Hypertension prevents a sensory stimulation-based collateral therapeutic from protecting the cortex from impending ischemic stroke damage in a spontaneously hypersensitive rat model

Aneeka M. Hancock; Ron D. Frostig

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206291

Abstract

Assessing potential stroke treatments in the presence of risk factors can improve screening of treatments prior to clinical trials and is important in testing the efficacy of treatments in different patient populations. Here, we test our noninvasive, nonpharmacological sensory stimulation treatment in the presence of the main risk factor for ischemic stroke, hypertension. Utilizing functional imaging, blood flow imaging, and histology, we assessed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) pre- and post-permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). Experimental groups included a treatment SHR group (sensory-stimulated group), control untreated SHR group (no sensory stimulation), and a treated (sensory-stimulated) Wistar-Kyoto normotensive group. Unlike our previous studies, which showed sensory-based complete protection from impending ischemic cortical stroke damage in rats as seen in the treated Wistar-Kyoto group, we found that SHRs at 24hr post-pMCAO lacked evoked cortical activation, had a significant reduction in blood flow within the MCA, and sustained very large infarcts regardless of whether they received stimulation treatment. If translatable, this work highlights a potential need for a combined treatment plan when delivering sensory stimulation treatment in this patient population.

Citation: Hancock AM, Frostig RD (2018) Hypertension prevents a sensory stimulation-based collateral therapeutic from protecting the cortex from impending ischemic stroke damage in a spontaneously hypersensitive rat model. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0206291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291

Editor: Johannes Boltze, Fraunhofer Research Institution of Marine Biotechnology, GERMANY

Received: December 28, 2017; Accepted: October 10, 2018; Published: October 23, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Hancock, Frostig. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by by NIH, grant# NS066001 and Leducq Foundation, grant # 15CVD02. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The heterogeneity of stroke has made the discovery of viable therapeutics challenging. Despite the fact that most stroke patients present with at least one risk factor, many studies do not take into account comorbidities when developing new treatments. Thus, it’s important to address a crucial discrepancy between bench and bedside and test potential therapeutics in the presence of these risk factors [1,2], as this is often a reason that clinical trials fail for otherwise promising treatments [3].

With approximately 77% of stroke patients having hypertension, it is the number one risk factor for ischemic stroke [4,5]. Prolonged periods of hypertension can lead to changes in the cerebral vasculature, but despite extended periods of high blood pressure causing pulsatile stress on the arterial trees, the major complication of hypertension is thrombotic, rather than hemorrhagic [6]. This thrombotic paradox of hypertension could be due to hypercoaguability or a prothrombotic state due to an imbalance between coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways, and high pressures damaging vessel walls [6,7]. Hypertension can also lead to stroke by promoting atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, and lipohyalinosis [8,9], resulting in maintenance of the elevated blood pressure [10], and thrombotic or embolic stroke [9,11]. Additional adaptive structural changes can occur due to increased workload, such as growth of smooth muscle cells that can reduce vessel lumen diameter [11,12]. This can further compound the vascular impairments as it results in increased vascular resistance that can reduce collateral blood flow, resulting in ischemia distal to an arterial occlusion [13], and reduction of salvageable penumbra.

It is clear that hypertension, as it relates to stroke pathology, is a complex issue, and greatly contributes to the heterogeneity of the stroke population. The development of new stroke therapeutics is imperative given that there is no cure, and various therapeutic targets could provide protection from stroke depending on patients’ comorbidities. Currently, the only FDA-approved treatment, tPA, results in positive outcome in only a small portion of stroke patients due to its limited therapeutic window and the risk of hemorrhagic transformation. Recent advances have enabled improved tPA efficacy by applying tPA with concurrent recanalization via endovascular thrombectomy, resulting in increased responsiveness to treatment but implementation requires extensive expertise [14]. Our lab has shown that a collateral-based sensory stimulation treatment is a promising therapeutic treatment, as it is noninvasive, has the potential to be delivered immediately, has long-lasting effects, and completely prevents impending ischemic stroke damage [15–19]. Additionally, we have already tested whether rats can be protected in the face of one risk factor, old age, and have observed complete protection in rodents that are equivalent in age to typical stroke patients (65 years old) [20]. However, to further assess the translational potential of this collateral-based treatment and potential limitations, it’s important to test it in cases where vessel lumen diameter, and other vascular characteristics, is negatively altered, as is the case in hypertension. Thus, in this study we aimed to test whether spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), a widely used model of essential hypertension, could be protected from ischemic damage following an identical stimulation protocol that protects normotensive rats.

Materials and methods

All procedures were in compliance with NIH guidelines and approved by UC Irvine Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #: 1997–1608, assurance ID#: A3416.01), and in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Subjects and surgical preparation

Fourteen experimental subjects, 295-400g (4–5 months of age) male spontaneously hypertensive rats (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA) with systolic blood pressures of ~150 mmHg, were individually housed in standard cages. At the beginning of each experiment, subjects were injected intraperitoneally with a Nembutal bolus (55 mg/kg b.w.). Supplemental injections of Nembutal (27.5 mg/kg b.w.) were given as necessary. After resection of soft tissue, a ~6.5 x 8 mm ‘imaging’ area of the skull over the left primary somatosensory cortex (rostromedial corner positioned approximately 1mm caudal and 2mm lateral from bregma) was thinned to ~150μm using a dental drill. 5% dextrose (3mL) and atropine (0.05 mg/kg, b.w.) were administered at the beginning of the experiment and every six hours after until the animal was returned to its home cage. Body temperature was measured via a rectal probe, and maintained at 37° Celsius by a self-regulating thermal blanket. Animals were returned to their home cage and allowed to recover overnight prior to all +24 hour experimentation.

