Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A longitudinal analysis among men with HIV in northern Vietnam

  • Rebecca B. Hershow ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    rhershow@live.unc.edu

    Affiliation Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • H. Luz McNaughton Reyes,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Tran Viet Ha,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America, Yen Hoa Health Clinic, University of North Carolina Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam

  • Geetanjali Chander,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • Nguyen Vu Tuyet Mai,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Vinmec Health Care System, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Affiliation Yen Hoa Health Clinic, University of North Carolina Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam

  • Teerada Sripaipan,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Constantine Frangakis,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • David W. Dowdy,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • Carl Latkin,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • Heidi E. Hutton,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • Audrey Pettifor,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Suzanne Maman,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Vivian F. Go

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

Abstract

Background

While the link between alcohol use and male-perpetrated intimate partner violence (IPV) has been well-established, research is needed to test whether psychosocial factors interact with alcohol use to exacerbate IPV perpetration. We tested whether depressive symptoms influenced the strength and/or direction of the alcohol-IPV relationship among men with HIV in Vietnam.

Methods

This study is a secondary analysis using data from a randomized controlled trial conducted in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam. Participants were clinic patients with HIV and hazardous alcohol use. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, three, six, and 12 months. Alcohol use was assessed as proportion of days alcohol abstinent. Analyses were restricted to males who reported being married/cohabitating at baseline (N = 313). Multilevel growth models were used to test whether time-varying depressive symptoms modified the time-varying effect of alcohol use on IPV perpetration.

Results

Time-varying depressive symptoms modified the effect of proportion of days alcohol abstinent on IPV perpetration. However, the pattern of effect modification was not as expected, as reporting depressive symptoms weakened the alcohol-IPV relationship. At times when participants screened negative for depressive symptoms, those who reported higher proportion of days alcohol abstinent than usual had significantly lower odds of IPV perpetration (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% Confidence Interval 0.06, 0.45, p = 0.0004). At times when participants screened positive for depressive symptoms, there was no observed effect of alcohol use on IPV perpetration (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 0.80, 22.78, p = 0.09).

Conclusion

The findings highlight the complex nature of the alcohol-IPV relationship and the need to investigate the intersection between hazardous drinking, mental health, and IPV. Men who concurrently report depressive symptoms and heightened alcohol use may be socially isolated from an intimate partner or experiencing fatigue, leading to less alcohol-related IPV perpetration. Mental health interventions addressing depression and alcohol misuse integrated into HIV services may reduce IPV perpetration.

Introduction

The link between alcohol use and male-perpetrated intimate partner violence (IPV) has been established [18]. The alcohol-IPV relationship is often explained by immediate alcohol intoxication effects, such as distorted perceptions of cues or lowered inhibitions, or by increased relationship conflict [4, 5, 7, 911]. However, meta-analytic reviews on alcohol use and IPV perpetration have observed large heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies [79, 12]. Research is needed to test whether psychosocial factors, such as depressive symptoms, influence the strength of the alcohol-IPV relationship [79, 12]. Such interactions may explain some of the heterogeneity found in the alcohol-IPV association, providing critical understanding on how to effectively intervene and reduce IPV perpetration among men. As both IPV and alcohol use lead to numerous health consequences, including HIV/STI infection, depression, physical injury, and death, IPV and alcohol interventions are urgently needed to improve the health and well-being of men and women at-risk for IPV [1317].

Alcohol use and IPV perpetration are highly prevalent in Vietnam and largely shaped by sociocultural norms that stem from Confucianism [18]. Men are the key decision-makers and income earners of their households [19, 20]. Men's use of violence or aggression to exercise control is often seen as necessary to maintain a superior position [19, 20]. Studies estimate that 58% of married women reported ever experiencing IPV by their husbands [21] and 37% of men reported ever perpetrating IPV against their wife [22]. Men's alcohol use is also closely tied to their masculinity [23] and it is strongly encouraged through cultural practices and informal and formal social events [2326]. The World Health Organization found that the annual per capita consumption of pure alcohol in Vietnam was 5.1 liters [14], which is greater than the global consumption of pure alcohol per capita (4.3 to 4.7 liters) [27]. Traditional gender norms characterize men as having volatile tempers and alcohol is perceived as a driver of men's aggressive or violent behavior [20]. Men’s use of violence under the influence of alcohol is often viewed as uncontrollable and an innate demonstration of masculinity [19, 20, 23].

The influence of depressive symptoms on the alcohol-IPV relationship is unexplored among men with HIV, a group at high risk for hazardous alcohol use, IPV perpetration, and forward HIV transmission [16, 17, 2830]. In Vietnam, depressive symptoms are highly prevalent and a known correlate of IPV perpetration among men with HIV [31]. The link between depressive symptoms and IPV perpetration may be explained by self-control impairment, relationship conflict, or a bi-directional relationship between depressive symptoms and IPV perpetration [3236]. However, there is a dearth of research in Vietnam and other global settings examining how depressive symptoms and alcohol use interact to influence IPV perpetration.

