CHR729 Is a CHD3 Protein That Controls Seedling Development in Rice

Xiaoding Ma; Jian Ma; Honghong Zhai; Peiyong Xin; Jinfang Chu; Yongli Qiao; Longzhi Han

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138934

Abstract

CHD3 is one of the chromatin-remodeling factors that contribute to controlling the expression of genes associated with plant development. Loss-of-function mutants display morphological and growth defects. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying CHD3 regulation of plant development remain unclear. In this study, a rice CHD3 protein, CHR729, was identified. The corresponding mutant line (t483) exhibited late seed germination, low germination rate, dwarfism, low tiller number, root growth inhibition, adaxial albino leaves, and short and narrow leaves. CHR729 encoded a nuclear protein and was expressed in almost all organs. RNA-sequencing analysis showed that several plant hormone-related genes were up- or down-regulated in t483 compared to wild type. In particular, expression of the gibberellin synthetase gibberellin 20 oxidase 4 gene was elevated in the mutant. Endogenous gibberellin assays demonstrated that the content of bioactive GA₃ was reduced in t483 compared to wild type. Moreover, the seedling dwarfism, late seed germination, and short root length phenotypes of t483 were partially rescued by treatment with exogenous GA₃. These results suggest that the rice CHD3 protein CHR729 plays an important role in many aspects of seedling development and controls this development via the gibberellin pathway.

Citation: Ma X, Ma J, Zhai H, Xin P, Chu J, Qiao Y, et al. (2015) CHR729 Is a CHD3 Protein That Controls Seedling Development in Rice. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0138934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934

Editor: Zhong-Hua Chen, University of Western Sydney, AUSTRALIA

Received: May 18, 2015; Accepted: September 5, 2015; Published: September 23, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013BAD01B02-2, 2013BAD01B0101-02), CAAS Science and Technology Innovation Program, Platform of National Crop Germplasm Resources, Protective Program of Crop Germplasm of China (2014NWB030-01), International Cooperation Project from National Institute of Crop Science, RDA (PJ008685), and CAS Key Technology Talent Program.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Chromatin is a macromolecular complex that consists of DNA, protein, and RNA. At least three processes control chromatin assembly and regulation: DNA methylation, histone modification, and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling [1]. Chromatin is highly dynamic and undergoes structural alterations in response to developmental changes and changes in the cellular environment [2, 3]. Dynamic regulation of chromatin structure is important for transcriptional regulation and other functions in higher eukaryotes, and many coordinating control factors are needed. One such factor is chromatin-remodeling factor, a member of the CHD family, which plays a substantial role in cellular development and chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation [4, 5].

CHD proteins contain chromo, helicase/ATPase, and DNA-binding domains, and belong to the sucrose non-fermenting (SNF2)-like family of ATPases. CHD proteins in higher eukaryotes fall into three subfamilies [6]. One of these, the CHD3 subfamily, is widely distributed in animals and plants and has been intensely studied. Early studies found that CHD3 members served as repression factors in various types of developmental regulation [7]. However, more recent studies indicated that CHD3 members were also involved in gene activation [8–11]. One example is the CHD3 protein PICKLE (PKL) in Arabidopsis. PKL was first found to act as a repressor in cellular differentiation, embryonic transition, and meristem development in leaf and carpel tissues [12–14], but more recent research found that the expression levels of root meristem genes decreased in a pkl mutant, and that root meristem activity was controlled by PKL [8].

In general, CHD3 proteins regulate gene expression in plants by promoting trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3). In the Arabidopsis pkl mutant, H3K27me3 levels were substantially lowered in H3K27me3-enriched genes, indicating a role for PKL in the modification of repressed chromatin [15]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that PKL directly interacted with the promoter region of H3K27me3-enriched genes. For example, during germination, PKL protein acted directly on the promoters of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEAFY COTYLEDON2. As a consequence, the expression of embryonic identity-related genes was repressed by PKL and seed germination was promoted [16]. CHD3 protein can also interact with dimethylated histone lysine 4 (H3K4me2). CHD3 proteins in rice also interact with H3K27me3 and H3K4me2 to control target genes during development [17].

Although a number of CHD3 subfamily proteins were described in previous studies, the mechanisms underlying their mediation of gene regulation are not yet fully understood. This is particularly the case for the relationships between target genes and developmental processes in different tissues. To examine these processes further, it is necessary to identify more CHD3 genes, screen downstream genes, and analyze relationships between target genes and phenotypic variation. This will not only help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying CHD3 proteins and gene regulation, but will also uncover the relationships between dynamic regulation of chromatin structure and developmental processes.

This study examined rice mutant t483, which displayed a number of characteristic morphological and growth features such as defective seed germination, dwarfism, low tiller number, root growth inhibition, and short and narrow leaves. Map-based cloning was used to isolate the gene responsible for the t483 phenotypes. The defect was caused by mutation in the gene encoding the CHD3 protein CHR729 (CHD-Related). RNA sequencing showed that expression of the gene encoding an active gibberellin synthetase, gibberellin 20 oxidase 4, was elevated in the mutant. Endogenous gibberellin analysis revealed that the content of bioactive GA₃ was reduced in the t483 mutant compared with wild type (WT). The t483 mutant was responsive to gibberellin, with exogenous GA₃ treatment partially correcting defective root/shoot development and seed germination. This suggested that CHR729 exercised control of development through the gibberellin pathway.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The t483 mutant (japonica cv. Nipponbare) was obtained from an EMS (Ethyl methanesulfonate)-mutagenized population. Nipponbare was used as a WT line for phenotypic observation and gene expression analysis. All materials for crossing and analysis were grown in the experimental field at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing and Sanya.

For germination analysis, rice seeds were soaked in tap-water at 37°C in the dark for three days. The soaked seeds were incubated at 28°C with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness for eight days, then seed germination rate was measured by counting only those seeds with shoots longer than 2 cm. For gibberellin treatment, mutant and WT seeds were surface sterilized in 2.5% NaClO, soaked with tap-water in sterile Petri dishes at 37°C in the dark for one day. Seeds were then soaked in different concentrations of gibberellin acid solution and incubated at 28°C with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness.

