Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Impairment of Ribosome Maturation or Function Confers Salt Resistance on Escherichia coli Cells

  • Yoichi Hase ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yoichi Hase, Takefusa Tarusawa

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan

    ⨯
  • Takefusa Tarusawa ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yoichi Hase, Takefusa Tarusawa

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan

    ⨯
  • Akira Muto,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan

    ⨯
  • Hyouta Himeno

    himeno@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp

    Affiliations Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan, RNA Research Center, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan

    ⨯

Abstract

We found that loss of integrity of the ribosome by removal of a putative ribosome maturation factor or a ribosomal protein conferred salt tolerance on Escherichia coli cells. Some protein synthesis inhibitors including kasugamycin and chloramphenicol also had a similar effect, although kasugamycin affected neither 16S rRNA maturation nor subunit association into a 70S ribosome. Thus, salt tolerance is a common feature of cells in which maturation or function of the ribosome is impaired. In these cells, premature induction of an alternative sigma factor, σE, by salt stress was observed. These results suggest the existence of a yet-unknown stress response pathway mediated by the bacterial ribosome.

Citation: Hase Y, Tarusawa T, Muto A, Himeno H (2013) Impairment of Ribosome Maturation or Function Confers Salt Resistance on Escherichia coli Cells. PLoS ONE 8(5): e65747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747

Editor: Hans-Joachim Wieden, University of Lethbridge, Canada

Received: December 16, 2012; Accepted: April 26, 2013; Published: May 31, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Hase et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to A.M. and H.H. (Nos. 23380054 and 24658066) and a Grant for Hirosaki University Institutional Research to H.H. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The prokaryotic ribosome is a ribonucleoprotein particle consisting of a large (50S) subunit and a small (30S) subunit. The 50S subunit, which consists of 23S rRNA, 5S rRNA and over 30 proteins, has a peptidyl transferase center, three tRNA binding sites and a GTPase-associated center. The 30S subunit, which consists of 16S rRNA and over 20 proteins, facilitates the initiation processes of translation and is involved in decoding the genetic message and controlling the fidelity of the codon-anticodon interaction. The maturation of ribosomes are highly elaborate processes, involving cleavage and trimming of the precursors of rRNA, modifications of ribosomal proteins and rRNA, ordered binding of ribosomal proteins and sequential conformational changes [1], [2]. These processes take approximately 2 min and require the help of a considerable number of non-ribosomal factors in vivo, although a functional ribosomal particle can be reconstituted from its components in vitro without any non-ribosomal factors [3], [4], [5].

RsgA (ribosome small subunit-dependent GTPase A, also known as YjeQ in Escherichia coli or YloQ in Bacillus subtilis) is a putative ribosome maturation factor having a GTPase activity that is activated by the 30S subunit [6], [7]. RsgA binds around the tRNA binding sites of the 30S subunit [8] to release RbfA, another ribosome maturation factor, from the 30S subunit at nearly the last stage of the ribosome biosynthesis [9]. Deletion of the gene for RsgA from the E. coli genome results in slow cell growth, accumulation of 17S RNA, which is a typical precursor of 16S rRNA, and a decreased level of subunit assembly of the ribosome [7], [10].

Our previous study showed that removal or inactivation of RsgA conferred salt tolerance on E. coli cells [11]. Defects in processing into 16S rRNA and ribosome assembly in RsgA-deletion cells were restored by salt stress, although the 70S ribosomes are dissociated into subunits in wild-type cells transiently after salt shock. Osmotic shock by upshift of salt or sugar concentration in the culture medium results in some physical changes in E. coli cells, such as dehydration and shrinkage of cells [12], which induce uptake of potassium ions and efflux of putrescine within a few minutes of osmotic upshift so that potassium ion replaces putrescine as a nucleic acid counterion [13], [14]. Subsequently, the cell begins to synthesize or uptake osmoprotectants such as glycine betaine, proline and trehalose, while inhibiting general σ70 transcription [15]. In consideration of such a drastic change in the physiological condition inside the cell after salt shock, it is possible that RsgA disturbs ribosome maturation under a high salt stress condition, although it usually promotes maturation.

In the present study, we found that removal of other ribosome-associated factors including RbfA or of a ribosomal protein also provides E. coli cells with resistance to high salt stress, indicating that salt tolerance is a common feature of cells possessing an increased level of impaired ribosomes. Increased salt tolerance was also provided by treatment of cells with some protein synthesis inhibitors including kasugamycin and chloramphenicol. This is the first report to show that a chemical substance provides cells with salt tolerance. Furthermore, high salt stress prematurely induced an alternative sigma factor, σE, which has a role in maintaining the cell envelope integrity under various stress conditions [16], in mutant cells in which maturation or function of the ribosome is impaired. These results suggest the presence of a novel stress response pathway mediated by the bacterial ribosome.