Alcohol use may be associated with IPV perpetration for some individuals, but not for others. Multiple threshold and disinhibition theories posit that each individual has an aggressive threshold determined by their propensity for aggression or by the extent to which their context encourages aggressive behavior [3739]. These theories state that for each individual, IPV occurs when they surpass their aggressive threshold, meaning the strength of their aggressive motivations exceeds that of their inhibitions [3739]. Depressive symptoms may interact with alcohol use to drive individuals past their aggressive thresholds. In particular, researchers have posited that depression may manifest as internalized anger and lead to self-control impairment or emotional dysregulation, making individuals who experience depressive symptoms more susceptible to the disinhibiting effects of alcohol intoxication on IPV perpetration [3234].

Empirical evidence also suggests that the co-occurrence of alcohol use and mental health exacerbates violence outcomes. A nationally representative study in the United States found that reporting a severe mental illness did not predict violence, but reporting both a severe mental illness and substance abuse did [40]. Another United States study found that alcohol use strengthened the relationship between mental illness symptoms and perpetration of aggression [32]. In addition to these quantitative studies, qualitative research in India has suggested that depressive symptoms interact with alcohol use to drive IPV perpetration [41].

In this study, we tested whether depressive symptoms influenced the strength and/or direction of the alcohol-IPV relationship among men with HIV and hazardous alcohol use in Vietnam. We investigated whether the concurrent effect of alcohol use on IPV perpetration differed at times when an individual reported having depressive symptoms versus not having depressive symptoms. Our specific hypothesis was that the time-varying association between alcohol use and IPV perpetration would be stronger at times when an individual screens positive for depressive symptoms as compared to negative.

Materials and methods

Study design

This study is a secondary analysis of data from a three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of two evidence-based, manually guided, individually delivered interventions to reduce alcohol use and determine the impact on viral load [42, 43]. From March 2016 to May 2018, data were collected from clinic patients with HIV and hazardous alcohol use (N = 440) in Thai Nguyen, a semi-urban province in northern Vietnam [42]. Thai Nguyen has the highest HIV prevalence among people who inject drugs (PWID; 34%) in Vietnam [44].

Participant recruitment and data collection

Recruitment of study participants took place at seven antiretroviral treatment (ART) community clinics in Thai Nguyen. Recruitment was completed at one clinic before moving on to recruit potential participants at each subsequent clinic. Study interviewers introduced the project before administering written informed consent to those who were interested in participating in the baseline questionnaire. Those who provided consent completed an interviewer-administered screening survey. The survey included the World Health Organization (WHO) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) survey items to determine eligibility for enrollment [45]. Inclusion criteria for eligibility included: (1) current patient on ART at the clinic; (2) AUDIT-C score ≥ 4 (for men) or ≥ 3 (for women) [45]; (3) 18 years of age or older; and (4) plan on residing in Thai Nguyen for the next 24 months. Exclusion criteria for eligibility included: (1) unable to participate in study activities due to psychological disturbance, cognitive impairment or threatening behavior (assessed by study staff); (2) unwilling to provide locator information; (3) unwilling to provide informed consent; and (4) currently participating in other HIV, drug use, or alcohol program, study, or intervention.

Eligible participants were asked to consent a second time to enroll in the study after interviewers explained the RCT study objectives, procedures, risks and benefits to the participants, and answered any questions. Consenting participants were assigned a unique identification number. They then completed the baseline questionnaire and Timeline Followback (TLFB) to measure daily alcohol use over the past 30 days [46]. Eligible participants were also randomly assigned to one of the three study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio.

At baseline, three, six, and 12 months, quantitative questionnaires and the TLFB were administered to all study participants. Each study visit lasted approximately two hours. Trained interviewers administered questionnaires through face-to-face interviews in a private room at the study site. Participants confirmed informed consent at each follow-up visit. The behavioral assessment collected quantitative data on sociodemographics, alcohol and drug use, mental health, and violence. At the end of each study visit, participants were reimbursed for their travel expenses and given 100,000 Vietnamese Dong (~$4.30 USD) as compensation for lost wages. Retention was 94% (405/430) at three months, 96% (410/427) at six months, and 94% (390/414) at 12 months excluding those who were incarcerated (n = 11/440; 2.5%) or died (n = 15/440; 3.4%) during the study period.

The study protocol received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Boards at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Thai Nguyen Center for Preventive Medicine. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02720237).

Key measures

IPV perpetration.