Overview

Using a within subject design that is identical to our previous studies, 14 subjects were randomly assigned to a +0h group (i.e., immediate sensory stimulation period following pMCAo) or a no-stimulation control group. Baseline functional imaging was collected for all subjects at the beginning of surgery. All +0h subjects (n = 7) then received a pMCAO, and immediate post-occlusion whisker stimulation. Post-occlusion whisker stimulation consisted of 1 s of 5 Hz deflections of a single whisker (whisker C2). This stimulation was intermittently delivered (with random intervals averaging 21 seconds) 256 times, totaling 4.27 minutes of stimulation, over the course of 2 hours [15]. No-stimulation controls (n = 7) underwent identical pMCAO to that of +0h subjects, but never received whisker stimulation; pMCAO was immediately followed by a 5-hour no-stimulation period. The length of this 5 hour quiet period was chosen by Lay et al. [15] to match time under anesthesia to subjects in that study that received the two hours of whisker stimulation three hours post-occlusion–this has become the standard for our no-stimulation controls as it produces invariable cortical infarct in these subjects. After whisker stimulation or quiet period, all rats were placed back in their home cage for recovery, until their follow-up assessment at 24 hours post-pMCAO, which consisted of functional imaging and blood flow imaging. At the end of pMCAO surgery, rats received subcutaneous ampicillin antibiotic injections (100 mg/kg), and Flunixin meglumine analgesic was injected subcutaneously (2 mg/kg). The closed wound was covered with topical antibiotic, and rats were monitored while recovering from anesthesia. At the end of 24 hour imaging, rats were then euthanized and the brains were removed for histological assessment. No mortality has been encountered in any of the experimental groups.

Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion

Permanent ischemic conditions are achieved as follows: The base of the left proximal middle cerebral artery at the M1 segment is permanently occluded [21–24] blocking flow to all MCA cortical branches. To do this, the skull and dura are carefully removed from a 2x2mm ‘surgical window’ just anterior and lateral to the imaging window (over the M1 segment of MCA, just distal to MCA’s lenticulostriate branches and proximal to any cortical branching). A half-curve reverse cutting suture needle is cut in half and threaded with two 4–0 silk threads and passed through the pial layer of the meninges, below MCA (the needle is kept above the cortical surface to the extent possible to prevent damage). Then the two threads (moved to ~1mm apart after being strung beneath the artery) are both tied and tightened around MCA and the vessel is transected (completely severed) between the two knots. Care is taken to avoid damaging the artery, and experiments are terminated if there are signs of bleeding from MCA. This method of occlusion has been reviewed by Davis et al. [25].

Histology (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining for infarct)

At the conclusion of each experiment, rats were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (2–3 mL, intraperitoneally), the brain was removed, sectioned into 2 mm coronal slices, and incubated in 2% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride at 37°C for 20 min in the dark [26]. TTC is enzymatically reduced, producing formazan (a bright red byproduct), by dehydrogenases in active mitochondria. Red stain intensity correlates with the number and functional activity of mitochondria, unstained (white) areas are indicative of infarct [27]. The TTC-stained sections are photographed with a digital camera, and images are analyzed using ImageJ software. The total infarct volume is determined by multiplying the infarct area of each slice by the thickness of that slice. Final volumes are then corrected for edema. An observer blind to experimental condition performs this volume calculation. A small surgical lesion (<1 mm in diameter) is occasionally apparent at the immediate site of MCA occlusion. This occurs infrequently and equivalently in all experimental groups (1–2 subjects per group). The small amount of damage occasionally produced at the surgical site can be readily distinguished from the large ischemic infarct and is excluded from infarct analysis [22].

Intrinsic signal optical imaging (ISOI) and analysis

A detailed description of ISOI data acquisition and analysis can be found elsewhere [28,29]. Briefly, a charge coupled device (CCD) camera (either a 16-bit Cascade 512F or a 12-bit Quantix 0206, Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA) equipped with an inverted 50 mm AF Nikon lens (1:1:8, Melville, NY, USA) combined with an extender (model PK-13, Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) is used for imaging and controlled by V++ Precision Digital Imaging System software (Digital Optics, Auckland, NZ). During each 15-s trial, 1.5 s of prestimulus data followed by 13.5 s of poststimulus data is collected, with a 6±5 sec random inter-trial interval. Stimulus consists of a single whisker being deflected by 9° in the rostral-caudal direction at a rate of 5 Hz for a total stimulus duration of 1 second. The cortex is illuminated with a red light emitting diode (635 nm maximum wavelength). Data are collected in blocks of 64 stimulation trials, and a sampled time point (for example pre-pMCAO baseline) is considered complete upon summation of 128 stimulation trials. Ratio images are created from calculating fractional change (FC) values by dividing each 500ms frame of poststimulus signal activity by the 500ms frame of prestimulus intrinsic signal activity collected immediately before stimulus onset. The ratio image containing the maximum areal extent for the first intrinsic signal phase (Initial Dip) is Gaussian filtered (half width = 5) and the areal extent quantified at a threshold level of 2.5 x 10⁻⁴ away from zero. Peak amplitude is quantified in fractional change units from the pixel with the peak activity within the maximum areal extent for both of the intrinsic signal phases.