Chlorophyll content measurement and transmission electron microscopy analysis

Chlorophyll contents were measured using a spectrophotometer according to the method of Arnon [18] with minor modifications. Briefly, equal weights of freshly collected second top leaves from two-week-old seedlings were marinated in 95% ethanol for 48 h in darkness. For thorough chlorophyll extraction tubes were periodically inverted five times. Residual plant debris was removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were used to measure chlorophyll content by a DU 800 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter) at 665, 649 and 470 nm.

For transmission electron microscopy analysis, leaf samples from two-week-old plants growing in paddy field were first fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde solution and then transferred into 1% OsO₄ for two days. After fixation, samples were stained with uranyl acetate and dehydrated in an ethanol series, and then embedded in Spurr’s medium before ultrathin sectioning. Samples were stained with uranyl acetate again and observed with a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H-7650, Japan).

Map-based cloning of the mutated gene in t483

To map the mutated gene, t483 was crossed with cv. 93–11 (indica). The plants with the mutant phenotype in F₂ population were selected for a genetic linkage analysis. Molecular markers distributed throughout the rice genome were chosen for preliminary mapping [19, 20]. Additional Insertion-deletion (IN) markers for fine mapping were developed according to the DNA sequence difference between japonica and indica. PCR procedure was as following: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, extension 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Generation of transgenic rice plants

Because the genomic sequence of CHR729 was very large, containing 13,848 bp (not including promoter sequence), it was difficult to construct a complementary transformation plasmid. We therefore used a pCUbi1390-ΔFAD₂ RNAi vector to generate a CHR729-RNAi construct [21]. The specific region of CHR729 used for the RNAi construct was identified by alignment with the basic local alignment search tool (http://www.gramene.org). A 346 bp specific fragment of the CHR729 gene was amplified with primer pairs RNAi-SF/ RNAi-SR and RNAi-AF/ RNAi-AF, then cloned into the pCUbi1390-ΔFAD₂ vector as described by Mao et al. [22]. The RNAi construct was introduced into wild type Nipponbare by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation as previous report and empty pCUbi1390 vector was also introduced as a control [23].

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from various tissues using RNA Prep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Co., Beijing), and was reverse transcribed using a SuperScript II Kit (TaKaRa), according to the user’s manual. qRT-PCR (quantitative real-time PCR) analyses were performed using the 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (ABI). UBIQUITIN gene (Os03g0234200) was chosen as a reference gene. Reactions containing SYBR premix (TaKaRa) were carried out in final volumes of 20 μL with 2 pmol of the appropriate primers. The 2^—ΔΔCT method was used to calculate relative levels of gene expression [24].

Subcellular localization of CHR729

To determine the subcellular localization, the CHR729 cDNA fragment was amplified (primer pair GFP-F/GFP-R) and ligated into pA7-GFP vector (p35S-CHR729-GFP). As a control, the cDNA of a previously characterized nuclear protein, OsMADS3, was fused to the mCherry gene (p35S-OsMADS3-mCherry) [25]. Protoplasts were isolated from rice seedlings, and co-transfected with the p35S-CHR729-GFP and p35S-OsMADS3-mCherry vectors. The transformed protoplasts were incubated at 28°C in darkness for 16 h before detection. Fluorescence of GFP was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP5).

RNA-sequencing

Two-week-old whole WT and t483 seedlings were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Material from five different plots was pooled together. Total RNA was extracted using a RNA Prep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Co., Beijing), and treated with RNase-free DNase I (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) to remove any genomic DNA contamination. For each sample, at least 10 μg of total RNA was used for illumina HiSeq2000 sequencing conducted at Beijing Novo Co. (Beijing). After sequencing, the raw reads were first purified by trimming adapter sequences and removing low-quality sequencing date. The clean reads were mapped to the reference genome of japonica cv. Nipponbare using SOAP2 software [26]. Genes differentially expressed (DEGs) between t483 and WT were identified using DEGseq R package (1.12.0; TNLIST, Beijing). P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg method [27]. Corrected p-values of 0.001 and log2 (fold change) of ±1 were set as the threshold to determine significant differential expression.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using the open-source MAS3 database (http://bioinfo.capitalbio.com/mas3/). A threshold of a two-fold change in gene expression levels and a FDR of <0.05 were used to identify DEGs. The p-values and FDRs of DEGs were calculated as previously reported [28].

Determination of endogenous GAs levels

500 mg of the plant material powder was extracted with 5 mL of 90% aqueous methanol (MeOH). Simultaneously 2 ng of each D-labelled GA compound was added to the extracting solvents as internal standards for GAs content measurement. MAX and MCX Cartridges (6 mL, 500 mg) were purchased from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA). The MAX cartridge was activated and equilibrated with 10 mL MeOH, water, 5% NH4OH, 90% MeOH in turn, while MCX with 10 mL MeOH, water and 90% MeOH. After the two columns were connected with an adapter, the crude extracts were subjected to the tandem cartridges. Then the MAX cartridge was disconnected and washed with 5% NH₄OH in 5% MeOH, MeOH in sequence. At last GAs were eluted with 2% FA in 90% MeOH. After dried with N₂ stream, the eluent was reconstructed with 200 μL 80% MeOH and subjected to UPLC-MS/MS analysis. GAs analysis was performed on a quadrupole linear ion trap hybrid mass spectrometer (QTRAP 5500, AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source coupled with a UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Five microliters of each sample were injected onto a BEH C18 column (100 mm*2.1 mm, 1.7 μm). The inlet method was set as follows: mobile phase A: 0.05% acetic acid in water, B: acetonitrile. Gradient: 0–17 min, 3% B to 65% B; 17–18.5 min, 65% B to 90% B; 18.5–19.5min, 90% B; 19.5–21 min, 90% B to 3% B; 21–22.5 min, 3% B. GAs were detected in negative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Each GA compound was quantified with a MRM transition and qualified with another one. The source parameters were set as: IS voltage -4500 V, TEM 600°C, GS1 45, GS2 55 and curtain gas 28.