The widely used and validated six-item shortened Conflict Tactics Scale 2 (CTS2) was used to measure recent psychological, physical, and sexual IPV perpetration among any current or previous partner [4749]. Recall periods varied based on the study visit (baseline: IPV perpetration in last 12 months; three-, six-, and 12-month follow-up: IPV perpetration in last three months). The numbers of recent IPV events reported over the study were skewed and zero inflation was observed in the data. As our sample was not large enough to assess IPV perpetration as a count variable, responses to all six items were categorized as those who reported recent IPV perpetration at least once and those who did not. Those who declined or did not know a response were classified as missing. A binary outcome variable was created for any form of recent IPV perpetration, defined as reporting recent psychological, physical, and/or sexual IPV perpetration [50].

Alcohol use.

The TLFB was used to measure alcohol use; the tool has been shown to be valid and reliable in multiple settings [51, 52]. The TLFB is interviewer-administered and reconstructs a daily behavior calendar to help promote memory recall for alcohol use. Using the TLFB data, we assessed alcohol use as proportion of days alcohol abstinent in past 30 days (0 to 1).

Depressive symptoms.

Depressive symptoms were measured using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale (Cronbach's alpha at baseline = 0.83) [53], a tool that has been validated in Vietnam [54]. A composite PHQ-9 score was calculated for each participant. Based on the standard scoring method used for the PHQ-9, those who scored zero to four were categorized as screening negative for depressive symptoms, and those who scored above four were categorized as screening positive for depressive symptoms [55]. A binary measure was also used as the distribution of PHQ-9 scores was highly skewed at baseline.

Covariates.

Theoretical and empirical evidence was used to select variables with the potential to confound the relationship between alcohol use and IPV perpetration [1, 6, 5660]. Exposure to violence as a child was measured using three items asking about ever witnessing interparental violence as a child, ever experiencing physical abuse as a child, or ever experiencing sexual abuse as a child. Responses were dichotomized; those who responded yes to any of the three questions were categorized as having been exposed to violence as a child. Involvement in community violence comprised two items asking about having ever been physically violent towards someone in their community or having ever experienced physical violence by someone in their community [61]. As both experiencing and perpetrating community violence increase the likelihood of IPV perpetration [1, 58, 62, 63], a composite variable was created for involvement in community violence.

Education, age, employment status, and injection drug use in the past three months were collected via self-report. Intervention arm was also selected as a covariate and was documented using a computer-generated randomization process.

Data analysis

For this study, analysis was restricted to male participants who reported being married or cohabitating with a partner at baseline (N = 313) for two main reasons. First, a previous study conducted among men with HIV in northern Vietnam demonstrated that the alcohol-IPV relationship operates differently for men who were married or cohabitating versus those who were single, divorced, separated or widowed [31]. This finding is supported by studies in other settings showing that IPV prevalence and dynamics differ by relationship status [64, 65]. Second, a commonly used theoretical model in alcohol and IPV research posits that relationship conflict may explain the alcohol-IPV relationship [4, 5, 11]. Those who are married or cohabitating may have more opportunity for changes in relationship conflict during the study window as compared to those who are not.

Effect modification analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4 with multilevel growth models using maximum likelihood based on the Laplace estimation [66]. First, we determined the best-fitting unconditional growth model for IPV perpetration by testing linear and quadratic functional forms. The variance component for the random effect was removed from the model if it could not be estimated. The fixed effect was also removed from the model if it was non-significant.

All variables included in the analysis were centered [67]. The wave of data collection variable was re-coded to start at zero to ensure the intercept represents the log odds of IPV perpetration at baseline. The alcohol use variable used to estimate time-varying (or within-person) effects was person-mean centered. For depressive symptoms, the person means were calculated and included in the model as controls along with the dummy coded depressive symptoms variable. Age (years) was grand-mean centered and categorical covariates were dummy coded.

After determining the best-fitting unconditional growth model, the adjusted conditional growth model tested the time-varying effects of alcohol use and depressive symptoms and the two-way interactions among depressive symptoms and alcohol use on IPV perpetration adjusting for covariates. Any non-significant interactions were removed from the final model. If an interaction term was significant, the effect of alcohol use on the predicted probability of IPV perpetration was graphed at both levels of the depressive symptoms variable (0 or 1) to visualize the relationships. Standard errors (SEs) and p-values were generated to test the statistical significance of the intercepts and slopes represented in the graphs. Since participants were recruited from different ART community clinics, recruitment site was initially tested as a fixed effect to assess if it influenced results. As it did not change the results, it was removed to make models more parsimonious.

Results

Descriptive statistics

The sample included 313 male participants who were married or cohabitating at baseline (Mean age: 40.8 years, Standard deviation [SD] = 5.6; Table 1). The median percent days alcohol abstinent increased over time (Baseline: 36.7, Interquartile range [IQR] = 66.7; 12-month follow-up: 76.7, IQR = 66.7). The proportion of participants who screened positive for depressive symptoms decreased over time (Baseline: N = 68/313, 21.7%; 12-month follow-up: N = 43/279, 15.4%).