Materials and Methods

E. coli strains

BW25113 (genotype, Δ(araD-araB)567, ΔlacZ4787(::rrnB-3), lambda−, rph-1, Δ(rhaD-rhaB)568, hsdR514) was used as wild-type. BW25113 rsgA::kan (ΔrsgA), BW25113 rimM::kan (ΔrimM), BW25113 rpsF::kan (ΔrpsF), and BW25113 rrmJ::kan (ΔrrmJ) were derived from the Keio collection [17]. BW25113 rbfA::kan (ΔrbfA), an intermediate strain for construction of W3110 rbfA::kan [9], was a gift from Dr. Simon Goto.

Culture conditions

E. coli BW25113 or its derivatives were cultured at 37°C with shaking at 130 rpm in LB medium with or without additional NaCl for salt shock. Culture was usually performed in 100 ml of medium in a 300 ml flask. In our previous study, 1.0 M NaCl was added to the culture of E. coli W3110 derivatives for salt shock [11], while we used 0.9 M NaCl for the E. coli BW25113 derivatives, as these have a lower resistance to salt shocks than W3110 derivatives.

Sedimentation profile

Cells were ruptured with the same weight of alumina powder, and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 4°C for 20 min at 15,000 g. The extract was loaded on a 5–20% (w/v) sucrose density gradient containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 10 mM MgCl2, 60 mM NH4Cl and 1 mM DTT, and it was centrifuged at 36,000 rpm using a P40ST rotor (Hitachi) for 3 hours at 4°C. The gradient was fractioned and the ribosomal concentration of each fraction determined by measuring the absorption at 260 nm (A260).

Preparation of RNA

RNA was extracted from cells with phenol containing 1% SDS and subjected to ethanol precipitation. The resulting RNA fraction was incubated with RNase-free DNase and was subjected to a second round of phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. This procedure (DNA treatment, phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation) was repeated twice and the concentration of RNA was determined by measuring the absorption at 260 nm (A260).

qRT-PCR

cDNA was prepared from an identical quantity (500 ng) of total RNA using Molony Murine Leukemia Virus (Takara) and a reverse primer corresponding to each gene (see below). The resulting cDNA was subjected to PCR reaction using a DyNAmo HS SYBR Green qPCR Kit (FINNZYMES) and an appropriate set of gene-specific primers (rpoE forward, 5′-ACCAGGTCCTGGTTGAACGG-3′; rpoE reverse, 5′-GCATAAAGTGGCGAGTCTGG-3′; rpoH forward, 5′-ATGACTGACAAAATGCAAAG-3′; rpoH reverse, 5′-AGCGCCCGCTCCTCGTCAGC-3′; MicA forward, 5′-CGCATTTGTTATCATCATCC-3′; MicA forward, 5′-GAAAAAGGCCACTCGTGAG-3′). Reactions were conducted using the DNA Engine OPTICON 2 Continuous Fluorescence Detection system (MJ Research). After initial heating of the sample for 10 min at 95°C, 35 cycles were performed, starting with 10 sec at 95°C, followed by 50°C for 10 sec and finally 72°C for 20 sec. The difference in cycle threshold between samples was calculated using a program attached to the machine. The identities of PCR products were examined by electrophoresis, and the uniformity of the amplified DNA was checked by its melting curve using a program attached to the machine.

Results

E. coli cells defective in ribosome maturation have tolerance to high salt stress

In a previous study, we found that removal of RsgA conferred salt tolerance on E. coli W3110 cells [11]. Salt tolerance was also provided by removal of RsgA in E. coli BW25113 cells (Figure 1A). To investigate whether the salt resistance is a specific phenotype to an RsgA-deleted strain, we examined the effect of salt stress on growth of an E. coli strain lacking a gene for another putative maturation factor for the 30S subunit, rbfA [18] or rimM [19]. RsgA, RbfA and RimM play their roles in maturation of the 30S subunit at different timings: first RimM, then RbfA, and last RsgA [8], [20]. We also focused on the effects of deletion of rpsF encoding the ribosomal protein S6 [21], which is available from the Keio collection, and rrmJ, a gene for methyltransferase (RrmJ) that catalyzes the 2′-O-methylation of the ribose at U2552 of 23S rRNA [22].

