early expanded parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized bovine blastocysts. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55: 607–614. pmid:19700929
  17. 17. Ghanem N, Salilew-Wondim D, Gad A, Tesfaye D, Phatsara C, Tholen E, et al. Bovine blastocysts with developmental competence to term share similar expression of developmentally important genes although derived from different culture environments. Reproduction. 2011;142: 551–564. pmid:21799070
  18. 18. El-Sayed A, Hoelker M, Rings F, Salilew D, Jennen D, Tholen E, et al. Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. Physiol Genomics. 2006;28: 84–96. pmid:17018689
  19. 19. Li X, Wang D. The role of leptin in the regulation of body weight, reproduction and immunity in mammals. Acta Theriol Sin. 2003;23: 168–174. Available: http://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/528653
  20. 20. Kawamura K, Sato N, Fukuda J, Kodama H, Kumagai J, Tanikawa H, et al. Leptin promotes the development of mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Endocrinology. 2002;143: 1922–1931. pmid:11956175
  21. 21. Moschos S, Chan JL, Mantzoros CS. Leptin and reproduction: A review. Fertil Steril. 2002;77: 433–444. pmid:11872190
  22. 22. Bajari TM, Nimpf J, Schneider WJ. Role of leptin in reproduction. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2004;15: 315–319. pmid:15166788
  23. 23. Pérez-Pérez A, Sánchez-Jiménez F, Maymó J, Dueñas JL, Varone C, Sánchez-Margalet V. Role of leptin in female reproduction. Clin Chem Lab Med. Walter de Gruyter GmbH; 2015;53: 15–28. pmid:25014521
  24. 24. Blüher S, Mantzoros CS. Leptin in reproduction. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2007;14: 458–464. pmid:17982352
  25. 25. Chehab FF. Leptin and reproduction: Past milestones, present undertakings, and future endeavors. J Endocrinol. BioScientifica Ltd.; 2014;223: T37–T48. pmid:25118207
  26. 26. Kumar L, Panda RP, Hyder I, Yadav VP, Sastry KVH, Sharma GT, et al. Expression of leptin and its receptor in corpus luteum during estrous cycle in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim Reprod Sci. Elsevier; 2012;135: 8–17. pmid:22959515
  27. 27. Panda BSK, Pandey S, Somal A, Parmar MS, Bhat IA, Baiju I, et al. Leptin supplementation in vitro improved developmental competence of buffalo oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;98: 116–122. pmid:28601148
  28. 28. Paula-Lopes FF, Boelhauve M, Habermann FA, Sinowatz F, Wolf E. Leptin promotes meiotic progression and developmental capacity of bovine oocytes via cumulus cell-independent and -dependent mechanisms. Biol Reprod. Oxford Academic; 2007;76: 532–541. pmid:17093200
  29. 29. Sarkar M, Schilffarth S, Schams D, Meyer HHD, Berisha B. The expression of leptin and its receptor during different physiological stages in the bovine ovary. Mol Reprod Dev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010;77: 174–181. pmid:19908249
  30. 30. Craig JA, Zhu H, Dyce PW, Wen L, Li J. Leptin enhances porcine preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. Elsevier; 2005;229: 141–147. pmid:15607538
  31. 31. Kim HS, Lee GS, Kim JH, Kang SK, Lee BC, Hwang WS. Expression of leptin ligand and receptor and effect of exogenous leptin supplement on in vitro development of porcine embryos. Theriogenology. Elsevier; 2006;65: 831–844. pmid:16356543
  32. 32. Kšinanová M, Cikoš Š, Babel’ová J, Šefcíková Z, Špirková A, Koppel J, et al. The responses of mouse preimplantation embryos to leptin in vitro in a transgenerational model for obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8: 1–11. pmid:28959235
  33. 33. González RR, Caballero-Campo P, Jasper M, Mercader A, Devoto L, Pellicer A, et al. Leptin and leptin receptor are expressed in the human endometrium and endometrial leptin secretion is regulated by the human blastocyst. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. The Endocrine Society; 2000;85: 4883–4888. pmid:11134157
