Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Effects of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis T-110 supplementation on gut immunity, gut flora, and intestinal infection in naturally aged hamsters

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a threat to elderly individuals, whose immune systems weaken with age. Among the various infectious diseases, Clostridium difficile infection is associated with a high rate of mortality in elderly individuals and is a serious health problem worldwide, owing to the increasing infection rates. Probiotic use has been proposed as an effective countermeasure for C. difficile infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis T-110 on intestinal immunity, intestinal flora, and intestinal infections, especially C. difficile infections, in naturally ageing animals, for extrapolating the results to elderly human subjects. Twenty female hamsters were randomly distributed into two groups. Group 1 was fed a basal diet and group 2 was fed a basal diet supplemented with heat-killed E. faecalis for 7 days. Heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 improved the gut immunity and microflora, especially Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile, in naturally aged hamsters. Therefore, heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 use may be a countermeasure against age-related immune dysfunction and intestinal infections, especially C. difficile infection, in elderly humans. However, further investigation in this regard is needed in humans.

Citation: Inatomi T, Otomaru K (2020) Effects of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis T-110 supplementation on gut immunity, gut flora, and intestinal infection in naturally aged hamsters. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0240773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240773

Editor: Michael H. Kogut, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, UNITED STATES

Received: October 1, 2020; Accepted: December 14, 2020; Published: December 30, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Inatomi, Otomaru. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Infectious diseases are a leading cause of mortality and significant morbidity in elderly individuals, who are at a greater risk than younger individuals [1]. With age, the humoral immunity and cell-mediated immunity are weakened against newly encountered pathogens or vaccines [2–6], necessitating countermeasures for age-related immune dysfunction.

Among the various infectious diseases, Clostridium difficile infection is a social problem in elderly individuals. Clostridium difficile produces a toxin that results in symptoms ranging from mild diarrhoea to inflammation of the bowel (pseudomembranous colitis), which can cause death. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea is a severe form of diarrhoea in humans. There are three key risk factors associated with the development of this infection: antibiotic use [7], ageing [8], and hospitalisation [9]. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea is responsible for approximately 10%–20% of all cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea [10], and it can occur up to 8 weeks after antibiotic therapy [11]. With the increasing threat of C. difficile infection, probiotics have been proposed as one of the effective countermeasures for C. difficile infection [12–14].

Probiotics have been defined as live, microbial, food components that are beneficial for human health. Recently, they have been shown to exhibit beneficial effects similar to those of live microbes; genetically engineered microbes and nonviable microbes are regarded as probiotics [15, 16]. Lactic acid bacteria, one of the most common types of probiotic bacteria, have been reported to exhibit beneficial effects on host homeostasis, including the activation of immune functions [17, 18]. To date, several heat-killed lactic acid bacteria have been shown to modulate specific and/or non-specific immune responses in animal models and occasionally in human subjects [19].

Regarding the use of probiotics for infection control, it is important that the probiotics administered are not infectious. Enterococcus faecalis T-110 (TOA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which belongs to the group of lactic acid bacteria, is unlikely to be a causative agent of opportunistic infection [20]. Enterococcus faecalis T-110 is approved for medical use and is widely used in Japan, China, and India for the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal infections such as Salmonella infection and rotavirus gastroenteritis. In terms of safety, E. faecalis T-110 is considered suitable for the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal infections.

Several studies have shown that ageing affects the gut flora [21–24]. Generally, senescence-accelerated animals are often used to investigate the effects of ageing. However, a few studies have shown that the gut flora of senescence-accelerated animals is similar to that of naturally ageing animals. Stephan et al. [25] reported that the gut microbiota of laboratory mice differs from that of free-living mammals and humans, making them unsuitable for the study of gut immunity. Clostridium difficile is a bacterium endemic to the intestine of hamsters. Aged hamsters often suffer from diarrhoeal infections, especially C. difficile infections [26]. These factors suggest that they are the best model of C. difficile infections in aged animals. Challenge tests are generally conducted in bacterial infection tests, but they are considered unsuitable as infection models for indigenous intestinal bacteria caused by immunosuppression due to ageing. Only a few studies have investigated the effects of safety-guaranteed, heat-killed bacteria on intestinal immunity, gut flora, or intestinal infections in naturally aged animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 on intestinal immunity, flora, and infections in naturally ageing animals, for prospective extrapolation of such information to studies on elderly humans.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

This study was conducted at Inatomi Animal Clinic in Tokyo Prefecture, Japan. It complied with the fundamental guidelines for the proper conduct of animal experiments and related activities in academic research institutions under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Inatomi Animal Clinic (Tokyo, Japan; approval number 2020–001).