Results

Phenotypic characterization of the rice t483 mutant

When compared to WT rice plants, t483 plants exhibited abnormal growth at every stage of development. The germination rate was significantly lower in the t483 mutant than in WT, with a clear difference first becoming apparent three days after germination (Fig 1A). Eight days post-germination, shoots of t483 were shorter than those of WT and roots in the mutant were shorter and lower in number (Fig 1B–1D). Furthermore, approximately 30% of the t483 mutant seeds arrested at the germination stage (Fig 1B, 1E and 1F). These results indicate that t483 is defective in seed germination.

Download:

Fig 1. Seed germination of WT and t483.

A, Germination of WT and t483 seeds after 3 days. B–E, Seedlings of WT and t483 at 8 days post-germination. F, Seed germination rate. Values are means ±SD of three independent experiments. Significance of differences between WT and t483 was determined by Student’s t-test (**P<0.01). Scale bars: 2 cm (A–D); 1 cm (E).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g001

The t483 mutant was also defective at other development stages. At the tillering stage, stature and tiller numbers were reduced compared to WT (Fig 2A). At the mature stage, mutant plants were reduced in height and had smaller and fewer panicles than WT plants (Fig 2B–2D, Table 1). In addition, leaf blade lengths and widths were reduced in the t483 mutant compared to WT. Mutant leaves exhibited pale coloration on the adaxial side (Fig 2E, Table 1) and normal coloration on the abaxial side (data not shown). Spectrophotometric analysis showed that chlorophyll levels were 27% lower in t483 than in WT (Fig 2F). Consistent with the alteration in leaf color, the numbers of thylakoid lamellar and stacked grana in chloroplasts of adaxial mesophyll cells were lower in t483 than in WT, as determined using transmission electron microscopy (Fig 2G–2J). The chloroplast structure and thylakoid lamellar were, however, developed normally in abaxial mesophyll cells of the mutant (data not shown). In summary, the t483 mutant had morphological and growth defects that affected seed germination, plant height, tillering, panicle, leaf color, and leaf and root dimensions.

Download:

Fig 2. Phenotypic characteristics of WT and t483.

A, Plants at the tillering stage after removal of soil. B, Mature plant stage. C, Three uppermost internodes from the main tiller. D, Panicles of WT and t483. E, Adaxial side of leaf segments. F, Leaf chlorophyll contents in WT and t483. Values are means ±SD (n = 3) (**P<0.01). G–H, Ultrastructure of chloroplasts in adaxial mesophyll cells of WT (G) and t483 (H). I–J, Thylakoid lamellar structure of WT (I) and t483 (J). C chloroplast, Thy thylakoid lamellar. Scale bars: 10 cm (A, C); 25 cm (B); 5 cm (D); 1cm (E); 0.5 μm (G, H); 0.2 μm (I, J).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g002

Download:

Table 1. Phenotypic comparisons of the t483 mutant and wild-type Nipponbare (Beijing).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.t001

Map-based cloning of the mutated gene in t483

Segregation analysis indicated that the t483 phenotype was controlled by a single recessive gene (55:174, χ²_1:3 = 0.118, P>0.70). The mutated gene was isolated by positional cloning. An F₂ population with 1,350 recessive mutant plants was developed from a cross between t483 and indica cv. 93–11. The mutated gene was located in a 27 kb region between markers IN27 and IN35 (Fig 3A). Three predicted open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted in this region, and the genomic sequences of each were obtained from WT and t483. A single nucleotide substitution of T for A in ORF3 in t483 was predicted to encode an early stop codon (Fig 3A). This nucleotide change was confirmed in the cDNA sequence.

Download:

Fig 3. Map-based cloning and confirmation of the CHR729 gene.

A, Map of the genomic region containing the t483 mutant locus of interest. Numerals below the corresponding markers indicate the number of recombinants identified among F₂ plants with the mutant phenotype mutant. The mutated gene was located in a 27 kb region between markers IN27 and IN35. Three ORFs were predicted in the mapped region. Sequencing analysis revealed that an A to T substitution in the fifth exon of the ORF3 resulted in a stop codon in t483. B, Phenotypes of control and typical T₂ transgenic knockdown plants (RNAi-3) at the heading stage. C, Germination of control and RNAi-3 seeds at 3 day. D, Control and RNAi-3 seedlings 8 days post-germination. E, Two-week-old seedlings. F, Expression analysis of CHR729 in leaves of control and RNAi-3 by qRT-PCR. G, Seed germination rates in control and RNAi-3 plants. H, Chlorophyll contents in control and RNAi-3 plants. Chlorophyll was extracted from above-ground parts of plants shown in (E). Values are means ±SD (n = 3, **P<0.01). Scale bars: 25 cm (B); 2 cm (C, D); 5 cm (E).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g003

Just after we analyzed the mutated gene in t483, two similar mutants, named chr729 and oschr4, were reported elsewhere [17, 29]. The location and sequence of these mutants suggested that CHR729/OsCHR4 was a candidate for t483. To investigate this further, we generated several transgenic lines by introducing the specific RNA interference construct into Nipponbare plants. In a typical homozygous T₂ line, RNAi-3, CHR729 transcript levels were significantly lower than in control, as determined by real-time PCR analysis (Fig 3F). Phenotypic evaluation of RNAi-3 revealed that plant height (Fig 3B), seed germination (Fig 3C, 3D and 3G), chlorophyll content (Fig 3E and 3H), panicle number and length, and the length and width of the flag leaf were also significantly reduced in the RNAi-3 line compared to control (Table 2). The phenotype of the silenced plants mimicked that of the t483 mutant. Together, the sequence and phenotype data suggested that the defect in the t483 line was caused by a mutation in CHR729/OsCHR4. Henceforth, t483 is used to denote the rice mutant line and CHR729 is used for the gene name.

Download:

Table 2. Phenotypic comparisons of control and homozygous T₂ transgenic plants of RNAi-3 line (Sanya).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.t002

Sequence comparison between genomic DNA and cDNA indicated that CHR729 contained ten exons and nine introns, and encoded a 2259 amino acid protein. CHR729 belonged to the CHD3 protein subfamily and contained a PHD zinc finger domain, two chromo domains, a SNF2-related helicase domain, and a DNA-binding domain.

