BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressors in neural crest cells are essential for craniofacial bone development

Kohei Kitami; Megumi Kitami; Masaru Kaku; Bin Wang; Yoshihiro Komatsu

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340

Abstract

Craniofacial abnormalities, including facial skeletal defects, comprise approximately one-third of all birth defects in humans. Since most bones in the face derive from cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), which are multipotent stem cells, craniofacial bone disorders are largely attributed to defects in CNCCs. However, it remains unclear how the niche of CNCCs is coordinated by multiple gene regulatory networks essential for craniofacial bone development. Here we report that tumor suppressors breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) are required for craniofacial bone development in mice. Disruption of Brca1 in CNCC-derived mesenchymal cells, but not in epithelial-derived cells, resulted in craniofacial skeletal defects. Whereas osteogenic differentiation was normal, both osteogenic proliferation and survival were severely attenuated in Brca1 mutants. Brca1-deficient craniofacial skeletogenic precursors displayed increased DNA damage and enhanced cell apoptosis. Importantly, the craniofacial skeletal defects were sufficiently rescued by superimposing p53 null alleles in a neural crest-specific manner in vivo, indicating that BRCA1 deficiency induced DNA damage, cell apoptosis, and that the pathogenesis of craniofacial bone defects can be compensated by inactivation of p53. Mice lacking Brca2 in CNCCs, but not in epithelial-derived cells, also displayed abnormalities resembling the craniofacial skeletal malformations observed in Brca1 mutants. Our data shed light on the importance of BRCA1/BRCA2 function in CNCCs during craniofacial skeletal formation.

Author summary

Craniofacial abnormalities, including facial skeletal defects, comprise approximately one-third of all birth defects in humans. Since most bones in the face derive from neural crest cells, which are multipotent stem cells, craniofacial bone disorders are largely attributed to defects in neural crest cells. However, it remains unclear how the niche of neural crest cells is coordinated by multiple gene regulatory networks essential for craniofacial bone development. Here, we show that tumor suppressor breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) are required for craniofacial bone development in mice. Our data shed light on the importance of the DNA damage response/repair machinery in neural crest cells via BRCA1/BRCA2, providing novel insights into the mechanisms of craniofacial bone development.

Citation: Kitami K, Kitami M, Kaku M, Wang B, Komatsu Y (2018) BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressors in neural crest cells are essential for craniofacial bone development. PLoS Genet 14(5): e1007340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340

Editor: Paul A. Trainor, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, UNITED STATES

Received: July 17, 2017; Accepted: March 28, 2018; Published: May 2, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Kitami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the NIDCR/NIH R01DE025897 (YK). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Abnormal growth of the facial bones causes congenital craniofacial malformations [1]. Because most bones in the face derive from multipotent stem cells designated cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs) [2, 3], craniofacial bone disorders are largely attributed to defects in CNCCs [4, 5]. Importantly, several bone-related diseases affect craniofacial bones, but not other bones, despite the fact that the genes involved in these diseases are expressed throughout the body [6]. This suggests that CNCCs have distinct mechanisms to regulate craniofacial bone development. Therefore, clarifying the role of CNCCs in craniofacial bone development is essential for understanding the etiology of facial bone anomalies.

Prior studies have shown that mutations in several DNA damage response proteins lead to defects in craniofacial skeletal development [7, 8]. For example, patients with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, which is caused by a mutation in NBS1, a molecule critical for the initial processing of DNA strand breaks, display small lower jaws [9]. Also, Fanconi anemia, a disease frequently associated with congenital craniofacial bone anomalies, results from a genetic defect in a cluster of genes responsible for DNA repair [10, 11]. However, it remains elusive whether DNA damage repair mechanisms in CNCCs contribute to normal craniofacial bone formation.

The tumor suppressor genes breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) are key players in DNA damage response and homologous recombination (HR), which are critical for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks to maintain the fidelity of the genome. Mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 lead to genetic instability and frequently cause familial breast and ovarian cancers [12]. While little is known about how these tumor suppressor genes affect craniofacial development, a recent study has shown that non-syndromic cleft lip and palate, one of the most common human craniofacial deformities, are associated with dysregulation of the gene regulatory network via BRCA1 [13]. Since germline mutations in DNA repair genes have been linked to congenital defects [8], it is tempting to hypothesize that the BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent DNA damage and repair machinery is critical for the prevention of craniofacial abnormalities. Therefore, it is important to understand how BRCA1/BRCA2 function in CNCCs during craniofacial development.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the multipotent cell population of CNCCs. We found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are required for skeletogenic cell proliferation and survival in CNCC-derived bones, highlighting the essentiality of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 for craniofacial skeletal development.

Results

Disruption of Brca1 in neural crest cells leads to craniofacial malformations in mice

To characterize the function of BRCA1 in craniofacial development, we disrupted Brca1 in a neural crest-specific manner using a wingless-related MMTV integration site1 (Wnt1)-Cre driver line [14, 15]. Mice lacking Brca1 in neural crests showed craniofacial abnormalities (Brca1:Wnt1-Cre hereafter) (Fig 1A). While Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice were born at Mendelian ratios (S1 Table), they could not survive more than twenty-four hours, most likely due to the cleft palate phenotype (data to be published elsewhere). Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice displayed small heads with 100% phenotypic penetrance (Fig 1A). Skeletal staining revealed that the CNCC-derived facial bones were hypoplastic in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos (Fig 1B). The size of the maxillary and mandibular bones was small, and the nasal-frontal bones and membranous bones on the skull base were defective in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice. These results thus suggest that BRCA1 is responsible for orchestrating the formation of CNCC-derived facial bones.