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of male participants who were married or cohabiting with a partner (N = 313).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.t001

The prevalence of any form of IPV perpetration in the past 12 months was 30.0% (94/313) at baseline (Table 2). At three-month follow-up, the prevalence of IPV in the past three months was 15.4% (44/286), and last-three-month IPV prevalence remained fairly stable throughout the remainder of the study period (six-month follow-up: N = 47/292, 16.1%; 12-month follow-up: N = 42/279, 15.1%). Participants who reported recent IPV perpetration at baseline (N = 94/313) had higher IPV perpetration prevalence estimates across all subsequent study visits as compared to participants who reported no recent IPV perpetration at baseline (N = 219/313; Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Prevalence of recent intimate partner violence perpetration among the full sample (N = 313), among those who reported no recent IPV perpetration at baseline (N = 219), and among those who reported recent IPV perpetration at baseline (N = 94).

Abbreviations: IPV = Intimate partner violence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.g001

thumbnail
Table 2. Prevalence of intimate partner violence perpetration across study visitsa,b.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.t002

Unconditional growth model

The best fitting unconditional growth model for IPV perpetration comprised a random intercept with linear and fixed effects for time. The odds of IPV perpetration significantly decreased over time (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.34, 0.59, p<0.0001). At baseline, the variance in IPV perpetration significantly differed between participants (Intercept: b = -1.09, SE = 0.14, p<0.0001).

Adjusted analyses

Depressive symptoms significantly modified the effect of proportion of days alcohol abstinent on IPV perpetration (Table 3). However, the pattern of effect modification did not support our hypothesis, as having depressive symptoms was found to weaken the inverse relationship between proportion of days alcohol abstinent and IPV perpetration (Fig 2). At times when individuals screened negative for depressive symptoms, those who reported higher proportion of days alcohol abstinent than usual were less likely to report IPV perpetration (Slope: OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.06, 0.45, p = 0.0004; Table 4). In contrast, at times when individuals screened positive for depressive symptoms, there was no significant association between proportion of days alcohol abstinent and IPV perpetration (Slope: OR = 4.28, 95% CI 0.80, 22.78, p = 0.09).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Estimated intimate partner violence perpetration as a function of depressive symptoms and proportion of days alcohol abstinent at times when participants screened positive and negative for depressive symptoms.

On the X-axis, the zero value is each participant's average proportion of days alcohol abstinent reported across the study period. Values greater than zero represent participants reporting higher proportion of days alcohol abstinent than average and values less than zero represent participants reporting lower proportion of days alcohol abstinent than average.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.g002

thumbnail
Table 3. Final adjusted conditional growth modela (N = 313).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Simple intercepts and slopes, proportion of days alcohol abstinent by depressive symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240674.t004

Discussion

In this study, alcohol use and depressive symptoms did not act synergistically to increase the odds of IPV perpetration. At times when participants reported having depressive symptoms, the effect of alcohol use on IPV perpetration became non-significant. However, at times when participants reported having no depressive symptoms, more alcohol use was associated with significantly higher odds of IPV perpetration. This finding diverges from empirical and theoretical evidence suggesting that alcohol use and depression interact to exacerbate violence outcomes [32, 3741, 68]. Previous research among Vietnamese men with HIV identified depressive symptoms and alcohol use as independent correlates of IPV perpetration [31]. Our study builds on these findings to suggest that while both depressive symptoms and alcohol use may be independently associated with IPV perpetration [31], they may not jointly increase odds of IPV perpetration.

Our study findings do not align with the multiple threshold and disinhibition theories, which suggest that people who use alcohol and experience depressive symptoms may have higher odds of IPV perpetration as compared to those who only use alcohol [3739]. However, an inherent assumption in these theories is that alcohol use and depressive symptoms are aggression-provoking factors both independently and jointly [3739]. Our study suggests that Vietnamese men with HIV who are concurrently using alcohol and experiencing depressive symptoms may not express aggression-provoking symptoms, such as hostility or anger [33, 69]. The combination of alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and HIV infection may lead to decreased energy and fatigue [70, 71], resulting in no relationship between alcohol use and IPV perpetration. Additionally, the co-occurrence of alcohol and depressive symptoms may result in other forms of violence or aggression beyond IPV perpetration; this should be tested in future research.

Another potential explanation may be the unique intersection between depressive symptoms, alcohol use, and social isolation in Vietnam. Men may respond to experiences of depression with social isolation [72, 73], leading to reduced alcohol use as drinking alone is uncommon [23, 24]. Instead, drinking centers around social interactions in Vietnam [23, 24, 74]. Those experiencing the co-occurrence of heightened alcohol use and depressive symptoms may represent a particularly isolated group that is not engaging with their partner, leaving limited opportunity for alcohol-related IPV events to occur. Research is needed to understand the circumstances under which men with HIV may or may not use alcohol as a coping strategy when experiencing depressive symptoms.

