Published online Dec 30, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2014.20.2.33
How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive diagnostic methods and rectal suction biopsy for the detection of Hirschsprung disease (HD).
Methods
We reviewed diagnostic methods and results retrospectively in patients who underwent anorectal manometry, barium enema and rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of HD at Asan Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2012.
Results
There were 97 patients (59 neonates and 38 infants) in the study period. The overall accuracy of anorectal manometry for the diagnosis of HD was 71.1% and its sensitivity was 51.4% (48.1% in neonate and 62.5% in infant, respectively) and its overall specificity was 82.3% (81.3% in neonate and 83.3% in infant, respectively). The Overall accuracy of barium enema was 66.0% (72.8% in neonate and 55.3% in infant, respectively) and specificity of barium enema was 53.2% (56.3% in neonate and 50.0% in infant, respectively). These results were lower than those of anorectal manometry. The overall sensitivity of barium enema was 88.6% (92.6% in neonate and 75.0% in infant, respectively) and it was higher than the sensitivity of anorectal manometry. Histological studies confirmed HD in 35 patients, in one of whom the suction biopsy showed negative finding.
Conclusion
Accuracy of non-invasive methods for diagnosis of HD in our study is lower than those in previous study, so we need to improve the quality of diagnostic tools in our hospital. We conclude that the rectal suction biopsy is the most accurate test for diagnosing HD, so the biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of the HD is very important.
Table 1
Test Results of Barium Enema
Table 2
Test Results of Anorectal Manometry
Table 3
Test Results of Suction Biopsy
Table 4
Direct Comparison of Accuracy
This study was presented at the 30th Annual Congress of Korean Society of Pediatric Surgeons.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
-
Osatakul S, Patrapinyokul S, Osatakul N. The diagnostic value of anorectal manometry as a screening test for Hirschsprung's disease. J Med Assoc Thai 1999;82:1100–1105.
-
-
Kim DY, Kim SC, Kim KM, Kim ER, Kim KS, Kim JS, et al. Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease of neonate and infant. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2002;8:1–5.
-
-
Martucciello G, Pini Prato A, Puri P, Holschneider AM, Meier-Ruge W, Jasonni V, et al. Controversies concerning diagnostic guidelines for anomalies of the enteric nervous system: a report from the fourth International Symposium on Hirschsprung's disease and related neurocristopathies. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1527–1531.
-
-
Choi YI, Choi SO, Park WH. Diagnostic strategy using barium enema and rectal suction biopsy with acetylcholinesterase histochemistry in neonates suspected of having Hirschsprung's disease. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2001;7:105–111.
-
-
Taxman TL, Yulish BS, Rothstein FC. How useful is the barium enema in the diagnosis of infantile Hirschsprung's disease? Am J Dis Child 1986;140:881–884.
-
-
Zhou XL, Chen FB, Ou BY, Zhang XP, Jiang MZ. Evaluation of clinical value of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease in neonate. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2004;42:681–683.
-
-
Lake BD, Puri P, Nixon HH, Claireaux AE. Hirschsprung's disease: an appraisal of histochemically demonstrated acetylcholinesterase activity in suction rectal biopsy specimens as an aid to diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1978;102:244–247.
-
-
Holschneider AM, Puri P. In: Hirschsprung's disease and allied disorders. 3rd ed. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2006.
-