CHR729 is ubiquitously expressed and encodes a nuclear protein

To examine the spatial expression pattern of CHR729, qRT-PCR analysis of endogenous CHR729 transcripts was performed using total RNA isolated from different WT tissues. As shown in Fig 4A, CHR729 was expressed in all the examined organs, including culms, leaf blades and sheaths, young inflorescences, and seedling-stage roots. CHR729 was also expressed in flower organs, including anthers, pistils, lemmas, and paleas. CHR729 therefore appeared to be constitutively expressed, which was consistent with the morphological defects observed in t483 at many developmental stages.

Download:

Fig 4. Expression analysis of CHR729 and subcellular localization of the encoding protein.

A, qRT-PCR analysis of CHR729 expression in WT roots (R), culms (C), leaves (L), leaf sheaths (Ls), and young 3 cm inflorescence (In). Dissected anthers (An), pistils (Pi), lemmas (Le) and paleas (Pa) at inflorescence stage 9 were also analyzed. Values are means ±SD of three replicates. B–D, CaMV35S:CHR729-GFP fusion protein localization in rice protoplast. B, Subcellular localization of CHR729-GFP fusion protein. C, Subcellular localization of MADS3-mCherry fusion protein (nuclear marker). D, Merged image of (B) and (C) in bright field. Scale bars: 10 μm (B–D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g004

To determine the subcellular localization of CHR729, a GFP fusion construct was transiently expressed in rice leaf protoplasts. The resulting GFP signal co-localized with the nuclear marker OsMADS3-mCherry [30] (Fig 4B–4D), suggesting that CHR729 was located in the nucleus.

Expression of genes putatively related to phytohormone function is altered in the t483 mutant

To understand the molecular mechanism of CHR729 in the regulation of plant development, gene expression changes were analyzed in young t483 seedlings using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Transcriptional analysis showed that 346 and 154 genes were up- and down-regulated, respectively, in t483 relative to WT (P<0.05; S1 Table). Many of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified as transcription factor genes (S2 Table). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis found that five GO categories were enriched in the group of DEGs (Fig 5A, S3 Table). The most enriched category was “protein phosphorylation”, and this group included genes encoding protein kinases. Of the DEGs, several were predicted to involve in phytohormones such as auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinins, gibberellin, and ethylene (S4 Table). Only three of the total 19 phytohormone genes were downregulated, and more than half were involved in ethylene signaling. The RNA-seq results were confirmed using qRT-PCR (Fig 5B). One of the upregulated genes, EIN3 (Ethylene-insensitive 3), encodes a protein that, after activation by EIN2, activates downstream transcription factors to induce various ethylene responses [31–34]. In addition to EIN3, expression of several other genes encoding ethylene-responsive transcription factors was elevated in t483 compared to WT (S4 Table, Fig 5B). These results suggest that altered phytohormone signaling might contribute to the morphological and growth defects observed in the t483 line.

Download:

Fig 5. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in young t483 seedlings.

A, Identification of GO biological process categories for genes differentially expressed in t483. Negative logarithms (base 10) of the adjusted P values were used as the bar lengths. B, qRT-PCR analysis of expression in ethylene signaling-related genes. Values are means ±SD of three replicates. Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences in expression (**P<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g005

Responses of the t483 mutant to gibberellins

The t483 mutant exhibited gibberellic acid (GA) deficiency phenotypes such as short roots, dwarfism, and late seed germination (Fig 1). In addition, the gene encoding gibberellin 20 oxidase 4 (OsGA20ox4), an active GA synthetase, was upregulated in t483 compared to WT (S4 Table). To evaluate if GA metabolism was altered in the mutant, endogenous GA content was measured in the t483 mutant and WT. Two weeks after germination, the levels of 13-OH GAs were significantly lower in the t483 mutant than in WT. In particular, GA₂₀ and active GA₃ levels were reduced by 50% compared to WT (Fig 6B). These results indicate that the GA synthesis pathway is defective in t483.

Download:

Fig 6. Endogenous gibberellin content in t483 and WT.

A, Schematic diagram of GA biosynthesis in the13-OH pathway. Gray boxes indicate steps catalyzed by GA20ox and GA3ox enzymes. B, Endogenous GAs levels in two-week-old t483 and WT seedlings. GA_53, GA_44, GA_19, GA₂₀ and GA₃ levels are indicated by a logarithmic scale. Values are means ±SD of three samples (*P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g006

To further test the effects of GA in t483, WT and t483 mutant plants were treated with exogenous GA₃. Seed germination vigor was improved in t483 by the addition of GA₃ (Fig 7A), but there was no change in the overall seed germination rate (data not shown). Seedlings were also treated to investigate the ongoing response of the t483 mutant to GA₃. Root lengths of WT seedlings were unaffected by GA₃ treatment, but root lengths in t483 seedlings increased significantly to lengths similar to those in WT (Fig 7B and S1B Fig). Consistent with the morphological responses, expression of OsGA20ox4 was more responsive to GA₃ treatment in t483 roots than in WT roots (Fig 7C). Shoot length was enhanced equally in WT and t483 seedlings upon GA₃ treatment (Fig 7B and S1C Fig). In untreated shoots, OsGA20ox4 mRNA accumulated to a higher level in t483 than in WT, but OsGA20ox4 mRNA levels were decreased to similar levels in t483 and WT when treated with GA₃. In untreated roots, OsGA20ox4 mRNA accumulated to higher levels in t483 than in WT. On treatment with GA₃, there was no change in accumulation of OsGA20ox4 mRNA in WT, but levels increased in t483 (Fig 7C). CHR729 expression also responded to GA₃ treatment (S1D Fig). These results suggest that t483 responds to GA and that exogenous GA₃ can overcome the mutant seed germination and root and shoot development defects, indicating that CHR729 regulates plant development through the GA pathway.

Download:

Fig 7. Response of t483 to gibberellin supplementation.

