An acidic-groups detection method and its application to analysis of Chinese humic acid samples

Pengfei Xu; Yuhao Wang; Xue Li; Qingshuang Chen; Lujiang Hao; Jie Zhang; Xiaoling Zhu; Baolei Jia

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238061

Abstract

The method of non-aqueous conductivity titration (NACT) of organic weak acids was applied to quickly and accurately determine the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid. By varying the pH of the humic-acid sample, the concentration of the titrant, and the nitrogen-gas flow rate, the optimal titration conditions were determined to be a sample pH of 4, titrant concentration of 0.05 mol/L, and nitrogen-gas flow rate of 80 mL/min. Applying the detection method to p-hydroxybenzoic acid showed that its phenolic-hydroxyl content was 758.82±111.76 cmol/kg and carboxyl content was 744.44±51.11 cmol/kg. The theoretical phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents of the p-hydroxybenzoic acid were 723.96 cmol/kg respectively, indicating that the method can accurately quantify the carboxyl and phenolic-hydroxyl groups in the sample. The NACT was used to measure the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid quickly and accurately. In addition, 29 humic acid samples from 8 provinces of China covering the main humic-acid producing areas were collected and analyzed for acidic-groups content using the reported method.

Citation: Xu P, Wang Y, Li X, Chen Q, Hao L, Zhang J, et al. (2020) An acidic-groups detection method and its application to analysis of Chinese humic acid samples. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0238061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061

Editor: Vijai Gupta, Tallinn University of Technology, ESTONIA

Received: January 29, 2020; Accepted: August 8, 2020; Published: August 26, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978347), the Shandong Province Agricultural Major Application Technology Innovation Project (No. 20182130106) and the Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program (No. 2018GSF117005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: XL is an employee to Yinfu (Jinan) Biotechnology, a company engaged in the application research of humic acid. QC is an employee to Shandong Asia-Pacific Haihua Biotechnolog, company engaged in the production of humic acid. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Humic substances are complex and heterogeneous mixtures of polydispersed materials formed in coal, soils, sediments, and natural waters by biochemical and chemical reactions during the decay and transformation of plant and microbial remains (a process called humification) [1]. Humic acid, together with fulvic acid and humins are the major component of humic substances. As the acid-insoluble fractions of humic substances, Humic acid is partially soluble in water and form micelle-like structures in neutral to acidic conditions [2]. Humic acid is polymer compound rich in active groups such as phenolic-hydroxyl, carboxyl, sulfhydryl, and carbonyl [3, 4] and is widely used in agriculture, ceramics, oil extraction, and environmental protection as an organic fertilizer, binder, mining aid, water purifier, and heavy-metal remover [5–11]. Humic acid is mainly found naturally in peat, lignite, and weathered coal in nature [12, 13], which composition can vary according to geographical origin, age, climate and biological conditions, making the precise characterization of these substances difficult [14, 15]. Humic acid is highly acidic due principally to carboxyl and phenolic-hydroxyl groups. Total acidity of humic acid may range from 1 mol/kg to more than 14 mol/kg. Other functional groups in humic acid include quinone and ketonic carbonyl, amino, and sulfhydryl groups (Fig 1) [13, 16–23]. These groups are responsible for exhibiting good hemostasis, and antidiarrheal functions. Humic acid is widely used in medicine and feed additives [24–26], and the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid is positively correlated with its biological activity [27, 28].

Download:

Fig 1. Humic acid model suggested by F. J. Stevenson [13].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g001

By hydrolyzing the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl esters in humic acid, the free phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents can be increased and the biological activity of the humic acid can be improved, so quantitative analysis of these groups in humic acid is key to its quality control. Folin phenol method and calcium acetate method (FPCA), potentiometric titration, NMR, and infrared method are commonly used to study the acidic groups in humic acid [29–36], but some of these methods are complicated, while some have high detection limits and inaccurate measurement results. For example, the FPCA method can be used to determine the concentrations of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups through classical titrations in the laboratory, however, the two different groups cannot be simultaneously determined, resulting in time-consuming work. Furthermore, NMR spectroscopy and infrared method involves the use of complicated equipment and have limiting operation-technology requirements, making it inconvenient for common application in the production and quality control of humic-acid products.