Download:

Fig 1. Neural crest cell-specific Brca1 deletion causes craniofacial bone abnormalities in mice.

(A) Lateral views of control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice at birth (NB). Scale bar = 5mm. (B) Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice at birth. Yellow broken lines indicate osteogenic fronts. Note that the frontal bones of Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice are separated by a large open space. Scale bar = 2mm. as, alisphenoid; bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; eo, exoccipital; fb, frontal bone; ib, interparietal bone; jb, jugal bone; md, mandible; mx, maxilla; nb, nasal bone; p, palatine; pb, parietal bone; pmx, premaxilla; ppmx, palatal process of maxilla; ppp, palatal process of palatine; ptg, pterygoid; tr, tympanic ring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.g001

Because epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are also critical for craniofacial morphogenesis [1], we disrupted Brca1 in an epithelial cell-specific manner using a Keratin14 (K14)-Cre driver line [16]. The epithelial cell-specific deletion of Brca1 did not result in any overt craniofacial abnormality (S1 Fig). Together, these results indicate that BRCA1 is indispensable for facial development in ectomesenchymal cells, but not in epithelial cells. In this study, we further examined the function of BRCA1 in craniofacial bones, especially focusing on CNCC-derived skull bones.

Brca1 is required for osteogenic proliferation and survival in the frontal bone primordium

CNCC-derived osteogenic precursors migrate from the dorsal neural tube to the supraorbital ridge, and ectomesenchymal cells start to condense at embryonic day (E) 12.5 [17, 18]. Therefore, we asked whether the skull malformations in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice can be attributed to the lack of early osteogenic condensation at E12.5. To investigate the pathogenesis of skull defects in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice, we examined the expression of RUNX2, an early marker of osteogenic precursors [19, 20]. While osteogenic precursors were well induced in both control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants, osteogenic proliferation was reduced in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre skulls at E12.5 and E13.5 (Fig 2A). Additionally, a large amount of apoptotic cells was observed in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre skulls (Fig 2B, arrows). At late-gestation at E16.5, however, CNCC-derived osteoblasts in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos showed normal cell proliferation and survival at levels comparable to the controls (S2 Fig). These results indicate that the defects seen in the frontal bones in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos are due to the decreased osteogenic cell population in the frontal bone primordium.

Download:

Fig 2. Brca1 is indispensable for osteoblast proliferation and survival at mid-gestation.

(A) Coronal sections of control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre frontal bone primordia at E12.5 and E13.5 were double-labeled with RUNX2 (red) and BrdU (green) to detect osteogenic cells and proliferative cells, respectively. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Right charts show quantification of the ratio of BrdU-positive cells over RUNX2-positive cells. Scale bar = 50μm. (B) Immunostaining for RUNX2 and TUNEL assay of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. Yellow color represents the non-specific signal from red blood cells. Scale bar = 100μm. (C) Immunostaining for γ-H2AX and Cleaved Caspase-3 and/or p-Chk2 of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate γ-H2AX- and/or Cleaved Caspase-3-positive cells. Scale bar = 100μm. (D) Quantification of the percentage of γ-H2AX-, Cleaved Caspase3- and TUNEL-positive cells in the frontal bone primordium. Data in A and D are represented as mean ±SD, n = 3 in each group. *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.g002

Because cell death in premigratory CNCCs frequently leads to craniofacial bone abnormalities [21], we tested whether there is increased cell death in premigratory CNCCs in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants. We performed TUNEL assay in control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutant embryos at E8.5. As a result, no excess of apoptosis occurred in Brca1 mutant embryos (S3A Fig), suggesting that Brca1 does not play a major role in the survival of premigratory CNCCs. In addition, CNCC migration also appeared to occur normally in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutant embryos indicated by normal Sox10 expression pattern at E9.5 (S3B Fig). Thus, BRCA1 is less likely to play a critical role in premigratory CNCCs. Interestingly, previous studies showed that Brca1 is highly expressed only from mid- to late- gestations in the facial tissues [22, 23], suggesting that BRCA1 may become critical after post-migration of CNCCs for the onset of craniofacial bone development. We examined whether BRCA1 is produced in CNCC-derived skeletogenic precursors at E12.5, the stage when CNCC-derived osteogenic precursors start to form [17, 18]. Our results showed that BRCA1 was abundantly produced in craniofacial skeletogenic precursors in control embryos, while its production was completely abolished in Brca1 mutants (S4 Fig). Together, these results demonstrate that BRCA1 is critical for the early onset of craniofacial skeletogenesis, but not for premigratory CNCCs.

Increased DNA damage in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos

It has been reported that DNA damage in neuroepithelial cells can induce cell death, leading to craniofacial bone deformities [24]. Because BRCA1 functions in DNA damage repair [12], one might predict that the underlying etiology of skull abnormalities is DNA damage-induced apoptosis in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos. To address this hypothesis, we examined whether there is increased DNA damage in craniofacial skeletogenic precursors in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos. We carried out immunofluorescence using antibodies against γ-H2AX, a marker of unrepaired DNA damage [25], in skulls from the embryos. Compared to the control, skulls from Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos showed increased numbers of γ-H2AX-stained skeletogenic precursor cells that are co-labeled with Cleaved Caspase-3 (Fig 2C, arrows). The portion of nuclei of skeletogenic precursor cells stained positive for phosphorylated-Chk2, a checkpoint kinase that is phosphorylated upon DNA damage and activation of central DNA damage kinase ATM, also increased (Fig 2C and 2D), indicating increased DNA damage-induced check point response. These data indicate that BRCA1 plays an important role in osteogenic proliferation and survival by suppressing DNA damage at the early stages of osteogenesis.