A, WT and t483 seed germination with or without treatment with GA₃ (5 μM). Image taken 3 DAI (days after imbibition). B, WT and t483 shoot and root development with or without GA₃ (5 μM). Image taken 14 DAI. C, Analysis of OsGA20ox4 expression in shoots and roots of WT and t483 seedlings with GA₃ treatment (at 14 DAI). Values are means ±SD of three replicates. Values annotated with the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.01, with Fisher’s least significant difference test. Scale bars: 2 cm (A), 4 cm (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.g007

Discussion

A rice mutant was identified with pleiotropic phenotypic traits including dwarfism, lower tiller number, small panicle size, root growth inhibition, short and narrow leaves, and reduced chlorophyll content. The mutant gene responsible for the mutant phenotype was shown to be CHR729, which encoded a CHD3 protein. Our data and former reports demonstrated that mutation of this gene affected expression of a substantial number of downstream genes [16, 17, 29, 35]. The large number of DEGs identified and the pleiotropic phenotype exhibited by the mutant suggested that CHR729 might be a hierarchical regulator of transcriptional cascades in plant growth and development. RNA-seq analysis identified 500 genes that were differentially regulated in t483 compared to WT, approximately 70% of which were upregulated in the mutant (S1 Table). About 10% of DEGs were transcription factor genes, and most of these were also upregulated in t483 (S2 Table). The mutation in the t483 line was predicted to lead to premature termination of CHR729. CHD3 proteins are generally considered to be transcriptional repressors, and the depression of transcription as a result of lower levels of active CHR729 is consistent with the upregulation of the majority of DEGs.

Hormones are signaling molecules that are vital to the life-cycles of many multicellular organisms [36]. There are eight major classes of plant hormones: auxin, ABA, gibberellin, ethylene, cytokinin, brassinosteroid, salicylic acid, and strigolactone. While each class performs specific functions, hormones regulate development in conjunction with one or more hormones of other classes [37, 38]. Of the DEGs identified in this study, 19 were phytohormone-related genes up- or down-regulated by CHR729 (S4 Table). These genes encoded proteins that were involved in auxin, ABA, cytokinin, gibberellin, and ethylene functions. These results suggest that CHR729 affects different plant tissues throughout development through its influence on several different phytohormone pathways.

In general, seed dormancy and germination are regulated by the antagonistic actions of ABA and GA. ABA induces and maintains the dormant seed state [39, 40], whereas GA negatively regulates dormancy by releasing coat-mediated seed dormancy and promoting or permitting seed germination [41]. Ethylene acts in concert with GA to promote seed germination, and can counteract the effects of ABA in seed germination [42]. Seed germination is thus a highly complex process that requires concerted interactions between ABA, ethylene, GA, and possibly other hormones. More research is needed to further elucidate the multiple roles of hormones in seed germination. The t483 mutant exhibited late germination and a low rate of germination. The expression of genes related to ABA, GA, and ethylene biosynthesis was altered in the mutant, as was signaling gene expression (S4 Table). Endogenous GA levels and levels of bioactive GA₃ were lower in the t483 mutant than in WT (Fig 6). Addition of exogenous GA₃ in the t483 line rescued the late seed germination phenotype (Fig 7A), but a similar effect was not seen with added ethylene (data not shown). This suggests that the t483 mutant is defective in GA biosynthesis and that late seed germination may be caused by the reduction in endogenous GA. As GA can regulate ethylene biosynthesis and the response to ethylene, it is possible that the differential expression of ethylene-related genes observed between WT and t483 might also be due to low endogenous GA levels [43]. The t483 mutant line thus constitutes a valuable genetic resource as not only can it be used to investigate the mechanisms underlying control of seed germination by phytohormones, but it can also be used to examine CHD3-mediated control of seed germination via the phytohormone pathway.

GA plays a key role in the regulation of plant growth and development, and many GA biosynthetic, catabolic, and signaling proteins have been identified [44]. While GAs are primarily known as growth-promoting hormones, they can also function as negative regulators. For example, bioactive GA in rice positively regulates seed germination and root elongation [41], but negatively regulates tillering through the Homeobox 1 and Teosinte branched1 pathway [45–47]. GA also negatively controls adventitious root development [48]. The t483 mutant displayed GA deficiency phenotypes such as short roots, dwarfism, and late seed germination (Figs 1 and 2). Endogenous GA assays in WT and t483 lines showed most of the 13-OH GAs to be present in both WT and t483. GA levels were lower in t483 compared to WT, but the bioactive GA₁ was not detected in either WT or t483. Although this differed from a previous report, in which GA₁ was detected in rice seedlings in the vegetative stage [49], the conflicting results might be a consequence of different sample timings. Here, treatment with exogenous GA₃ rescued most of the phenotypic effects seen in the mutant (Fig 7 and S1 Fig). GA deficiency generally causes thick culms; however, tiller number was reduced in t483. It is possible that the CHR729-controlled genes that are involved in tillering control do not act antagonistically to the GA pathway.

GA20ox is a key enzyme that catalyzes the penultimate steps in bioactive GA synthesis from GA₅₃/GA₁₂ to GA₂₀/GA₉. Rice contains four GA20ox-like genes. GA20ox2, also named SD-1 (semi-dwarfing gene), is known as the rice “green revolution gene” due to the dramatic yield increases (and semi-dwarfism) seen in sd-1 lines [50]. A second gene, GA20ox1, also affects plant stature, and its overexpression results in tall plants and a GA-overproduction phenotype [51]. GA20ox3 contributes to disease resistance as well as to plant stature [52]. The function of GA20ox4 remained unclear until now. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analysis performed in this study showed that GA20ox4 was upregulated in t483 compared to WT. This result was contradictory when considered in the context of the functions of the other three GA20ox genes. Specifically, higher GA20ox levels would be expected to produce a GA-overproduction phenotype, but the t483 mutant contained low GA levels and exhibited features characteristic of GA deficiency. This suggests that GA20ox4 plays a different role to the other GA20ox genes in GA metabolism.