The non-aqueous conductivity titration (NACT) is the most common titrimetric procedure used in pharmacopoeial assays and it is suitable for the titration of very weak acids and very weak bases, which has been used to quantitatively analyze phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in lignin [37–39]. Because humic acid and lignin have similar molecular structures and NACT can be applied to the measurement of weak organic acids [38], in this study, we attempted to adopt this method to measure the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents of humic acid by optimizing the humic-acid sample pH, concentration of the titrant, and nitrogen-gas flow rate. It was found that it can be used to simultaneously measure the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid by one titration, which is convenient and quick.

Materials and methods

Test materials

Samples were collected from the humic-acid producing area of China, as shown in Table 2 and Fig 2. Qingshuang Chen from Shandong Asia-Pacific Haihua Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Xue Li from Yinfu (Jinan) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. collected, registered, and numbered the humic acid samples from the two companies. The two companies do not make any requirements on the use of humic acid raw materials.

Download:

Fig 2. Humic acid products from different producing areas in China.

H: Heilongjiang, J: Jilin, I: Inner Mongolia, S: Shanxi, G: Gansu, X: Xinjiang, JX: Jiangxi, and NX: Ningxia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g002

Humic-acid raw materials contain various trace elements and impurities, which would affect the detection accuracy; hence, they are converted into sodium humate by a reaction with sodium hydroxide during the extraction process. Briefly, 50 g humic acid ore powder and 5 g NaOH were mixed in 1000 mL distilled water and stirred at room temperature for 2h. The reaction solution was centrifuged 2800×g for 30 minutes to remove the insoluble precipitates. The supernatant was dried at 105°C in oven to a constant weight.

The chemical reagents used in this study included: p-hydroxybenzoic acid, potassium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, acetone, pyridine, and anhydrous ethanol, which were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. and were all of analytical grade (AR). The main instruments used were: a DDSJ-308F conductivity meter with a lightning magnetic DJS-1C platinum black electrode (Shanghai Lei Magnetic Instrument Factory) and an 85–1 magnetic constant-temperature mixer (Changzhou Guohua Electric Co., Ltd.).

Preparation of humic-acid sample

10 g of sodium humate was weighed into 100 mL of 12 mol/L hydrochloric acid, stirred well, and then slowly diluted to 300 mL with distilled water. The mixture was then centrifuged at 2800×g for 5 minutes.

A total of 300 mL distilled water was added to the precipitate after centrifugation with thorough stirring. The mixture was centrifuged at 2800×g for 5 min, and the pH of the supernatant was measured at the same time. This water-washing process was repeated, followed by drying for concentrate analysis (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Scheme of the study outline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g003

Principle and process of NACT of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in humic acid

During the titration, OH^- in the KOH-isopropanol titration solution first reacts with the more acidic carboxyl groups on the humic-acid molecule. After this reaction is complete, the OH^- continues to react with the phenolic-hydroxyl groups. The conductivity change of the solution during the reaction is measured using a conductivity meter.

The specific process included weighing 100 mg of humic acid (dry), placing it in a clean and dry 50 mL round-bottom four-necked flask, adding 40 mL of pyridine/acetone (1:4,v:v) solvent and 1 mL of distilled water, and finally adding 0.41 mL ethanol (99.5%, mL/mL). Nitrogen was flowed in to protect the active groups, while the sample was stirred at 200 rpm. After 5 minutes, the titration was performed with a KOH-isopropyl alcohol solution, with the conductivity instrument used to record the conductivity curve until two equivalence points appeared [37]. The equivalence points M and N were determined using the conductivity curve (Fig 4).

Download:

Fig 4. Standard curve for NACT of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in humic acid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g004

The dotted line is the tangent epitaxial line of the inflection point, and the intersection points M and N are the equivalence points of the carboxyl- and phenolic-hydroxyl groups corresponding to the two inflection points, respectively.

Therefore, the carboxyl-groups content A and the phenolic-hydroxyl-groups content P can be calculated using Eqs (1) and (2) on the basis of previous study [39]: (1) (2) where V_M and V_N are the titrant consumptions (mL) at the equivalence points M and N, m is the sample mass (mg); C is the concentration of titrant(mol/L); 45 and17 are the molar masses of the carboxyl group and the phenolic-hydroxyl group, respectively.

Condition optimization

The sample pH, titrant concentration, and nitrogen-gas flow rate were varied to determine the optimal reaction conditions using the weathered coal from Shanxi province, China (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Condition optimization parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.t001

Validation of the NACT method

To verify the accuracy of the method for the detection of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, 20 mg p-hydroxybenzoic acid was used as the substrate and the measured phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents were compared with the theoretical values.

