Figures
There is an error in the second sentence of the fourteenth paragraph of the Results section. The correct sentence is: The GD values for the first and third codon positions are negative, ranging from −12.8% to −49.1% (Fig 8B).
In Fig 8, the headings are missing. Please see the corrected Fig 8 here.
The GD measure calculated under four models of the genetic code (DEG, BLO, NUM, and GEN) when the polarity costs were minimized for three codon positions individually (A, B, and C) or as the sum of costs over all positions (D).
Reference
- 1. Błażej P, Wnętrzak M, Mackiewicz D, Mackiewicz P (2018) Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201715 pmid:30092017
Citation: Błażej P, Wnętrzak M, Mackiewicz D, Mackiewicz P (2018) Correction: Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0205450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205450
Published: October 4, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Błażej et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.