We also investigated whether BRCA1 plays a role in osteogenic differentiation. CNCC-derived skull tissues were harvested, and the expression levels of osteogenic genes were examined. The majority of the osteogenic genes tested, including Runx2, Sp7 and Ibsp, were expressed normally in control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos (S5A Fig). Furthermore, Brca1-disrupted preosteoblasts from CNCC-derived skulls were capable to differentiate and mineralize in vitro (S5B Fig). Thus, Brca1 is dispensable for osteogenic differentiation.

Deletion of p53 partially rescues the skull defects in Brca1 mutant mice by decreasing DNA damage and preventing cell death

It has been reported that DNA damage triggers p53 stabilization, and if the damage is extensive or cannot be repaired, it induces apoptosis [26]. Therefore, we hypothesized that p53-mediated apoptosis may cause the craniofacial bone defects seen in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos. Supporting this hypothesis, the protein levels of p53 were much higher in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants than in controls (Fig 3A), suggesting that DNA damage-induced p53 stabilization may be responsible for the pathogenesis of Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice. To test this possibility in vivo, we superimposed null alleles of p53 into Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants in a neural crest-specific manner [27]. Consistent with our prediction, the p53 deletion partially rescued the craniofacial bone defects in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants (Fig 3B). Importantly, two copies of the p53 deletion alleles were able to rescue the skull defects more efficiently than one copy in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos (Fig 3B and 3C). While there was no significant difference in head width in all genotypes, sagittal skull length was also rescued along with the recovery of maxilla and mandibular bones (Fig 3D–3F).

Download:

Fig 3. The Brca1-p53 interaction is critical for craniofacial bone morphogenesis.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of facial region tissue from E13.5 embryos. Each sample is from individual embryos. Right chart shows quantification of p53 relative production level. (B) Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control, Brca1^-/-:Wnt1-Cre, Brca1^-/-:p53^+/-:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre mice at birth. Yellow broken lines indicate osteogenic fronts. Scale bar = 2mm. (C) Quantification of the area ratio of frontal foramen in the frontal bone area. White box represents the mean of each genotype. (D) Quantification of sagittal length. (E) Quantification of skull width. (F) Measurement schema of C, D and E. The shaded area surrounded by the red line is the measured frontal area in C. Sagittal length was divided into anterior and posterior part at the estimated anterior fontanelle (yellow). Data in A, D and E are represented as mean ±SD, n = 3 in A and n = 10 in C, D and E in each group. *P<0.05. N.S., not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.g003

We found that the p53 deletion did not have an effect on the dysregulation of cell proliferation (Fig 4A), but sufficiently suppressed the enhanced cell death in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos (Fig 4B). The suppression of cell death in rescued mice was linked to reduced number of γ-H2AX-stained cells co-labeled with either Cleaved Caspase-3 or phosphorylated-Chk2 (Fig 4C). Thus, reduction of p53 in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre predominantly rescues the phenotype through decreasing DNA damage-induced cell death, but not through increasing osteogenic cell proliferation. We also examined whether p53 cell cycle regulation is involved in rescuing the defects of Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos. Since p53 regulates cell cycle through regulation of p21 [28], we analyzed p21 expression in Brca1 mutants and rescued embryos. The expression levels of p21 were comparable among controls, Brca1 mutants and p53^-/- superimposed Brca1 mutants (S6 Fig). This indicates that p21 regulation was not affected and that the cell cycle checkpoint regulation through the p53-p21 axis did not play a major role in its function in Brca1 mutants. Taken together, these data demonstrate that BRCA1 deficiency-induced pathogenesis of craniofacial bone defects can be partially rescued by inactivation of p53 through reducing DNA damage-induced cell death.

Download:

Fig 4. Deletion of p53 partially rescues the skull defects by preventing cell death.

(A) Coronal sections of control, Brca1^-/-:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre frontal bone primordia at E12.5 were double-labeled with RUNX2 (red) and BrdU (green). Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Right charts show quantification of the ratio of BrdU-positive cells over RUNX2-positive cells. Scale bar = 50μm. (B) Immunostaining for RUNX2 and TUNEL assay of sections from control, Brca1^-/-:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. Yellow color represents the non-specific signal from red blood cells. Right chart shows quantification of the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the frontal bone primordium. (C) Immunostaining for γ-H2AX and Cleaved Caspase-3 and/or p-Chk2 of sections from control, Brca1^-/-:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate double-positive cells for γ-H2AX/Cleaved Caspase-3 and/or γ-H2AX/p-Chk2. Right chart shows quantification of the percentage of γ-H2AX, Cleaved Caspase-3 and p-Chk2 positive cells in the frontal bone primordium. Scale bar = 100μm. Data in A, B and C are represented as mean ±SD, n = 3 in each group. *P<0.05. N.S., not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.g004

BRCA2 is required for craniofacial skeletal development

BRCA2, the second major hereditary breast cancer susceptibility factor, is also critical for maintaining genome integrity [8]. While BRCA1 has multiple functions in the repair process of DNA damage, BRCA2 appears to be mainly involved in HR [29].

To examine the role of BRCA2 in CNCCs, we disrupted Brca2 in an epithelial- and/or ectomesenchymal-cell specific manner in mice [30]. While the epithelial-specific deletion of Brca2 did not induce any overt craniofacial malformation (S7 Fig), mice lacking Brca2 in CNCCs (hereafter Brca2:Wnt1-Cre) exhibited craniofacial bone defects resembling those of Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice (Fig 5A). CNCC-derived craniofacial bones, including the frontal-nasal and maxilla-mandibular bones, were severely compromised (Fig 5A). The ratio of defective frontal bone area and sagittal length in the skull was measured (Fig 5B and 5C). Similar to Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice, CNCC-derived osteoblasts from Brca2:Wnt1-Cre embryos differentiated normally (S8 Fig). On the other hand, both osteogenic proliferation and cell survival were severely attenuated in Brca2:Wnt1-Cre (Fig 5D and 5E). With the strong phenotypic similarities in both Brca1:Wnt1-Cre and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre mutants, we conclude that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are critical for craniofacial skeletal development.