Folin phenol method and calcium acetate method (FPCA) were used to determine the concentration of phenolic hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups, respectively. In Folin phenol method, 5μL humic acid (2.5 mg/mL) was added into 95μL distilled water. The solution was further mixed with 30μL Folin phenol reagent and 70μL sodium carbonate solution (10%, w/v) in the dark. After reaction at 37°C in the dark for 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 765 nm. p-hydroxybenzoic acid was used as the standard solution to determine the phenolic hydroxyl groups by Folin phenol method. According to the standard curve, the molar number of phenolic hydroxyl in humic acid was calculated, and then the content of phenolic hydroxyl in humic acid sample was obtained. To measure the carboxyl groups, 1g of humic acid sample was added into 130 mL calcium acetate solution (0.25M) in a flat-bottom flask, which reacted for 2 hours at 100 ^oC in a water bath with condenser tube. Finally, 0.01M sodium hydroxide solution was used to titrated until the pH increase to 8.2. The content of carboxyl groups in humic acid sample was calculated based on that the molar number of sodium hydroxide consumed in titration was equal to that of carboxyl groups in humic acid.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered a statistically significant result.

Results and discussion

Effect of pH and rinsing cycles on conductivity

The titration cannot be directly performed because the Na⁺ ions in the sodium-humate sample would affect the conductivity of the solution. Instead, insoluble humic acid was formed by reacting the sodium humate with excess hydrochloric acid, and the sample was then washed with distilled water to remove Na⁺, H⁺, Cl^-, etc., to ensure that no free ions were present in the sample. For convenience, the end point of H⁺ removal was identified by measuring the pH of the supernatant of the washing liquid. It can be seen from Fig 5 that after washing 8 times, the pH of the supernatant no longer changed and the pH of humic acid tended to be stable. This indicated that there was almost no free H⁺ and Cl^- remaining in the humic acid sample, so it had reached the requirement for titration. Therefore, in the rest of the study, the samples were washed with 2.4 L of distilled water 8 times to remove free ions.

Download:

Fig 5. The pH of the humic acid sample after rinsing by distilled water.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g005

It can be seen from Fig 6 that the pH value of the sample had a great influence on the conductivity. With 4–6 washing cycles (pH<4.0), there were three inflection points in the conductivity curve, which could be because the residual H⁺ and Cl^- affecting the ion concentration in the solution that further affect the conductometric curves. The conductivity curve was more clearly defined after washing 8–10 times (pH≈4) as most of the residuals were removed. However, the humic-acid content in the sample was 55±1.2% after 8 washing cycles, and it was 51±0.9% after 10 washes, indicating that humic-acid sample loss occurred during washing. As long as the pH is stable, the number of washings should be as low as possible to minimize sample loss, so 8 water-washing cycles was optimal.

Download:

Fig 6. Influence of washing times on conductivity curves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g006

Therefore, in order to simplify the analysis process, in future experiments, the number of washing cycles and distilled water consumption need not be measured. Instead, the supernatant pH value of 4.0 could be directly used to determine whether H⁺ in the sample had reached the removal end point.

Effect of titrant concentration on the conductivity curve

The titrant concentration had a strong influence on the conductivity measurements, as shown in Fig 7. When the titrant concentration was 0.03 M, the second equivalence point did not appear. This may be because the concentration of the titration solution was too low and the phenol hydroxyl titration equivalent point cannot be reached. As the volume of the reaction system was limited, we increased the concentration of the titrants. When the titrant concentration was 0.05 M, both the equivalence points appeared. However, when the titrant solution concentration was 0.07 M, the OH-concentration was higher compared to that of the carboxyl content in the sample, so the reaction jumped past the first equivalence point. This made it impossible to calculate the carboxyl content. Therefore, the titrant concentration of 0.05 M was used for the next experimental process.