CHR729 appeared to negatively control the OsGA20ox4 gene. Compared with WT, CHR729 expression decreased and OsGA20ox4 increased in the t483 mutant. GA₃ supplementation data were consistent with these observations (Fig 7 and S1 Fig). Previous research showed that the CHD3 protein regulated target gene expression via H3K27me3 [17]. It is possible that control of OsGA20ox4 by CHR729 may be regulated in a similar manner. Further studies will enhance our understanding of CHR729 and its regulatory mechanisms.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. GA₃ treatment in WT and t483 seedlings.

A–C, Root number (A), root length (B), and shoot length (C) in WT and t483 with or without GA₃ treatment. Measurements were taken from 12 plants at 14 DAI. Values are means ±SD. D, Expression of CHR729 in shoots and roots of WT and t483 seedlings with GA₃ treatment (at 14 DAI). Values are means ±SD of three replicates. Values annotated with the same letter are not significantly difference at P<0.01, with Fisher’s least significant difference test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes in t483.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s002

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Transcription factor genes differentially regulated in t483.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s003

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Genes in GO categories enriched from differentially expressed genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s004

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Genes putatively involved in changed phytohormone responses (auxin, abscisic acid, cytokinins, gibberellin and ethylene) in t483.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s005

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Sequences of primers used in this work.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138934.s006

(XLSX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XM LH. Performed the experiments: XM JM HZ PX JC. Analyzed the data: XM HZ PX JC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HZ YQ. Wrote the paper: XM YQ.

