Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Phylogeographic characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolated from Bangladesh

  • Md. Shariful Alam Jilani ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jilanimsa@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Saika Farook,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Arittra Bhattacharjee,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Bioinformatics Division, National Institute of Biotechnology, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Lovely Barai,

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Chowdhury Rafiqul Ahsan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Jalaluddin Ashraful Haq,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Apichai Tuanyok

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

Abstract

Background

Burkholderia pseudomallei possesses a diverse set of genes which encode a vast array of biological functions reflecting its clinical, ecological and phenotypic diversity. Strain variation is linked to geographic location as well as pattern of land uses. This soil-dwelling Gram-negative pathogen causes melioidosis, a tropical disease endemic in northern Australia and Southeast Asian regions including Bangladesh. Phylogeographic analyses of B. pseudomallei isolates by molecular typing techniques could be used to examine the diversity of this organism as well as to track melioidosis epidemics.

Methods

In this study, 22 B. pseudomallei isolates, of which 20 clinical and two soil isolates were analyzed, utilizing Real-time PCR assay and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The sequences were then submitted to PubMLST database for analysis and construction of phylogenetic tree.

Findings

A total of 12 different sequence types (STs) that includes four novel STs were identified for the first time. Strains having STs 1005, 1007 and 56 were the most widespread STs frequently isolated in Bangladesh. ST 1005, ST 56, ST 1007 and ST 211 have been detected not only in Bangladesh but are also present in many Southeast Asian countries.

Significance

ST 1005 was detected in both soil and clinical samples of Gazipur. Most prevalent, ST 56 has been previously reported from Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam, confirming the persistence of the genotype over the entire continent. Further large-scale study is necessary to find out the magnitude of the infection and its different reservoirs in the environment along with phylogeographic association.

Author summary

Melioidosis, caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a disease of various manifestations and poor outcome, if not diagnosed and treated early. The first case of melioidosis is believed to be identified from Bangladesh as early as 1960, although the persistence of the causative organism was discovered in soil about 50 years later, in 2012. The study utilized 20 B. pseudomallei isolated from clinical samples and 2 from soil samples. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted with all 22 isolates and the sequence types analyzed and compared with B. pseudomallei sequence types previously detected from other countries. Four novel sequence types (STs) were detected in our study. Out of 12 different STs determined, STs 1005, 1007 and 56 were the commonest sequence types identified in Bangladesh. ST 1005 was found in both clinical and soil samples. ST 56 was isolated from five septicemic patients. The study revealed the sequence types of B. pseudomallei isolated from Bangladesh and their genetic relatedness with sequence types of other regions. We further showed that the sequence types of Bangladesh share more genetic similarities with the isolates of Southeast Asian isolates rather than South Asian isolates.

Introduction

The soil-dwelling bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei is responsible for causing the deadly disease melioidosis. Once considered an obscurity, the disease is now recognized as an emerging fulminating infectious disease of global significance. The hyper-endemic foci of this disease exist in northern Australia, Thailand and Singapore, where extensive surveillance had undertaken [1,2]. Since melioidosis is a disease of rural poor that usually affects the people in areas that are poorly supplied with the diagnostic capability to make the diagnosis, so the true burden of this disease throughout the globe remains abstruse [3]. However, in recent years melioidosis has been increasingly reported from diverse tropical regions of the globe where it has not been detected previously [46]. It is not clear whether the spread of melioidosis beyond the known endemic regions has occurred in recent decades, or it is just being unveiled by better recognition, increased awareness and surveillance. It has been hypothesized that B. pseudomallei may have originated in Australia and subsequently spread to South and Southeast Asia via animal migration during the Miocene period about 15 million years ago when the continents were joined by a land bridge due to greatly lowered sea levels [7]. From Asia B. pseudomallei appears to have spread to Africa and from there to the Americas, possibly via slave trading from West African Countries to America [8,9].