Download:

Fig 7. Influence of titrant concentrations on conductivity curve.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g007

Effect of nitrogen-gas flow rate on conductivity

Phenolic hydroxyl groups in humic acid were easily oxidized to quinone groups during titration with the increase of pH value [40, 41], and the humic acid could be converted to short chain fatty acids such as acetic acid and oxalic acid during the oxidation process [42]. Nitrogen-gas was injected to avoid an undesired oxidation. Fig 8 shows that the nitrogen-gas flow rate had a significant influence on the conductivity curve. The nitrogen-gas flow rate of 40 mL/min and 60mL/min were too low so the reaction did not go to completion or the acidic groups were destroyed by oxidation [41], while the nitrogen-gas flow rate of 40 mL/min and 60mL/min allowed for full reaction of the humic acid. When the nitrogen-gas flow rate was 80 mL/min, the phenolic-hydroxyl-groups and carboxyl-groups contents were measured to be 105.88±17.65 cmol/kg and 60±4.44 cmol/kg respectively, and with the nitrogen flow rate at 100 mL/min, they were 117.65±35.29 cmol/kg and 62.22±8.89 cmol/kg. It can be seen that the measured functional groups contents were very similar. Considering that evaporation of the solvent under a too-high nitrogen-gas flow rate would affect the conductivity, the optimum nitrogen-gas flow rate was identified to be 80 mL/min.

Download:

Fig 8. Influence of nitrogen-gas flow rates on conductivity curves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g008

Verify the accuracy of the method using p-hydroxybenzoic acid

Because the acidic-groups content in humic acid is uncertain, the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents of the reference compound p-hydroxybenzoic acid were determined to further verify the accuracy of the NACT. The theoretical carboxyl and phenolic-hydroxyl content in p-hydroxybenzoic acid was 723.96 cmol/kg respectively. The equivalence points M and N of the conductivity curve were determined (Fig 9), wherein M is the carboxyl equivalence point and N is that for phenolic-hydroxyl groups or similar. The carboxyl-groups content A and the phenolic-hydroxyl-groups content P can thus be calculated using Eqs (1) and (2), respectively. In three parallel measurements, the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents of p-hydroxybenzoic acid were found to be 758.82±111.76 cmol/kg and 744.44±51.11 cmol/kg. These results indicated that the NACT could be used quickly and accurately to measure the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in p-hydroxybenzoic acid after optimizing the conditions.

Download:

Fig 9. Conductivity curve for p-Hydroxybenzoic acid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g009

Validation of the NACT method by FPCA method

To validate the data from NACT method, FPCA method was further carried out to measure the phenolic hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups in the purchased humic acid standard (Fig 10). The result showed that the phenolic hydroxyl groups were 106.26±2.71 and 102.19±4.39 cmol/kg determined by NACT method and by FPCA method, respectively. While the carboxyl groups were 43.93±3.42 and 42.31±2.46 cmol/kg measured by the two methods. The data from the two methods did not show significant difference (phenolic hydroxyl group, p = 0.24; carboxyl group, p = 0.54), which indicated that NACT method is as accurate as previous method.

Download:

Fig 10. Comparison of NACT and FPCA methods in humic acid analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g010

Measurement of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid products from different production areas in China

Quantitative analysis of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in humic acid products from different mining areas in China was carried out using the NACT established in this study, with the results shown in Table 2.

Download:

Table 2. Analysis of humic acid products from different regions of China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.t002

China has a vast territory with large geological differences. According to available data, the distribution of humic-acid mines in China is very uneven, and they are mainly found in Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Gansu, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, and a few other provinces. Humic acid is a complex macromolecular substance that is buried in the ground during the movement of the earth's crust and undergoes a combination of physical, chemical, and microbial processes. Therefore, the structure of the humic acid in each region varies because of the differences in the geological conditions.

It can be seen in Table 2 that the humic-acid content in the 29 samples varied from 25.1±0.53% to 71.8±0.98%. There was no obvious correlation between the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents and the humic-acid content in the 29 samples. For example, in sample H1 with the lowest humic-acid content, the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents were 94.12±25.88 cmol/kg and 64.44±9.11 cmol/kg, respectively, while the humic-acid content was 71.8±0.98 in sample X6, the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents were 82.35±17.06 cmol/kg and 68.89±15.11 cmol/kg. It can be seen that there was no obvious correlation between the humic acid and acidic-groups contents in the results (Fig 11).

Download:

Fig 11. Phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid products.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.g011

Conclusions

For quick and effective determination of the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid, the measurement of the conductivity curve of humic-acid samples prepared at pH 4 was found to be the most accurate approach. The optimum conditions for the titration process were titrant concentration of 0.05 mol/L and nitrogen gas permeation rate of 80 mL/min.