Animals, diets, and management

Twenty healthy, 547-day-old female hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan, and acclimatised for 10 days before use in the experiments. These animals were healthy and did not receive any treatments before the study. They were randomly divided into two treatment groups (groups 1 and 2) of 10 hamsters each and housed individually in a cage (27 × 15 × 10 cm) under a 24 h light/dark cycle for 14 days. Temperature was maintained at 26 ± 1°C, and a basic diet (Rodent Diet CE-2, CLEA JAPAN, Tokyo, Japan) and water were provided to the hamsters ad libitum.

Group 2 hamsters received 0.1 ml of heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 saline suspension (1.0 × 10⁷ cfu/ml) daily from days 1 to 7. Heat-killed E. faecalis T-110, a commercial heat-killed and dried cell preparation (TOA Biopharma, Tokyo, Japan), was used. The heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 saline suspension was prepared as previously described [27]. The faeces of individual hamsters were checked daily during this experiment and was categorised according to a faecal score (0, normal faeces; 1, loose stool; 2, moderate diarrhoea; 3, severe diarrhoea).

After this experiment, all hamsters used in this study were bred under a normal environment without being euthanised.

Immunological study

On days 1, 7, and 14, the total immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration in the faeces of all hamsters was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Hamster Immunoglobulin A ELISA Kit; My BioSource, Inc, California, USA). The ELISA procedure was conducted according to the protocol of the manufacturer.

Microbiological study

The faeces of hamsters were used for the microbiological study. Bacterial genomic DNA from the samples was extracted using a commercial extraction system (QuickGene 810 and Quick Gene DNA tissue kit; KURABO, Osaka, Japan), as previously described [28]. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of Bifidobacterium sp., C. perfringens, Lactobacillus spp., and C. difficile were performed using the Rotor-Gene system 6200 (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan), as previously described [29]. The primer sequences and PCR conditions for each bacterium are given in Table 1.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Primers and thermal cycling profiles used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240773.t001

Bifidobacterium sp., C. perfringens, Lactobacillus spp., and C. difficile in the faeces were quantified by real-time PCR, with three replicates for each sample. Amplification was carried out with a 10-μl reaction mixture containing 5 μl of SYBR_Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), 1 μl of DNA template, and 0.2 μmol/l of each primer. Primers for Bifidobacterium sp., C. perfringens, Lactobacillus spp., and C. difficile and the thermal programs are listed in Table 1. For each reaction described above, the positive control and negative water control were assayed together with samples. The melting curves of the amplified DNA were generated to verify the specificity of the reaction. To construct standard curves, 10-fold diluted target species genomic DNA preparations (between 0.1 pg and 10 ng; approximately 30–100 to 3.0 × 10⁶–1.0 × 10⁷ target genomes) were applied by PCR. A mixture of DNA isolated from an extensive set of non-target test bacteria (100 pg each) was used as the negative control. Standard curves of individual real-time PCR assays were used to quantify the target bacterial DNA from faecal DNA preparations. For each assay, the PCR results were converted to the average estimate of target bacterial genomes present in 1 g of faeces (wet weight).

Statistical analysis

Values are presented as mean ± standard error. Mann–Whitney U-test was applied to analyse differences between mean values in all parameters. Differences between mean values were considered significant at P < 0.05 in all statistical analyses. Mann–Whitney U-test was performed using EZR software (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University); EZR is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 2.13.0) [30]. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Total number of days of abnormal defaecation

In the first week, the total number of days of abnormal defaecation improved in group 2 compared with that in group 1 (P < 0.05) (Table 2). In the second week, there was no difference in the total number of days of abnormal defaecation in groups 1 and 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Total number of days apparent abnormal defaecation in hamsters fed a basal diet (group 1) and a 1.0 × 10⁷ cfu/ml supplement of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis (group 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240773.t002

Immunological study

The total immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration in faeces was significantly higher in group 2 than that in group 1 on day 7 (Table 3). On days 1 and 14, no difference in total immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration was detected between groups 1 and 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Total immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration (mg/g) in the faeces of hamsters fed a basal diet (group 1) and a 1.0 × 10⁷ cfu/ml supplement of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis (group 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240773.t003