Download:

Fig 5. Neural crest cell-specific Brca2 deletion results in a craniofacial bone phenotype similar to that of the neural crest cell-specific Brca1 deletion in mice.

(A) Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre mice at birth. Yellow broken lines indicate osteogenic fronts. Scale bar = 2mm. (B) Quantification of the area ratio of frontal foramen in the frontal bone area. White box represents the mean of each genotype. (C) Quantification of sagittal length. (D) Coronal sections of control and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre frontal bone primordia at E12.5 and E13.5 were double-labeled with RUNX2 (red) and BrdU (green). Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Right charts show quantification of the ratio of BrdU-positive cells over RUNX2-positive cells. Scale bar = 50μm. (E) Immunostaining for RUNX2 and TUNEL assay of sections from control and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. Yellow color represents the non-specific signal from red blood cells. Scale bar = 100μm. as, alisphenoid; bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; eo, exoccipital; fb, frontal bone; ib, interparietal bone; jb, jugal bone; md, mandible; mx, maxilla; nb, nasal bone; p, palatine; pb, parietal bone; pmx, premaxilla; ppmx, palatal process of maxilla; ppp, palatal process of palatine; ptg, pterygoid; tr, tympanic ring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.g005

Discussion

The etiology of craniofacial bone abnormalities is very complex. Alteration of transcriptional regulation, developmental signals, or epigenetic factors has been considered to cause facial bone defects. However, much still remains unknown about the regulation of craniofacial bone development. BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumor suppressor proteins play important roles in DNA damage response and repair, maintenance of genome stability and tumor suppression. In this report, we found a novel connection between the etiology of craniofacial skeletal defects and the BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent DNA damage response. Our data indicate that maintaining genomic stability through BRCA1/BRCA2 may be one of the key elements to prevent craniofacial bone abnormalities.

The DNA damage repair machinery is critical for the onset of craniofacial bone development

BRCA1 has a central role in DNA damage response and tumor suppression [31], but its function in craniofacial bone development is not known. Conventional disruption of Brca1 in mice results in embryonic lethality due to increased cell death and/or restricted proliferation in neuroepithelial cells [32–34], and mice lacking Brca1 in neural stem cells display severe brain defects [35, 36]. These data indicate that BRCA1 may have a specific role in neuroepithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Our findings support this notion that BRCA1 is critical for the neuroepithelial lineage cells, i.e. CNCC-derivatives. Our data showed that Brca1 disruption in CNCCs causes decreased proliferation and increased cell death at mid gestation (Fig 2), but not at the maturation stages of craniofacial osteogenesis (S2 Fig). Thus, BRCA1 is likely required for early onset of craniofacial skeletogenesis.

Similar to our Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice, treacle ribosome biogenesis factor 1 (Tcof1) haploinsufficiency leads to augmentation of p53 production, and genetic suppression of p53 in Tcof1 mutant mice rescues the craniofacial bone abnormalities [37]. Of note, Tcof1 haploinsufficiency results in neuroepithelial cell death, and loss of Tcof1 diminishes the accumulation of BRCA1 at DNA damage sites, providing a potential link between TCOF1 and BRCA1 in the DNA damage response [24]. It remains to be determined whether TCOF1 and BRCA1 genetically interact in craniofacial bone formation and whether TCOF1 is involved in the regulation of BRCA1.

BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent DNA damage repair is essential for craniofacial bone development

Deficiencies in the DNA response and repair mechanism often lead to genome instability associated with cancer predisposition. Whereas the importance of BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent DNA damage response and repair in tumorigenesis is well known, it is unclear how the BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent pathway functions in multiple developmental aspects, especially during craniofacial formation. The main function of BRCA2 is to load Rad51 recombinase to single-stranded DNA to facilitate HR, while BRCA1 has been implicated in multiple aspects of cellular response in addition to its role in regulating HR. We found that Brca2:Wnt1-Cre mutants have craniofacial bone defects almost identical to those observed in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mutants (Fig 1, Fig 2 and Fig 5), suggesting that BRCA1- and BRCA2-dependent HR function is likely to be involved in regulating craniofacial bone development. It is possible that CNCCs encounter internal or external genetic insults that can result in DNA damage in early embryonic development during craniofacial bone formation. Indeed, it has been shown that oxidative stress increases during this time of the development process, which may lead to increased DNA damage [24]. Therefore, BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent HR is likely to be essential to ensure proper CNCC proliferation. Recently, it also has been shown that BRCA1/BRCA2 play an important role in protecting stalled replication fork stability in order to maintain genome integrity [12]. It is also possible that rapid CNCC proliferation during craniofacial bone formation may generate replication stress; BRCA1/BRCA2 are required to protect the replication fork's integrity, and their deficiency leads to increased DNA damage. Given the essential role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in embryonic development, the Wnt1-Cre deletion of Brca1 or Brca2 resulted in relatively mild craniofacial phenotypes. It remains to be seen whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 function redundantly during neural crest cell development and their differentiation into skeletogenic derivatives. Generating a Brca1- and Brca2-double deficiency in CNCCs may facilitate the understanding of the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in craniofacial bone development. Nevertheless, although the importance of BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent function in tumorigenesis is widely recognized, our data show, for the first time, the robust requirement of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in craniofacial bone development.