References

1. Ho L, Crabtree GR. Chromatin remodeling during development. Nature 2010 463:474–484. pmid:20110991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Kornberg RD. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 1974 184:868–871. pmid:4825889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nature Rev Genet 2008 9:465–476. pmid:18463664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Clapier CR, Cairns BR. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009 78:273–304. pmid:19355820
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Zhang K, Sridhar VV, Zhu J, Kapoor A, Zhu JK. Distinctive core histone post-translational modification patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2007 2:e1210. pmid:18030344
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Aasland R, Stewart AF. The chromo shadow domain, a second chromo domain in heterochromatin-binding protein 1, HP1. Nuc Acids Res 1995 23:3168–3173.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Bowen NJ, Fujita N, Kajita M, Wade PA. Mi-2/NuRD: Multiple complexes for many purposes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004 1667:52–57.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Aichinger E, Villar CB, Di Mambro R, Sabatini S, Köhler C. The CHD3 chromatin remodeler PICKLE and polycomb group proteins antagonistically regulate meristem activity in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 2011 23:1047–1060. pmid:21441433
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Murawska M, Kunert N, Vugt J, Langst G, Kremmer E, Logie C, et al. dCHD3, a novel ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler associated with sites of active transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2008 28:2745–2757. pmid:18250149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Shimono Y, Murakami H, Kawai K, Wade P, Shimokata K, Takahashi M. Mi-2β associates with BRG1 and RET finger protein at the distinct regions with transcriptional activating and repressing abilities. J Biol Chem 2003 278:51638–51645. pmid:14530259
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Srinivasan S, Armstrong J, Deuring R, Dahlsveen I, McNeill H, Tamkun J. The Drosophila trithorax group protein Kismet facilitates an early step in transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Development 2005 132:1623–1635. pmid:15728673
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Ogas J, Kaufmann S, Henderson J, Somerville C. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96:13839–13844. pmid:10570159
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Ogas J, Cheng JC, Sung ZR, Somerville C. Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science 1997 277:91–94. pmid:9204906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Hay A, Kaur H, Phillips A, Hedden P, Hake S, Tsiantis M. The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans. Curr Biol 2002 12:1557–1565. pmid:12372247
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Zhang H, Rider SD Jr, Henderson JT, Fountain M, Chuang K, Kandachar V, et al. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE promotes trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. J Biol Chem 2008 283:22637–22648. pmid:18539592
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Zhang H, Bishop B, Ringenberg W, Muir WM, Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE associates with genes enriched for trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. Plant Physiol 2012 159:418–432. pmid:22452853
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Hu Y, Liu D, Zhong X, Zhang C, Zhang Q, Zhou D. CHD3 protein recognizes and regulates methylated histone H3 lysines 4 and 27 over a subset of targets in the rice genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109:5773–5778. pmid:22451926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 1949 24:1–15. pmid:16654194
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Supplement). DNA Res 2002a 9:257–279.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 2002b 9:199–207.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Stoutjesdijk PA, Singh SP, Liu Q, Hurlstone CJ, Waterhouse PA, Green AG. hpRNA-mediated targeting of the Arabidopsis FAD2 gene gives highly efficient and stable silencing. Plant Physiol 2002 129:1723–1731. pmid:12177485
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Mao BG, Cheng ZJ, Lei CL, Xu FH, Gao SW, Ren YL, et al. Wax crystal-sparse leaf2, a rice homologue of WAX2/GL1, is involved in synthesis of leaf cuticular wax. Planta 2011
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 1994 6:271–282. pmid:7920717
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008 3:1101–1108. pmid:18546601
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Han MJ, Jung KH, Yi G, An G. Rice importin β1 gene affects pollen tube elongation. Mol Cell 2011 31:523–530.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009 25:1966–1967. pmid:19497933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Roy Stat Soc Series B-Methodol 1995 57:289–300.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Audic S, Claverie JM. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 1997 7:986–995. pmid:9331369
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Zhao C, Xu J, Chen Y, Mao C, Zhang S, Bai Y, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of OsCHR4, a rice chromatin-remodeling factor required for early chloroplast development in adaxial mesophyll. Planta 2012 236:1165–1176. pmid:22644768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Kang HG, Jeon JS, Lee S, An G. Identification of class B and class C floral organ identity genes from rice plants. Plant Mol Biol 1998 38:1021–1029. pmid:9869408
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Ju C, Yoon GM, Shemansky JM, Lin DY, Ying ZI, Chang JH, et al. CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control ethylene hormone signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109:19486–19491. pmid:23132950
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Qiao H, Shen Z, Huang SS, Schmitz RJ, Urich MA, Briggs SP, et al. Processing and subcellular trafficking of ER-tethered EIN2 control response to ethylene gas. Science 2012 338:390–393. pmid:22936567
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Wen X, Zhang C, Ji Y, Zhao Q, He W, An F, et al. Activation of ethylene signaling is mediated by nuclear translocation of the cleaved EIN2 carboxyl terminus. Cell Res 2012 22:1613–1616. pmid:23070300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Guo HW, Ecker JR. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF (EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 2003 115:667–677. pmid:14675532
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Shaked H, Avivi-Ragolsky N, Levy AA. Involvement of the Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling gene family in DNA damage response and recombination. Genetics 2006 173:985–994. pmid:16547115
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Davies PJ. The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence, and functions. Plant hormones 1995 pp1–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Vandenbussche F, Van Der Straeten D. One for all and all for one: crosstalk of multiple signals controlling the plant phenotype. J Plant Growth Regul 2007 26:178–187.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Yoo SD, Cho Y, Sheen J. Emerging connections in the ethylene signaling network. Trends Plant Sci 2009 14:270–279. pmid:19375376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Kucera B, Cohn MA, Leubner-Metzger G. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res 2005 15:281–307.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Rentzsch S, Podzimska D, Voegele A, Imbeck M, Müller K, Linkies A, et al. Dose- and tissue-specific interaction of monoterpenes with the gibberellin-mediated release of potato tuber bud dormancy, sprout growth and induction of a-amylases and b-amylases. Planta 2011 235:137–151. pmid:21858448
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Holdsworth MJ, Finch-Savage WE, Grappin P, Job D. Postgenomics dissection of seed dormancy and germination. Trends Plant Sci 2008b 13:7–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Matilla AJ, Matilla-Vázquez MA. Involvement of ethylene in seed physiology. Plant Sci 2008 175:87–97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Ogawa M, Hanada A, Yamauchi Y, Kuwahara A, Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Cell 2003 15:1591–1604. pmid:12837949
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008 59:225–251. pmid:18173378
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Li XY, Qian Q, Fu ZM, Wang YH, Xiong GS, Zeng DL, et al. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 2003 422:618–621. pmid:12687001
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 2003 33:513–520. pmid:12581309
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S. Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 2002 162:1927–1935. pmid:12524360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Lo SF, Yang SY, Chen KT, Hsing YL, Zeevaart J, Chen LJ, et al. A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. The Plant Cell 2008 20:2603–2618. pmid:18952778
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Hirose F, Inagaki N, Hanada A, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, Miyao A, et al. Cryptochrome and phytochrome cooperatively but independently reduce active gibberellin content in rice seedlings under light irradiation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 53:1570–1582. pmid:22764280
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Suzuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y, et al. Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice “green revolution gene” encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 2002 9:11–17. pmid:11939564
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Tetsuo O, Masaji K, Kiyohide K, Hitoshi Y, Motoshige K. A role of OsGA20ox1, encoding an isoform of gibberellin 20-oxidase, for regulation of plant stature in rice. Plant Mol Biol 2004 55:687–700. pmid:15604710
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Qin X, Liu JH, Zhao WS, Chen XJ, Guo ZJ, Peng YL. Gibberellin 20-Oxidase gene OsGA20ox3 regulates plant stature and disease development in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2013 26:227–239. pmid:22992000
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Ho L, Crabtree GR. Chromatin remodeling during development. Nature 2010 463:474–484. pmid:20110991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kornberg RD. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 1974 184:868–871. pmid:4825889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nature Rev Genet 2008 9:465–476. pmid:18463664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Clapier CR, Cairns BR. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009 78:273–304. pmid:19355820
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Zhang K, Sridhar VV, Zhu J, Kapoor A, Zhu JK. Distinctive core histone post-translational modification patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2007 2:e1210. pmid:18030344
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Aasland R, Stewart AF. The chromo shadow domain, a second chromo domain in heterochromatin-binding protein 1, HP1. Nuc Acids Res 1995 23:3168–3173.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Bowen NJ, Fujita N, Kajita M, Wade PA. Mi-2/NuRD: Multiple complexes for many purposes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004 1667:52–57.
View Article
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Aichinger E, Villar CB, Di Mambro R, Sabatini S, Köhler C. The CHD3 chromatin remodeler PICKLE and polycomb group proteins antagonistically regulate meristem activity in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 2011 23:1047–1060. pmid:21441433
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Murawska M, Kunert N, Vugt J, Langst G, Kremmer E, Logie C, et al. dCHD3, a novel ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler associated with sites of active transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2008 28:2745–2757. pmid:18250149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Shimono Y, Murakami H, Kawai K, Wade P, Shimokata K, Takahashi M. Mi-2β associates with BRG1 and RET finger protein at the distinct regions with transcriptional activating and repressing abilities. J Biol Chem 2003 278:51638–51645. pmid:14530259
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Srinivasan S, Armstrong J, Deuring R, Dahlsveen I, McNeill H, Tamkun J. The Drosophila trithorax group protein Kismet facilitates an early step in transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Development 2005 132:1623–1635. pmid:15728673
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Ogas J, Kaufmann S, Henderson J, Somerville C. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96:13839–13844. pmid:10570159
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Ogas J, Cheng JC, Sung ZR, Somerville C. Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science 1997 277:91–94. pmid:9204906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Hay A, Kaur H, Phillips A, Hedden P, Hake S, Tsiantis M. The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans. Curr Biol 2002 12:1557–1565. pmid:12372247
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zhang H, Rider SD Jr, Henderson JT, Fountain M, Chuang K, Kandachar V, et al. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE promotes trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. J Biol Chem 2008 283:22637–22648. pmid:18539592
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zhang H, Bishop B, Ringenberg W, Muir WM, Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE associates with genes enriched for trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. Plant Physiol 2012 159:418–432. pmid:22452853
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Hu Y, Liu D, Zhong X, Zhang C, Zhang Q, Zhou D. CHD3 protein recognizes and regulates methylated histone H3 lysines 4 and 27 over a subset of targets in the rice genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109:5773–5778. pmid:22451926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 1949 24:1–15. pmid:16654194
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] PubMed/NCBI