Laser speckle imaging (LSI) and analysis

A detailed description of LSI [30,31] data acquisition and analysis can be found elsewhere [15]. Briefly, a 632.8 nm 15 mW HeNe laser was used as the illumination source. The speckle pattern from the 5.12×5.12 mm imaged region was captured as 512×512 pixel images by a 16-bit CCD camera (Cascade 512F) equipped with a Navitar zoom lens plus extenders such that speckle size matched camera pixel size. Collected images were processed as previously described [15]. Speckle contrast images were converted to speckle index images by calculating their inverse squares multiplied by the exposure time in seconds, so that larger index values corresponded to faster blood flow. Speckle index images were then averaged to improve signal-to-noise ratio. To quantify blood flow within the MCA, we calculated the mean value within a region of interest (ROI) in MCA cortical branches as defined according to several criteria described previously [15]. All flow index values were scaled over a range where 0 flow was set at noise values. Values were collected from all euthanized animals 5 minutes after the cessation of the heart beat, and these noise values were subtracted from all other values.

Statistical analysis

For imaging data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) were run on baseline values to ensure no significant differences before pMCAO. Because there were no responses to quantify at 24 hours, post-pMCAO imaging evoked area and amplitude were converted to difference score values (postocclusion—baseline) with values away from 0 signifying a change from baseline. A constant was added to difference values, which were then transformed with a natural log function to better satisfy the assumptions of ANOVA and inferential statistics were performed on the transformed data. Raw values of laser speckle velocity were used for analysis. After ANOVA, specific contrasts were performed to identify which groups differed from baseline. Alpha level was set to 0.05 and Bonferroni adjustments were applied to account for multiple contrasts. Infarct volume comparisons were performed by employing two-sample t-tests. All plotting and statistics were performed using SYSTAT 11 (SYSTAT Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Treated hypertensive rats do not exhibit protection of cortical function

Before pMCAO, there was no significant difference between groups for either the area (mean_treated = 5.01 ± 1.11; mean_untreated = 4.18 ± 0.80; F_1,12 = 0.19, P > 0.05, ANOVA) or amplitude (mean_treated = 4.43±0.28; mean_untreated = 4.13 ± 0.26; F_1,12 = 0.55, P > 0.05, ANOVA) of the whisker functional representation (WFR). At twenty-four hours post-pMCAO, neither treated or untreated groups were protected and therefore had no whisker functional representation at this time point (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Treated hypertensive rats lack cortical activity at 24 hours post-pMCAO.

Experimental schema with ISOI representative cases for treated (top) and untreated (bottom) subjects, before (left) and 24 hours after (right) pMCAO. Treated (n = 7) and untreated (n = 7) subjects have normal whisker functional representations (WFR) at baseline. After imaging, all subjects received a pMCAO (dashed vertical red line), which was followed immediately by 2 hours of whisker stimulation treatment or a no-stimulation period. At 24 hours post-pMCAO, all subjects lacked a WFR. Green arrows indicate the direction of whisker movement during stimulation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291.g001

As such, there were no significant differences between groups at 24 hours for either area (mean_treated = 0.02 ± 0.02; mean_untreated = 0.01 ± 0.01; F_1,12 = 0.79, P > 0.05, ANOVA) or amplitude (mean_treated = 0.24±0.17; mean_untreated = 0.24±0.16; F_1,12 = 0.37, P > 0.05, ANOVA). The lack of cortical activity at twenty-four hours post-pMCAO resulted in a significant reduction in area and amplitude compared to baseline activity for treated subjects (n = 7; area: F_1,12 = 13.97, P < 0.005; amplitude: F_1,12 = 83.02, P < 0.001) as well as untreated subjects (n = 7; area: F_1,12 = 10.14, P < 0.01; amplitude: F_1,12 = 68.08, P < 0.001) (Fig 2). Thus, treated and untreated subjects were equivalent, as treatment did not have a protective effect.

Download:

Fig 2. Treated and untreated hypertensive subjects show a strong reduction in the whisker functional representation (WFR) 24 hours after pMCAO.

Quantification of the area (left) and amplitude (right) of the WFR at both baseline and 24 hours for treated and untreated subjects. Treated (n = 7) and untreated (n = 7) subjects showed a significant decrease in both parameters at 24 hours post-pMCAO compared to baseline (dashed and solid lines, respectively) (* = p ≤ 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.01, *** = p ≤ 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291.g002

Hypertensive rats have strongly reduced retrograde collateral flow feeding the MCA at 24 hours post-pMCAO

A subset of subjects underwent blood flow imaging to assess whether the MCA was capable of being reperfused via the collateral vasculature. There were no significant differences between groups either before (F_1,5 = 3.83, P > 0.05, ANOVA) or twenty-four hours (F_1,5 = 0.05, P > 0.05, ANOVA) after pMCAO. We found that treated (n = 4; mean_%ofbaseline = 31.62) and untreated (n = 3; mean_%ofbaseline = 24.33) subjects all had reduced blood flow within the MCA post-occlusion, and this was a significant reduction compared to baseline flow for both treated (t(3) = [18.63], p = [0.0003]) and untreated subjects (t(2) = [4.612], p = [0.0439]) (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Treatment resulted in minimal retrograde blood flow within the MCA at 24 hours post-pMCAO.

