• google scholor
  • Views: 1460

  • PDF Downloads: 10

Morphometric and Sub-Watershed Analysis of Taraka Watershed, H.D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District, Karnataka, India using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

Basavaraju * and D. Nagaraju

Corresponding author Email: basavadrpete@gmail.com

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.16.3.25

The current research work is an attempt to study of drainage area covering 429 sqkms comprising of 10 sub-watersheds they are namely Heggadadevanakote, Budanuru, Kodasige, Yedenhundi, Sunkadakatte, Nagarahole, Muruganahalli, Heggadapura, Kalhalla, Sarathihole. The research area has strong structural control shows that the 10 sub-basins named as the normal category. Different parameters of morphometric were used, Arc-Info and Arc -View GIS software was used to analysis the morphometric parameters and drainage characteristics, Sub-basin have been delineated by drainage pattern. The drainage pattern suggesting very coarse to coarse texture and the density explains the texture of drainage is related to coarse as geomorphic development their late youth stage and values suggest that Form factor, Circulatory ratio, Sub-basins are circular to elongated in shape.

H D Kote; Morphometry Analysis; Remote Sensing and GIS; Taraka Watershed

Copy the following to cite this article:

Basavaraju B, Nagaraju D. Morphometric and Sub-Watershed Analysis of Taraka Watershed, H.D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District, Karnataka, India using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Curr World Environ 2021;16(3). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.16.3.25

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Basavaraju B, Nagaraju D. Morphometric and Sub-Watershed Analysis of Taraka Watershed, H.D. Kote Taluk, Mysuru District, Karnataka, India using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Curr World Environ 2021;16(3). Available From: https://bit.ly/31Y52qX


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 23-07-2021
Accepted: 20-12-2021
Reviewed by: Orcid Orcid L.K Prasad
Second Review by: Orcid Orcid Hamdi S. Aldharab
Final Approval by: Dr. C. P. Kumar


Introduction

Remote sensing application is wide in all fields especially on aspects of surface covering a large area. Surface feature is very useful for morphometry of particular area of interest in terms of drainage. Remote sensing application using software Arc GIS is very useful analyzing the relationship between runoff, geomorphic and geographic characteristics for morphometry of drainage. The quantitative analysis of watershed gives us an idea about many hydrological aspects. Lithology, slope pedology plays a major role to form watershed. This paper will explain a detail hydrological aspects study area taraka watershed at district Mysore, Karnataka covers 429 km2. Arc GIS maps will be better tool to understand the particular area under study of morphometry on watershed expressed as quantitative analysis description of the drainage pattern in watershed. The establishing of drainage pattern on the behavier of the hyrological system of the watershed area. The quantitative discription and analysis of land forms of drainage basin. The  assessment grondwater management groundwater potential zones and physical changes in nature respones over time on drainage system by human impact. A classification of watersheds based on stream oders was first conducted by Horton, which later explained by Strahler(1952)

Material and Method

The GSI topographic map of the 1:50,000 scale map were utilized for delineating the study area. Software using the ArcGIS 9-2.The main concept of the drainage basin are order and length of stream, bifurcation ratios and length of the overland flow(chow,1964;padmini), this is strahler stream classification system.

The basic parmeters are area (A), Stream length (Lu), perimeter(p), watershed length (L), Stream order (Nu) are found out from the watershed map. The diferrent parameters such as Stream length ratio (Rl), Ratio of Bifurcation (Rb), Stream frequency, (Fs), Density of drainage (Dd), Infiltration number (If), Form of factor (Rf), Ratio of Elongation (Re). Circularity ratio (Rc).

Study Area

The Taraka water basin is a part of the river Cauvery basin in the H D KoteTaluk, Mysore District of Karnataka. It is located between 12o00’ to 12o15’ North latitudes and 76o5’ to 76o25’ East longitudes. Taraka watershed, Mysore district, Karnatak state southern part and It comprises of 10 sub-watersheds. The area of study is 429 sq km2. According to Survey of India 57D/4, 57D/8, 58A/1 and 58A/05 are the toposheet number. The study area connected with an all-weather motorable road (Fig.1 and 2). River Cauvery is towards North and H D Kote towards South zone shown in Fig.1. The average rainfall is about 560mm.

Figure 1: Location Map using Arc GIS.