The genome of B. pseudomallei encompasses a diverse set of genes which encode a vast array of biological functions reflecting its clinical, ecological and phenotypic diversity. Strain variation within B. pseudomallei is linked to geographic location as well as pattern of land uses [10]. It has been determined that Australian isolates usually possess an ancestral B. thailandensis-like flagellum and chemotaxis (BTFC) gene cluster, whilst isolates from Asia and elsewhere almost exclusively carry a Yersinia-like fimbrial (YLF) gene cluster [11,12]. B. pseudomallei strains containing the YLF gene cluster are more associated with clinical cases, whereas strains containing the BTFC gene cluster are more likely to be environmental isolates, indicating a potential role for the YLF gene associated with virulence [11]. The variation in clinical manifestations between melioidosis in Australia and Southeast Asia suggests that these populations are genetically distinct due to broad-scale bio-geographical factors associated with the establishment and persistence of the organism [11]. Melioidosis is caused by contact with contaminated surface water or soil, via respiratory route with human-to-human transmission being exceptionally rare [13]. Thus, large geographic barriers, as for example, the Wallace Line, which separates most of Asia from Australia, may have subsequently restricted gene flow between populations. However, whole-genome sequencing has resolved that Asian isolates of B. pseudomallei share an Australian ancestral root [14].

Melioidosis has been sporadically detected in Bangladesh over last several decades [15]. Until 2021, a total of 86 B. pseudomallei isolates have been obtained from 68 melioidosis cases [16]. Although, the first confirmed case of melioidosis from Bangladesh is believed to be identified in a 29-year-old British sailor in 1960, the persistence of the organism in soil was first confirmed 52 years later in 2012 [17,18]. In 2013, melioidosis endemic countries were categorized into “definite” and “probable” on the basis of the presence of the causative organism in human as well as environment [19]. B. pseudomallei was isolated for the first time in Indian Subcontinent from soil samples from Gazipur district of Bangladesh. Since then, Bangladesh is considered as a definitive country for melioidosis due to the presence of B. pseudomallei in both clinical and soil samples [18]. However, the true burden of the disease as well as mortality rates attributed to melioidosis are unknown, due to a lack of extensive epidemiological surveillance programs. Molecular analyses of B. pseudomallei isolates by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) can be used to examine the diversity of this organism from various geographic regions, which can assist with assessment of population structure of the organism as well as form phylogeographic characteristics that can be used to track melioidosis epidemics [20].

The current study demonstrates the utility of the MLST scheme for epidemiological studies and clarifies the genetic relationships between B. pseudomallei isolated from the clinical specimen and environmental sources. Understanding the population genetic structure and existing biodiversity of B. pseudomallei in endemic environments has implications for tracing outbreak source [21]. Detailed phylogenetic study of isolates will advance understanding of the biogeography of B. pseudomallei from this region as well as from the neighboring countries. In the present study, we examined the strains isolated from both clinical specimen and soil samples from different areas of Bangladesh using microbiological and molecular tests. To explore the genetic relatedness of our local isolates with isolates detected previously from other countries, we collected and compared sequences from PubMLST database [22].

Methodology

Ethics statement

The Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS) has approved the study (IMC/RP/2017/94). Ibrahim Medical College (IMC) is an institution under the BADAS, where the study was conducted.

Sample collection and isolation of Bacterial strains

The study utilized a total of 23 B. pseudomallei isolates that included 20 clinical, two soil isolates and one reference strain (USM strain) obtained from Universiti Sans Malaysia. The study availed archived clinical isolates, which were obtained from diabetic patients who attended Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM General Hospital) from 2009 to 2015 and two soil strains isolated from Kapasia, Gazipur as previously described [15,18]. The sample collecting regions of Bangladesh has been demonstrated in Fig 1 using DIVA-GIS (www.diva-gis.org). Bacteria were stored in Trypticase Soy Broth supplemented with 15% glycerol. Isolates were plated onto Ashdown’s agar and cultivated at 37°C for 48 hours before DNA extraction [23]. Real-time PCR assay followed by MLST from extracted DNA was performed at the Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, USA.

Real-time PCR assay

From the extracted DNA Real-time PCR assay was done for molecular identification of Type III secretion system 1 (TTS1). Primer pair and probe were used to target the TTS1 gene cluster of B. pseudomallei as previously described [24]. The YLF and BTFC gene clusters were detected using Real-time PCR assay developed by Tuanyok A et al in 2007. PCR primers for detecting YLF and BTFC genes were used as previously described [11].