Due to the high prevalence of hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms among men with HIV globally and in Vietnam [71, 74], intervening on alcohol use and depression may be promising IPV prevention strategies. A quarter of Vietnamese men with HIV screened positive for depressive symptoms and nearly half (46%) screened positive for hazardous drinking [31]. Incorporating mental health services addressing depression and alcohol misuse into HIV care and treatment may reduce depression, alcohol use, and IPV perpetration among men with HIV. Systematic reviews have found that mental health treatments for common mental disorders and for alcohol misuse could effectively reduce IPV [75, 76]. However, there is limited research on the impact of mental health treatment targeting depression on IPV perpetration instead of IPV victimization [75]. Further, there is limited evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of mental health interventions on IPV perpetration in low- and middle-income settings [75, 76].

A large proportion of the participants currently or previously injected drugs because the HIV epidemic in Vietnam is largely driven by injection drug use [44, 77]. PWID with HIV have a higher risk of mortality than non-PWID with HIV [78] and hazardous alcohol use and depressive symptoms are highly prevalent among PWID with HIV [74, 79]. As the co-occurrence and dynamics of depressive symptoms and alcohol use may differ between HIV-infected men with and without a history of injection drug use, generalizability of study findings should be limited to men with HIV in countries with injection-driven HIV epidemics. Additionally, it is difficult to compare IPV prevalence estimates from our study to other Vietnam studies as the IPV measures and recall periods often differ [22, 49, 80].

We are not able to characterize the gender of all participants' partners due to missing data (N = 42/313). All participants with available data reported recently having female sexual partners only and having female main partners. Additionally, we did not collect data on the length of participants' intimate relationships. Participants whose relationships ended during the study may have been less likely to report IPV perpetration after their relationships ended. However, the vast majority of participants reported stable relationship statuses across study visits.

Variables measured using self-report may have been biased due to social desirability, resulting in more conservative estimates of IPV perpetration and depressive symptoms [81, 82]. This is probable as the questionnaires were interviewer-administered, which may have made participants less likely to report depressive symptoms or IPV perpetration [53]. However, interviewers received extensive training on questionnaire administration, reducing the likelihood of social desirability bias. Estimates of alcohol use may also be subject to recall bias as data were collected via self-report. However, sub-analyses of the study data validated the self-report alcohol measures using phosphatidylethanol (PEth) [42], a biomarker that is a direct metabolite of alcohol consumption [83].

Participants who dropped out of the study may have been more likely to perpetrate IPV than those who were retained in the study, resulting in an underestimation of IPV perpetration. We also used a binary measure of depressive symptoms in analyses, which may have led to a loss of meaningful information and attenuated effects.

Despite these limitations, this longitudinal study contributes important findings on the intersection between hazardous alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and IPV perpetration in a high-risk, understudied population. Unexpectedly, having depressive symptoms was found to weaken the alcohol-IPV relationship. These results suggest that men who reported higher alcohol use and depressive symptoms than usual may be experiencing extreme social isolation from an intimate partner, leading to less opportunity for alcohol-related IPV perpetration. Alternatively, men with HIV who are concurrently using alcohol and experiencing depressive symptoms may have fatigue or reduced energy, decreasing risk of alcohol-related IPV perpetration. Previous mental health interventions aiming to reduce IPV perpetration have either targeted participants who misuse alcohol or those who screen positive for depressive symptoms [75]. This study suggests that mental health interventions for men with HIV should target both groups—those who screen positive for hazardous drinking or depressive symptoms—to effectively reduce IPV perpetration.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Thai Nguyen Center for Disease Control for their support.