In summary, we demonstrate the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in CNCCs and highlight the importance of BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent function in DNA damage response and repair for proper craniofacial bone development.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The guidelines for this study were issued by the Center for Laboratory Animal Medicine and Care (CLAMC). The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Texas Medical School at Houston under approval number AWC-15-0152.

Animals

Brca1-floxed mice [14], Brca2-floxed mice [30], p53-floxed mice [27], Wnt1-Cre mice [15], and K14-Cre mice [16] were obtained from NCI/NIH and The Jackson Laboratory. All mice were maintained in the animal facility of The University of Texas Medical School at Houston. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Texas Medical School at Houston.

Genotyping analysis

The DNA from mouse embryos was analyzed by PCR. The sequences of each primers were listed (S2 Table). The conditions for genotyping PCR were 94°C for 20 sec, 65°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 20 sec, repeated 40 cycles. Genotyping for Brca1, PCR reaction yielded 450 bp for wild-type or 500 bp for Brca1 floxed DNA fragment. Genotyping for Brca2, PCR reaction yielded 298 bp for wild-type or 376 bp for Brca2 floxed DNA fragment. Genotyping for p53, PCR reaction yielded 270 bp for wild-type or 390 bp for p53 floxed DNA fragment. For genotyping of Cre, PCR reaction yielded 169 bp for Cre gene.

Skeletal preparations and histological analysis

Staining of bone and cartilage of embryos with Alizarin red/Alcian blue was carried out as described previously [38]. An Olympus SZX16 microscope equipped with a DP71 digital camera was used for capturing images. The length and area ratio of the frontal foramina were measured by ImageJ. Immunofluorescent staining, and TUNEL assays of paraffin sections were performed as previously described [38]. Pregnant females were injected intraperitoneally with BrdU (Invitrogen, BrdU labeling reagent; 1 mL/100 g body weight) and sacrificed 2 hours later. Primary antibodies used in immunofluorescence staining were as follows: RUNX2 (1:400, Cell Signaling; no. 12556), Ki-67 (1:100, BD Biosciences; 550609), Cleaved Caspase-3 (1:400, Cell Signaling; 9664), γ-H2AX (1:200, Millipore; 05–636). Slides were viewed with an Olympus FluoView FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope using the software FV10-ASW Viewer (version 3.1).

Isolation of primary osteoblasts

Cranial preosteoblasts were established from E18.5 embryos as described previously [38]. The frontal bones were subjected to five sequential digestions with an enzyme mixture containing 1 mg/mL collagenase type I (Sigma-Aldrich; C0130) and 1 mg/mL collagenase type II (Sigma-Aldrich; C6885). Cell fractions (from two to five of the sequential digestions) were collected. Preosteoblasts were grown in α-MEM medium (Sigma-Aldrich; M8042) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS (Sigma-Aldrich; F4135), 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich; P4333), and 4 mM glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich; G7513). Osteogenic differentiation was induced using culture medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich; A-4403) and 2 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich; G-9891).

Western blot analysis

Facial tissues were homogenized using protein lysis buffers. After centrifugation, the supernatants were separated by SDS/PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane, and analyzed with specific antibodies. The antibodies used were as follows: GAPDH (1:2000, Cell Signaling; 2118), p53 (1:2000, Santa Cruz; sc-6243). The Clarity Max ECL Substrate (Bio-rad) was used for chemiluminescent detection, and signals were quantified with Image Lab Version 5.0 (Bio-Rad).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), total RNA was extracted from the frontal bones of control, Brca1:Wnt1-Cre and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E17.5. The total RNA was treated with DNase I (Roche) before cDNA synthesis. Total RNA from the cultured osteoblasts was purified using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (BioRad). Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) using CFX Connect System (Bio-Rad). The conditions for qRT-PCR were 95°C for 2 min, 95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, repeated 40 cycles. The sequences of each primers were listed below (Table 1). Data were normalized to GAPDH and quantified by 2^−∆∆CT method.

Download:

Table 1. Primer sequences for Quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.t001

Statistical analysis

The Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca1:K14-Cre mice at birth.

Scale bar = 2mm. bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; fb, frontal bone; ib, interparietal bone; jb, jugal bone; md, mandible; mx, maxilla; nb, nasal bone; p, palatine; pb, parietal bone; ppp, palatal process of palatine; ptg, pterygoid; tr, tympanic ring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig.

(A) Double immunostaining for RUNX2 (red) and Ki-67 (green) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E16.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Right chart show quantification of the ratio of Ki-67-positive cells over RUNX2-positive cells. Scale bar = 100μm. (B) TUNEL assay of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E16.5. Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. White arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. Right chart show quantification of the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the frontal bone primordium. Scale bar = 100μm. Data in A and B are represented as mean ±SD, n = 3 in each group. N.S., not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig.

(A) Whole mount TUNEL assay in control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E8.5. Scale bar = 100μm. (B) Expression analysis of Sox10 by whole mount in situ hybridization in control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E9.5. Scale bar = 1mm in left panel and 250μm in right panel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Immunostaining for BRCA1 (green) and RUNX2 (red) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5.

Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Scale bar = 100μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig.

(A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers in control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre frontal bones at E17.5. (B) Bone nodules are stained with Alizarin red for primary osteoblasts derived from frontal bone culturing 1 week (1W) and 2 weeks (2W) and quantified (n = 3). Data in A and B are represented as mean ±SD, n = 3 in each group. N.S., not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Immunostaining for p21 (green) and RUNX2 (red) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5.