[70] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Supplement). DNA Res 2002a 9:257–279.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 2002b 9:199–207.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Stoutjesdijk PA, Singh SP, Liu Q, Hurlstone CJ, Waterhouse PA, Green AG. hpRNA-mediated targeting of the Arabidopsis FAD2 gene gives highly efficient and stable silencing. Plant Physiol 2002 129:1723–1731. pmid:12177485
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Mao BG, Cheng ZJ, Lei CL, Xu FH, Gao SW, Ren YL, et al. Wax crystal-sparse leaf2, a rice homologue of WAX2/GL1, is involved in synthesis of leaf cuticular wax. Planta 2011
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 1994 6:271–282. pmid:7920717
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008 3:1101–1108. pmid:18546601
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Han MJ, Jung KH, Yi G, An G. Rice importin β1 gene affects pollen tube elongation. Mol Cell 2011 31:523–530.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009 25:1966–1967. pmid:19497933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Roy Stat Soc Series B-Methodol 1995 57:289–300.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Audic S, Claverie JM. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 1997 7:986–995. pmid:9331369
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Zhao C, Xu J, Chen Y, Mao C, Zhang S, Bai Y, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of OsCHR4, a rice chromatin-remodeling factor required for early chloroplast development in adaxial mesophyll. Planta 2012 236:1165–1176. pmid:22644768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Kang HG, Jeon JS, Lee S, An G. Identification of class B and class C floral organ identity genes from rice plants. Plant Mol Biol 1998 38:1021–1029. pmid:9869408
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ju C, Yoon GM, Shemansky JM, Lin DY, Ying ZI, Chang JH, et al. CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control ethylene hormone signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109:19486–19491. pmid:23132950
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Qiao H, Shen Z, Huang SS, Schmitz RJ, Urich MA, Briggs SP, et al. Processing and subcellular trafficking of ER-tethered EIN2 control response to ethylene gas. Science 2012 338:390–393. pmid:22936567
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wen X, Zhang C, Ji Y, Zhao Q, He W, An F, et al. Activation of ethylene signaling is mediated by nuclear translocation of the cleaved EIN2 carboxyl terminus. Cell Res 2012 22:1613–1616. pmid:23070300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Guo HW, Ecker JR. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF (EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 2003 115:667–677. pmid:14675532
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Shaked H, Avivi-Ragolsky N, Levy AA. Involvement of the Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling gene family in DNA damage response and recombination. Genetics 2006 173:985–994. pmid:16547115
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Davies PJ. The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence, and functions. Plant hormones 1995 pp1–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Vandenbussche F, Van Der Straeten D. One for all and all for one: crosstalk of multiple signals controlling the plant phenotype. J Plant Growth Regul 2007 26:178–187.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Yoo SD, Cho Y, Sheen J. Emerging connections in the ethylene signaling network. Trends Plant Sci 2009 14:270–279. pmid:19375376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Kucera B, Cohn MA, Leubner-Metzger G. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res 2005 15:281–307.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Rentzsch S, Podzimska D, Voegele A, Imbeck M, Müller K, Linkies A, et al. Dose- and tissue-specific interaction of monoterpenes with the gibberellin-mediated release of potato tuber bud dormancy, sprout growth and induction of a-amylases and b-amylases. Planta 2011 235:137–151. pmid:21858448
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Holdsworth MJ, Finch-Savage WE, Grappin P, Job D. Postgenomics dissection of seed dormancy and germination. Trends Plant Sci 2008b 13:7–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Matilla AJ, Matilla-Vázquez MA. Involvement of ethylene in seed physiology. Plant Sci 2008 175:87–97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Ogawa M, Hanada A, Yamauchi Y, Kuwahara A, Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Cell 2003 15:1591–1604. pmid:12837949
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008 59:225–251. pmid:18173378
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Li XY, Qian Q, Fu ZM, Wang YH, Xiong GS, Zeng DL, et al. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 2003 422:618–621. pmid:12687001
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 2003 33:513–520. pmid:12581309
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S. Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 2002 162:1927–1935. pmid:12524360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Lo SF, Yang SY, Chen KT, Hsing YL, Zeevaart J, Chen LJ, et al. A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. The Plant Cell 2008 20:2603–2618. pmid:18952778
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Hirose F, Inagaki N, Hanada A, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, Miyao A, et al. Cryptochrome and phytochrome cooperatively but independently reduce active gibberellin content in rice seedlings under light irradiation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 53:1570–1582. pmid:22764280
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Suzuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y, et al. Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice “green revolution gene” encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 2002 9:11–17. pmid:11939564
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Tetsuo O, Masaji K, Kiyohide K, Hitoshi Y, Motoshige K. A role of OsGA20ox1, encoding an isoform of gibberellin 20-oxidase, for regulation of plant stature in rice. Plant Mol Biol 2004 55:687–700. pmid:15604710
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Qin X, Liu JH, Zhao WS, Chen XJ, Guo ZJ, Peng YL. Gibberellin 20-Oxidase gene OsGA20ox3 regulates plant stature and disease development in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2013 26:227–239. pmid:22992000
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Chlorophyll content measurement and transmission electron microscopy analysis

Map-based cloning of the mutated gene in t483

Generation of transgenic rice plants

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Subcellular localization of CHR729

RNA-sequencing

Determination of endogenous GAs levels

Results

Phenotypic characterization of the rice t483 mutant

Map-based cloning of the mutated gene in t483

CHR729 is ubiquitously expressed and encodes a nuclear protein

Expression of genes putatively related to phytohormone function is altered in the t483 mutant

Responses of the t483 mutant to gibberellins

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. GA3 treatment in WT and t483 seedlings.

S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes in t483.

S2 Table. Transcription factor genes differentially regulated in t483.

S3 Table. Genes in GO categories enriched from differentially expressed genes.

S4 Table. Genes putatively involved in changed phytohormone responses (auxin, abscisic acid, cytokinins, gibberellin and ethylene) in t483.

S5 Table. Sequences of primers used in this work.

Author Contributions

References

S1 Fig. GA₃ treatment in WT and t483 seedlings.