Click here to view Figure



The Lithology of the Area

The taraka watershed is a Proterozoic western block of southern part of Karnataka. Amphibolite Schistose rock of granulite facies of metamorphism which divides the Amphibolite Schist and Granitic Gneissic rocks of Archean age. This area is a typical hard rock terrain (Fig.2 and 3).

Figure 2: Lithology Map of the Area.

Click here to view Figure



Morphometry Analysis

Morphometry was a tool for the measurement and calculative method of analysis to get the quantified values on the surface, shape and dimension of the land. The Taraka watershed is composed of ten sub watershed showing sub-dendritic from dendritic patterns.

Drainage

The procedure by which the water of an area flow off on surface streams or subsurface condition. Natural and artificial methods for effecting discharge of water by surface and subsurface system followed by passages termed as drainage. Geological structure and the natural condition of the soil are the controlling for system flowing movement pattern like vertical and horizontal. Drainage pattern of study area was prepared by toposheets, the 5.8 m spatial resolution and interpretation keys are tone, pattern, texture, and association.

Results and Discussion

Stream Order


The easiest, simplest and widely used numbering is the first tributaries rank of 1 first-order and followed second-order was defined under junction of two first-order streams (Strahler, 1964). In the same 3rd and 4th order will form in Taraka watershed. The stream order was studied 10 sub watersheds of study area. Total 669 streams are present. Out of 10 sub watershed were 5 fifth streams order, 3 were 4th orders of stream, 1 were third and second order streams. First order of stream is present in all 10 sub watershed in an area (Table-1)

Figure 3(a): Stream Order at the Area.

Click here to view Figure


Stream Length

The linear length of river stream is calculated using ARC GIS data analysis techniques. In all watershed first-order which that as streams are lengthier than other which that as the orders of stream increases as the linear length of streams decreased (Horton, 1945). Natural gravity and instable slopes in a place shows this kind of characteristics. The length is high in sub watershed 1 is about 89.59 km and least at sub watershed 6 of 5.861km (Table-2)

Mean Stream Length

Mean length-Lu, of mean channel segment in stream order of u is a dimension property of revealing the size of characteristic the component on a network of drainage and its contributing basin surface (Strahler-1964). To calculate the Total length of channel order of u, total length is divided by the number of segment Nu of that order (Table-3).

Bifurcation Ratio

Bifurcation ratio (Rb) means ratio of stream order to consecutive next order of streams. The 1storder stream doesn’t have tributaries. The 1st and 2nd order streams received by 3rd order streams as tributaries (Schumn, 1956). The 1.06-18.99 value ranges in bifurcation ratio shows the drainage pattern was influenced the geological features and structures. The high value shows stronger geological structures with good topography (Table-4).

Drainage Density

The degree of drainage characterized by development within the basin, purely in qualitative terms such as well-drained and poorly drained are commonly used (Horton, 1945). The controlling factors are length of streams, weathering resistance and rock formations, permeability apart from vegetation and climate. High density drainage is represented in the regions of impermeable and weak and subsurface of hilly regions. The values ranges 0.87-1.29 density of drainage at area was fall under low density (Table-4)

Figure 3(b): Drainage Density at the Study Area.

Click here to view Figure


Stream Frequency

It is explained (Horton, 1932) as the stream segments total in number of all total orders per unit area. The values range from 1.31-1.76. The entire 10 sub-watershed indicates fractures controlled channel (Table 3).

Drainage Texture

As per the definition of Smith, 1950 explained in terms of very coarse, coarse and fine texture. The watershed number 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 were very coarse. Watershed number 2, 4, 7 were coarse texture. Fine texture was absent as per the calculation (Table.4).

Elongation Ratio

It means analysis the basin shape (Schumn, 1956). The values were generally from 0.71 to 1.2. It means geological and climate condition plays a major role. Range from 0.71-1.2 is usually steep slope and high value of relief (Table.4).

Form Factor

The form factor Rf, which are the dimensionless total area of the basin ratio, can be used to indicate the drainage basin of outline shape is quantitative expression of Aof the square of basin length L0,.The area of the ratio square of the streams length.(Horton, 1945). The values ranges from 4.50-20.61 the basin is almost narrowed length basin (Table.4)

Circularity Ratio

As per the definition of Miller (1953), “The ratio0f circularity  is expressed as the ratio of the area, The basin area of the circles whose perimeter is equal to the basins of the perimeter” as mentioned in the Table 1. It means stream frequency and stream length. The circularity ratios values Varied from 0.21 –0.73 elongated basin in shape wise.