Broken line describes the osteogenic lineage cell population. Dental tissues served as positive controls for p21 since p21 was highly produced in the dental epithelium (green, right panel). Scale bar = 100 μm for skull tissues, 20 μm for dental tissue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca2:K14-Cre mice at birth.

Scale bar = 2mm. as, alisphenoid; bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; fb, frontal bone; ib, interparietal bone; jb, jugal bone; md, mandible; mx, maxilla; nb, nasal bone; p, palatine; pb, parietal bone; pmx, premaxilla; ppmx, palatal process of maxilla; ppp, palatal process of palatine; ptg, pterygoid; tr, tympanic ring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers in control and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre frontal bones at E17.5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s008

(TIF)

S1 Table. Genotype analysis of Brca1 and Brca2 mutant mice.

Brca1:Wnt1-Cre mice and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre mice were born at Mendelian ratios but they could not survive more than twenty-four hours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s009

(TIF)

S2 Table. Genotype analysis of Brca1, Brca2 and p53 mutant mice.

The sequences of each primers were listed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007340.s010

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Chu-Xia Deng for the Brca1-floxed mice and Brca2-floxed mice; Dr. Anton Berns for the p53-floxed mice; Dr. Andrew P. McMahon for the Wnt1-Cre mice; and K14-Cre mice and Dr. Jingling Shen for skeletal staining of Brca1:K14-Cre mice. We thank Patricia Fonseca for editorial assistance.

