Evaluation for all CNS-related disorders

We evaluated the possibility to predict gene–phenotype associations based on 13,204 HBA-derived 3D gene expression profiles from the human brain using a large-scale leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV; see Methods) over all CNS-related Mendelian disorders from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database [22] (see Text S1) and compared the results to those previously obtained for the MBA [18].

As in our previous study, we prioritized a list of candidate genes taken from “artificial” orphan loci of various sizes centered around the true phenotype-causing gene and verified how often was ranked first (), among the top ten (), and among the upper 10% () of the candidates. For this purpose, the 3D gene expression profiles of the candidates were compared to those of a set of disease-related reference genes (see Methods).

As can be seen in Table S2, the procedure yielded for all sizes of artificial loci a significantly higher number of positive results than expected by chance, suggesting that spatial gene expression data from the HBA can be an important source of information to predict novel gene–phenotype associations. The HBA expression profiles perform similarly to those of the MBA, in some cases even better. This may seem obvious, given that we consider human disorders, but it is less clear when taking into account that the mouse 3D expression profiles cover the entire brain and have a far higher-resolution than the preliminary human data and that the two brain atlases are based on completely different technologies (ISH vs. microarray).

Better results are obtained when taking the known molecular basis of the disorders as reference (simulating phenotypes with partially known molecular basis), instead of relying on reference genes from similar OMIM phenotypes (to simulate phenotypes with unknown molecular basis; see Text S1). Nonetheless, the results obtained when simulating an unknown molecular basis are highly significant and suggest that the method can be used also for phenotypes to which so far no disease genes have been associated.

Complementarity of HBA and GEO data

Since the HBA is based on microarray technology, in contrast to the MBA that uses ISH, we asked how the disease gene prioritization method performs using ‘traditional’ microarray data from multiple individuals. For this purpose we compiled a dataset of 453 normal brain samples for 19,946 genes from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [23].

The GEO dataset performs better than the HBA data (see Table S2). This is likely due to the greater number of genes for which expression profiles are available. Nonetheless, given the different nature of the two datasets the positive predictions derived from both have only a limited overlap (no overlap for and less than 30% for both and ; see Table S3). This suggests that the 3D gene expression data–spatially distributed samples from a single individual–provides information that is complementary to that provided by ‘traditional’ expression data–arbitrarily distributed samples from many individuals. Also the fact that different microarray platforms have been used for the two datasets is likely to play a role [24].

Consequently, some cases can be successfully predicted when relying on spatial expression information while others using ‘traditional’ expression data. We therefore suggest that while the best candidates are those derived from an intersection of the prioritizations from the two data sources, those candidates obtained from only one of the datasets should still be taken into consideration. Although the GEO dataset performs generally better, it cannot replace the HBA predictions.

Evaluation for FEB and GEFS+

The effectiveness of our approach for CNS-related disease phenotypes in general does not necessarily imply that it can be successfully used for FEB and GEFS+ in particular. Febrile seizures are age-dependent and occur in immature brains of infants and young children. It is therefore imperative to specifically evaluate whether in this case expression data from the adult brain, that shows important differences in gene expression patterns, can aid in prioritizing candidate genes.

In order to verify the performance of our approach for the specific case of FEB and GEFS+, we performed an LOOCV taking into account only the reference genes listed in Table 1, found to be associated with FEB and GEFS+ in OMIM and/or the literature. From this list, we excluded MASS1 ( GPR98) that was suggested by Nakayama et al [25] to be the disease gene for the FEB4 locus because the gene had been reported to be involved in audiogenic seizures in the Frings mouse strain [26], [27] and they found a nonsense mutation in a small family with febrile and afebrile seizures. However, the cosegregation of the mutation with the seizure phenotype was not unambiguous due to the small family size. Moreover, another linkage study has mapped FEB/GEFS+ to an overlapping (although larger) locus, but did not find disease-causing mutations in the exons of MASS1 (or VLGR1 that includes most MASS1 exons), suggesting that another gene may be underlying the FEB4 locus [28]. Due to this uncertainty, we chose to consider this linkage interval as an additional orphan locus (see Table 2) and MASS1 as a candidate, rather than a disease gene.

As for the large-scale LOOCV performed over all CNS-related disorders, we constructed artificial loci of various sizes centered around each of the FEB or GEFS+ genes and took the remaining five genes as reference genes for the prioritization.