Length of the Overland Flow

The water flow average length on surface before it became a stream it might be horizontal and drainage divides point finally drains to a same point(Horton, 1945). This is nothing but reciprocal of density of the area drainage. The surface flow water values varied from 0.38 to 0.63. The lithology and physiographic conditions are controlling factor.

Figure 3(c): Map of Sub-Watersheds.

Click here to view Figure

 

Figure 4: Sub-Watershed Map of the Study Area.

Click here to view Figure



Table 1: Parameter of Morphometric and Methodology of Morphometric.

Sl.no

Parameters of Morphometric

Methodology of Morphometric

Reference

1

Order of  Stream  (u)

Order of  Hierarchical

Strahler, (1964)

2

Length of  Stream  (Lu)

 Stream Length

 Horton, (1945)

3

Mean Length of  Stream  (Lsm)

Lu / Nu = Lsm ; Lu=Mean length of  stream order, Nu= Number segments of stream

Strahler,
(1964)

4

Length of  Stream Ratio (Rl)

Lu/Lu-1= Rl =;Lu =Total length of stream orders (u),Total streams length of next lower order=Lu-1

Horton,
(1945)

5

Ratio of  Bifurcation  (Rb)

Nu / Nu+1= Rb, Nu=Number of segments in stream present in the order; Segments Number of the higher order= Nu+1.

Schumn,
(1956)

6

Mean Ratio of Bifurcation  (Rbm)

Average  bifurcation ratio of all order = Rbm.

Strahler, (1964)

7

Length of  Basin  (Lb)

Straight-line distance between the mouth of a basin and the intersected of point on the water divided  on the projection of the line's direction via the main stream's sources.

Horton, (1932)

8

Perimeter (P)

water divide of Horizontal projection

Zavoianu, (1978)

9

Area of Basin  (Ba)

The complete area of drained by stream systems

GIS

10

Density of  Drainage  (Dd)

Lu /Ba= D ;Lu=Total length of  Stream of entire area orders (km);
Basin Area = Au in km2

Horton, (1945)

11

Texture of  Drainage (Dt)

Nu/P= Dt ; Total number of stream orders= Nu; P=Perimeter in km.

Smith,
 (1950)

12

Intensity of  Drainage  ( Di)

Fs/Dd= Di ; Fs =  Frequency of Stream; Density of  Drainage.(DD)

Faniran,
(1968)

13

Frequency of  Stream  (Fs)

Nu /Ba= Fs; Nu=Total streams number entire area of all orders
Ba=  Basin Area in km2

Horton, (1932)

14

Length Flow of Over Land (Lg)

1/ D×2= Lg; D = Density of Drainage (km/km2)

Horton, (1945)

15

Form Factor (Rf)

Ba / Lb2 = Rf ;Ba = Basin  Area in km2;  Lb2 = Square length of basin in km

Horton, (1945)

16

Ratio of  Circularity  (Rc)

4×π×Ba/ P2= Rc; Ba = Basin Area ( km2) ;P=  Basin Perimeter in km, ℼ = 3.14

Miller,(1953)

17

Ratio of  Elongation (Re)

√(Ba/π) / Lb= Re; Ba= Basin Area in km2 ;
Lb = length of the Basin  (km), ℼ= 3.14

Schumn (1956)

18

Shape Index (Si)

Lb2/Ba= Si ; Lb2 = Square length of basin in km;
Ba = Area of the Basin in km2

Faniran(1968)

19

Maintenance of Constant Channel (C)

C = 1/Dd,, where: Dd = Drainage density

 

20

Coefficient of Compactness

(Cc)

0.2841 x (P/Ba 0.5)= Cc ,P = Perimeter in km, Ba = Basin Area in km2

Luchisheva, (1950)

21

Number of  Infiltration  (If)

Fs×Dd= If ; Fs =  Frequency of Stream; Dd =  Density of Drainage 

Faniran(1968)

22

Maximum  basin height (Hmax) m

DEM or GIS analysis

     -

23

Basin mouth  Height  (Hmin) m

DEM or GIS analysis

   -

24

Total Relief of  Basin (R)

R = Hmax - Hmin

Strahler (1952)

25

Ratio of  Relief  (Rr)

𝐻/𝐿b= 𝑅r ;  H = Total basin relief in Kilometer ; 𝐿𝑏 =Length of the  Basin.