References

  1. 1. Jansen HA, Nguyen TV, Hoang TA. Exploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: results from a cross-sectional national survey. Int J Public Health. 2016;61(8):923–34. pmid:27554794
  2. 2. Fulu E, Jewkes R, Roselli T, Garcia-Moreno C, UN Multi-country Cross-sectional Study on Men and Violence research team. Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: findings from the UN Multi-country Cross-sectional Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(4):e187–207. pmid:25104345
  3. 3. Phil RO, Hoaken PNS. Biological bases of addiction and aggression in close relationships. Wall CWAM, editor. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2002.
  4. 4. Fischer JL, Fitzpatrick J, Cleveland B, Lee JM, McKnight A, Miller B. Binge drinking in the context of romantic relationships. Addict Behav. 2005;30(8):1496–516. pmid:15885923
  5. 5. White HR, Chen PH. Problem drinking and intimate partner violence. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(2):205–14. pmid:12033697
  6. 6. Tschann JM, Flores E, Pasch LA, Marin BV. Emotional distress, alcohol use, and peer violence among Mexican-American and European-American adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(1):11–8. pmid:15963902
  7. 7. Foran HM, O'Leary KD. Alcohol and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(7):1222–34. pmid:18550239
  8. 8. Stith SM, Smith DB, Penn CE, Ward DB, Tritt D. Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2004;10(1):65–98.
  9. 9. Crane CA, Godleski SA, Przybyla SM, Schlauch RC, Testa M. The Proximal Effects of Acute Alcohol Consumption on Male-to-Female Aggression: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Experimental Literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016;17(5):520–31. pmid:26009568
  10. 10. Reyes HL, Foshee VA, Bauer DJ, Ennett ST. Developmental Associations Between Adolescent Alcohol Use and Dating Aggression. J Res Adolesc. 2012;22(3):526–41. pmid:23589667
  11. 11. Quigley BM, Leonard KE. Alcohol and the continuation of early marital aggression. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24(7):1003–10. pmid:10924003
  12. 12. Ferrer VB, E.; Garcia E.; Manassero M. A.; Gili M. Meta-analytic study of differential characteristics between batterers and non-batterers: The case of psychopathology and consumption of alcohol and drugs. Psykhe. 2004;13(1):141–56.
  13. 13. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
  14. 14. Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  15. 15. Li Y, Marshall CM, Rees HC, Nunez A, Ezeanolue E, Ehiri J. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014(17):18845.
  16. 16. Hatcher AM, Gibbs A, McBride RS, Rebombo D, Khumalo M, Christofides NJ. Gendered syndemic of intimate partner violence, alcohol misuse, and HIV risk among peri-urban, heterosexual men in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2019:112637. pmid:31708236
  17. 17. Okafor CN, Christodoulou J, Bantjes J, Qondela T, Stewart J, Shoptaw S, et al. Understanding HIV Risk Behaviors Among Young Men in South Africa: A Syndemic Approach. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(12):3962–70. pmid:30003507
  18. 18. Zhang HX, Locke C. Contextualising Reproductive Rights Challenges: The Vietnam Situation. Women’s Studies International Forum. 2002;25(4):443–53.
  19. 19. Horton P, Rydstrom H. Heterosexual Masculinity in Contemporary Vietnam: Privileges, Pleasures, and Protests. Men and Masculinities. 2011;14(5):542–64.
  20. 20. Rydstrom H. Encountering “Hot” Anger: Domestic Violence in Contemporary Vietnam. Violence Against Women. 2003;9(6):676–97.
  21. 21. “Keeping silent is dying”: Results from the National Study on Domestic Violence Against Women in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: General Statistics Office of Vietnam; 2010.
  22. 22. Yount KM, Higgins EM, Vanderende KE, Krause KH, Minh TH, Schuler SR, et al. Men’s Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence in Vietnam: Gendered Social Learning and the Challenges of Masculinity. Men and Masculinities. 2015;19(1):64–84.
  23. 23. Lincoln M. Alcohol and drinking cultures in Vietnam: A review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;159:1–8. pmid:26802499
  24. 24. Hershow RB, Zuskov DS, Vu Tuyet Mai N, Chander G, Hutton HE, Latkin C, et al. "[Drinking is] Like a Rule That You Can't Break": Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Reduce Alcohol Use and Improve Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence among People Living with HIV and Alcohol Use Disorder in Vietnam. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(7):1084–92. pmid:29537932
  25. 25. Luu BN, Nguyen TT, Newman IM. Traditional alcohol production and use in three provinces in Vietnam: an ethnographic exploration of health benefits and risks. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:731. pmid:25037953
  26. 26. Tran BX, Nguyen N, Ohinmaa A, Duong AT, Nguyen LT, Van Hoang M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use disorders during antiretroviral treatment in injection-driven HIV epidemics in Vietnam. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;127(1–3):39–44. pmid:22749565
  27. 27. Recorded alcohol per capita (15 years) consumption in litres of pure alcohol, from 1990: World Health Organization; 2016 [Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/alcohol/consumption_levels/adult_recorded_percapita/en/.
  28. 28. Blashill AJ, Bedoya CA, Mayer KH, O'Cleirigh C, Pinkston MM, Remmert JE, et al. Psychosocial Syndemics are Additively Associated with Worse ART Adherence in HIV-Infected Individuals. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):981–6. pmid:25331267