  34. 34. Herrid M, Nguyen VL, Hinch G, McFarlane JR. Leptin has concentration and stage-dependent effects on embryonic development in vitro. Reproduction. 2006;132: 247–256. pmid:16885533
  35. 35. Lavara R, Mocé E, Lavara F, Viudes De Castro MP, Vicente JS. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits? Theriogenology. 2005;64: 1130–1141. pmid:16125557
  36. 36. Vicente JS, Viudes-De-Castro MP, García ML. In vivo survival rate of rabbit morulae after vitrification in a medium without serum protein. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1999;39: 657–662. pmid:10619172
  37. 37. Nowotny A. Protein Determination by the Biuret Method. Basic Exercises in Immunochemistry: A Laboratory Manual. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1979. p. (1979) 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67356-6_50
  38. 38. Vajta G. Vitrification of the oocytes and embryos of domestic animals. Anim Reprod Sci. Anim Reprod Sci; 2000;60–61: 357–364. pmid:10844207
  39. 39. Mehaisen GMK, Saeed AM. In vitro development rate of preimplantation rabbit embryos cultured with different levels of melatonin. Zygote. 2013;23: 111–115. pmid:23985360
  40. 40. Burnett LC, Skowronski AA, Rausch R, LeDuc CA, Leibel RL. Determination of the half-life of circulating leptin in the mouse. Int J Obes. Nature Publishing Group; 2017;41: 355–359. pmid:28025576
  41. 41. Koo DB, Kang YK, Choi YH, Park JS, Kim HN, Oh KB, et al. Aberrant allocations of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells in bovine nuclear transfer blastocysts. Biol Reprod. Society for the Study of Reproduction; 2002;67: 487–492. pmid:12135886
  42. 42. Mehaisen GMK, Viudes-de-Castro MP, Vicente JS, Lavara R. In vitro and in vivo viability of vitrified and non-vitrified embryos derived from eCG and FSH treatment in rabbit does. Theriogenology. 2006;65: 1279–1291. pmid:16171855
  43. 43. Hamzawy MA, El-Ghandour YB, Abdel-Aziem SH, Ali ZH. Leptin and camel milk abate oxidative stress status, genotoxicity induced in valproic acid rat model of autism. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2018;32: 1–11. pmid:30004275
  44. 44. Şerbetçi K, Uysal O, Erkasap N, Köken T, Baydemir C, Erkasap S. Anti-apoptotic and antioxidant effect of leptin on CCl 4-induced acute liver injury in rats. Mol Biol Rep. Springer; 2012;39: 1173–1180. pmid:21607623
  45. 45. Fontoura P, Mello MD, Gallo-Sá P, Erthal-Martins MC, Cardoso MCA, Ramos C. Leptin improves sperm cryopreservation via antioxidant defense. J Reprod Infertil. 2017;18: 172–178. pmid:28377896
  46. 46. Gonzalez-Añover P, Torres-Rovira L, García-Contreras C, Vazquez-Gomez M, Pesantez JL, Sanz-Fernandez MV, et al. Antioxidant homeostasis is disturbed in fetuses with leptin-resistant genotypes: A cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018;16: 497–500. pmid:30288483
  47. 47. Sebert S, Sharkey D, Budge H, Symonds ME. The early programming of metabolic health: is epigenetic setting the missing link? Am J Clin Nutr. Oxford Academic; 2011;94: 1953S–1958S. pmid:21543542
  48. 48. Yagishita Y, Uruno A, Fukutomi T, Saito R, Saigusa D, Pi J, et al. Nrf2 improves leptin and insulin resistance Provoked by hypothalamic oxidative stress. Cell Rep. ElsevierCompany.; 2017;18: 2030–2044. pmid:28228267
  49. 49. Song NY, Lee YH, Na HK, Baek JH, Surh YJ. Leptin induces SIRT1 expression through activation of NF-E2-related factor 2: Implications for obesity-associated colon carcinogenesis. Biochem Pharmacol. Elsevier; 2018;153: 282–291. pmid:29427626
  50. 50. Amin A, Gad A, Salilew-Wondim D, Prastowo S, Held E, Hoelker M, et al. Bovine embryo survival under oxidative-stress conditions is associated with activity of the NRF2-mediated oxidative-stress-response pathway. Mol Reprod Dev. 2014;81: 497–513. pmid:25057524
  51. 51. Gómez E, Muñoz M, Rodríguez A, Caamaño JN, Facal N, Díez C. Vitrification of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro inflicts selective damage to the inner cell mass. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44: 194–199. pmid:18992090