The NACT was applied to the reference compound p-hydroxybenzoic acid, giving a phenolic-hydroxyl-groups content of 758.82±111.76 cmol/kg and a carboxyl-groups content of 744.44±51.11 cmol/kg, identical to the theoretical phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents. This method could be used to quickly and accurately measure the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in p-hydroxybenzoic acid, thereby indicating method accuracy and feasibility.

NACT is a new method for measuring the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid. It is fast, simple, and accurate and facilitates the simultaneous measurement of the phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents by one titration, which can greatly improve detection efficiency.

The NACT was successfully conducted in this study to determine the acidic-groups content in the samples obtained from the main humic-acid mines in China, demonstrating its applicability for the molecular-structure analysis and functional development of humic acid.

Supporting information

S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238061.s001

(XLSX)

References

1. Felbeck GT. Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water. 1986 Dec; Organic Geochemistry. 9(4), 213.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Philippe CB, Michelle W. The (bio)chemistry of soil humus and humic Substances: why is the “new view” still considered novel after more than 80 years? 2019 Mar; Front. Environ. Sci.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Martina K. Size and charge evaluation of standard humic and fulvic acids as crucial factors to determine their environmental behavior and impact. 2018 Jul; Front. Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00235
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Wang RQ, Gutierrez L, Choon NS, Croué JP. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography method for measuring the composition of aquatic humic substances. 2015 Jan; Anal. Chim. Acta. 853, 608–616. pmid:25467510
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Capcarova M, Kalafova A, Lajdova Z, Schwarzova M, Zbynovska K, Hrncar C, et al. Effectiveness of non-antibiotic stimulators in Japanese quail diet: Gender comparison and economical annex. 2017 Jan; Biologia. 72(1), 96–104.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Tohid T, Hasan G, Alireza T. Efficacy of mannanoligosaccharides and humate on immune response to Avian Influenza (H9) disease vaccination in broiler chickens. 2010 Dec; Vetres. Commum. 34(8), 709–717.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Sellamuthu KM, Govindaswamy M. Effect of fertiliser and humic acid on rhizosphere microorganisms and soil enzymes at an early stage of sugarcane growth. 2003 Dec; Sugar. Tech. 5(4), 273–277.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Arai S, Kumada K. An interpretation of the conductometric titration curve of humic acid. Geoderma. 1977 Sep; 19(1), 21–35.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Li Y, Yue Q, Gao B. Adsorption kinetics and desorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution onto humic acid. 2010 Jun; J. Hazard. Mater. 178(1–3), 455–461. pmid:20149528
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Jia B, Park D, Hahn Y, Jeon CO. Metagenomic analysis of the human microbiome reveals the association between the abundance of gut bile salt hydrolases and host health. 2020 Apr; Gut. Microbes. 11(5), 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Jia B, Jeon C O. Promotion and induction of liver cancer by gut microbiome-mediated modulation of bile acids. 2019 Sep; PLOS Pathog. 15(9), e1007954. pmid:31487329
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Hayes MHB, Swift RS, Wardle RE, Brown JK. Humic materials from an organic soil: A comparison of extractants and of properties of extracts. 1975 Apr; Geoderma. 13(3), 231–245.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. 1994 Apr; 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed072pA93.6
14. Calmon C. Humic substances in soil, sediment and water. 1986 Dec; Reactive Polymers, Ion Exchangers, Sorbents. 4(4), 318.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Sposito G, Weber JH. Sorption of trace metals by humic materials in soils and natural waters. 1986 May; Crit. Rev. Environ. Control. 16(2), 193–229.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Nebbioso A, Piccolo A. Advances in humeomics: Enhanced structural identification of humic molecules after size fractionation of a soil humic acid. 2012 Mar; Anal. Chim. Acta. 720, 77–90. pmid:22365124