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Properties of mutant cells and effect of salt shock on cell growth.

(A) Growth of E. coli mutant cells under normal culture conditions. Growth of wild-type, ▵rsgA, ▵rbfA, ▵rimM, ▵rpsF or ▵rrmJ cells at 37°C in LB medium was monitored by measuring OD600. (B) Accumulation of 17S RNA in mutant cells. One µg of total RNA fraction prepared from each of the cells was electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gel. The 3′ truncation product of 16S rRNA is indicated by an asterisk [11]. The band of slightly lower migration than that of 16S rRNA was confirmed as 17S RNA by northern hybridization (Figure S1). The ratio of the amount of 17S RNA to that of 16S rRNA is shown below each lane. (C) Defect in subunit assembly of ribosome in mutant cells. Cells were lysed with alumina powder and the cell debris was removed as described in Materials and Methods. Ten A260 units of crude cell extracts were fractionated by 5%–20% sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation. (D) Growth curves of mutant cells after salt shock. Cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium. When OD600 had reached 0.8, 0.9 M NaCl was added to the medium. The OD600 value subtracted from that measured immediately after salt shock is plotted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.g001

Under normal growth conditions, deletion of any of these genes from the E. coli genome leads to slow cell growth (Figure 1A). We next examined the property of the ribosomes in each cell. As reported previously [18], [19], [20], deletion of rbfA or rimM results in a considerable level of accumulation of 17S RNA, a typical precursor of 16S rRNA (Figure 1B, Figure S1). We found that 17S RNA also accumulates in ΔrpsF and ΔrrmJ. The level of 17S RNA that accumulates in ΔrbfA or ΔrimM is almost comparable to that of ΔrsgA. In ΔrpsF and ΔrrmJ, the level of 17S RNA is slightly lower than that in ΔrsgA. We also found that the ratio of the level of 70S ribosomes to that of the 50S or 30S subunits is decreased in cells with deletion of each of these genes (Figure 1C).

The effect of salt shock on growth rate of each strain was then examined (Figure 1D). The cells were cultivated in LB medium, and 0.9 M NaCl was added when the OD600 value reached 0.8. As reported previously, ΔrsgA cells stop growing immediately after salt shock but begin to grow efficiently from a few hours after salt shock, while the growth of wild-type cells remains stopped until ten hours after salt shock. Interestingly, all mutant strains used have tolerance to salt stress. ΔrpsF and ΔrrmJ shows prominent tolerance with a degree almost comparable to that of ΔrsgA strain. ΔrbfA and ΔrimM grow slightly but reproducibly faster than wild-type cells.

We then analyzed the ribosome profile in mutants gaining salt tolerance. As shown in Figure 1, the levels of dissociated subunits relative to 70S ribosomes in ΔrsgA, ΔrbfA, ΔrimM, ΔrpsF or ΔrrmJ cells are significantly higher than that in wild type cells before salt shock. At four hours after salt shock, the level of 70S ribosomes decreased and instead dissociated subunits accumulate in these mutant cells as well as in wild type cells (Figure S2). At eight hours after salt shock, the level of 70S ribosomes relative to the dissociated subunits is increased (Figure S2). This situation is in contrast to that of the wild type cells in which considerable level of 70S ribosomes remain dissociated until eight hours after salt shock.

These results indicate that salt tolerance is conferred by removal of not only RsgA but also other proteins involved in maturation of the 30S subunit, and even a maturation factor for the 50S subunit or a ribosomal protein (S6). Note that the protein products derived from these genes for deletion used in this study bind various regions of the 70S ribosome: RsgA and RbfA bind the tRNA binding sites around helix 44 in the body [8], [23], [24], [25], while RimM binds the head of the 30S subunit [20]. S6 bind to the platform of the 30S subunit [26]. RrmJ binds the A-loop in the 50S subunit [27]. In addition, the composition of ribosomal proteins in the immature 30S subunits varies depending on cells used, which has been checked by quantitative mass spectroscopy [20] or Tris-Tricine PAGE (Goto S., unpublished results). This suggests that salt resistance is provided by impairment of the ribosome maturation regardless of the stage of maturation. We also found that not every single knock-out does result in an increased salt tolerance (Figure S3). For example, deletion of ksgA encoding KsgA, a methyltransferase that modifies A1518 and A1519 in the 3'-terminal helix 45 of the 16S rRNA [28], has little or no effect on salt tolerance. Unlike ΔrsgA, ΔrbfA, ΔrimM, ΔrpsF and ΔrrmJ, ΔksgA shows almost normal cell growth, subunit pattern of ribosomes and processing of 16S rRNA in the absence of salt shock [29].