A, Experimental schema with LSI representative cases for treated (top) and untreated (bottom) subjects, before (left) and 24 hours after (right) pMCAO. Treated (n = 4) and untreated (n = 3) subjects are similar in that there was reduced blood flow at 24 hours post-pMCAO. B, Quantification of laser speckle velocity for both groups, represented as a percentage of baseline values. The reduction in blood flow was significant for all subjects. Green arrows indicate the direction of whisker movement during stimulation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291.g003

Hypertensive rats sustain large cortical infarcts after pMCAO despite receiving immediate treatment

Finally, we assessed ischemic damage with TTC staining and found that the hypertensive rats sustained large infarcts regardless of whether they received immediate treatment (Fig 4).

Download:

Fig 4. Hypertensive rats are not protected from impending ischemic damage and sustain large infarcts.

A, Quantification of infarct and representative TTC-stained sections for treated and untreated subjects. No difference in infarct size existed between the groups (n = 7 per group). Gray arrows indicate cortical infarct. B, A representative example of TTC staining in the whole brain following the addition of all individually stained 2mm sections. This illustrates that the entire MCA territory was infarcted. Ink spot (black arrow) indicates the location of the center of the barrel cortex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291.g004

Wistar Kyoto rats

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats are commonly used as controls for SHR. We have therefore run +0h experiments on a group (n = 6) of WKY rats. Their TTC results showed no sign of infarct in their cortex (see S1 Fig for a TTC example), consistent with our previous +0h findings in Sprague Dawley rats. Two WKY rats showed some subcortical damage, damage not typically seen in +0h SHR. More research is needed to reveal whether WKY rats are potentially more susceptible for subcortical infarct under these experimental conditions.

There was no effect of treatment on infarct size (t[12] = 0.76, P>0.05), with treated subjects sustaining infarcts ranging from 74.27–137.94 mm³ (mean = 104.05±9.37 mm³), and infarcts for untreated subjects ranging from 83.96–107.74 mm³ (mean = 96.53±3.32 mm³).

Discussion

Our previous research has shown that in normotensive rats, cortical activity is maintained in early-treated, protected subjects at 24 hours post-pMCAO [15,16,18]. This finding stands in stark contrast to the results presented here. It is clear from the ISOI, LSI and TTC data that these hypertensive rats are not protected from impending ischemic stroke damage when given immediate collateral-based sensory stimulation treatment. The whisker functional representation for treated subjects was completely eliminated at 24 hours post-pMCAO. Importantly, this is identical to what we observed for untreated control subjects that never received treatment. Additionally, these treated subjects lacked significant retrograde blood flow within the MCA at 24 hours post-pMCAO as we normally observe in normotensive treated, protected subjects [16]. Finally, TTC staining confirmed that these subjects did in fact have infarcts that seemed to span the entire MCA territory. Not only did treated subjects sustain massive infarcts similar to the untreated controls, but these values are much larger than what we have observed in any of our previous normotensive subjects when anesthetized with pentobarbital. Normotensive untreated controls typically sustain infarcts of 28.4±2.4 mm³, while subjects that receive treatment 3 hours post-pMCAO (+3h) sustain larger infarcts of 61.4±2.4 mm³ [15], which is still small compared to the infarct volumes reported here. The only damage that treated subjects tend to experience comes from surgical damage (<1mm in diameter) and is observed infrequently.

Hypertension is the single most important risk factor for the development of stroke [32], as it promotes atherosclerosis and various types of structural remodeling as compensatory mechanisms for dealing with chronic high blood pressure. Unfortunately, all of these vascular stresses can result in stenosis and increase the risk of ischemic stroke. To further compound the issue, hypertension can alter cerebrovascular autoregulation and reduce vascular responsiveness to endothelium-dependent vasodilators such as nitric oxide [33,34] and functional hyperemia [12,35–38]. In some cases, this impaired functional hyperemia is due to stenosis, and thickening and hardening of vessel walls, but it could also be attributed to high angiotensin II levels [39]. These effects are present both in animal models and in patients with hypertension. A study by Jennings et al. [35] showed that increased cerebral blood flow as a result of functional hyperemia from brain activation was reduced in patients with chronic hypertension. Additionally, several studies in humans have also shown that a history of hypertension is more frequently associated with fewer leptomeningeal collaterals in CT angiography [40], and with poor collateral flow [41].