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of the bacterial strains

MLST was performed by amplifying and sequencing of the seven housekeeping gene fragments (ace, gltB, gmhD, lepA, lipA, narK and ndh).The sequences were submitted to the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org/) for further analysis [22,25]. The presence of the Sequence Type (ST) in organisms detected in other countries was identified by exploring the PubMLST datasets for B. pseudomallei. Genetic relations between the isolates from Bangladesh and other countries that have found the same ST were visualized using GrapeTree [26].

Characterization of the New ST

To characterize the genomic makeup of the new ST, the nucleotide sequences of the selected housekeeping genes were taken to construct a neighbor-joining (NJ) based phylogenetic tree with the B. pseudomallei sequence types isolated from Bangladesh [27]. The tree was constructed via PubMLST and visualized by iTOL [28]. After that the Based upon Related Sequences (BURST) algorithm was applied on the isolates of Bangladesh, Myanmar and Thailand to identify the relations of the genotypes in major clonal clusters with default group definition. The central ST of a BURST group have the highest number of single locus variants (SLVs). Generally, the most frequent ST take the central roles in the cluster/clonal complex and therefore helps to characterize the genotypic properties of the new ST [29,30].

Result

Isolates were collected from melioidosis patients and soil

Out of 20 patients from whom clinical samples were collected, 6 patients came from Gazipur while 5 patients were from Tangail. However, only one patient reported from Khagrachari which is geographically closer to Southeast Asian country Myanmar (Fig 1). Both isolates from soil samples were obtained from Gazipur [18].

Real-time PCR identified all isolates as YLF positive B. pseudomallei

Real-time PCR assay, targeting TTS1, confirmed that all 20 clinical and two environmental isolates were B. pseudomallei along with the USM reference strain. All isolates contain YLF gene cluster and are negative to BTFC gene cluster.

MLST profiling of B. pseudomallei from Bangladesh

MLST unveiled a total of 12 STs of which four STs (STs- 756, 1352, 761 and 61) were novel types and identified for the first time (Table 1). Strains having STs 1005, 1007 and 56 were the most frequently isolated STs in Bangladesh. ST 1005, ST 56, ST 1007 and ST 211 have been detected not only in Bangladesh but are also present in Thailand, Cambodia, Australia, Myanmar, China and Vietnam. According to PubMLST database, ST 1005 was previously isolated from soil samples of different regions such as environmental samples from Thailand and Australia. Interestingly, ST 1005 has not been isolated from clinical samples previously from any patients of any country. In Bangladesh, we have isolated two ST 1005 B. pseudomallei genotypes for the first time, from sputum and urine samples respectively. Whole genome sequencing study can provide further information about any possible linkage between the soil and clinical ST 1005 isolates.

thumbnail
Table 1. Sequence Type (ST) of B. pseudomallei in the present study. ST that were common in other countries are also given.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.t001

Predominant sequence types of Bangladesh share more genetic similarities with Southeast Asian strains rather than South Asian

Relationships between the Sequence Type were determined by GrapeTree (Fig 2). GrapeTree implemented a novel minimum spanning tree algorithm to rebuild these relationships [26]. According to the Grape Tree of PubMLST, two distinctive clusters were observed. In one cluster Australian strains such as ST 553, ST 131 were present, while in the other cluster, all strains were connected to Australian/ Asian strain ST 562. This ST 562 generated cluster is less predominant with Australian isolates and seems more diverse (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Genetic relationships of B. pseudomallei isolates between the countries that share common sequence types with Bangladesh.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.g002

Microreact revealed close distance among the isolates of Myanmar, Thailand and Bangladesh via NJbased tree (S1 Fig) [31]. Two field breakdowns of the dataset revealed the frequencies and the mutual presence of ST 56 in Myanmar, Thailand and Bangladesh. Sequence Type 56 is predominant in both Bangladesh and Myanmar (Fig 2).