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Flaig W, Beutelspacher H, Rietz E. Chemical composition and physical properties of humic substances. 1975; Soil. Components. 1–211.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Woelki G, Salzer R. Thermal investigations of the structure of two humic acid salts by in situ FTIR spectroscopy. 1995 Jan; Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 352(5), 529–531.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Chen H, Berndtsson R, Ma M. et al. Characterization of insolubilized humic acid and its sorption behaviors. 2009 Jun; Environ. Geol. 57, 1847–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1472-0
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Akbari F, Khodadadi M, Panahi A H, Naghizadeh A. Synthesis and characteristics of a novel FeNi₃/SiO₂/TiO₂ magnetic nanocomposites and its application in adsorption of humic acid from simulated wastewater: study of isotherms and kinetics. 2019; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.26, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.052
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Yustiawati , Kihara Y, Sazawa K, Kuramitz H, Kurasaki M, Saito T, et al. Effects of peat fires on the characteristics of humic acid extracted from peat soil in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. 2014 Oct; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22(4), 2384–2395.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Fong SS, Mohamed M. Chemical characterization of humic substances occurring in the peats of Sarawak, Malaysia. 2007; Org. Geochem. 38(6), 967–976.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Schnitzer M, Hoffman I. Thermogravimetry of soil humic compounds. 1965 Aug; Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 29(8), 859–870.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Szot K, Góralczyk K, Michalska M, Veryho N, Chojnowski J, Ponikowska I, et al. The effects of humic water on endothelial cells under hyperglycemic conditions: inflammation-associated parameters. 2019 Jun; Environ. Geochem. Hlth.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Junek R, Morrow R, Schoenherr JI, Schubert R, Kallmeyer R, Phull S, et al. Bimodal effect of humic acids on the LPS-induced TNF-α release from differentiated U937 cells. 2009 Jan; Phytomedicine. 16(5), 470–476. pmid:19131228
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Khil’ko SL, Semenova RG. Interaction of humic acid salts with drug preparations. 2016 Dec; Solid. Fuel. Chem. 50(6), 390–394.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Proidakov AG. Humic acids from mechanically treated coals: A review. 2009 Feb; Solid. Fuel. Chem. 43(1), 9–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Kautenburger R, Hein C, Sander JM, Beck HP. Influence of metal loading and humic acid functional groups on the complexation behavior of trivalent lanthanides analyzed by CE-ICP-MS. 2014 Mar; Anal. Chim. Acta. 816, 50–59. pmid:24580854
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Schafer H N S. Determination of carboxyl groups in low-rank coals. 1984 May. Fuel. 63(5), 723–726.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Swift RS, Thornton BK, Posner AM. Spectral characteristics of a humic acid fractionated with respect to molecular weight using an agar gel. 1970; Soil. Sci. 110(2), 93–99.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Tombficz E, Varga K, Sznnto F. An X-ray diffraction study of alkylammonium humate complexes. 1988 Aug; Colloid. Polym. Sci. 266(8), 734–738.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Wilson MA, Collin PJ, Tate KR. ¹H-nuclear magnetic resonance study of a soil humic acid. 1983 Jul; J. Soil Sci. 34(2), 297–304.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Malcolm RL. Factors to be considered in the isolation and characterization of aquatic humic substances. 2006 Oct; Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. 7–36.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Melton JR, Kantzas A, Langford CH. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry as a spectroscopic probe of the coordination sphere of a paramagnetic metal bound to a humic acid mixture. 2007 Dec; Anal. Chim. Acta. 605(1), 46–52. pmid:18022410
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Francioso O, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Ciavatta C. Thermal analysis (TG–DTA) and isotopic characterization (¹³C–¹⁵N) of humic acids from different origins. 2005 Oct; Appl. Geochem. 20(3), 537–544.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Fukushima M, Furubayashi K, Fujisawa N. Characterization of humic acids in sediments from dam reservoirs by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using tetramethylammonium hydroxide: Influence of the structural features of humic acids on iron(II) binding capacity. 2011 Jul; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 9(2),323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.03.008