Schumm (1954)

26

Relative Relief Ratio (Rhp)

R×100/P= Rhp ; R = Maximum relief of the basin
P = Basin Perimeter in km

Melton, (1957)

27

Watershed Slope (Sw)

R/Lb= Sw ; R=Basin Maximum relief, Length of the Basin (𝐿𝑏)

        -

28

Aanalysis of  Slope (Sa)

DEM or GIS analysis

-


Table 2: Order, Number and Length Streams of Sub-Watersheds.

 

 

 

Streams Order

Streams length (KM)

Sl, no

Sub watersheds

Streams order

I

II

III

IV

V

ΣNu

I

II

III

IV

V

ΣLu

1

SW -1

IV

62

28

26

6

0

122

45.85

23.02

16.34

4.38

0.00

89.59

2

SW -2

IV

50

19

22

7

0

98

36.00

15.33

14.45

3.12

0.00

68.90

3

SW -3

V

37

17

13

0

7

74

29.22

15.53

8.23

0.00

5.79

58.77

4

SW -4

IV

34

10

5

19

0

68

33.86

7.50

4.05

9.67

0.00

55.07

5

SW -5

V

27

10

2

11

9

59

28.92

6.12

1.41

6.98

5.69

49.12

6

SW -6

II

8

2

0

0

0

10

4.26

1.60

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.86

7

SW -7

IV

44

22

7

16

0

89

36.01

16.16

4.45

9.23

0.00

65.85

8

SW -8

V

36

15

12

4

0

67

24.78

11.34

6.69

1.74

0.00

44.55

9

SW -9

IV

19

8

5

1

0

33

12.39

5.09

2.25

0.12

0.00

19.84

10

SW -10

III

26

9

14

0

0

49

20.95

6.09

9.57

0.00

0.00

36.61

 

Table 3: Mean and Ratios of Stream Length of Sub-Watersheds.

Sl. no

Sub watersheds

Mean length of streams (km)

Length of Stream ratio

I

II

III

IV

V

II/I

III/II

IV/III

V/IV

1

SW -1

0.73

0.82

0.62

0.73

0

0.50

0.71

0.27

0.00

2

SW -2

0.72

0.8

0.65

0.44

0

0.43

0.94

0.22

0.00

3

SW -3

0.78

0.91

0.63

0

0.82

0.53

0.53

0.00

0.00

4

SW -4

0.99

0.75

0.81

0.5

0

0.22

0.54

2.39

0.00

5

SW -5

1.07

0.61

0.7

0.63

0.63

0.21

0.23

4.95

0.81

6

SW -6

0.53

0.8

0

0

0

0.37

0.00

0.00

0.00

7

SW -7

0.81

0.73

0.63

0.57

0

0.45

0.28

2.07

0.00

8

SW -8

0.68

0.75

0.55

0.43

0

0.46

0.59

0.26

0.00

9

SW -9

0.65

0.63

0.45

0.12

0

0.41

0.44

0.05

0.00

10

SW -10

0.8

0.67

0.68

0

0

0.29

1.57

0.00

0.00

 

Table 4: Bifurcation Ratios, Density of Drainage, Texture of Drainage, Intensity Drainage and Frequency of Stream of Sub-Watersheds.

Sl. no

Sub-watershed

Ratio of  Bifurcation  (Rb)

Mean ratio of  bifurcation (Rbm)

Stream frequency (Fs)

Drainage density (Dd)

Drainage intensity (Di)

Drainage texture (Dt)

I/II

II/III

III/IV

IV/V

1

SW -1

1.99

1.41

3.73

0.00

1.78

1.70

1.25

1.36

3.46

2

SW -2

2.35

1.06

4.63

0.00

2.01

1.76

1.24

1.39

2.93

3

SW -3

1.88

1.89

0.00

0.00

0.94

1.44

1.14

1.26

1.82

4

SW -4

4.52

1.85

0.42

0.00

1.7

1.52

1.23

1.23

2.09

5

SW -5

4.73

4.34

0.20

1.23

2.62

1.55

1.29

1.20

1.71

6

SW -6

2.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.67

1.41

0.82

1.71

0.58

7

SW -7

2.23

3.63

0.48

0.00

1.58

1.53

1.13

1.35

2.64

8

SW -8

2.18

1.70

3.85

0.00

1.93

1.70

1.13

1.50

1.92

9

SW -9

2.43

2.26

18.99

0.00

5.92

1.31

0.79

1.65

0.86

10

SW -10

3.44

0.64

0.00

0.00

1.02

1.51

1.13

1.33

1.93

 

Table 5: Compactness coefficient, Maintenance of channel Constant, Land flow Length, Shape index.