Some ribosome-targeting antibiotics provide cells with salt tolerance

The above results suggest that the salt tolerance of a cell can be induced by a defect in ribosome maturation or ribosome function. Ribosomal function can also be impaired by the addition of antibiotics. We next examined the effects of several antibiotics including inhibitors of DNA synthesis, transcription and translation, on salt tolerance of wild-type cells (Figure 2, Table S1). Wild-type cells were grown in LB medium containing an antibiotic, and cells were subjected to salt shock when OD600 had reached 0.8.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Effects of inhibitors of DNA synthesis, transcription and translation on salt tolerance.

Wild type cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium with the indicated concentration of each drug. When OD600 reached 0.8, 0.9 M NaCl was added to the medium. Three different concentrations for each antibiotic, which were determined in consideration of the inhibitory effect on the growth of wild type cells in LB medium in the absence of salt shock, were used (Table S1). Growth of drug-untreated ▵rsgA cells is shown as the control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.g002

Inhibitors of DNA synthesis, ciprofloxacin, furazolidone, nalidixic acid, novobiocin and proflavine, have negative effects on salt tolerance of cells. Cells treated with rifampicin, a transcription inhibitor, have no resistance to salt stress. In contrast, some protein synthesis inhibitors, kasugamycin and chloramphenicol, have pronounced effects. The growth rate of kasugamycin-treated cells after salt shock is significantly higher than that of cells not treated with kasugamycin. Kasugamycin mimics the codon nucleotides at the P- and E-sites by binding within the mRNA path to indirectly inhibit binding of P-site tRNA during the translation initiation process [30]. Chloramphenicol, which inhibits the peptidyl transferase activity for the elongation process of translation [31], [32], also has a similar effect. At 8 hours after salt shock, the ratio of the levels of 70S ribosomes to the dissociated subunits in cells treated with kasugamycin or chloramphenicol is significantly higher than that in cells untreated with antibiotics (Figure S2). Other protein synthesis inhibitors, kanamycin and streptomycin, which bind around the A-site to cause miscoding [33], and fusidic acid, which inhibits the turnover of EF-G [34], have no significant effect on salt tolerance of cells.

Kasugamycin had no effect on processing into 16S rRNA or subunit association into a 70S ribosome

To investigate whether the observed salt tolerance by some protein synthesis inhibitors is due to a defect in ribosome maturation, the effects of antibiotics, which conferred pronounced salt tolerance on the cells, on ribosome maturation were examined (Figure 3). We analyzed total RNA prepared from these cells by gel electrophoresis to study the degree of processing of 17S RNA into 16S rRNA (Figure 3A). As shown previously, 17S RNA accumulates in rsgA-deleted cells [7]. Accumulation of 17S RNA is also detected in chloramphenicol-treated cells, although in a lesser extent [7], and this may be caused by unbalanced synthesis of ribosomal proteins [35]. In contrast, little 17S RNA accumulates in kasugamycin-treated cells as in wild-type cells.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Effects of protein synthesis inhibitors on processing of 17S RNA and on subunit association.

Wild-type cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium with 80 µg/ml kasugamycin (Kas) or 1.2 µg/ml chloramphenicol (Chl). (A) One µg of total RNA fraction prepared from wild-type, ▵rsgA, or drug-treated cells was electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gel. The ratio of the amount of 17S RNA to that of 16S rRNA is shown below each lane. (B) Ribosome profiles of wild-type cells, RsgA-deletion cells and wild-type cells treated with protein synthesis inhibitors are shown. Cells were lysed with alumina powder and the cell debris was removed as described in Materials and Methods. Ten A260 units of crude cell extracts were fractionated by 5%–20% sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.g003

We also examined the pattern of ribosomal subunits from drug-treated cells by sucrose density gradient sedimentation for comparison with that from non-treated cells (Figure 3B). As observed previously [7], the majority of 70S ribosomes are dissociated into subunits in ΔrsgA cells. In contrast, kasugamycin or chloramphenicol has only a small effect on subunit association.

These results indicate that the increased salt tolerance of cells does not necessarily require defects in processing into 16S rRNA or subunit association of ribosome. The increased salt tolerance of E. coli cells can be attributed to a defect either in ribosome maturation or in some process of translation.