Microbiological study

On day 1, the counts of Bifidobacterium sp., C. perfringens, Lactobacillus spp., and C. difficile in faeces were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 4). On day 7, the counts of C. perfringens and C. difficile in the faeces were lower in group 2 than in group 2. The counts of Bifidobacterium sp. and Lactobacillus spp. were not significantly different between the two groups. After day 14, the counts of Bifidobacterium sp., C. perfringens, Lactobacillus spp., and C. difficile were similar in the faeces between the two groups.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Microbiological analyses of faeces (log cells/g) of hamsters fed a basal diet (group 1) and a 1.0 × 10⁷ cfu/ml supplement of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis (group 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240773.t004

Discussion

Immunoglobulin A is one of the main defence elements that prevent pathogenic microorganisms from crossing the intestinal epithelial cell barrier and is important in protecting the intestinal mucosa [31, 32]. In the present study, heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 increased total immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration in the faeces (Table 3). Similar effects have been reported by other studies [33–38]. Havenaar and Spanhaak [39] demonstrated that probiotics stimulate the immunity of animals in two ways: i) the probiotic flora migrates throughout the gut wall and multiplies to a limited extent and ii) antigens released by dead microorganisms are absorbed and stimulate the immune system. Kaji et al. [40] demonstrated that bacterial cell components of heat-killed probiotics stimulate the immune system. Their detailed mechanisms of action are unknown and further investigation into the immunostimulatory effect of cell wall components is needed. However, it has been suggested that heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 stimulates gut immunity and increases the production of IgA, consistent with the results of previous studies.

In this study, heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 decreased the number of C. perfringens and C. difficile in aged hamsters (Table 4). Similar effects have been reported in other studies [41–48]. Considering the increased faecal IgA concentration in the current study, it is likely that heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 decreased the number of C. perfringens and C. difficile by improving the gut immunity of ageing animals, consistent with the results of previous studies. Currently, drug resistance and adverse effects are a problem in the antimicrobial treatment of C. difficile infection. The results of the present study suggest that the use of antimicrobials in combination with heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis T-110 for C. difficile infection can reduce the amount of antimicrobials used. This may overcome the problem of drug resistance and adverse effects associated with antimicrobial treatment.

In this study, heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 decreased the total number of days of abnormal defaecation. Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile cause diarrhoea in hamsters [49]. Considering the decreased number of C. perfringens and C. difficile in the current study, it is likely that heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 decreased the total number of days of abnormal defaecation by improving the gut immunity in ageing animals.

Conclusions

The administration of heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 decreased the counts of C. perfringens and C. difficile in aged hamsters. The suppression of C. perfringens and C. difficile by heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 administration could be partially associated with intestinal immunostimulation. Further investigations, including the identification of immunostimulatory cell wall components, are needed. However, based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that heat-killed E. faecalis T-110 has the potential to improve intestinal environment, particularly in aged animals with C. difficile infection.