Sl. no.

Sub watershed

Compactness coefficient (Cc)

Maintenance of  channel Constant (C)

Land flow Length (Lg)

Shape index (Si)

1

SW -1

0.07

0.8

0.4

0.17

2

SW – 2

0.08

0.80

0.4

0.15

3

SW – 3

0.11

0.87

0.43

0.24

4

SW – 4

0.10

0.81

0.4

0.23

5

SW -5

0.13

0.77

0.38

0.26

6

SW -6

0.34

1.21

0.6

0.35

7

SW -7

0.08

0.88

0.44

0.14

8

SW -8

0.12

0.88

0.44

0.19

9

SW -9

0.21

1.26

0.63

0.21

10

SW -10

0.11

0.88

0.44

0.27

 

Table 6: Basin area, length of the Basin, ratio of Elongation, Perimeter, Form factor, ratio of circularity, Infiltration number and Shape index of the sub watersheds.

Sl.no.

Sub watersheds

Area of Basin (Ba) Sq. km

Basin length (Lb) kms

Perimeter (P)

Form factor (Rf)

Elongation ratio (Re)

Circularity ratio (Rc)

Infiltration number (If)

1

SW -1

71.83

12.14

35.24

20.61

0.78

0.73

2.12

2

SW – 2

55.78

8.7

33.44

18.91

0.96

0.63

2.18

3

SW – 3

51.43

12.56

40.62

14.51

0.64

0.39

1.64

4

SW – 4

44.64

10.51

32.50

13.76

0.71

0.53

1.86

5

SW -5

37.96

9.93

34.46

12.04

0.7

0.4

1.99

6

SW -6

7.11

2.50

17.12

4.50

1.2

0.30

1.15

7

SW -7

58.22

8.54

33.67

19.92

1

0.64

1.72

8

SW -8

39.38

7.64

34.78

14.24

0.92

0.4

1.92

9

SW -9

25.16

5.18

38.28

11.05

1.09

0.21

1.03

10

SW -10

32.52

9.06

25.37

10.80

0.71

0.63

1.70

 

Conclusion

The Taraka watershed situated at the south part of Karnataka. River Cauvery is towards North, and H D Kote towards South. The area of study is 429 sq km2. The taraka watershed is composed of ten sub watershed are showing Dendritic to sub-dendritic patterns. Total 669 streams are present out of 10 sub watershed. The length is high in sub watershed number 1 is about 89.59 km and least at sub watershed number 6 is about 5.86km. The bifurcation value ranges from 1.06-18.99. These reading shows the drainage pattern is influenced the geological features and structures. Controlled channel and low drainage density. High relief and almost narrowed channel very coarse 6 watershed and 4 coarse drainage density. The surface flow water depends on the lithology and physiographic conditions are controlling factor.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank University of Mysore for granting the Ph.D. research work. The Department of Earth Science, Manasagangothri, Univeristy of Mysore is highly appreciated for allowed the GIS laboratory work. The author is also profoundly grateful to the National Remote Sensing Center (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Govt. of India for their guidance during the Satellite data procurement.

Funding Source

This research is funded by university of mysore research fellowship («WÀ 4/28/2018-19 dated 18.06.2019 /267).