Salt stress induced premature activation of σE in salt-resistant cells

The key pathway involved in adaptation to salt stress is control of the outer membrane protein expression. In E. coli, an alternative sigma factor, σE, encoded by the rpoE gene plays a central role in maintaining the cell envelope integrity [16], [36]. σE is usually sequestered in the cytoplasmic membrane by an anti-sigma factor, RseA, while it is released from RseA into the cytoplasm by exocytoplasmic stresses including salt stress. Then activated σE regulates the expression of periplasmic and outer membrane proteins, and it also positively regulates transcription of stress-related factors including σE itself [37], [38]. We therefore investigated the expression patterns of rpoE encoding σE under a salt stress condition by qRT-PCR.

It has been shown that 0.464 M sucrose induces rpoE within 30 minutes [39]. Consistently, the level of rpoE mRNA in either wild-type or ΔrsgA cells is immediately elevated after a moderate level of salt shock by the addition of 0.6 M NaCl and it returned to the initial level within one hour (data not shown). It was found that a higher level of salt shock (0.9 M NaCl) used in the present study delays the timing of induction. The level of rpoE mRNA begins to increase from about four hours after salt shock and continues to increase until at least 8 hours in wild-type cells (Figure 4A). Intriguingly, the timing of induction in ΔrsgA cells is a few hours earlier than that in wild-type cells. The level of rpoE mRNA begins to increase about one hour after salt shock and then decreases from 4 or 5 hours after salt shock.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Premature and transient induction of genes regulated by σE.

Cells in which a ribosome maturation factor or a ribosomal protein was removed (A–C) and wild-type cells treated with 80 µg/ml kasugamycin, 1.2 µg/ml chloramphenicol or 2.5 µg/ml streptomycin (D) were used. Levels of rpoE mRNA (A and D), rpoH mRNA (B) and MicA (C) at the indicated time points after salt shock were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Total RNA fraction prepared from each of the cells was used as the template.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.g004

We also investigated the expression patterns of other RNAs regulated by σE, rpoH mRNA encoding a sigma factor, σ32, involved in heat shock response [40], and MicA, a small non-coding RNA that downregulates the expression of the gene for an outer membrane protein, OmpA, at the translational level [41], [42], [43]. In each mutant cell used in this study, the levels of these RNAs begin to increase about one hour after salt shock, but then decrease from 4 or 5 hours after salt shock (Figure 4B, 4C). This is in sharp contrast to the expression levels of these RNAs in wild-type cells, in which they begin to increase from about four hours after salt shock and continues to increase until at least 8 hours. Such expression patterns of rpoH and micA in wild-type and mutant cells are similar to those of rpoE.

Premature and transient expression of rpoE mRNA is also observed in wild-type cells treated with kasugamycin or chloramphenicol but not in those treated with streptomycin, which has no detectable effect on salt tolerance (Figure 4D).

Discussion

The present study demonstrates increased salt tolerance of several E. coli variants lacking either a ribosome maturation factor (RsgA, RbfA, RimM or RrmJ) or a ribosomal protein S6. Salt tolerance is provided regardless of the site of action of the depleted protein on the 70S ribosome and of the stage of maturation of the immature 30S subunits accumulated, although it is apparently involved in some impairment of the ribosomes. These results suggest that increased salt tolerance of cells should be attributed to a general mechanism involved in the ribosome rather than a specific event by a specific ribosome maturation factor. Furthermore, some kinds of translation inhibitors, kasugamycin and chloramphenicol, also provide cells with salt tolerance. Kasugamycin accumulates no detectable level of immature ribosomes, suggesting that the salt tolerance is caused not only by impairment in the ribosome maturation.

Osmotic shock by upshift of salt induces several physical changes in E. coli cells, such as dehydration and shrinkage of cells [44], which are sensed by osmosensors embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane, inducing uptake of potassium ions and efflux of putrescine within a few minutes so that potassium ion replaces putrescine as a nucleic acid counterion [45], [46]. Concomitantly, the cell begins to accumulate potassium glutamate in the cell. It induces a σS-dependent gene expression to uptake osmoprotectants such as glycine betaine, proline and trehalose, which counteract the osmotic pressure for survival of cell, while down-regulating general σ70 transcription [47]. How ribosome impairment is involved in this pathway has yet to be studied. In the present study, we found that any impairment of ribosome by removal of a ribosome-associated factor or by drug treatment induces premature activation of σE. σE may contribute to salt tolerance such that it reinforces the outer membrane protein expression. For example, it induces MicA that down-regulates the expression of the gene for an outer membrane protein, OmpA, at the translational level. Earlier induction of σE would contribute to salt tolerance to some extent, considering that σE regulates expression of outer membrane proteins and that it induces a heat shock sigma factor. Because induction of σE appears to begin from a few hours after salt shock, the effects of impairment of the ribosome function on earlier events should be focused in the future study.