References

  1. 1. Gavazzi G, Krause KH. Ageing and infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2: 659–666. pmid:12409046
  2. 2. Phair J, Kauffman CA, Bjornson A, Adams L, Linnemann C Jr. Failure to respond to influenza vaccine in the aged: correlation with B-cell number and function. J Lab Clin Med. 1978;92: 822–828. pmid:309499
  3. 3. Cook JM, Gualde M, Hessel L, Mounier M, Michel JP, Denis F, et al. Alterations in the human immune response to the hepatitis B vaccine among the elderly. Cell Immunol. 1987;109: 89–96. pmid:2958144
  4. 4. Burns EA, Lum LG, L'Hommedieu G, Goodwin JS. Specific humoral immunity in the elderly: in vivo and in vitro response to vaccination. J Gerontol. 1993;48: B231–B236. pmid:8227990
  5. 5. Kolibab K, Smithson SL, Shriner AK, Khuder S, Romero-Steiner S, Carlone GM, et al. Specific humoral immunity in the elderly: in vivo and in vitro response to vaccination. Immun Ageing. 2005;2: 10. pmid:15982420
  6. 6. Aspinall R, Del Giudice G, Effros RB, Grubeck-Loebenstein G, Sambhara S. Challenges for vaccination in the elderly. Immun Ageing. 2007;4: 9. pmid:18072962
  7. 7. Bartlett JG. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145: 758–764. pmid:17116920
  8. 8. Karlström O, Fryklund B, Tullus K, Burman LG. A prospective nationwide study of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26: 141–145. pmid:9455523
  9. 9. Wiström J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, Eriksson S, Granström G, Lagergren L, et al. Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients: a prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47: 43–50. pmid:11152430
  10. 10. Bartlett JG. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2002;346: 334–339. pmid:11821511
  11. 11. Gerding DN, Olson MM, Peterson LR. Clostridium difficile—associated diarrhea and colitis in adults a prospective case-controlled epidemiologic study. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146: 95–100. pmid:3942469
  12. 12. Rodriguez H, Miller JE. Do prophylactic probiotics prevent the incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis infection in hospitalized patients? J Okla State Med Assoc. 2019;112: 18–19. pmid:31379393
  13. 13. Sinclair A, Xie X, Saab L, Dendukuri N. Lactobacillus probiotics in the prevention of diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile: a systematic review and Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis. CMAJ Open. 2016;4: E706–E718. pmid:28018885
  14. 14. Lau CS, Chamberlain RS. Probiotics are effective at preventing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gen Med. 2016;9: 27–37. pmid:26955289
  15. 15. Isolauri E, Kirjavainen PV, Salminen S. Probiotics: a role in the treatment of intestinal infection and inflammation? Gut. 2002;50: iii54–iii59. pmid:11953334
  16. 16. Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73: 361S–364S.
  17. 17. Alvarez-Olmos MI, Oberhelman RA. Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32: 1567–1576. pmid:11340528
  18. 18. Fernandes CF, Shahani KM. Anticarcinogenic and immunological properties of dietary Lactobacilli. J Food Prot. 1990;53: 704–710. pmid:31018334
  19. 19. Ezendam J, van Loveren H. Probiotics: immunomodulation and evaluation of safety and efficacy. Nutr Rev. 2006;64: 1–14. pmid:16491665
  20. 20. Noguchi N, Nakaminami H, Nakase K, Sasatsu M. Characterization of Enterococcus strains contained in probiotic products. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34: 1469–1473. pmid:21881235
  21. 21. Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, et al. Through ageing, and beyond: Gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One. 2010;5: e10667. pmid:20498852
  22. 22. Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O’Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108: 4586–4591. pmid:20571116
  23. 23. Biagi E, Candela M, Fairweather-Tait S, Franceschi C, Brigidi P. Ageing of the human meta-organism: the microbial counterpart. Age. 2012;34: 247–267. pmid:21347607
  24. 24. Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: A cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72: 1027–1033. pmid:16461645
  25. 25. Rosshart SP, Herz J, Vassallo BG, Hunter A, Wall MK, Badger JH, et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science. 2019;365: eaaw4361. pmid:31371577
  26. 26. Miedel EL, Hankenson FC. Chapter 5—Biology and Diseases of Hamsters. American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine; 2015. pp. 209–45.
    • 27. Wagner RD, Pierson C, Warner T, Dohnalek M, Hilty M, Balish E. Probiotic effects of feeding heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei to Candida albicans-colonized immunodeficient mice. J Food Prot. 2000;63: 638–644. pmid:10826722
    • 28. Hayakawa T, Masuda T, Kurosawa D, Takamitsu A. Dietary administration of probiotics to sows and/or their neonates improves the reproductive performance, incidence of post-weaning diarrhea and histopathological parameters in the intestine of weaned piglets. Anim Sci J. 2016;87: 1501–1510. pmid:27018090
    • 29. Tsukahara T, Inoue R, Nakayama K, Inatomi T. Inclusion of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain TOA5001 in the diet of broilers suppresses the symptoms of coccidiosis by modulating intestinal microbiota. Anim Sci J. 2018;89: 679–687. pmid:29282825