Table 3 demonstrates that in most of the prioritizations the true FEB/GEFS+ gene is ranked among the top ten and/or the best 10% of the candidates from the artificial locus. Most important, four of the six genes ( GABRD, GABRG2, SCN1B, and SCN2A) rank in at least one of the two datasets among the first three candidates for artificial loci of similar sizes ( = 50) as the orphan loci (between 12 and 112 genes, see Table 2). Even for far larger loci of up to 401 candidates ( = 200) half of the disease genes have , suggesting that the method may be particularly effective for FEB and GEFS+.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 3. Leave-one-out cross-validation of known FEB and GEFS+ genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023149.t003

Although, as for the large-scale LOOCV, the GEO expression data generally performs better, in some cases the rankings obtained with the HBA data are better. Interestingly, this is the case for SCN9A that does not show a particularly strong relationship with the other reference genes, but whose involvement in FEB/GEFS+ is significantly better recalled when applying spatially mapped expression profiles.

Prediction for orphan FEB and GEFS+ loci

Given the good performance of our prioritization procedure, as demonstrated by the CNS-related and the GEFS+/FEB-specific LOOCVs, we processed all orphan disease loci (see Table 2) to find the most promising candidates for an involvement in FEB or GEFS+ susceptibility using only the known disease genes (Table 1) as reference genes.

Since we found the HBA and GEO expression data to be complementary for the purpose of disease gene prediction for CNS-related disorders, in Table 4 we report for all orphan loci the best ranking candidate for each of the two data sources, as well as the candidate that has the best average relative rank (average of ) over both datasets. For the complete prioritized candidate lists that contain further interesting candidates, please see Table S4.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 4. Prediction results for orphan FEB and GEFS+ loci.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023149.t004

Strikingly, for most of the orphan loci, the results obtained with HBA and GEO data support each other. Indeed, in the large majority of cases, the first ranking candidate of one data source often obtained a high rank also for the other data source and vice versa, so that one of the two first ranking candidates (from HBA or GEO) remains the best candidate also on average. Only for four of the thirteen loci (FEB2, both FEB4 loci, and FEB5) the best average candidate did not rank first for HBA or GEO. Most important, for several of the loci (FEB6, GEFS+4, GEFS+6, and GEFS+N), both spatially mapped and traditional expression data agree upon the best candidate. This result is especially remarkable for the GEFS+N locus, being the third largest orphan locus with a total of 89 candidates (see Table 2).

FEB1

The first FEB locus was mapped by Wallace et al [29] in a large Australian family spanning three generations. Results supported a hypothesis of autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance, i.e. conditional upon the involvement of other modifier loci or environmental factors.

Wallace et al [29] have proposed corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) as one of the most interesting candidates of this locus. Indeed, in our prioritizations, CRH ranks 4th for the HBA expression data and 2nd for GEO, as well as 2nd with respect to the average relative rank over both datasets (see Table S4). CRH is known to be involved in an age-dependent manner in seizures in rat models [30], [31] and its activation is thought to be an important mechanism for generating developmentally regulated, triggered seizures [32]. Notably, some studies support a region-specific regulation of CRH gene expression by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Tran et al [33], for example, showed that the GABA degradation blocker gamma-vinyl-GABA (VGB) that is used for clinical seizure treatment causes a reduction of both CRH gene expression and secretion in the hypothalamus of 9-day-old rats. Finally, an excess in CRH has been hypothesized to underlie West syndrome, in which seizures during infancy play an important role [34], and CRH has been found to play a role in the increased susceptibility to seizures in shigellosis [35].

Taken together, CRH is a likely candidate for this locus, and a mutation that causes an increase in CRH levels or activity would be consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance. Our two first ranking candidates ARFGEF1 and VCPIP1, instead, have so far not been implicated in seizures or epileptic disorders, but their coexpression with the reference genes in the human brain suggests a potential functional relationship.

FEB2

Johnson et al [14] mapped the FEB2 locus in a large multi-generational family with an autosomal dominant inheritance of febrile convulsions.