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Thompson SO, Chesters G. Nonaqueous titration of acidic groups of Lignins. Titration in pyridine using potassium methoxide as titrant. 1964 Mar; Anal. Chem. 36(3), 655–657.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Butler JP, Czepiel TP. Determination of phenolic groups in lignin preparations titration with potassium methoxide using dimethylformamide as a solvent. 1956 Sep; Anal. Chem. 28(9), 1468–1472.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Liu D, Chen HH. Determination of phenolic hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in lignin with the conductometric titration in organic solvent. 1992; Cellulose Chemistry & Technology. 26, 63–71.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Burges NA, Hurst HM, Walkden B. The phenolic constituents of humic acid and their relation to the lignin of the plant cover. 1964 Oct; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 28(10–11), 1547–1554.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Van DLMJHA. Reactions of humic materials with methionine and arginine. 1979 Jun; Soil Biol. Biochem, 11(6), 571–576.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. García M, Collado S, Oulego P, & Díaz M. The wet oxidation of aqueous humic acids. 2020 Feb; J. Hazard. Mater, 396, 122402. pmid:32298859
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Felbeck GT. Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water. 1986 Dec; Organic Geochemistry. 9(4), 213.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Philippe CB, Michelle W. The (bio)chemistry of soil humus and humic Substances: why is the “new view” still considered novel after more than 80 years? 2019 Mar; Front. Environ. Sci.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Martina K. Size and charge evaluation of standard humic and fulvic acids as crucial factors to determine their environmental behavior and impact. 2018 Jul; Front. Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00235
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Wang RQ, Gutierrez L, Choon NS, Croué JP. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography method for measuring the composition of aquatic humic substances. 2015 Jan; Anal. Chim. Acta. 853, 608–616. pmid:25467510
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Capcarova M, Kalafova A, Lajdova Z, Schwarzova M, Zbynovska K, Hrncar C, et al. Effectiveness of non-antibiotic stimulators in Japanese quail diet: Gender comparison and economical annex. 2017 Jan; Biologia. 72(1), 96–104.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Tohid T, Hasan G, Alireza T. Efficacy of mannanoligosaccharides and humate on immune response to Avian Influenza (H9) disease vaccination in broiler chickens. 2010 Dec; Vetres. Commum. 34(8), 709–717.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Sellamuthu KM, Govindaswamy M. Effect of fertiliser and humic acid on rhizosphere microorganisms and soil enzymes at an early stage of sugarcane growth. 2003 Dec; Sugar. Tech. 5(4), 273–277.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Arai S, Kumada K. An interpretation of the conductometric titration curve of humic acid. Geoderma. 1977 Sep; 19(1), 21–35.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Li Y, Yue Q, Gao B. Adsorption kinetics and desorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution onto humic acid. 2010 Jun; J. Hazard. Mater. 178(1–3), 455–461. pmid:20149528
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Jia B, Park D, Hahn Y, Jeon CO. Metagenomic analysis of the human microbiome reveals the association between the abundance of gut bile salt hydrolases and host health. 2020 Apr; Gut. Microbes. 11(5), 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Jia B, Jeon C O. Promotion and induction of liver cancer by gut microbiome-mediated modulation of bile acids. 2019 Sep; PLOS Pathog. 15(9), e1007954. pmid:31487329
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hayes MHB, Swift RS, Wardle RE, Brown JK. Humic materials from an organic soil: A comparison of extractants and of properties of extracts. 1975 Apr; Geoderma. 13(3), 231–245.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. 1994 Apr; 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed072pA93.6

