Brain Neurorehabil. 2016 Mar;9(1):48-55. Korean.
Published online Mar 31, 2016.
Copyright © 2016 Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation
Original Article

Mirror Therapy Using Virtual Reality on the Wrsit of Rheumatoid Arthritis; Pilot Trial

Seung Won Choi, M.D., Ph.D.,1 Suncheol Heo,2 Chang Ho Hwang, M.D., Ph.D.,3 and Kyo-in Koo, Ph.D.2
    • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.
    • 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Ulsan, Korea.
    • 3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.
Received November 18, 2015; Revised December 15, 2015; Accepted March 30, 2016.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective

Authors conducted the pilot trial to evaluate whether the virtual reality using mirror therapy induces analgesia and functional improvement to the patients of rheumatoid wrist arthritis.

Method

Three patients with no symptom or sign of active phase at both wrists were recruited. Voluntary range of motion (ROM) of each wrist over as far as possible was recorded and then the same movement was recorded only over 60% of the previous one after break of 5 minutes. For the virtual reality treatment, the second recorded motion was reconstructed into the another one of as same ROM and spent time as the first one, providing confusing visual information to the patients while patients were instructed to reach only the red flags (60% ROM of 1st one). This exercise was repeated for 5 days. Numerous scales such as VAS, ROM, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionaire (MHQ), Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL), patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) were evaluated before and after repetition.

Results

The increased satisfaction with their hands (satisfaction score of MHQ; 5.8 ± 2.3, [6-30]), improved ADL performances (PS-ADL score: 5.0 ± 3.5, [0-117]), and no side effect were noticed.

Conclusion

The virtual reality using mirror therapy may be safe and has some analgesic effect, which warrants a clinical trial in the future for the patients of rheumatoid wrist arthritis.

Keywords
analgesia; rheumatoid arthritis; virtual reality therapy; wrist

Figures

Fig. 1
Diagram of virtual reality. Patients were instructed to took a seat upright in a chair opposite to the table on which a monitor of virtual reality was placed, stretche their either of arm out into the support for the elbow, replace their wrist and hand in an anatomical neutral position under a camera to be seen fully in the center of the monitor, and their forearm and wrist were immobilized to the supports using Velcro strap.

Fig. 2
Preparation of virtual reality. Patients were instructed to grip a white poles using the palm surface so that the tip of the while pole was protruded beyond the ulnar border. Two red- colored round stickers of 1 cm in diameter were affixed to the center of wrist strap and the tip of the white pole respectively.

Fig. 3
Process of virtual reality. Patients were instructed to do flexion-extension wrist exercise again up- and down-ward to two red frags the location of which in a monitor was seen as the same as during the former exercise of full range. But virtual reality let the real-time movement of the wrist (white spot; 60% of previous range of motion) be seen to reach to the red flag in the pace of the same angular velocity.

Tables

Table 1
Interval Changes of Functional and Surrogate Ends

Appendix

Validation of virtual reality

References

    1. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996;263:377–386.
    1. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 2009;132:1693–1710.
    1. Moseley GL. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia. Pain 2007;130:294–298.
    1. Karmarkar A, Lieberman I. Mirror box therapy for complex regional pain syndrome. Anaesthesia 2006;61:412–413.
    1. Ramachandran VS, Seckel EL. Using mirror visual feedback and virtual reality to treat fibromyalgia. Med Hypotheses 2010;75:495–496.
    1. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sutbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Koseoglu F. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:393–398.
    1. Lee HM, Li PC, Fan SC. Delayed mirror visual feedback presented using a novel mirror therapy system enhances cortical activation in healthy adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015;12:56.
    1. Waljee JF, Chung KC, Kim HM, Burns PB, Burke FD, Wilgis EF. Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1569–1577.
    1. Holmes NP, Crozier G, Spence C. When mirrors lie: visual capture of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2004;4:193–200.
    1. Romano D, Bottini G, Maravita A. Perceptual effects of the mirror box training in normal subjects. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013;31(4):373–386.
    1. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:575–587.
    1. Archenholtz B, Dellhag B. Validity and reliability of the instrument Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL) and its clinical applicability to adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Occup Ther 2008;15:13–22.
    1. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:577–586.
    1. Norkin C WJ. In: Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. Philadelphia, PA: Davis Company; 1995. pp. 89-90.
    1. Darnall BD, Li H. Home-based self-delivered mirror therapy for phantom pain: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:254–260.
    1. Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see. Nature 1998;391:756.
    1. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 2005;163:118–122.
    1. Harris AJ. Cortical origin of pathological pain. Lancet 1999;354:1464–1466.
    1. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995;375:482–484.
    1. Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grusser S. Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet 2001;357:1763–1764.
    1. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Cortical reorganization during recovery from complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2004;63:693–701.
    1. Pleger B, Tegenthoff M, Ragert P, Forster AF, Dinse HR, Schwenkreis P. Sensorimotor retuning [corrected] in complex regional pain syndrome parallels pain reduction. Ann Neurol 2005;57:425–429.
    1. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Brain plasticity and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 1998;49:43–64.
    1. Funase K, Tabira T, Higashi T, Liang N, Kasai T. Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett 2007;419:108–112.
    1. Touzalin-Chretien P, Ehrler S, Dufour A. Dominance of vision over proprioception on motor programming: evidence from ERP. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:2007–2016.
    1. Schaefer M, Flor H, Heinze HJ, Rotte M. Morphing the body: illusory feeling of an elongated arm affects somatosensory homunculus. Neuroimage 2007;36:700–705.
    1. Schaefer M, Heinze HJ, Rotte M. My third arm: shifts in topography of the somatosensory homunculus predict feeling of an artificial supernumerary arm. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:1413–1420.
    1. Egsgaard LL, Petrini L, Christoffersen G, Arendt-Nielsen L. Cortical responses to the mirror box illusion: a high-resolution EEG study. Exp Brain Res 2011;215:345–357.
    1. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5–8.
    1. Kang YJ, Ku J, Han K, Kim SI, Yu TW, Lee JH. Development and clinical trial of virtual reality-based cognitive assessment in people with stroke: preliminary study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:329–339.
    1. Keshavarz B, Hecht H. Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Hum Factors 2011;53:415–426.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 3

Tables

1 / 2

PERMALINK