A potentially interesting candidate for the largest FEB/GEFS+ orphan locus is the ATCAY gene, which has been found mutated in human Cayman ataxia [36] and in a form of rat dystonia [37]. This gene ranks 5th for the HBA expression data and 3rd for GEO, as well as 4th with respect to the average relative rank over both datasets (see Table S4). ATCAY encodes for BNIP-H or Caytaxin, a brain-specific member of the BNIP-2 family that reduces the steady-state levels of glutamate by inhibiting kidney-type glutaminase (KGA) enzyme activity, affecting glutamate synthesis at synapses during neurotransmission [38]. Loss of function of ATCAY may lead to deregulated glutamatergic activation or even to glutamate excitotoxicity [38]. Hence, we propose that a mutation of the ATCAY gene may potentially lead to an imbalance between excitation and inhibition that increases the susceptibility to seizures.

The coexpression of BRUNOL5, or CELF5, with the reference genes is also intriguing. Indeed, this gene encodes for a brain-specific splicing factor (although its function is likely not limited to the regulation of alternative splicing) [39] that may in theory affect the splicing of other genes related to FEB/GEFS+.

FEB4

We have considered two different linkage intervals for FEB4, since Deprez et al [28] mapped a locus that overlapped the one first identified by Nakayama et al [40], who had suggested MASS1 ( GPR98) as the disease causing gene [25]. The evidence, however, was not conclusive and Deprez et al [28] did not find any disease-causing mutations in the exons of MASS1 (see above), so that we considered it as a regular candidate.

In our prioritization for the original FEB4 locus, GPR98 ranks 16th and 20th for HBA and GEO expression data, respectively. In the larger locus identified by Deprez et al [28] the ranks are even less suggestive (31st for HBA and 39th for GEO, see Table S4). Hence, at least with respect to expression profiles in the human brain, as compared to those of the reference genes, MASS1 does not seem to be a particularly strong candidate. Of course this result does not imply that this gene is not involved, as we do not expect all disease genes to be revealed by a coexpression-based approach. Its involvement in audiogenic seizures in the Frings mouse strain [26], [27] remains a strong argument for a possible implication in FEB/GEFS+.

However, among the other candidates found in these overlapping loci, we think that the peptidylglycine -amidating monooxygenase ( PAM) gene is a particularly promising alternative. Indeed, although PAM is not a very strong candidate with the HBA dataset, it is the top scoring candidate in both intervals with the GEO dataset. The protein encoded by the PAM gene is a cuproenzyme essential for the synthesis of many neuropeptides [41]. Finally, and quite remarkably, it has recently been shown that mice heterozygous for a null mutation in the PAM gene are more susceptible to chemically induced seizures [42]. Taken together, these evidences point to PAM as a very strong candidate for FEB4.

But also GLRX and C5orf13 are potentially interesting candidates. Glutaredoxin (thioltransferase), or GLRX, regulates the activity of the copper-transporting P-type ATPases ATP7A and ATP7B [43] that are involved in Menkes disease (OMIM: #309400) and Wilson disease (OMIM: #277900), respectively. Since epilepsy is a major feature of Menkes disease [44], [45], and seizures occur at low frequency in patients affected by Wilson disease [46], [47], it is conceivable that reduced function of GLRX may lead to increased neuronal excitability. On the other hand, C5orf13 (also PTZ17 or P311) lies outside of the original FEB4 locus but might be a candidate for the larger locus reported by Deprez et al [28], since it was identified as differentially expressed after inducing seizures in mice [48]. However, no seizures were reported in C5orf13 knockout mice [49].

FEB5

Nabbout et al [15] suggested that the locus mapping to 6q22-q24 was the first locus identified for pure simple febrile seizures, the most frequent form of FEB. They excluded the implication of several candidate genes, such as syntaxin 7 ( STX7), A kinase anchor protein 7 ( AKAP7, also AKAP18), putative neurotransmitter receptor ( PNR), G protein receptor 58 ( GPR58) and G protein receptor 57 ( GPR57) by sequencing their coding exons and exon–intron boundaries.

According to our analysis, AKAP7 is one of the best candidates, ranking 1st for the HBA. AKAP7, that is expressed among other tissues in the cerebral cortex, targets the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) to the plasma membrane, permitting its functional coupling with L-type calcium channels [50]. These voltage-gated channels control a variety of neuronal functions that are implicated in epileptogenesis [51]. It is in principle possible that the affected family members studied by Nabbout et al [15] are carriers of a mutation that effects regulatory elements or other essential non-coding residues of AKAP7. Hence, we suggest not to exclude the possibility that a mutation in AKAP7 is the true cause for the FEB5 locus.