Given that hypertension is known to negatively impact the brains vasculature in humans and animal models of hypertension, including the collateral vessels that are critical to the efficacy of our treatment, it is not surprising that these hypertensive rats were not protected from impending ischemic stroke damage. The model used here, the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHRs), was first developed in 1963 by Okamoto and Aoki as a model for essential hypertension, which is the most common form (i.e., persistent high blood pressure of unknown causation), affecting approximately 95% of hypertensive patients. SHRs are currently the only, and thus most widely used, model for human essential hypertension [42], since it occurs without any treatment to induce hypertension [43]. SHRs also exhibit hypertension in stages similar to humans, with pre-hypertension existing for the first 6–8 weeks of their lives (with systolic blood pressures around 100–120 mmHg), followed by hypertension developing over the next 12–14 weeks, where systolic blood pressure remains over 150 mmHg [42]. The cerebral vasculature of these rats is known to have similar characteristics to that of hypertensive individuals. This includes decreased distensibility of cerebral arteries due to an increase in collagen but not elastin content [44], and increased thickness of the vascular wall, specifically the intima media (which comprises the middle smooth muscle, and inner endothelial layers of a blood vessel) [32,45,46]. This is in contrast to large amounts of smooth muscle, and small amounts of elastin, basement membrane and collagen in pial arteries in normotensive rats.

Due to these hypertension-induced vascular impairments, spontaneously hypertensive rats sustain infarcts of greater volume, but with less variability, than normotensive controls [47,48]. This is likely the result of cortical collateral flow that’s been reduced to an unsustainable level due to the reduced luminal diameter and reduced vasodilation and autoregulation capabilities rather than a lack of collaterals [12,49–51]. The severely impaired vasculature in these rats could thus explain the larger infarct size compared to normotensive untreated and +3h subjects (those that receive sensory stimulation treatment 3 hours post-pMCAO) from our lab. +3h subjects may have large infarcts due to enhanced blood flow through functioning collaterals at a late time point, leading to reperfusion injury and thereby exacerbating the damage that has already occurred, while the hypertensive rats may have a general reduction in blood flow post-occlusion due to increased vascular resistance as a result of brain-wide vascular impairments and reduced vessel lumen diameters. This could result in a larger portion of cortex remaining hypoperfused after pMCAO, and ultimately evolution of the penumbra into infarct.

The findings presented here further corroborate the existing literature. Regardless of whether rats received early sensory stimulation treatment, we observed severely reduced collateral flow in hypertensive rats as demonstrated by significantly reduced blood flow in the MCA at 24 hours post-pMCAO. This reduction in retrograde blood flow in the MCA, which we have shown originates from the pial collaterals in treated, protected subjects [15], resulted in the development of ischemic damage as is evident by the lack of evoked cortical activity and large infarcts.

The collateral vasculature is known to be responsible for rescuing penumbral tissue and reducing infarct size. However, our results show that cerebrovascular impairments in these hypertensive rats did not permit viable levels of collateral blood flow and led to ischemic damage, at least when using the same protective whisker stimulation parameters employed in normotensive rats, which may not be sufficient for protection in SHRs. When considering the translational potential of this collateral-based treatment for ischemic stroke patients, it is important to keep in mind that these rats may not be an optimal model, as they begin developing hypertension from a relatively young age. Thus, although it appears that this treatment might not be a viable solution to prevent ischemic damage in this population of stroke patients, it is possible that the effects of hypertension in these rats may impair the cerebral vasculature more severely compared to patients with hypertension. Additionally, this model does not take into account the fact that many patients are on medications to control blood pressure, which may also reduce the severity of the vascular impairments depending on how long the patient has had hypertension and the length of time that they’ve been taking medications. Thus, an effective solution for patients with hypertension and minimal collateral flow may be to combine this collateral-based sensory stimulation treatment with another therapeutic, such as tPA or recanalization. To conclude, hypertension-induced cerebrovascular impairments prevent ischemic stroke protection via the collateral-based treatment described by our lab in a rat model of essential hypertension. Further work is necessary to determine whether this treatment may be useful for patients with hypertension, and in what capacity it might prevent ischemic damage through either the enhancement of blood flow to, and rescue of, penumbral regions, or by improving delivery of tPA or other potential therapeutics to the ischemic region.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Example of TTC staining of a treated Wistar-Kyoto rat showing no clear sign of damage.

A: (top) left side view of the entire brain; (bottom) right side view of the entire brain. B: 2-mm slices of the brain in A.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206291.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Peggy Galvez for assisting with imaging and histological analysis, and Cynthia Chen-Bee for providing the whole brain TTC image.