Novel ST are closely related to Southeast Asian genotypes (especially Thailand)

Four novel genotypes (STs-1352, 756, 61 and 761) were found in this study. Among the sequence types of Bangladesh, ST 761 is clustered along with ST 1124 and ST 1548 (Fig 3). Sequence Type 1352 clustered with the clade of STs-1007 and 46. Sequence Type 756 did not cluster in any clades (Fig 3). Members of the same clades share more genetic similarities than distant clades. Sequence types- 1352, 756 and 761 were closely related with STs-1007, 188, 211, 874, respectively (S3 Fig). BURST analysis depicted that STs-1352 and 756 are double locus variant (DLV) of ST 48. Sequence Type 761 is a single locus variant (SLV) of ST 185 (S2 Fig). All these central genotypes were found in Thailand or other Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam and China.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic relationships of B. pseudomallei in Bangladesh. On the right side, the columns depict the ID of the strain in the PubMLST database, Sequence Type (ST), specimen, source of the isolate and year of isolation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.g003

Discussion

Melioidosis, a severe disease caused by B. pseudomallei, is increasingly recognized in tropical and subtropical areas worldwide. In recent years, greater awareness among clinicians and microbiologists along with better laboratory facilities in Bangladesh aided in the isolation of the organism in growing numbers thus necessitating the understanding of population structure of the pathogen.

Real-time-PCR assay targeting both YLF and BTFC gene cluster in our clinical and soil isolates detected the presence of only YLF gene cluster in Bangladesh. YLF gene cluster is horizontally acquired while BTFC gene cluster is ancestral to B. pseudomallei [11]. The YLF group predominates in Asia while BTFC group is more prevalent in Australia. It is interesting to note that the YLF group is more common in clinical cases whereas BTFC group is more frequent in environmental isolates [11]. In Thailand, where YLF is dominant, mortality rates for the primary disease are higher (50%) than the endemic regions of Australia, where mortality rate is around 15 to 20% [32,33]; although high mortality rates are attributable to several confounding factors. Since the YLF gene is also dominant among the B. pseudomallei isolated in Bangladesh, further genomic studies may reveal whether virulence or disease severity is associated with the YLF gene that may lead to increase mortality rate.

The phylogenetic tree showed two groups of sequence types. One group belongs to ST 56 while another group (non-ST 56) has high sequence diversity (Fig 3). This sequence diversity indicates the endemicity of the pathogen [34,35]. Sequence types 1005, ST 56, ST 1007 and ST 211 have been detected not only in Bangladesh but are also present in Thailand, Cambodia, Australia, Myanmar, China and Vietnam. Additionally, B. pseudomallei STs 42, 43, 46, and 71 were previously identified from Bangladeshi patients [25]. Sequence Type 56 which was present in five clinical isolates is the most common variant present in Bangladesh, followed by ST 1005 and ST 1007.

According to PubMLST, at least four STs (STs-1352, 756, 761 and 61) were novel types and identified for the first time. It can be assumed that the existence of novel genotypes point towards local persistence of B. pseudomallei in the same geographical area and their ability to establish a new clone series producing novel offspring that carry new genotypes [36]. MLST based molecular surveillance underlined a strong genetic relationship among Chinese, Indian, Myanmar and Southeast Asian B. pseudomallei isolates [3438]. All of these studies found common ST with that of strains isolated from Thailand where melioidosis is widespread. The genetic relationship of all the available ST from Bangladesh was visualized via GrapeTree. The Grape Tree clusters suggest that Australian strains such as ST 553, ST 131 present are distinctive from Australian/ Asian strain ST 562 which is related with the strains found in Bangladesh (Fig 2). Most plausibly, ST 562 went under different selection pressure and their variants were introduced in Bangladesh via tropical south-eastern part of Bangladesh (Myanmar and China). GrapeTree also reveals Sequence Type 56 are isolated from neighboring countries, Myanmar and Thailand. In addition, other sequence types like ST 172, ST 211 and ST 422 share more genetic similarities with Southeast Asian strains than South Asian isolates (Fig 2). Only, ST 1124 is found to be common between India and Bangladesh. This observed relatedness may be explained by B. pseudomallei transmission into Bangladesh due to geographical propinquity to neighbors, human and animal migration, ancient and persisting trading and travel networks. Previous studies demonstrated that Malay Peninsula was repeatedly reintroduced with B. pseudomallei [9,34]. However, to identify this type of reintroductions in Bangladesh, comparative genomics-based investigations are necessary.