References

1. Chai Y, Maxson RE Jr. Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2006;235(9):2353–75. Epub 2006/05/09. pmid:16680722.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. Journal of anatomy. 2005;207(5):637–53. Epub 2005/11/30. pmid:16313397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1571561.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y, Bringas P Jr., Han J, Rowitch DH, et al. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development. 2000;127(8):1671–9. Epub 2000/03/22. pmid:10725243.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Noden DM, Trainor PA. Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations. Journal of anatomy. 2005;207(5):575–601. Epub 2005/11/30. pmid:16313393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1571569.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Bronner ME, LeDouarin NM. Development and evolution of the neural crest: an overview. Dev Biol. 2012;366(1):2–9. pmid:22230617; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3351559.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Zhao H, Chai Y. Stem Cells in Teeth and Craniofacial Bones. J Dent Res. 2015;94(11):1495–501. Epub 2015/09/10. pmid:26350960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4622324.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Katyal S, McKinnon PJ. DNA repair deficiency and neurodegeneration. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(19):2360–5. pmid:17700067.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. McKinnon PJ, Caldecott KW. DNA strand break repair and human genetic disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:37–55. pmid:17887919.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kobayashi J, Antoccia A, Tauchi H, Matsuura S, Komatsu K. NBS1 and its functional role in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3(8–9):855–61. pmid:15279770.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Dong H, Nebert DW, Bruford EA, Thompson DC, Joenje H, Vasiliou V. Update of the human and mouse Fanconi anemia genes. Hum Genomics. 2015;9:32. pmid:26596371; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4657327.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Krasnoshtein F, Buchwald M. Developmental expression of the Fac gene correlates with congenital defects in Fanconi anemia patients. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5(1):85–93. Epub 1996/01/01. pmid:8789444.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Prakash R, Zhang Y, Feng W, Jasin M. Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(4):a016600. pmid:25833843; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4382744.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Kobayashi GS, Alvizi L, Sunaga DY, Francis-West P, Kuta A, Almada BV, et al. Susceptibility to DNA damage as a molecular mechanism for non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65677. pmid:23776525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3680497.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Xu X, Wagner KU, Larson D, Weaver Z, Li C, Ried T, et al. Conditional mutation of Brca1 in mammary epithelial cells results in blunted ductal morphogenesis and tumour formation. Nat Genet. 1999;22(1):37–43. Epub 1999/05/13. pmid:10319859.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Danielian PS, Muccino D, Rowitch DH, Michael SK, McMahon AP. Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase. Current biology: CB. 1998;8(24):1323–6. Epub 1998/12/09. pmid:9843687.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Dassule HR, Lewis P, Bei M, Maas R, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development. 2000;127(22):4775–85. Epub 2000/10/25. pmid:11044393.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Ishii M, Merrill AE, Chan YS, Gitelman I, Rice DP, Sucov HM, et al. Msx2 and Twist cooperatively control the development of the neural crest-derived skeletogenic mesenchyme of the murine skull vault. Development. 2003;130(24):6131–42. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14597577.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay GM. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol. 2002;241(1):106–16. pmid:11784098.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997;89(5):747–54. Epub 1997/05/30. pmid:9182762.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89(5):755–64. Epub 1997/05/30. pmid:9182763.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Dixon J, Jones NC, Sandell LL, Jayasinghe SM, Crane J, Rey JP, et al. Tcof1/Treacle is required for neural crest cell formation and proliferation deficiencies that cause craniofacial abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(36):13403–8. pmid:16938878; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1557391.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Lane TF, Deng C, Elson A, Lyu MS, Kozak CA, Leder P. Expression of Brca1 is associated with terminal differentiation of ectodermally and mesodermally derived tissues in mice. Genes & development. 1995;9(21):2712–22. Epub 1995/11/01. pmid:7590247.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Rajan JV, Marquis ST, Gardner HP, Chodosh LA. Developmental expression of Brca2 colocalizes with Brca1 and is associated with proliferation and differentiation in multiple tissues. Dev Biol. 1997;184(2):385–401. Epub 1997/04/15. pmid:9133444.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Sakai D, Dixon J, Achilleos A, Dixon M, Trainor PA. Prevention of Treacher Collins syndrome craniofacial anomalies in mouse models via maternal antioxidant supplementation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10328. pmid:26792133; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4735750.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Kuo LJ, Yang LX. Gamma-H2AX—a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2008;22(3):305–9. Epub 2008/07/10. pmid:18610740.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, Levine A. Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(5):402–12. pmid:18431400.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Marino S, Vooijs M, van Der Gulden H, Jonkers J, Berns A. Induction of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum. Genes & development. 2000;14(8):994–1004. Epub 2000/04/27. pmid:10783170; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC316543.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Dulic V, Kaufmann WK, Wilson SJ, Tlsty TD, Lees E, Harper JW, et al. p53-dependent inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activities in human fibroblasts during radiation-induced G1 arrest. Cell. 1994;76(6):1013–23. Epub 1994/03/25. pmid:8137420.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Stark JM, Pierce AJ, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24(21):9305–16. pmid:15485900; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC522275.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Jonkers J, Meuwissen R, van der Gulden H, Peterse H, van der Valk M, Berns A. Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):418–25. pmid:11694875.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer suppression by the chromosome custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science (New York, NY). 2014;343(6178):1470–5. Epub 2014/03/29. pmid:24675954.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Hakem R, de la Pompa JL, Sirard C, Mo R, Woo M, Hakem A, et al. The tumor suppressor gene Brca1 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Cell. 1996;85(7):1009–23. Epub 1996/06/28. pmid:8674108.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Xu X, Qiao W, Linke SP, Cao L, Li WM, Furth PA, et al. Genetic interactions between tumor suppressors Brca1 and p53 in apoptosis, cell cycle and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2001;28(3):266–71. Epub 2001/06/30. pmid:11431698.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Gowen LC, Johnson BL, Latour AM, Sulik KK, Koller BH. Brca1 deficiency results in early embryonic lethality characterized by neuroepithelial abnormalities. Nat Genet. 1996;12(2):191–4. Epub 1996/02/01. pmid:8563759.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Pulvers JN, Huttner WB. Brca1 is required for embryonic development of the mouse cerebral cortex to normal size by preventing apoptosis of early neural progenitors. Development. 2009;136(11):1859–68. Epub 2009/05/01. pmid:19403657.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Pao GM, Zhu Q, Perez-Garcia CG, Chou SJ, Suh H, Gage FH, et al. Role of BRCA1 in brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(13):E1240–8. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24639535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3977248.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Jones NC, Lynn ML, Gaudenz K, Sakai D, Aoto K, Rey JP, et al. Prevention of the neurocristopathy Treacher Collins syndrome through inhibition of p53 function. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):125–33. pmid:18246078; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3093709.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Noda K, Kitami M, Kitami K, Kaku M, Komatsu Y. Canonical and noncanonical intraflagellar transport regulates craniofacial skeletal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(19):E2589–97. pmid:27118846; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4868419.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Chai Y, Maxson RE Jr. Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2006;235(9):2353–75. Epub 2006/05/09. pmid:16680722.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. Journal of anatomy. 2005;207(5):637–53. Epub 2005/11/30. pmid:16313397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1571561.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y, Bringas P Jr., Han J, Rowitch DH, et al. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development. 2000;127(8):1671–9. Epub 2000/03/22. pmid:10725243.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Noden DM, Trainor PA. Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations. Journal of anatomy. 2005;207(5):575–601. Epub 2005/11/30. pmid:16313393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1571569.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Bronner ME, LeDouarin NM. Development and evolution of the neural crest: an overview. Dev Biol. 2012;366(1):2–9. pmid:22230617; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3351559.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Zhao H, Chai Y. Stem Cells in Teeth and Craniofacial Bones. J Dent Res. 2015;94(11):1495–501. Epub 2015/09/10. pmid:26350960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4622324.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Katyal S, McKinnon PJ. DNA repair deficiency and neurodegeneration. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(19):2360–5. pmid:17700067.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. McKinnon PJ, Caldecott KW. DNA strand break repair and human genetic disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:37–55. pmid:17887919.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kobayashi J, Antoccia A, Tauchi H, Matsuura S, Komatsu K. NBS1 and its functional role in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3(8–9):855–61. pmid:15279770.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Dong H, Nebert DW, Bruford EA, Thompson DC, Joenje H, Vasiliou V. Update of the human and mouse Fanconi anemia genes. Hum Genomics. 2015;9:32. pmid:26596371; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4657327.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Krasnoshtein F, Buchwald M. Developmental expression of the Fac gene correlates with congenital defects in Fanconi anemia patients. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5(1):85–93. Epub 1996/01/01. pmid:8789444.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Prakash R, Zhang Y, Feng W, Jasin M. Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(4):a016600. pmid:25833843; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4382744.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Kobayashi GS, Alvizi L, Sunaga DY, Francis-West P, Kuta A, Almada BV, et al. Susceptibility to DNA damage as a molecular mechanism for non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65677. pmid:23776525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3680497.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Xu X, Wagner KU, Larson D, Weaver Z, Li C, Ried T, et al. Conditional mutation of Brca1 in mammary epithelial cells results in blunted ductal morphogenesis and tumour formation. Nat Genet. 1999;22(1):37–43. Epub 1999/05/13. pmid:10319859.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Danielian PS, Muccino D, Rowitch DH, Michael SK, McMahon AP. Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase. Current biology: CB. 1998;8(24):1323–6. Epub 1998/12/09. pmid:9843687.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Dassule HR, Lewis P, Bei M, Maas R, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development. 2000;127(22):4775–85. Epub 2000/10/25. pmid:11044393.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Ishii M, Merrill AE, Chan YS, Gitelman I, Rice DP, Sucov HM, et al. Msx2 and Twist cooperatively control the development of the neural crest-derived skeletogenic mesenchyme of the murine skull vault. Development. 2003;130(24):6131–42. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14597577.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay GM. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol. 2002;241(1):106–16. pmid:11784098.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997;89(5):747–54. Epub 1997/05/30. pmid:9182762.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89(5):755–64. Epub 1997/05/30. pmid:9182763.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Dixon J, Jones NC, Sandell LL, Jayasinghe SM, Crane J, Rey JP, et al. Tcof1/Treacle is required for neural crest cell formation and proliferation deficiencies that cause craniofacial abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(36):13403–8. pmid:16938878; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1557391.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lane TF, Deng C, Elson A, Lyu MS, Kozak CA, Leder P. Expression of Brca1 is associated with terminal differentiation of ectodermally and mesodermally derived tissues in mice. Genes & development. 1995;9(21):2712–22. Epub 1995/11/01. pmid:7590247.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Rajan JV, Marquis ST, Gardner HP, Chodosh LA. Developmental expression of Brca2 colocalizes with Brca1 and is associated with proliferation and differentiation in multiple tissues. Dev Biol. 1997;184(2):385–401. Epub 1997/04/15. pmid:9133444.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Sakai D, Dixon J, Achilleos A, Dixon M, Trainor PA. Prevention of Treacher Collins syndrome craniofacial anomalies in mouse models via maternal antioxidant supplementation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10328. pmid:26792133; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4735750.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Kuo LJ, Yang LX. Gamma-H2AX—a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2008;22(3):305–9. Epub 2008/07/10. pmid:18610740.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, Levine A. Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(5):402–12. pmid:18431400.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Marino S, Vooijs M, van Der Gulden H, Jonkers J, Berns A. Induction of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum. Genes & development. 2000;14(8):994–1004. Epub 2000/04/27. pmid:10783170; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC316543.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Dulic V, Kaufmann WK, Wilson SJ, Tlsty TD, Lees E, Harper JW, et al. p53-dependent inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activities in human fibroblasts during radiation-induced G1 arrest. Cell. 1994;76(6):1013–23. Epub 1994/03/25. pmid:8137420.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Stark JM, Pierce AJ, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24(21):9305–16. pmid:15485900; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC522275.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Jonkers J, Meuwissen R, van der Gulden H, Peterse H, van der Valk M, Berns A. Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):418–25. pmid:11694875.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer suppression by the chromosome custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science (New York, NY). 2014;343(6178):1470–5. Epub 2014/03/29. pmid:24675954.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hakem R, de la Pompa JL, Sirard C, Mo R, Woo M, Hakem A, et al. The tumor suppressor gene Brca1 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Cell. 1996;85(7):1009–23. Epub 1996/06/28. pmid:8674108.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Xu X, Qiao W, Linke SP, Cao L, Li WM, Furth PA, et al. Genetic interactions between tumor suppressors Brca1 and p53 in apoptosis, cell cycle and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2001;28(3):266–71. Epub 2001/06/30. pmid:11431698.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Gowen LC, Johnson BL, Latour AM, Sulik KK, Koller BH. Brca1 deficiency results in early embryonic lethality characterized by neuroepithelial abnormalities. Nat Genet. 1996;12(2):191–4. Epub 1996/02/01. pmid:8563759.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Pulvers JN, Huttner WB. Brca1 is required for embryonic development of the mouse cerebral cortex to normal size by preventing apoptosis of early neural progenitors. Development. 2009;136(11):1859–68. Epub 2009/05/01. pmid:19403657.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Pao GM, Zhu Q, Perez-Garcia CG, Chou SJ, Suh H, Gage FH, et al. Role of BRCA1 in brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(13):E1240–8. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24639535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3977248.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Jones NC, Lynn ML, Gaudenz K, Sakai D, Aoto K, Rey JP, et al. Prevention of the neurocristopathy Treacher Collins syndrome through inhibition of p53 function. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):125–33. pmid:18246078; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3093709.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Noda K, Kitami M, Kitami K, Kaku M, Komatsu Y. Canonical and noncanonical intraflagellar transport regulates craniofacial skeletal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(19):E2589–97. pmid:27118846; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4868419.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Results