References

1. STAIR. Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 1999. 30:2752–2758. pmid:10583007
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Fisher M, Feuerstein G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, et al. Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke 2009. 40: 2244–2250. pmid:19246690
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, and Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 391–397. pmid:10441299
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Dahlof B. Prevention of stroke in patients with hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 17J–24J. pmid:17666193
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e1–458.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Messerli FH, Williams B, and Ritz E. Essential hypertension. Lancet 2007. 370: 591–603. pmid:17707755
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Lip GY and Blann AD. Does hypertension confer a prothrombotic state? Virchow's triad revisited. Circulation 2000. 101: 218–220. pmid:10645912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Bronner LL, Kanter DS, and Manson JE. Primary prevention of stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1392–1400. pmid:7477121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Harazny JM, Ritt M, Baleanu D, Ott C, Heckmann J, Schlaich MP, et al. Increased wall:lumen ratio of retinal arterioles in male patients with a history of a cerebrovascular event. Hypertension 2007. 50: 623–629. pmid:17698722
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Thom S. Arterial structural modifications in hypertension. Effects of treatment. Eur Heart J 1997. 18 Suppl E: E2–4.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Johansson BB. Hypertension mechanisms causing stroke. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1999. 26: 563–565. pmid:10405790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Faraco G and Iadecola C. Hypertension: a harbinger of stroke and dementia. Hypertension 2013. 62: 810–817. pmid:23980072
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Grabowski M, Mattsson B, Nordborg C, and Johansson BB. Brain capillary density and cerebral blood flow after occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 1993. 11: 1363–1368. pmid:8133018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et al. Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in Stroke. N Engl J Med 2015. 372:2285–2295. pmid:25882376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation completely protects the adult rodent cortex from ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2010; 5: e11270. pmid:20585659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation reestablishes cortical function during the acute phase of ischemia. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 11495–11504. pmid:21832179
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Lay CC and Frostig RD. Complete protection from impending stroke following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in awake, behaving rats. Eur J Neurosci 2014; 1–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Davis MF, Lay CC, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Amount but not pattern of protective sensory stimulation alters recovery after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2011; 42: 792–798. pmid:21317269
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Hancock AM, Lay CC, Davis MF, and Frostig RD. Sensory Stimulation-Based Complete Protection from Ischemic Stroke Remains Stable at 4 Months Post-Occlusion of MCA. J Neurol Disord 2013. 1: 135. pmid:24634892
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation protects the aged rodent from cortical ischemic stroke after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1: e001255. pmid:23130160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Gibo H, Carver CC, Rhoton AL Jr, Lenkey C, and Mitchell RJ. Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg 1981; 54: 151–169. pmid:7452329
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Tamura A, Graham DI, McCulloch J, and Teasdale GM. Focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat: 1. Description of technique and early neuropathological consequences following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1981. 1: 53–60. pmid:7328138
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Brint S, Jacewicz M, Kiessling M, Tanabe J, and Pulsinelli W. Focal brain ischemia in the rat: methods for reproducible neocortical infarction using tandem occlusion of the distal middle cerebral and ipsilateral common carotid arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1988; 8: 474–485. pmid:3392112
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Wang-Fischer Y. Manual of Stroke Models in Rats. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
25. Davis MF, Lay C, and Frostig RD. Permanent Cerebral Vessel Occlusion Via Double Ligature and Transection. J Vis Exp 2013; 77, e50418.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Germano SM, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, and Bartkowski HM. Evaluation of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride as a stain for detection and quantification of experimental cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke 1986; 17: 1304–1308. pmid:2433817
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Goldlust EJ, Paczynski RP, He YY, Hsu CY, and Goldberg MP. Automated measurement of infarct size with scanned images of triphenyltetrazolium chloride-stained rat brains. Stroke 1996. 27: 1657–1662. pmid:8784144
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Ts'o DY, Frostig RD, Lieke EE, and Grinvald A. Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. Science 1990; 249: 417–420. pmid:2165630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Chen-Bee CH, Agoncillo T, Xiong Y, and Frostig RD. The triphasic intrinsic signal: implications for functional imaging. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 4572–4586. pmid:17460070
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Dunn AK, Bolay H, Moskowitz MA, and Boas DA. Dynamic imaging of cerebral blood flow using laser speckle. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001; 21: 195–201. pmid:11295873
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Lotfi J, and Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics. J Biomed Opt 2006; 11: 041129. pmid:16965157
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Air EL and Kissela BM. Diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and ischemic stroke: epidemiology and possible mechanisms. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 3131–3140. pmid:17848611
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Didion SP, Sigmund CD, and Faraci FM. Impaired endothelial function in transgenic mice expressing both human renin and human angiotensinogen. Stroke 2000; 31: 760–764; discussion 765. pmid:10700516
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Capone C, Faraco G, Park L, Cao X, Davisson RL, and Iadecola C. The cerebrovascular dysfunction induced by slow pressor doses of angiotensin II precedes the development of hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011; 300: H397–407. pmid:20971763
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Jennings JR, Muldoon MF, Ryan C, Price JC, Greer P, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Reduced cerebral blood flow response and compensation among patients with untreated hypertension. Neurology 2005. 64: 1358–1365. pmid:15851723
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Capone C, Faraco G, Peterson JR, Coleman C, Anrather J, Milner TA, et al. Central cardiovascular circuits contribute to the neurovascular dysfunction in angiotensin II hypertension. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 4878–4886. pmid:22492044
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Calcinaghi N, Wyss MT, Jolivet R, Singh A, Keller AL, Winnik S, et al. Multimodal imaging in rats reveals impaired neurovascular coupling in sustained hypertension. Stroke 2013; 44: 1957–1964. pmid:23735955