The most common variant (i.e., ST 56) found in Bangladesh, was isolated from patients of diverse regions of the country. ST 56 was also isolated from a patient in 1983, as per PubMLST database, which suggests the existence of the genotype in the country for over a period of 32 years. ST 56 has been previously reported from Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam, confirming the persistence of the strain, causing infection over the entire continent. The five ST 56 that were isolated in Bangladesh were from patients’ blood (S1 Table). Two out of these five septicemic patients died. The first melioidosis case was detected in a Bangladeshi infant, suffering from pneumonia and septicemia, who died 12 hours following hospital admission [39]. This case was probably identified as the same ST 56 case in accordance with PubMLST data, which leads us to suspect that some distinct virulence factors are associated with this specific Sequence Type in Bangladesh. However, whole genome sequencing followed by in vivo and in vitro validations are required to provide clear pathophysiology.

The presence of B. pseudomallei is higher in anthrosol than acrisol soil types. Anthrosol is a soil type that has been highly modified by human for the preparation of paddy fields whereas acrisol is enriched with clay-rich soil common in tropical climates [40]. We found two ST 1005 isolates from anthrosol type of soil from Gazipur. ST 1005 was also isolated from clinical samples of Gazipur. These are the first clinical cases of ST 1005 according to PubMLST database. This strongly indicates that spatial clustering of clinical incidence is linked to the environmental persistence of the organism and infection follows environmental exposure. A study conducted by Roe et al (2022) analyzed sequence type 1005 isolated from soil. Following inoculation of seven ST 1005 isolates in BALB/c mice, only one was found to be virulent, although it lacked the conserved gene (BPSS0417-BPSS0428) associated with virulence [41]. Analysis of the differences of virulent genes among ST 1005 isolated in different regions of the world will assist in understanding their ability to cause human infection.

The study included small number of isolates from sporadic melioidosis cases, indicating ecologically established population of B. pseudomallei. It contrasts with the study conducted in Australia by Mcrobb et al, which showed diversified population of the bacteria when increased sample size and sampling areas were considered [42]. Further large scale study will help to understand the true ecological establishment of B. pseudomallei in Bangladesh.

The detection of different sequence types in a defined area indicates the historical introduction and dissemination of different genotypes into the area or due to expansion of local ST that yielded new strains with novel ST [37]. MLST is an unambiguous and powerful tool to study the bacterial populations and its global distribution [25]. However, MLST is not very much efficient in detecting relatedness among B. pseudomallei ST due to high levels of lateral gene transfer in B. pseudomallei strain. In order to determine the origin of the organism in Bangladesh, its introduction and dissemination to other area and evolutionary change among strains require a whole genome-based single nucleotide polymorphism typing. Such study will also help us to understand the phylogeographic association of B. pseudomallei hailing from a particular region of the country with foreign strains and present a comparative analysis to identify essential genes involved in their pathogenicity, adaptability, and drug resistance mechanisms.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Relationships between the strains of Bangladesh, Myanmar and Thailand.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. BURST (based upon related sequences) analysis of the novel STs. Novel STs are labeled with blue boxes

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Node that are Mostly close to the Novel STs (inside the red boxes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.s003

(TIF)

S1 Table. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing Profile of the B. pseudomallei strains that have been isolated from Bangladesh.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011823.s004

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Michael Norris, a former Postdoctoral Associate in Dr. A. Tuanyok’s Laboratory, at the University of Florida for his technical assistance. We would also like to thank Dr. Mili Rani Saha, Dr. Tanzila Rahman and Md. Rokib Hasan, Department of Microbiology, BIRDEM Hospital for their assistance in detection, identification and preservation of the strains.