  29. 29. Glynn TR, Safren SA, Carrico AW, Mendez NA, Duthely LM, Dale SK, et al. High Levels of Syndemics and Their Association with Adherence, Viral Non-suppression, and Biobehavioral Transmission Risk in Miami, a U.S. City with an HIV/AIDS Epidemic. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(11):2956–65. pmid:31392443
  30. 30. McMahon JM, Braksmajer A, Zhang C, Leblanc N, Chen M, Aidala A, et al. Syndemic factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive adult heterosexual men. AIDS Res Ther. 2019;16(1):32. pmid:31706357
  31. 31. Hershow RB, Ha TV, Sripaipan T, Latkin C, Hutton HE, Chander G, et al. Perpetration of intimate partner violence among men living with HIV in northern Vietnam. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(9):2555–2571. pmid:32078077
  32. 32. Quigley BM, Houston RJ, Antonius D, Testa M, Leonard KE. Alcohol use moderates the relationship between symptoms of mental illness and aggression. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2018;32(7):770–8. pmid:30265055
  33. 33. Birkley E, Eckhardt CI. Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;37:40–56. pmid:25752947
  34. 34. Maiuro RD. Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988;56(1):17–23. pmid:3346444
  35. 35. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439. pmid:23671407
  36. 36. Yu R, Nevado-Holgado AJ, Molero Y, D'Onofrio BM, Larsson H, Howard LM, et al. Mental disorders and intimate partner violence perpetrated by men towards women: A Swedish population-based longitudinal study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1002995. pmid:31846461
  37. 37. Fals-Stewart W, Leonard KE, Birchler GR. The occurrence of male-to-female intimate partner violence on days of men's drinking: the moderating effects of antisocial personality disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(2):239–48. pmid:15796631
  38. 38. McNaughton Reyes HL, Foshee VA, Bauer DJ, Ennett ST. Heavy alcohol use and dating violence perpetration during adolescence: family, peer and neighborhood violence as moderators. Prev Sci. 2012;13(4):340–9. pmid:21494801
  39. 39. Parker RN, Rebhun L. Alcohol and Homicide: A Deadly Combination of Two American Traditions. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1995.
  40. 40. Elbogen EB, Johnson SC. The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(2):152–61. pmid:19188537
  41. 41. Satyanarayana VA, Hebbani S, Hegde S, Krishnan S, Srinivasan K. Two sides of a coin: Perpetrators and survivors perspectives on the triad of alcohol, intimate partner violence and mental health in South India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2015;15:38–43. pmid:26001901
  42. 42. Go VF, Hutton HE, Ha TV, Chander G, Latkin CA, Mai NVT, et al. Effect of 2 integrated interventions on alcohol abstinence and viral suppression among Vietnamese adults with hazardous alcohol use and HIV: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2017115. pmid:32945875
  43. 43. Hutton HE, Lancaster KE, Zuskov D, Mai NVT, Quynh BX, Chander G, et al. Cultural adaptation of 2 evidence-based alcohol interventions for antiretroviral treatment clinic paitents in Vietnam. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019;18:2325958219854368.
  44. 44. Vietnam AIDS Response Progress Report 2014: Following up the 2011 Political Declaration on HIV/AIDS. Hanoi: National Committee for AIDS, Drugs and Prostitution Prevention and Control; 2014.
  45. 45. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. 2001.
  46. 46. Sobell LC, Brown J, Leo GI, Sobell MB. The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;42(1):49–54. pmid:8889403
  47. 47. Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence Vict. 2004;19(5):507–20. pmid:15844722
  48. 48. Murshid NS, Murshid N. Intergenerational Transmission of Marital Violence: Results From a Nationally Representative Sample of Men. J Interpers Violence. 2018;33(2):211–27. pmid:26378116
  49. 49. Nguyen TD. Prevalence of male intimate partner abuse in Vietnam. Violence Against Women. 2006;12(8):732–9. pmid:16861330
  50. 50. Benebo FO, Schumann B, Vaezghasemi M. Intimate partner violence against women in Nigeria: a multilevel study investigating the effect of women's status and community norms. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):136. pmid:30092785
  51. 51. Fiellin DA, McGinnis KA, Maisto SA, Justice AC, Bryant K. Measuring alcohol consumption using Timeline Followback in non-treatment-seeking medical clinic patients with and without HIV infection: 7-, 14-, or 30-day recall. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(3):500–4. pmid:23490581
  52. 52. Vakili S, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Simco ER, Agrawal S. Using the Timeline Followback to determine time windows representative of annual alcohol consumption with problem drinkers. Addict Behav. 2008;33(9):1123–30. pmid:18562125
  53. 53. Pence BW, Gaynes BN, Atashili J, O'Donnell JK, Tayong G, Kats D, et al. Validity of an interviewer-administered patient health questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in HIV-infected patients in Cameroon. J Affect Disord. 2012;143(1–3):208–13. pmid:22840467
  54. 54. Nguyen TQ, Bandeen-Roche K, Bass JK, German D, Nguyen NT, Knowlton AR. A tool for sexual minority mental health research: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a depressive symptom severity measure for sexual minority women in Viet Nam. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2016;20(2):173–91. pmid:27642381
  55. 55. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. pmid:11556941
  56. 56. Dasgupta A, Silverman J., Saggurti N., Ghule M., Donta B., Battala M., et al. Understanding Men’s Elevated Alcohol Use, Gender Equity Ideologies, and Intimate Partner Violence Among Married Couples in Rural India. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018;12(4):1084–93. pmid:29779428