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Iadecola C and Davisson RL. Hypertension and cerebrovascular dysfunction. Cell Metab 2008. 7: 476–484. pmid:18522829
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Kazama K, Wang G, Frys K, Anrather J, and Iadecola C. Angiotensin II attenuates functional hyperemia in the mouse somatosensory cortex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003. 285: H1890–1899. pmid:12907423
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Lima FO, Furie KL, Silva GS, Lev MH, Camargo EC, Singhal AB, et al. The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 2010; 41: 2316–2322. pmid:20829514
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Liebeskind DS. Blood pressure in acute stroke is inversely related to the extent of collaterals. Stroke 2008. 39:538.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Doggrell SA and Brown L. Rat models of hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Cardiovasc Res 1998. 39: 89–105. pmid:9764192
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Okamoto K. and Aoki K. Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 1963. 27: 282–293. pmid:13939773
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Baumbach GL, Walmsley JG, and Hart MN. Composition and mechanics of cerebral arterioles in hypertensive rats. Am J Pathol 1988; 133: 464–471. pmid:3202116
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Mangiarua EI and Lee RM. Morphometric study of cerebral arteries from spontaneously hypertensive and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 1992. 10: 1183–1190. pmid:1334999
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Tice FD, Peterson JW, Orsinelli DA, Binkley PF, Cody RJ, Guthrie R, et al. Vascular hypertrophy is an early finding in essential hypertension and is related to arterial pressure waveform contour. Am Heart J 1996. 132: 621–627. pmid:8800034
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Barone FC, Price WJ, White RF, Willette RN and Feuerstein GZ. Genetic hypertension and increased susceptibility to cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1992; 16: 219–233. pmid:1630732
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Nishimura Y, Ito T, and Saavedra JM. Angiotensin II AT(1) blockade normalizes cerebrovascular autoregulation and reduces cerebral ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke 2000. 31: 2478–2486. pmid:11022082
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Coyle P and Jokelainen PT. Dorsal cerebral arterial collaterals of the rat. Anat Rec 1982; 203: 397–404. pmid:7137595
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Coyle P and Heistad DD. Blood flow through cerebral collateral vessels in hypertensive and normotensive rats. Hypertension 1986; 8: II67–71. pmid:3721559
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Jacewicz M. The hypertensive rat and predisposition to cerebral infarction. Hypertension 1992. 19: 47–48. pmid:1730438
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. STAIR. Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 1999. 30:2752–2758. pmid:10583007
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Fisher M, Feuerstein G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, et al. Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke 2009. 40: 2244–2250. pmid:19246690
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, and Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 391–397. pmid:10441299
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Dahlof B. Prevention of stroke in patients with hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 17J–24J. pmid:17666193
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e1–458.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Messerli FH, Williams B, and Ritz E. Essential hypertension. Lancet 2007. 370: 591–603. pmid:17707755
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lip GY and Blann AD. Does hypertension confer a prothrombotic state? Virchow's triad revisited. Circulation 2000. 101: 218–220. pmid:10645912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Bronner LL, Kanter DS, and Manson JE. Primary prevention of stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1392–1400. pmid:7477121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Harazny JM, Ritt M, Baleanu D, Ott C, Heckmann J, Schlaich MP, et al. Increased wall:lumen ratio of retinal arterioles in male patients with a history of a cerebrovascular event. Hypertension 2007. 50: 623–629. pmid:17698722
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Thom S. Arterial structural modifications in hypertension. Effects of treatment. Eur Heart J 1997. 18 Suppl E: E2–4.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Johansson BB. Hypertension mechanisms causing stroke. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1999. 26: 563–565. pmid:10405790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Faraco G and Iadecola C. Hypertension: a harbinger of stroke and dementia. Hypertension 2013. 62: 810–817. pmid:23980072
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Grabowski M, Mattsson B, Nordborg C, and Johansson BB. Brain capillary density and cerebral blood flow after occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 1993. 11: 1363–1368. pmid:8133018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et al. Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in Stroke. N Engl J Med 2015. 372:2285–2295. pmid:25882376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation completely protects the adult rodent cortex from ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2010; 5: e11270. pmid:20585659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation reestablishes cortical function during the acute phase of ischemia. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 11495–11504. pmid:21832179
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lay CC and Frostig RD. Complete protection from impending stroke following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in awake, behaving rats. Eur J Neurosci 2014; 1–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Davis MF, Lay CC, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Amount but not pattern of protective sensory stimulation alters recovery after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2011; 42: 792–798. pmid:21317269
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Hancock AM, Lay CC, Davis MF, and Frostig RD. Sensory Stimulation-Based Complete Protection from Ischemic Stroke Remains Stable at 4 Months Post-Occlusion of MCA. J Neurol Disord 2013. 1: 135. pmid:24634892
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Lay CC, Davis MF, Chen-Bee CH, and Frostig RD. Mild sensory stimulation protects the aged rodent from cortical ischemic stroke after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1: e001255. pmid:23130160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Gibo H, Carver CC, Rhoton AL Jr, Lenkey C, and Mitchell RJ. Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg 1981; 54: 151–169. pmid:7452329
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Tamura A, Graham DI, McCulloch J, and Teasdale GM. Focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat: 1. Description of technique and early neuropathological consequences following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1981. 1: 53–60. pmid:7328138
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Brint S, Jacewicz M, Kiessling M, Tanabe J, and Pulsinelli W. Focal brain ischemia in the rat: methods for reproducible neocortical infarction using tandem occlusion of the distal middle cerebral and ipsilateral common carotid arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1988; 8: 474–485. pmid:3392112
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Wang-Fischer Y. Manual of Stroke Models in Rats. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.