Disruption of Brca1 in neural crest cells leads to craniofacial malformations in mice

Brca1 is required for osteogenic proliferation and survival in the frontal bone primordium

Increased DNA damage in Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos

Deletion of p53 partially rescues the skull defects in Brca1 mutant mice by decreasing DNA damage and preventing cell death

BRCA2 is required for craniofacial skeletal development

Discussion

The DNA damage repair machinery is critical for the onset of craniofacial bone development

BRCA1/BRCA2-dependent DNA damage repair is essential for craniofacial bone development

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Animals

Genotyping analysis

Skeletal preparations and histological analysis

Isolation of primary osteoblasts

Western blot analysis

Quantitative RT-PCR

Statistical analysis

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca1:K14-Cre mice at birth.

S2 Fig.

S3 Fig.

S4 Fig. Immunostaining for BRCA1 (green) and RUNX2 (red) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5.

S5 Fig.

S6 Fig. Immunostaining for p21 (green) and RUNX2 (red) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1-/-:p53-/-:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5.

S7 Fig. Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skulls of control and Brca2:K14-Cre mice at birth.

S8 Fig. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers in control and Brca2:Wnt1-Cre frontal bones at E17.5.

S1 Table. Genotype analysis of Brca1 and Brca2 mutant mice.

S2 Table. Genotype analysis of Brca1, Brca2 and p53 mutant mice.

Acknowledgments

References

S6 Fig. Immunostaining for p21 (green) and RUNX2 (red) of sections from control and Brca1:Wnt1-Cre and Brca1^-/-:p53^-/-:Wnt1-Cre embryos at E12.5.