  57. 57. Go VF, Minh NL, Frangakis C, Ha TV, Latkin CA, Sripaipan T, et al. Decreased injecting is associated with increased alcohol consumption among injecting drug users in northern Vietnam. Int J Drug Policy. 2013;24(4):304–11. pmid:23332981
  58. 58. Gilchrist G, Radcliffe P, Noto AR, d'Oliveira AF. The prevalence and factors associated with ever perpetrating intimate partner violence by men receiving substance use treatment in Brazil and England: A cross-cultural comparison. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017;36(1):34–51. pmid:27709693
  59. 59. Machisa MT, Christofides N, Jewkes R. Structural Pathways between Child Abuse, Poor Mental Health Outcomes and Male-Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150986. pmid:26986056
  60. 60. Cunradi CB, Mair C, Todd M. Alcohol outlet density, drinking contexts and intimate partner violence: a review of environmental risk factors. J Drug Educ. 2014;44(1–2):19–33. pmid:25725018
  61. 61. Dahlberg LL, Toal SB, Behrens CB. Measuring violence-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors among youths: A compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta, GA: Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.
  62. 62. Beyer K, Wallis AB, Hamberger LK. Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015;16(1):16–47. pmid:24370630
  63. 63. Reed E, Silverman JG, Welles SL, Santana MC, Missmer SA, Raj A. Associations between perceptions and involvement in neighborhood violence and intimate partner violence perpetration among urban, African American men. J Community Health. 2009;34(4):328–35. pmid:19343487
  64. 64. Brown SL, Bulanda JR. Relationship violence in young adulthood: A comparison of daters, cohabitors, and marrieds. Social Science Research. 2008;37(1):73–87.
  65. 65. Sutton D, Dawson M. Differentiating Characteristics of Intimate Partner Violence: Do Relationship Status, State, and Duration Matter? J Interpers Violence. 2018:886260518795501.
  66. 66. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate Inference in Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1993;88(421):9–25.
  67. 67. Enders CK, Tofighi D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(2):121–38. pmid:17563168
  68. 68. Hershow RB, Bhadra M, Mai NVT, Sripaipan T, Ha TV, Go VF. A Qualitative Study With Women Living With HIV on Perceived Gender Norms and Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in Northern Vietnam. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(23–24):5905–5925. pmid:29294869
  69. 69. Zhao M, Liu B, Zheng T, Xu J, Hao Y, Wang J, et al. Factors associated with hostility among people living with HIV/AIDS in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1189. pmid:31464596
  70. 70. Medeiros GC, Smith FA, Trivedi MH, Beach SR. Depressive Disorders in HIV/AIDS: A Clinically Focused Narrative Review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2020.
  71. 71. Nanni MG, Caruso R, Mitchell AJ, Meggiolaro E, Grassi L. Depression in HIV infected patients: a review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(1):530. pmid:25413636
  72. 72. Arseniou S, Arvaniti A, Samakouri M. HIV infection and depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014;68(2):96–109. pmid:24552630
  73. 73. Ge L, Yap CW, Ong R, Heng BH. Social isolation, loneliness and their relationships with depressive symptoms: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182145. pmid:28832594
  74. 74. Levintow SN, Pence BW, Ha TV, Minh NL, Sripaipan T, Latkin CA, et al. Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among HIV-positive men who inject drugs in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191548. pmid:29364928
  75. 75. Tol WA, Murray SM, Lund C, Bolton P, Murray LK, Davies T, et al. Can mental health treatments help prevent or reduce intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):34. pmid:30764813
  76. 76. Wilson IM, Graham K, Taft A. Alcohol interventions, alcohol policy and intimate partner violence: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:881. pmid:25160510
  77. 77. Optimizing Viet Nam’s HIV Response: An Investment Case. Ministry of Health of Viet Nam; 2014.
  78. 78. May MT, Justice AC, Birnie K, Schwarze-Zander C, Moreno S, Guest JL, et al. Injection drug use and Hepatitis C as risk factors for mortality in HIV-infected individuals: the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(3):348–54. pmid:25848927
  79. 79. Hershow RB, Gottfredson NC, Ha TV, Chu VA, Lancaster KE, Quan VM, et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Perceived Social Support, and Alcohol Use among HIV-Infected Men Who Inject Drugs in Northern Vietnam. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(8):1237–45. pmid:32266856
  80. 80. Yount KM, Pham HT, Minh TH, Krause KH, Schuler SR, Anh HT, et al. Violence in childhood, attitudes about partner violence, and partner violence perpetration among men in Vietnam. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(5):333–9. pmid:24630242
  81. 81. Perinelli E, Gremigni P. Use of Social Desirability Scales in Clinical Psychology: A Systematic Review. J Clin Psychol. 2016;72(6):534–51. pmid:26970350
  82. 82. Sugarman DB, Hotaling GT. Intimate Violence and Social Desirability: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1997;12(2):275–90.
  83. 83. Hahn JA, Dobkin LM, Mayanja B, Emenyonu NI, Kigozi IM, Shiboski S, et al. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) as a biomarker of alcohol consumption in HIV-positive patients in sub-Saharan Africa. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012;36(5):854–62. pmid:22150449