FEB6

The haplotype analysis performed by Nakayama et al [52] indicated a possible role for the IMPA2 gene, which is located in the FEB6 locus. Moreover, Nabbout et al [53] have found a locus on chromosome 18p to contain a modifier gene who's cosegregation with the FEB9 locus on 3p (see FEB9) is associated with more severe disorders like childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) and TLE, but is likely to also contribute to febrile seizures per se [53], suggesting that the modifier locus could actually be the FEB6 locus. Thus, they sequenced the IMPA2 gene as most likely candidate, but found no disease-causing mutations. In our analysis, IMPA2 has no significant rankings (5th out of 11 for HBA and 8th out of 12 for GEO expression data). However, neither the lack of mutations in [53] nor our negative result represent sufficient evidence to exclude this candidate.

The best candidate identified by our approach is the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein gamma ( NAPG) that ranks first with both the HBA and the GEO datasets. The encoded protein belongs to the SNAP family, a group of factors involved in membrane fusion events by allowing NSF proteins to target membranes. Accordingly, the NAPG protein has been shown to mediate platelet exocytosis and to control the membrane fusion events of this process [54]. Although the gene has never been studied in a neuronal context, genetic studies suggest that it could play an important role in neurons, because a possible involvement in bipolar disorders has been detected by several independent reports [55]–[57].

FEB7

The orphan FEB7 locus was mapped by Hedera et al [58] in a five-generation family with autosomal dominant febrile seizures. Of 13 individuals affected by FEB, three showed coexisting afebrile seizures. The authors sequenced all exons of four ion-channel genes–the potassium channel genes KCNE1, KCNE2 and KCNJ6 and the intracellular chloride channel gene CLIC6–but did not identify any disease-causing mutations. Three of these candidates ( KCNE1, KCNE2 and CLIC6) have no HBA expression profiles available, but rankings obtained with the GEO dataset are rather low (37th, 26th and 36th out of 54, respectively). KCNJ6, however, was ranked 1st for the HBA expression data and 2nd for GEO. As for AKAP7 and FEB5, a mutation in a regulatory element or in another essential non-coding region should not be excluded.

On the other hand, even the TIAM1 gene, that ranks first with the GEO dataset, could be an interesting candidate, because studies conducted in rodents have shown that the encoded protein plays a role in axonogenesis [59], in neuronal migration [60] and in the formation of dendritic spines [61].

FEB9

Nabbout et al [53] mapped the FEB9 locus in a large French family with febrile seizures but also CAE and TLE that were largely associated with an additional modifier locus on chromosome 18p (see FEB6). The authors have sequenced the coding exons, exon-intron boundaries and translation start sites of six potential candidates of the FEB9 locus without finding disease-causing mutations. Of these, the SCL4A7 gene encoding the sodium bicarbonate cotransporter NBC3 scored best in our prioritizations (3rd for HBA, 10th for GEO and 5th for its average relative rank).

The two candidates that rank first for HBA and GEO data, respectively, are difficult to link to FEB or GEFS+.

However, GPD1L, which ranks 5th for HBA, 3rd for GEO, and 3rd with respect to its average relative rank, encodes the glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase 1-like protein, an enzyme that may modify heart excitability by regulating the activity of the sodium channel SCN5A through PKC-dependent phosphorylation [62]. SCN5A itself was one of the candidates sequenced by Nabbout et al [53] (although it lies for about 5-Mb outside of the FEB9 locus), but had no causal mutations. It is in principle thinkable that GPD1L instead may be responsible for the phenotype through its capability to regulate the activity of SCN5A or other sodium channels in the brain, some of which have already been implicated in FEB/GEFS+ (see Table 1).

FEB10

Dai et al [63] mapped the FEB10 locus in a four-generation Chinese family with autosomal dominant febrile seizures and epilepsy. By mutational analysis, they have excluded the two potassium channel genes KCNMB2 and KCNMB3, none of which ranks among the top five in our analysis (average relative rank over HBA and GEO).