    • 30. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48: 452–458. pmid:23208313
    • 31. Fagarasan S, Honjo T. Intestinal IgA synthesis: regulation of front-line body defences. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3: 63–72. pmid:12511876
    • 32. Lyu Y, Wu L, Wang F, Shen X, Lin D. Carotenoid supplementation and retinoic acid in immunoglobulin A regulation of the gut microbiota dysbiosis. Exp Biol Med. 2018;243: 613–620. pmid:29534601
    • 33. Arai S, Iwabuchi N, Takahashi S, Xiao J, Abe F, Hachimura S. Orally administered heat-killed Lactobacillus paracasei MCC1849 enhances antigen-specific IgA secretion and induces follicular helper T cells in mice. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0199018. pmid:29897995
    • 34. Kikuchi Y, Kunitoh-Asari A, Hayakawa K, Imai S, Kasuya K, Abe K, et al. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum strain AYA enhances IgA secretion and provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice. PLoS One. 2014;9: e86416. pmid:24466081
    • 35. Ishikawa H, Kutsukake E, Fukui T, Sato I, Shirai T, Kurihara T, et al. Oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum strain b240 protected mice against Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74: 1338–1342. pmid:20622449
    • 36. Campeotto F, Suau A, Kape Nl, Magne F, Viallon V, Ferrari L, et al. A fermented formula in pre-term infants: clinical tolerance, gut microbiota, down-regulation of faecal calprotectin and up-regulation of faecal secretory IgA. Br J Nutr. 2011;105: 1843–1851. pmid:21426607
    • 37. Sukegawa S, Ihara Y, Yuge K, Rao S, Oka K, Arakawa F, et al. Effects of oral administration of heat-killed Enterococcus faecium strain NHRD IHARA in post-weaning piglets. Anim Sci J. 2014;85: 454–60. pmid:24450962
    • 38. Sakai F, Hosoya T, Ono-Ohmachi A, Ukibe K, Ogawa A, Moriya T, et al. Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 induces TGF-b Expression in dendritic cells and activates TLR2 signal to produce IgA in the small intestine. PLoS One. 2014;9: e105370. pmid:25144744
    • 39. Havenaar R, Spanhaak S. Probiotics from an immunological point of view. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994;5: 320–325.
    • 40. Kaji R, Kiyoshima-Shibata J, Nagaoka M, Nanno M, Shida K. Bacterial teichoic acids reverse predominant IL-12 production induced by certain Lactobacillus strains into predominant IL-10 production via TLR2-dependent ERK activation in macrophages. 2010;184: 3505–3513.
    • 41. Canducci F, Armuzzi A, Cremonini F, Cammarota G, Bartolozzi F, Pola P, et al. A lyophilized and inactivated culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus increases Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14: 1625–1629. pmid:11121911
    • 42. Aiba Y, Ishikawa H, Tokunaga M, Komatsu Y. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of non-living, heat-killed form of Lactobacilli including Lactobacillus johnsonii No. 1088. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017;364. pmid:28505287
    • 43. Chauvière G, Coconnier MH, Kerneis S, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Joly B, Servin AL. Competitive exclusion of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) from human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells by heat-killed Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;70: 213–217. pmid:1624102
    • 44. Moyen EN, Bonneville F, Fauchère JL. Modification of intestinal colonization and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni by erythromycin and an extract of Lactobacillus acidophilus in axenic mice. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol. 1985;137A: 199–207.
    • 45. Chen C-Y, Tsen H-Y, Lin C-L, Lin C-K, Chuang L-T, Chen C-S, et al. Enhancement of the immune response against Salmonella infection of mice by heat-killed multispecies combinations of lactic acid bacteria. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62: 1657–1664. pmid:24000228
    • 46. Ishikawa H, Kutsukake E, Fukui T, Sato I, Shirai T, Kurihara T, et al. Oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum strain b240 protected mice against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74: 1338–1342. pmid:20622449
    • 47. Aiba Y, Ishikawa H, Tokunaga M, Komatsu Y. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of non-living, heat-killed form of Lactobacilli including Lactobacillus johnsonii No.1088. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017;364. pmid:28505287
    • 48. Schwendicke F, Horb K, Kneist S, Dörfer C, Paris S. Effects of heat-inactivated Bifidobacterium BB12 on cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59: 1384–1390. pmid:25214308
    • 49. Miedel EL, Hankenson FC. Chapter 5—Biology and Diseases of Hamsters. Laboratory Animal Medicine (Third Edition); 2015. pp. 209–245.
    • 50. Gueimonde M, Tölkkö S, Korpimäki T, Salminen S. New real-time quantitative PCR procedure for quantification of Bifidobacteria in human fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;70: 4165–4169.
    • 51. Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97: 1166–1177. pmid:15546407
    • 52. Wise MG, Siragusa GR. Quantitative detection of Clostridium perfringens in the broiler fowl gastrointestinal tract by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71: 3911–3916. pmid:16000804