[ref25] 25. Davis MF, Lay C, and Frostig RD. Permanent Cerebral Vessel Occlusion Via Double Ligature and Transection. J Vis Exp 2013; 77, e50418.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Germano SM, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, and Bartkowski HM. Evaluation of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride as a stain for detection and quantification of experimental cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke 1986; 17: 1304–1308. pmid:2433817
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Goldlust EJ, Paczynski RP, He YY, Hsu CY, and Goldberg MP. Automated measurement of infarct size with scanned images of triphenyltetrazolium chloride-stained rat brains. Stroke 1996. 27: 1657–1662. pmid:8784144
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Ts'o DY, Frostig RD, Lieke EE, and Grinvald A. Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. Science 1990; 249: 417–420. pmid:2165630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Chen-Bee CH, Agoncillo T, Xiong Y, and Frostig RD. The triphasic intrinsic signal: implications for functional imaging. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 4572–4586. pmid:17460070
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Dunn AK, Bolay H, Moskowitz MA, and Boas DA. Dynamic imaging of cerebral blood flow using laser speckle. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001; 21: 195–201. pmid:11295873
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Lotfi J, and Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics. J Biomed Opt 2006; 11: 041129. pmid:16965157
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Air EL and Kissela BM. Diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and ischemic stroke: epidemiology and possible mechanisms. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 3131–3140. pmid:17848611
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Didion SP, Sigmund CD, and Faraci FM. Impaired endothelial function in transgenic mice expressing both human renin and human angiotensinogen. Stroke 2000; 31: 760–764; discussion 765. pmid:10700516
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Capone C, Faraco G, Park L, Cao X, Davisson RL, and Iadecola C. The cerebrovascular dysfunction induced by slow pressor doses of angiotensin II precedes the development of hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011; 300: H397–407. pmid:20971763
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Jennings JR, Muldoon MF, Ryan C, Price JC, Greer P, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Reduced cerebral blood flow response and compensation among patients with untreated hypertension. Neurology 2005. 64: 1358–1365. pmid:15851723
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Capone C, Faraco G, Peterson JR, Coleman C, Anrather J, Milner TA, et al. Central cardiovascular circuits contribute to the neurovascular dysfunction in angiotensin II hypertension. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 4878–4886. pmid:22492044
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Calcinaghi N, Wyss MT, Jolivet R, Singh A, Keller AL, Winnik S, et al. Multimodal imaging in rats reveals impaired neurovascular coupling in sustained hypertension. Stroke 2013; 44: 1957–1964. pmid:23735955
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Iadecola C and Davisson RL. Hypertension and cerebrovascular dysfunction. Cell Metab 2008. 7: 476–484. pmid:18522829
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Kazama K, Wang G, Frys K, Anrather J, and Iadecola C. Angiotensin II attenuates functional hyperemia in the mouse somatosensory cortex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003. 285: H1890–1899. pmid:12907423
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Lima FO, Furie KL, Silva GS, Lev MH, Camargo EC, Singhal AB, et al. The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 2010; 41: 2316–2322. pmid:20829514
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Liebeskind DS. Blood pressure in acute stroke is inversely related to the extent of collaterals. Stroke 2008. 39:538.
View Article
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Doggrell SA and Brown L. Rat models of hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Cardiovasc Res 1998. 39: 89–105. pmid:9764192
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Okamoto K. and Aoki K. Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 1963. 27: 282–293. pmid:13939773
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Baumbach GL, Walmsley JG, and Hart MN. Composition and mechanics of cerebral arterioles in hypertensive rats. Am J Pathol 1988; 133: 464–471. pmid:3202116
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Mangiarua EI and Lee RM. Morphometric study of cerebral arteries from spontaneously hypertensive and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 1992. 10: 1183–1190. pmid:1334999
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Tice FD, Peterson JW, Orsinelli DA, Binkley PF, Cody RJ, Guthrie R, et al. Vascular hypertrophy is an early finding in essential hypertension and is related to arterial pressure waveform contour. Am Heart J 1996. 132: 621–627. pmid:8800034
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Barone FC, Price WJ, White RF, Willette RN and Feuerstein GZ. Genetic hypertension and increased susceptibility to cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1992; 16: 219–233. pmid:1630732
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Nishimura Y, Ito T, and Saavedra JM. Angiotensin II AT(1) blockade normalizes cerebrovascular autoregulation and reduces cerebral ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke 2000. 31: 2478–2486. pmid:11022082
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Coyle P and Jokelainen PT. Dorsal cerebral arterial collaterals of the rat. Anat Rec 1982; 203: 397–404. pmid:7137595
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Coyle P and Heistad DD. Blood flow through cerebral collateral vessels in hypertensive and normotensive rats. Hypertension 1986; 8: II67–71. pmid:3721559
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Jacewicz M. The hypertensive rat and predisposition to cerebral infarction. Hypertension 1992. 19: 47–48. pmid:1730438
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Subjects and surgical preparation

Overview

Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion

Histology (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining for infarct)

Intrinsic signal optical imaging (ISOI) and analysis

Laser speckle imaging (LSI) and analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

Treated hypertensive rats do not exhibit protection of cortical function

Hypertensive rats have strongly reduced retrograde collateral flow feeding the MCA at 24 hours post-pMCAO

Hypertensive rats sustain large cortical infarcts after pMCAO despite receiving immediate treatment

Wistar Kyoto rats

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Example of TTC staining of a treated Wistar-Kyoto rat showing no clear sign of damage.

Acknowledgments

References