The strongest candidates identified by our analysis are AADACL1 and PIK3CA that rank very favorably with both datasets. The involvement of the first gene is not supported by other evidences, because AADACL1, also known as NCHE1 (neutral cholesterol ester hydrolase 1), has never been studied in a neuronal context. On the other hand, PIK3CA, the p110 alpha subunit of PI3K, which is known mostly for its role in growth factor-activated signaling and for its oncogenic potential, has recently been shown to negatively regulate neuronal excitability [64]. In addition, levels of phosphorylated (inactive) FOXO, a product of PI3K/Akt activity, are strongly modulated in experimental models of epilepsy and in the hippocampi of epileptic patients [65]. Finally, it has been recently observed that application of leptin, a known PI3K activator, inhibits seizures in rats in a PI3K-dependent manner [66]. Thus, it is conceivable that mutations leading to reduced PI3K activity might be a cause of increased neuronal excitability, possibly leading to febrile seizures.

GEFS+4

Audenaert et al [67] have suggested that KCNS3 (voltage gated potassium channel, subfamily S, member 3) is one of the most attractive candidate genes in the GEFS+4 locus, since it encodes a subunit of the voltage-gated potassium channel of the delayed rectifier type and is abundantly expressed in the brain [68]. We find this gene ranking 3rd for HBA and 6th for GEO (5th with respect to its average relative rank), but given the small locus size, these ranks cannot be deemed as very significant.

According to our prioritization, we propose VSNL1 (also VILIP-1) as a potential alternative candidate. Indeed, besides ranking first for both the HBA and the GEO dataset, this gene may be strongly involved in regulating neuronal excitability. VSNL1 is a member of the visinin/recoverin subfamily of neuronal calcium sensor proteins [69]. Interestingly, it has been recently found that VSNL1 may lead to the upregulation of functional 42 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) in hippocampal neurons [70]. This observation could be very important, because a dysfunction of the 42 nAChR has been previously implicated in frontal lobe epilepsy [71]. Therefore, a mutation that should result in increased function of VSNL1 would be predicted to produce increased neuronal excitability.

GEFS+6

The locus for GEFS+6 was mapped by Baulac et al [72] in two independent French families. More precisely, the largest family (family 15173) showed a linkage to a 13-Mb interval between markers D8S1706 and D8S258 (chr8:6,840,747-20,367,401), but since a second family showed a linkage to an overlapping region, the authors assumed that in both families the same gene was affected and hence narrowed to region down to a 7.3-Mb candidate interval (chr8:6,940,747-15,649,945).

However, it is in principle possible that the genetic causes are distinct for the two families and hence we have performed the prioritization for both intervals. The results of these prioritizations are in good agreement, since the top three genes (with respect to average relative rank) for the narrow locus– LOC157627, MTMR9, PRAGMIN–rank 2nd, 4th, and 3rd for family 15173, respectively (see Table S4). LOC157627 is the best ranking gene for GEO in both the narrowed and the larger locus. EFHA2, although lying for about 1.2-Mb outside of the narrowed GEFS+6 locus, has particularly good rankings for the locus of family 15173 (1st for HBA, 2nd for GEO, and 1st regarding the average relative rank) and might thus be taken as an additional interesting candidate.

Baulac et al [72] have sequenced the coding exons of six candidates– MTMR9, MTMR7, CTSB, SGCZ, SG223 ( PRAGMIN), and ATP6V1B–according to their expression in the brain and putative function, but all identified variants were either known polymorphisms or found in 100 matched French controls. Two of these candidates are suggested as interesting by our analysis: MTMR9 and PRAGMIN (see Table S4). Their rankings for the larger locus of family 15173 are less suggestive, but still good. It is in principle possible that mutations in their regulatory elements or other essential non-coding regions are causative for GEFS+. Therefore, we suggest not to exclude them from further studies.

GEFS+N

Not having found an official denomination, we called this locus “GEFS+N” (where N stands for ‘novel’). The locus contains no known genes associated with ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors, therefore Poduri et al [73] suggest that the identification of the responsible gene may lead to novel insight into the mechanisms of febrile seizures and inherited epilepsy. This makes our prediction results for this locus particularly interesting, but also more difficult to interpret, since a coexpression with known disease genes (reference genes) is more likely if a candidate is involved in a similar function.

Of the 16 candidates sequenced and excluded by Poduri et al [73], KPNA5 obtained the highest average relative rank in our prioritization (9th for HBA, 11th for GEO, 7th with respect to the average relative rank).