As far as we know, increased tolerance of cells to osmotic stress by removal of a ribosome maturation factor or addition of a chemical substance has never been reported. Or rather, even increased sensitivity to osmotic stress by removal of a ribosome maturation factor has been reported in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [48]. In mammalian cells, impaired ribosome biogenesis induces a p53-dependent stress response pathway [49]. Some kinds of ribosome-targeting antibiotics including kanamycin and streptomycin induce heat shock proteins in E. coli, and other kinds of those antibiotics including chloramphenicol, fusidic acid and tetracycline induce cold shock proteins, leading to the proposal that bacterial ribosome acts as a sensor of temperature for the control of global regulatory networks [50]. The present results strongly suggest the presence of a novel stress response pathway, which is mediated by the bacterial ribosome. For example, the following pathway can be assumed: some quantitative and/or qualitative perturbation in protein synthesis activity by the loss of integrity of ribosome or its function affects homeostasis of the cell membrane, causing premature induction of σE to confer salt tolerance on cells.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Accumulation of 17S RNA in ΔrsgA, ΔrbfA, ΔrimM, ΔrpsF or ΔrrmJ cells. One mg of total RNA was subjected to electrophoresis on denaturing MOPS-formaldehyde 1.8% agarose gel. The band of slightly lower migration than that of 16S rRNA was confirmed as 17S RNA by northern hybridization using 3′-DIG labeled probe 9 and probe 12, which are complimentary to 16S rRNA and its 5′ extension, respectively (Hase et al., 2009).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.s001

(EPS)

Figure S2.

Effects of depletion of a maturation factor or a ribosomal protein S6 and addition of protein synthesis inhibitor on subunit association of the ribosome. Cells depleted of a maturation factor or S6 were grown at 37°C in LB medium, and wild type cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium supplemented with 80 µg/ml kasugamycin or 1.2 µg/ml chloramphenicol. When OD600 reached 0.8, 0.9 M NaCl was added to the medium. Cells, which were collected at 0, 4 and 8 hours after salt shock, were lysed with alumina powder and the cell debris was removed as described in Materials and Methods. Crude cell extracts were fractionated by 5%–20% sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation. Peak height of each subunit relative to that of 70S ribosome is shown above the peak.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.s002

(EPS)

Figure S3.

Effect of salt shock on cell growth of ΔksgA or ΔlonA. (A) Growth of wild-type, ΔrsgA, ΔksgA or ΔlonA cells at 37°C in LB medium was monitored by measuring OD600. (B) Cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium. When OD600 had reached 0.8, 0.9 M NaCl was added to the medium. The OD600 value subtracted from that measured immediately after salt shock is plotted. (C) Accumulation of 17S RNA in ΔksgA and ΔlonA cells. One µg of total RNA fraction prepared from each of the cells was electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gel. The 3′ truncation product of 16S rRNA is indicated by an asterisk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.s003

(EPS)

Table S1.

Concentrations of drugs used in this study. Three different concentrations for each antibiotic, which were determined in consideration of the inhibitory effect on the growth of wild type cells in LB medium in the absence of salt shock, were used. The lowest of the three concentrations had almost no effect on growth rate. The highest concentration was determined so that it inhibited the growth rate of wild type cells in the absence of salt stress to the level similar to that of ΔrsgA cells. Some antibiotics such as kanamycin and streptomycin drastically decreased the plateau level of growth curve, and in this case the highest concentration was adjusted so that OD600 at the plateau was nearly equal to or slightly lower than 1.0. At each time point, OD600 was measured and compared with that of wild type cells grown without antibiotics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065747.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Gene Research Center of Hirosaki University for the use of their facility. We also thank Nara Institute of Science and Technology, National BioResource Project and National Institute of Genetics for providing E. coli strains from the Keio collection.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YH TT AM HH. Performed the experiments: YH TT. Analyzed the data: YH TT AM HH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YH TT. Wrote the paper: YH TT AM HH.