[ref14] 14. Calmon C. Humic substances in soil, sediment and water. 1986 Dec; Reactive Polymers, Ion Exchangers, Sorbents. 4(4), 318.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Sposito G, Weber JH. Sorption of trace metals by humic materials in soils and natural waters. 1986 May; Crit. Rev. Environ. Control. 16(2), 193–229.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Nebbioso A, Piccolo A. Advances in humeomics: Enhanced structural identification of humic molecules after size fractionation of a soil humic acid. 2012 Mar; Anal. Chim. Acta. 720, 77–90. pmid:22365124
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Flaig W, Beutelspacher H, Rietz E. Chemical composition and physical properties of humic substances. 1975; Soil. Components. 1–211.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Woelki G, Salzer R. Thermal investigations of the structure of two humic acid salts by in situ FTIR spectroscopy. 1995 Jan; Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 352(5), 529–531.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Chen H, Berndtsson R, Ma M. et al. Characterization of insolubilized humic acid and its sorption behaviors. 2009 Jun; Environ. Geol. 57, 1847–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1472-0
View Article
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Akbari F, Khodadadi M, Panahi A H, Naghizadeh A. Synthesis and characteristics of a novel FeNi₃/SiO₂/TiO₂ magnetic nanocomposites and its application in adsorption of humic acid from simulated wastewater: study of isotherms and kinetics. 2019; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.26, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.052
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Yustiawati , Kihara Y, Sazawa K, Kuramitz H, Kurasaki M, Saito T, et al. Effects of peat fires on the characteristics of humic acid extracted from peat soil in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. 2014 Oct; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22(4), 2384–2395.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Fong SS, Mohamed M. Chemical characterization of humic substances occurring in the peats of Sarawak, Malaysia. 2007; Org. Geochem. 38(6), 967–976.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Schnitzer M, Hoffman I. Thermogravimetry of soil humic compounds. 1965 Aug; Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 29(8), 859–870.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Szot K, Góralczyk K, Michalska M, Veryho N, Chojnowski J, Ponikowska I, et al. The effects of humic water on endothelial cells under hyperglycemic conditions: inflammation-associated parameters. 2019 Jun; Environ. Geochem. Hlth.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Junek R, Morrow R, Schoenherr JI, Schubert R, Kallmeyer R, Phull S, et al. Bimodal effect of humic acids on the LPS-induced TNF-α release from differentiated U937 cells. 2009 Jan; Phytomedicine. 16(5), 470–476. pmid:19131228
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Khil’ko SL, Semenova RG. Interaction of humic acid salts with drug preparations. 2016 Dec; Solid. Fuel. Chem. 50(6), 390–394.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Proidakov AG. Humic acids from mechanically treated coals: A review. 2009 Feb; Solid. Fuel. Chem. 43(1), 9–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Kautenburger R, Hein C, Sander JM, Beck HP. Influence of metal loading and humic acid functional groups on the complexation behavior of trivalent lanthanides analyzed by CE-ICP-MS. 2014 Mar; Anal. Chim. Acta. 816, 50–59. pmid:24580854
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Schafer H N S. Determination of carboxyl groups in low-rank coals. 1984 May. Fuel. 63(5), 723–726.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Swift RS, Thornton BK, Posner AM. Spectral characteristics of a humic acid fractionated with respect to molecular weight using an agar gel. 1970; Soil. Sci. 110(2), 93–99.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Tombficz E, Varga K, Sznnto F. An X-ray diffraction study of alkylammonium humate complexes. 1988 Aug; Colloid. Polym. Sci. 266(8), 734–738.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Wilson MA, Collin PJ, Tate KR. ¹H-nuclear magnetic resonance study of a soil humic acid. 1983 Jul; J. Soil Sci. 34(2), 297–304.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Malcolm RL. Factors to be considered in the isolation and characterization of aquatic humic substances. 2006 Oct; Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. 7–36.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Melton JR, Kantzas A, Langford CH. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry as a spectroscopic probe of the coordination sphere of a paramagnetic metal bound to a humic acid mixture. 2007 Dec; Anal. Chim. Acta. 605(1), 46–52. pmid:18022410
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Francioso O, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Ciavatta C. Thermal analysis (TG–DTA) and isotopic characterization (¹³C–¹⁵N) of humic acids from different origins. 2005 Oct; Appl. Geochem. 20(3), 537–544.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Fukushima M, Furubayashi K, Fujisawa N. Characterization of humic acids in sediments from dam reservoirs by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using tetramethylammonium hydroxide: Influence of the structural features of humic acids on iron(II) binding capacity. 2011 Jul; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 9(2),323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.03.008
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Thompson SO, Chesters G. Nonaqueous titration of acidic groups of Lignins. Titration in pyridine using potassium methoxide as titrant. 1964 Mar; Anal. Chem. 36(3), 655–657.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Butler JP, Czepiel TP. Determination of phenolic groups in lignin preparations titration with potassium methoxide using dimethylformamide as a solvent. 1956 Sep; Anal. Chem. 28(9), 1468–1472.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Liu D, Chen HH. Determination of phenolic hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in lignin with the conductometric titration in organic solvent. 1992; Cellulose Chemistry & Technology. 26, 63–71.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Burges NA, Hurst HM, Walkden B. The phenolic constituents of humic acid and their relation to the lignin of the plant cover. 1964 Oct; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 28(10–11), 1547–1554.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Van DLMJHA. Reactions of humic materials with methionine and arginine. 1979 Jun; Soil Biol. Biochem, 11(6), 571–576.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. García M, Collado S, Oulego P, & Díaz M. The wet oxidation of aqueous humic acids. 2020 Feb; J. Hazard. Mater, 396, 122402. pmid:32298859
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Test materials

Preparation of humic-acid sample

Principle and process of NACT of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in humic acid

Condition optimization

Validation of the NACT method

Statistical analysis

Results and discussion

Effect of pH and rinsing cycles on conductivity

Effect of titrant concentration on the conductivity curve

Effect of nitrogen-gas flow rate on conductivity

Verify the accuracy of the method using p-hydroxybenzoic acid

Validation of the NACT method by FPCA method

Measurement of phenolic-hydroxyl and carboxyl-groups contents in humic acid products from different production areas in China

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 Data.

References