The TSPYL1 and TSPYL4 genes come out as outstanding candidates from our analysis. Indeed, they are found as the first and second ranking genes, respectively, for both the HBA and GEO dataset; a very strong result if considering that the locus contains a total of 89 candidates. The two genes are closely related members of the Nucleosome Assembly Protein (NAP) family. Both genes have been investigated as candidates for a genetic syndrome characterized by sudden infant death from cardiac and respiratory arrest, associated with dysgenesis of the testes, and null mutations have been found in TSPYL1 [74]. However, the molecular mechanism leading to this phenotype is not understood. Therefore, we think that it would be very interesting to evaluate both genes for mutations in GEFS+N. Moreover, it could be worth addressing whether increased or decreased function of these genes may affect the electrical behavior of excitable cells, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes. These studies could contribute to elucidating the mechanisms underlying both febrile seizures and sudden death syndrome.

Conclusions

In this study, we have shown that the preliminary Human Brain Atlas (HBA), although not yet complete, is already a powerful tool for disease gene prediction and provides results that are complementary to those obtained from a traditional microarray dataset.

Despite the fact that the HBA and GEO gene expression data represent mostly the adult brain and not the immature brain, an application to FEB/GEFS+ seemed particularly promising, given that, in an LOOCV with artificial loci of approximately the same size as the largest FEB or GEFS+ orphan loci, four out of six known disease genes ranked among the first three candidates for at least one of the two human brain gene expression atlases. This allowed us to propose several strong candidates for the true orphan loci and to discuss their possible involvement in FEB/GEFS+. Several of them would be excellent candidates for mutation screenings, however also high ranking candidates that are less obviously related to neuronal excitability should not be excluded from further analysis. In fact, the purpose and strength of computational approaches like the one presented here is to potentially uncover so far unknown and non obvious functional relationships.

Spatial human brain gene-expression data

We downloaded the spatial gene-expression data of the Human Brain Atlas (HBA) from [21] on 20 July 2010, but used only the most recent experiment for each tissue ID, resulting in a total of 798 tissue samples. After normalization with the “Agi4x44PreProcess” Bioconductor R package, we mapped the probesets of the custom Agilent 8x60 Whole Human Genome array (that is derived from the standard Agilent 4x44 Whole Human Genome array) to Entrez gene IDs via the RefSeq RNA nucleotide accessions reported in the downloaded data files. We considered only unique mappings to Entrez IDs and averaged expression profiles of genes with multiple probesets, obtaining expression profiles for a total of 13,204 genes.

Traditional microarray expression data

For comparison with the spatially mapped gene expression data we compiled a microarray dataset from GEO [23], containing 453 samples of normal human brain tissue (excluding tumor samples or other diseases) performed on a standard Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 chip. We chose the Affymetrix platform over the Agilent 4x44 because for the latter only four normal brain samples were available. A list of the GEO accessions of all samples can be found in Table S1. We normalized the dataset with the Affymetrix MAS5.0 algorithm and mapped probeset IDs to Entrez IDs using the official Affymetrix annotation (na30), but accepted only probesets with unique Entrez IDs (19,946 genes). For genes with multiple probesets, we used averaged expression profiles.

Candidate gene prioritization

The evaluation and prioritization of positional candidates was performed as in our previous study. The following is a brief summary of the procedure, for a more detailed description, please see [18].

First, a set of ‘reference genes’ is defined as the genes that are involved in the given phenotype or in similar phenotypes (see Text S1). Then, for each reference gene, all other genes are ranked in a genome-wide coexpression list according to their decreasing Pearson correlation coefficient with the reference gene.

The relative ranks of the positional candidates within these reference coexpression lists are determined (i.e. the ranks divided by the number of genes in the lists) and overall scores for the single candidates are determined as the product of their relative ranks.

Finally, positional candidates are sorted, i.e. prioritized, according to their increasing overall scores, since lower scores indicate a higher correlation with the reference genes and thus a higher probability of being functionally related to (and hence more likely involved in) the given phenotype.

Leave-one-out

We performed large-scale LOOCVs over all CNS-related Mendelian disorders for both the spatially mapped expression data from the HBA and the GEO dataset. For each known gene–disease association, we constructed an artificial locus comprising the disease gene itself and the closest genes on both sides of the chromosome (for , , , and ), hence containing at the most genes. Then, we prioritized the candidates from the artificial loci and verified the absolute rank () and relative rank (number of candidates) of the true disease gene within the prioritized candidate list. For more details, please see Supporting Text S1.

Candidate gene lists

To identify candidate genes (in terms of Entrez gene IDs) residing between or at the markers flanking the mapped linkage intervals, reported in the respective publications (see Table 2), we used the UCSC Genome Browser [75].