References

  1. 1. Kaczanowska M, Rydén-Aulin M (2007) Ribosome biogenesis and the translation processes in Eschericia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 477–494.
  2. 2. Wilson DN, Nierhaus KH (2007) The weird and wonderful world of bacterial ribosome regulation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42: 187–219.
  3. 3. Held WA, Ballou B, Mizushima M, Nomura M (1974) Assembly mapping of 30S ribosomal proteins from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 249: 3103–3111.
  4. 4. Holmes KL, Culver GM (2005) Analysis of conformational changes in 16 S rRNA during the course of 30 S subunit assembly. J Mol Biol 354: 340–357.
  5. 5. Shajani Z, Sykes MT, Williamson JR (2011) Assembly of bacterial ribosomes. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 501–526.
  6. 6. Daigle DM, Brown ED (2004) Studies of the interaction of Escherichia coli YjeQ with the ribosome in vitro. J Bacteriol 186: 1381–1387.
  7. 7. Himeno H, Hanawa-Suetsugu K, Kimura T, Takagi K, Sugiyama W, et al. (2004) A novel GTPase activated by the small subunit of ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5303–5309.
  8. 8. Kimura T, Takagi K, Hirata Y, Hase Y, Muto A, et al. (2008) Ribosome-small-subunit-dependent GTPase interacts with the tRNA binding sites on the ribosome. J Mol Biol 381: 467–477.
  9. 9. Goto S, Kato S, Kimura T, Muto A, Himeno H (2011) RsgA releases RbfA from 30S ribosomal subunit during a late stage of ribosome biosynthesis. EMBO J 30: 104–114.
  10. 10. Campbell TL, Daigle DM, Brown ED (2005) Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis GTPase YloQ and its role in ribosome function. Biochem J 389: 843–852.
  11. 11. Hase Y, Yokoyama S, Muto A, Himeno H (2009) Removal of a ribosome small subunit-dependent GTPase confers salt-resistance on Escherichia coli cells. RNA 15: 1766–1774.
  12. 12. Wood JM (1999) Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 230–262.
  13. 13. McLaggan D, Naprstek J, Buurman ET, Epstein W (1994) Interdependence of K+ and glutamate accumulation during osmotic adaptation of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 269: 1911–1917.
  14. 14. Poolman B, Spitzer JJ, Wood JM (2004) Bacterial osmosensing: roles of membrane structure and electrostatics in lipid-protein and protein-protein interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1666: 88–104.
  15. 15. Lee SJ, Gralla JD (2004) Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 14: 153–162.
  16. 16. Raivio TL, Silhavy TJ (2001) Periplasmic stress and ECF sigma factors. Annu Rev Microbiol 55: 591–624.
  17. 17. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, et al. (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2: 2006.0008.
  18. 18. Bylund GO, Wipemo LC, Lundberg LA, Wikstrom PM (1998) RimM and RbfA are essential for efficient processing of 16S rRNA in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180: 73–82.
  19. 19. Lövgren JM, Bylund GO, Srivastava MK, Lundberg LA, Persson OP, et al. (2004) The PRC-barrel domain of the ribosome maturation protein RimM mediates binding to ribosomal protein S19 in the 30S ribosomal subunits. RNA 10: 1798–1812.
  20. 20. Guo Q, Goto S, Chen Y, Feng B, Xu Y, et al. (2013) Dissecting the in vivo assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit reveals the role of RimM and general features of the assembly process. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 2609–2620.
  21. 21. Isono K, Kitakawa M (1978) Cluster of ribosomal protein genes in Escherichia coli containing genes for proteins S6, S18, and L9. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 6163–6167.
  22. 22. Caldas T, Binet E, Bouloc P, Costa A, Desgres J, et al. (2000) The FtsJ/RrmJ heat shock protein of Escherichia coli is a 23 S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase. J Biol Chem 275: 16414–16419.
  23. 23. Datta PP, Wilson DN, Kawazoe M, Swami NK, Kaminishi T, et al. (2007) Structural aspects of RbfA action during small ribosomal subunit assembly. Mol Cell 28: 434–445.
  24. 24. Guo Q, Yuan Y, Xu Y, Feng B, Liu L, et al. (2011) Structural basis for the function of a small GTPase RsgA on the 30S ribosomal subunit maturation revealed by cryoelectron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 13100–13105.
  25. 25. Jomaa A, Stewart G, Mears JA, Kireeva I, Brown ED, et al. (2011) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the 30S subunit in complex with the YjeQ biogenesis factor. RNA 17: 2026–2038.