Reference

  1. Agarwal, C.S, Study of Drainage Pattern Through Aerial Data in Naugarh Area of Varanasi DistrictU.P Jour. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing (1998), 26(4): 169-175.
    CrossRef
  2. AIS & LUS, Watershed Atlas of India, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, All India Soil and Land Use Survey(1990), IARI Campus, New Delhi.
  3. Amit Bera, Bhabani Mukhopadhyay, Debasish Das, "Morphometric Analysis of Adula River Basin in Maharashtra, India using GIS and Remote Sensing techniques", Gatha Cognition(2018).
    CrossRef
  4. Binoy Kumar Barman, Gautam Raj Bawri, K. Srinivasa Rao, Sudhir Kumar Singh, Dhruvesh Patel, "Drainage network analysis to understand the morphotectonic significance in upper Tuirial watershed, Aizawl, Mizoram"Elsevier BV(2021).
  5. Clarke, J.I, Morphometry from Maps. Essays in Geomorphology, Elsevier Publ. Co. (1966), New York, pp. 235-274.
  6. H. Gupta, B. Hazarika, R. Yenkie, M. Jaunjalkar, S.Verma and D.B. Malpe, Morphometric Analysis of PGW-1 Watershed of Ghatanji Area, Yavatmal District, Maharashtra, Journal of Geosciences Research Vol. 5, No. 2020, Pp-27-34.
  7. H.S. Kale and S.B. Deshmukh, Morphometric Analysis of WGKD Sub-watershed using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, Journal of Geosciences Research Vol. 5, No. 2020, Pp-35-42.
  8. Horton, R.E, Drainage Basin Characteristics.Trans. Am. Geophys(1932), Union, 13: 350-361.
    CrossRef
  9. Horton, R.E, Erosional Development of Streams and their Drainage Basins; Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology(1945), Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 56: 275-370.
    CrossRef
  10. J.R. Shrivatra, B.S. Manjare and S.K. Paunikar, Morphometric Analysis Based Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds of WRJ-1 Watershed of Narkhed Taluka, Nagpur District, Maharashtra Using Geospatial Techniques, Journal of Geosciences Research, Vol. 6, No.2, 2021, Pp-242-250.
  11. Langbein, W.B, Topographic Characteristics of Drainage Basins. U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper(1947), 986(C): 157-159.
  12. M. Rudraiah, S. Govindaiah, S. Srinivas Vittala. "Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna river basin, Gulburga district, Karnataka, India", Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing(2009).
    CrossRef
  13. Miller, V.C, A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee (1953), Proj. NR389-402, Tech Rep 3, Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, New York.
  14. NRSA, Integrated Mission for Sustainable Development Technical Guidelines, National Remote Sensing Agency (1995), Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad.
  15. P.B. Kamble, J.U. Shinde, M.A. Herlekar, P.B. Gawali, B.N. Umrikar, A.M. Varade and S. Aher, Morphometric Analysis of Ratnagiri Coast, Western Maharashtra, Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, Journal of Geosciences Research, Vol. 4, No. 2 July 2019, Pp-185-195.
  16. Prafull Singh, Jay Krishna Thakur, U. C. Singh, "Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques", Environmental Earth Sciences. (2012).
    CrossRef
  17. Ravi Shankar, Ashok Kumar Singh, Gyan Prakash Satyam, Heidi Daxberger, "Active tectonics influences in the Satluj river basin in and around Rampur, Himachal Himalaya, India", Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2020).
    CrossRef
  18. Reddy, P.R.R. and Rangaswamy, C.Y, Groundwater Resources of Pavagada Taluk, Tumkur District. Groundwater Studies No. 240. Department of Mines and Geology (1989), Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.
  19. S. C. Bhatt, Rubal Singh, M. A. Ansari, S. Bhatt, "Quantitative Morphometric and Morphotectonic Analysis of Pahuj Catchment Basin, Central India", Journal of the Geological Society of India. (2020).
    CrossRef
  20. S. P. Rajaveni, K. Brindha, L. Elango, "Geological and geomorphological controls on groundwater occurrence in a hard rock region", Applied Water Science (2015).
    CrossRef
  21. S.P. Masurkar, B.S. Manjare and N. Anusha, Morphotectonics of Wan River Sub-basin Using Remote Sensing and GIS Approach, Journal of Geosciences Research, Vol. 4, No. 2 July 2019, Pp -163-172.
  22. Schumm, S.A, Evolution of Drainage Systems and Slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull (1956), 67: 597-646.
    CrossRef
  23. Srivastava, V.K, Study of Drainage Pattern of Jharia Coalfield (Bihar), India, Through Remote Sensing Technology. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing(1997), 25(1): 41-46.
    CrossRef
  24. Srivastava, V.K. and Mitra, D, Study of Drainage Pattern of RaniganjCoalfield (Burdwan District) as observed on Landsat-TM/lRS LISS II Imagery. J.Indian Soc. Remote Sensing (1995), 23(4): 225-235.]
    CrossRef
  25. Strahler, A.N, Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union (1957)., 38:913-920.
    CrossRef
  26. Strahler, A.N, Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: V. T. Chow (ed), Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGrawHill Book Company (1964), New York, section 4-11.
  27. Y.A. Murkute, S.P. Joshi, S.S. Deshpande and N.G. Oak, Morphometric Study of PG-1 Watershed of Chandrapur District, Maharashtra, Journal of Geosciences Research Vol. 5, No. 2020, Pp-43-51.