References

  1. 1. Hantrakun V, Kongyu S, Klaytong P, Rongsumlee S, Day NP, Peacock SJ, Hinjoy, et al. Clinical epidemiology of 7126 melioidosis patients in Thailand and the implications for a national notifiable diseases surveillance system. Open forum infectious diseases. 2019; 6(2): 498. pmid:32083145
  2. 2. Sim SH, Ong CEL, Gan YH, Wang D, Koh VWH, Tan YK, et al. Melioidosis in Singapore: clinical, veterinary, and environmental perspectives. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2018; 3(1): 31. pmid:30274428
  3. 3. Dance DA, Puthucheary SD. Epidemiology. In: Keethesan N, editor. Melioidosis: A century of observation and research. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2012. p. 24.
  4. 4. Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2005; 18(2): 383–416. pmid:15831829
  5. 5. Dance DA. Melioidosis as an emerging global problem. Actatropica. 2000; 74(2–3): 115–9. pmid:10674638
  6. 6. Currie BJ, Dance DA, Cheng AC. The global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis: an update. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008; 102: 1–4.
  7. 7. Cheng AC, Godoy D, Mayo M, Gal D, Spratt BG, Currie BJ. Isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from northern Australia are distinct by multilocus sequence typing, but strains type do not correlate with clinical presentation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003; 42: 5477–5483.
  8. 8. Sarovich DS, Garin B, De Smet B, Kaestli M, Mayo M, Vandamme P, et al. Phylogenomic analysis reveals an Asian origin for African Burkholderia pseudomallei and further supports melioidosis endemicity in Africa. MSphere. 2016; 1(2): e00089–15. pmid:27303718
  9. 9. Chewapreecha C, Holden MT, Vehkala M, Valimaki N, Yang Z, Harris SR, et al. Global and regional dissemination and evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nature microbiology. 2017; 2(4): 1–8. pmid:28112723
  10. 10. Pearson TR, Price EP, Tuanyok A, Keim P. Genetic diversity and geographic distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei. In: Keethsan N, editor. Melioidosis: a century of observation and research. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2012. pp. 340–348.
  11. 11. Tuanyok A, Auerbach RK, Brettin TS, Bruce DC, Munk AC, Detter JC, et al. A horizontal gene transfer event defines two distinct groups within Burkholderia pseudomallei that have dissimilar geographic distributions. Journal of bacteriology. 2007; 189(24): 9044–9. pmid:17933898
  12. 12. Baker A, Pearson T, Price EP, Dale J, Keim P, Hornstra H, et al. Molecular phylogeny of Burkholderia pseudomallei from a remote region of Papua New Guinea. PLoS One. 2011; 6(3): e18343. pmid:21483841
  13. 13. Aziz A, Currie BJ, Mayo M, Sarovich DS, Price EP. Comparative genomics confirms a rare melioidosis human-to-human transmission event and reveals incorrect phylogenomic reconstruction due to polyclonality. Microbial genomics. 2020; 6(2). pmid:31958055
  14. 14. Pearson T, Giffard P, Beckstrom-Sternberg S, Auerbach R, Hornstra H, Tuanyok A, et al. Phylogeographic reconstruction of a bacterial species with high levels of lateral gene transfer. BMC biology. 2009; 7(1): 1–4. pmid:19922616
  15. 15. Barai L, Jilani MS, Haq JA. Melioidosis case reports and review of cases recorded among Bangladeshi population from 1988–2014. Ibrahim medical college journal. 2014; 8(1): 25–31.
  16. 16. Barai L, Saha MR, Rahman T, Sukanya M, Jafrin J, Ferdous J, et al. Trends in laboratory detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern from clinical samples over twenty-one years from 2001 to 2021 in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Bangladesh journal of medical microbiology. 2021; 15(1): 8–14.
  17. 17. Maegraith BG, Leithead CS. Melioidosis: A Case-Report. Lancet. 1964; 862–3. pmid:14124069
  18. 18. Jilani MS, Robayet JA, Mohiuddin M, Hasan MR, Ahsan CR, Haq JA. Burkholderia pseudomallei: its detection in soil and seroprevalence in Bangladesh. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2016; 10(1): e0004301. pmid:26771511
  19. 19. Limmathurotsakul D, Dance DA, Wuthiekanun V, Kaestli M, Mayo M, Warner J, et al. Systematic review and consensus guidelines for environmental sampling of Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013; 7: e2105. pmid:23556010
  20. 20. Dale J, Price EP, Hornstra H, Busch JD, Mayo M, Godoy D, et al. Epidemiological tracking and population assignment of the non-clonal bacterium, Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2011; 5(12): e1381. pmid:22180792