  26. 26. Brodersen DE, Clemons WM Jr, Carter AP, Wimberly BT, Ramakrishnan V (2002) Crystal structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus: structure of the proteins and their interactions with 16 S RNA. J Mol Biol 316: 725–768.
  27. 27. Hager J, Staker BL, Jakob U (2004) Substrate binding analysis of the 23S rRNA methyltransferase RrmJ. J Bacteriol 186: 6634–6642.
  28. 28. Boehringer D, O'Farrell HC, Rife JP, Ban N (2012) Structural insights into methyltransferase KsgA function in 30S ribosomal subunit biogenesis. J Biol Chem 287: 10453–10459.
  29. 29. Connolly K, Rife JP, Culver G (2008) Mechanistic insight into the ribosome biogenesis functions of the ancient protein KsgA. Mol Microbiol 70: 1062–1075.
  30. 30. Schluenzen F, Takemoto C, Wilson DN, Kaminishi T, Harms JM, et al. (2006) The antibiotic kasugamycin mimics mRNA nucleotides to destabilize tRNA binding and inhibit canonical translation initiation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 871–878.
  31. 31. Hansen JR, Ippolita JA, Steitz TA (2003) Structures of five antibiotics bound at the peptidyl transferase center of large ribosomal subunit. J Mol Biol 330: 1061–1057.
  32. 32. Bayfield MA, Dahlberg AE, Schulmeister U, Dorner S, Barta A (2001) A conformational change in the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center upon active/inactive transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10096–10101.
  33. 33. Woodcock J, Moazed D, Cannon M, Davies J, Noller HF (1991) Interaction of antibiotics with A- and P-site-specific bases in 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J 10: 3099–3103.
  34. 34. Gao YG, Selmer M, Dunham CM, Weixlbaumer A, Kelley AC, et al. (2009) The structure of the ribosome with elongation factor G trapped in the posttranslocational state. Science 326: 694–699.
  35. 35. Siibak T, Peil L, Dönhöfer A, Tats A, Remm M, et al. (2011) Antibiotic-induced ribosomal assembly defects result from changes in the synthesis of ribosomal proteins. Mol Microbiol 80: 54–67.
  36. 36. Dartigalongue C, Missiakas D, Raina S (2001) Characterization of the Escherichia coli sigma E regulon. J Biol Chem 276: 20866–20875.
  37. 37. Missiakas D, Mayer MP, Lemaire M, Georgopoulos C, Raina S (1997) Modulation of the Escherichia coli sigmaE (RpoE) heat-shock transcription-factor activity by the RseA, RseB and RseC proteins. Mol Microbiol 24: 355–371.
  38. 38. Ades SE (2004) Control of the alternative sigma factor sigmaE in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Microbiol 7: 157–162.
  39. 39. Bianchi AA, Baneyx F (1999) Hyperosmotic shock induces the σ32 and σE stress regulons of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 34: 1029–1038.
  40. 40. Mutalik VK, Nonaka G, Ades SE, Rhodius VA, Gross CA (2009) Promoter strength properties of the complete sigma E regulon of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 191: 7279–7287.
  41. 41. Udekwu KI, Darfeuille F, Vogel J, Reimegård J, Holmqvist E, et al. (2005) Hfq-dependent regulation of OmpA synthesis is mediated by an antisense RNA. Genes Dev 19: 2355–2366.
  42. 42. Johansen J, Rasmussen AA, Overgaard M, Valentin-Hansen P (2006) Conserved small non-coding RNAs that belong to the sigmaE regulon: role in down-regulation of outer membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 364: 1–8.
  43. 43. Thompson KM, Rhodius VA, Gottesman S (2007) SigmaE regulates and is regulated by a small RNA in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189: 4243–4256.
  44. 44. Wood JM (1999) Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 230–262.
  45. 45. McLaggan D, Naprstek J, Buurman ET, Epstein W (1994) Interdependence of K+ and glutamate accumulation during osmotic adaptation of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 269: 1911–1917.
  46. 46. Poolman B, Spitzer JJ, Wood JM (2004) Bacterial osmosensing: roles of membrane structure and electrostatics in lipid-protein and protein-protein interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1666: 88–104.
  47. 47. Lee SJ, Gralla JD (2004) Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase. Mol.. Cell 14: 153–162.
  48. 48. Loar JW, Seiser RM, Sundberg AE, Sagerson HJ, Ilias N, et al. (2004) Genetic and biochemical interactions among Yar1, Ltv1 and Rps3 define novel links between environmental stress and ribosome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168: 1877–1889.
  49. 49. Deisenroth C, Zhang Y (2010) Ribosome biogenesis surveillance: probing the ribosomal protein-Mdm2-p53 pathway. Oncogene 29: 4253–4260.
  50. 50. VanBogelen RA, Neidhardt FC (1990) Ribosomes as sensors of heat and cold shock in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 5589–5593.