  52. 52. Niemann H, Wrenzycki C. Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. J Biol Chem. 2000;53: 21–34. pmid:10735059
  53. 53. Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Niemann H. Timing of blastocyst expansion affects spatial messenger RNA expression patterns of genes in bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2003;68: 2073–2080. pmid:12606328
  54. 54. Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Keskintepe L, Martins A, Sirisathien S, Brackett B, et al. Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 893–901. pmid:11331635
  55. 55. Castillo-Martín M, Bonet S, Morató R, Yeste M. Supplementing culture and vitrification-warming media with l-ascorbic acid enhances survival rates and redox status of IVP porcine blastocysts via induction of GPX1 and SOD1 expression. Cryobiology. 2014;68: 451–458. pmid:24657197
  56. 56. Dehghani-Mohammadabadi M, Salehi M, Farifteh F, Nematollahi S, Arefian E, Hajjarizadeh A, et al. Melatonin modulates the expression of BCL-xl and improve the development of vitrified embryos obtained by IVF in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31: 453–461. pmid:24419931
  57. 57. Goto K, Muguruma K, Kuramochi T, Shimozawa N, Hioki K, Itoh T, et al. Effects of cryopreservation of mouse embryos and in vitro fertilization on genotypic frequencies in colonies. Mol Reprod Dev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002;62: 307–311. pmid:12112593
  58. 58. Shaw L, Sneddon SF, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Comparison of gene expression in fresh and frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos. Reproduction. 2012;144: 569–582. pmid:22996807
  59. 59. Chandrakanthan V, Chami O, Stojanov T, O’Neill C. Variable expressivity of the tumour suppressor protein TRP53 in cryopreserved human blastocysts. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. BioMed Central; 2007;5: 39. pmid:17939878
  60. 60. Toro AR, Maymó JL, Ibarbalz FM, Pérez A, Maskin B, Faletti AG, et al. Leptin is an anti-apoptotic effector in placental cells involving p53 downregulation. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014;9. pmid:24922063
  61. 61. Pérez-Pérez A, Toro AR, Vilarino-Garcia T, Guadix P, Maymó JL, Dueñas JL, et al. Leptin reduces apoptosis triggered by high temperature in human placental villous explants: The role of the p53 pathway. Placenta. W.B. Saunders Ltd; 2016;42: 106–113. pmid:27238720
  62. 62. Zheng J, Fang J, Yin YJ, Wang XC, Ren AJ, Bai J, et al. Leptin protects cardiomyocytes from serum-deprivation-induced apoptosis by increasing anti-oxidant defence. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010;37: 955–962. pmid:20557321
  63. 63. Levy-Rimler G, Viitanen P, Weiss C, Sharkia R, Greenberg A, Niv A, et al. The effect of nucleotides and mitochondrial chaperonin 10 on the structure and chaperone activity of mitochondrial chaperonin 60. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268: 3465–3472. pmid:11422376
  64. 64. Gupta S, Knowlton AA. HSP60, Bax, apoptosis and the heart. J Cell Mol Med. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine; 2005;9: 51–58. pmid:15784164
  65. 65. Chandra D, Choy G, Tang DG. Cytosolic accumulation of HSP60 during apoptosis with or without apparent mitochondrial release: Evidence that its pro-apoptotic or pro-survival functions involve differential interactions with caspase-3. J Biol Chem. J Biol Chem; 2007;282: 31289–31301. pmid:17823127
  66. 66. Bonior J, Jaworek J, Konturek SJ, Pawlik WW. Leptin is the modulator of HSP60 gene expression in AR42J cells. J Physiol Pharmacol. Poland; 2006;57 Suppl 7: 135–143. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17228101/
  67. 67. Klikova K, Pilchova I, Stefanikova A, Hatok J, Dobrota D, Racay P. The role of heat shock proteins in Leukemia. Klin Onkol. 2016;29: 29–38. pmid:26879061