  21. 21. Currie BJ, Mayo M, Anstey NM, Donohoe P, Haase A, Kemp DJ. A cluster of melioidosis cases from an endemic region is clonal and is linked to the water supply using molecular typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2001; 65(3): 177–9. pmid:11561699
  22. 22. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MC. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST. org website and their applications. Wellcome open research. 2018; 3. pmid:30345391
  23. 23. Ashdown LR. An improved screening technique for isolation of Pseudomonas pseudomallei from clinical specimens. Pathology. 1979; 11(2): 293–7. pmid:460953
  24. 24. Novak RT, Glass MB, Gee JE, Gal D, Mayo MJ, Currie BJ, et al. Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay targeting the type III secretion system of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2006; 44(1): 85–90. pmid:16390953
  25. 25. Godoy D, Randle G, Simpson AJ, Aanensen DM, Pitt TL, Kinoshita R, et al. Multilocus sequence typing and evolutionary relationships among the causative agents of melioidosis and glanders, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2003; 41(5): 2068–79. pmid:12734250
  26. 26. Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, et al. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome research. 2018; 28(9): 1395–404. pmid:30049790
  27. 27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular biology and evolution. 1987; 4(4): 406–25. pmid:3447015
  28. 28. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic acids research. 2016; 44(W1): W242–5. pmid:27095192
  29. 29. Feil EJ, Li BC, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. Journal of bacteriology. 2004; 186(5): 1518–30. pmid:14973027
  30. 30. Rajendra KC O’Toole RF. Understanding the Biology of Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Through the Lens of Genomics. In: Dua K, Lobenberg R, Luzo ACM, Shukla S, Satija S, editors. Targeting Cellular Signaling Pathways in Lung Diseases. Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 471–484.
  31. 31. Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJ, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microbial genomics. 2016; 2(11). pmid:28348833
  32. 32. Cheng AC, Hanna JN, Norton R, Hills SL, Davis J, Krause VL, et al. Melioidosis in northern Australia, 2001–02. Communicable diseases intelligence. 2003; 27(2): 4–17. pmid:12926743
  33. 33. White NJ. Melioidosis. The Lancet. 2003; 361(9370): 1715–22.
  34. 34. Webb JR, Win MM, Zin KN, Win KK, Wah TT, Ashley EA, et al. Myanmar Burkholderia pseudomallei strains are genetically diverse and originate from Asia with phylogenetic evidence of reintroductions from neighbouring countries. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1): 1–0.
  35. 35. Zhu X, He L, Kuang H, Li H, Li S, Chen H, et al. Correlation between climatic factors and incidence of melioidosis in Sanya, Hainan. Disease surveillance. 2020; 35(2): 156–61.
  36. 36. Zueter AR, Rahman ZA, Abumarzouq M, Harun A. Multi locus sequence typing of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from peninsular Malaysia and their associations disease outcomes. BMC infectious diseases. 2018; 18: 5.
  37. 37. Balaji V, Perumalla S, Perumal R, Inbanathan FY, Rajamani Sekar SK, Paul MM, et al. Multi locus sequence typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from India unveils molecular diversity and confers regional association in Southeast Asia. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2018; 12(6): e0006558. pmid:29949580
  38. 38. Fang Y, Zhu P, Li Q, Chen H, Li Y, Ren C, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of 102 Burkholderia pseudomallei strains isolated from China. Epidemiology & Infection. 2016; 144(9): 1917–23. pmid:26744829
  39. 39. Struelens MJ, Mondol G, Bennish M, Dance DA. Melioidosis in Bangladesh: a case report. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1988; 82(5): 777–8. pmid:3252602
  40. 40. Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott DM, Moyes CL, et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nature microbiology. 2016; 1(1): 1–5.
  41. 41. Roe C, Vazquez AJ, Phillips PD, Allender CJ, Bowen RA, Nottingham RD, et al. Multiple phylogenetically-diverse, differentially-virulent Burkholderia pseudomallei isolated from a single soil sample collected in Thailand. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2022;16(2): e0010172. pmid:35143500
  42. 42. McRobb E, Kaestli M, Price EP, Sarovich DS, Mayo M, Warner J, et al. Distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in northern Australia, a land of diversity. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2014; 80(11): 3463–8. pmid:24657869