Skip to content
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS): Cohort characteristics at enrollment

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa bears a disproportionate burden of preterm birth and other adverse outcomes. A better understanding of the demographic, clinical, and biologic underpinnings of these adverse outcomes is urgently needed to plan interventions and inform new discovery. 
Methods: The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS) is a prospective observational cohort established at the Women and Newborn Hospital (WNH) in Lusaka, Zambia. We recruit pregnant women from district health centers and the WNH and offer ultrasound examination to determine eligibility. Participants receive routine obstetrical care, lab testing, midtrimester cervical length measurement, and serial fetal growth monitoring. At delivery, we assess gestational age, birthweight, vital status, and sex and assign a delivery phenotype. We collect blood, urine, and vaginal swab specimens at scheduled visits and store them in an on-site biorepository. In September 2017, enrollment of the ZAPPS Phase 1—the subject of this report—was completed. Phase 2, which is limited to HIV-uninfected women, reopened in January 2018. 
Results: Between August 2015 and September 2017, we screened 1784 women, of whom 1450 (81.2%) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The median age at enrollment was 27 years (IQR 23–32) and median gestational age was 16 weeks (IQR 13–18). Among women with a previous pregnancy (n=1042), 19% (n=194) reported a prior miscarriage.  Among parous women (n=992), 41% (n=411) reported a prior preterm birth and 14% (n=126) reported a prior stillbirth. The HIV seroprevalence was 24%.
Discussion: We have established a large cohort of pregnant women and newborns at the WNH to characterize the determinants of adverse birth outcomes in Lusaka, Zambia. Our overarching goal is to elucidate biological mechanisms in an effort to identify new strategies for early detection and prevention of adverse outcomes. We hope that findings from this cohort will help guide future studies, clinical care, and policy.

Keywords

Preterm Birth, Africa, Cohort

Revised Amendments from Version 2

This revision corrects minor typographical errors and updates baseline descriptive characteristics that shifted slightly during data cleaning performed at the time of our primary outcomes analysis.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Fyezah Jehan
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Zahida Qureshi

Introduction

Preterm birth is a global challenge impacting both developed and developing countries1,2. It contributes to approximately 35% of neonatal and 75% of perinatal mortality each year3,4. Further, preterm infants who survive are at an elevated risk of long-term respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurodevelopmental morbidities. These complications may affect subsequent health, growth, psychosocial functioning, and even economic capacity of these individuals57.

The greatest burden of mortality and morbidity from preterm births occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)8. Of an estimated 14.9 million preterm births globally each year, 13.6 million (91%) occur in LMICs1. Preterm birth rates are as low as 5% in some European countries and as high as 18% in some African countries1, precisely where the resources to prevent preterm birth and manage preterm infants are least developed. In Zambia, for example, the preterm birth rate is estimated to be 13%1. Each year there are 77,600 preterm births and 6,800 infant deaths due to preterm birth complications9.

The burden of maternal HIV infection is also high in many LMIC settings, where it has been associated with a 50% increased risk of preterm birth10. Although the increasing availability of maternal antiretroviral therapy has led to dramatic reductions in pediatric HIV incidence11, it does not seem to reduce HIV-attributable preterm birth in this population. In fact, antiretroviral drug exposure may in fact increase the risk of preterm birth among some HIV-infected gravidas1214.

Preterm birth can result from many different etiological entities. Approximately one-third of preterm deliveries are indicated because of pre-eclampsia, hemorrhage, abnormal placentation, intra-uterine growth restriction, oligohydramnios, or multi-fetal gestation. Spontaneous preterm labor is implicated in about 40% of preterm births; another 25% are related to preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes1517. The underlying causes of spontaneous preterm birth in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations are not well understood. Although several maternal and newborn interventions (e.g. antenatal corticosteroids, neonatal resuscitation, and kangaroo mother care) can reduce the complications of preterm birth, prevention is key. Much remains to be discovered about the risk factors, causes, and pathophysiology of preterm delivery, and how to prevent its occurrence.

Methods

Study design

The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS) aims to establish a well-characterized pregnancy cohort to better understand the risk factors associated with preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes in a LMIC setting. The cohort was established to be a local resource to the University of Zambia School of Medicine and to contribute to general scientific knowledge around the biology of pregnancy and parturition.

ZAPPS enrolls pregnant women at the Women and Newborn Hospital of the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia into a prospective antenatal cohort. The UTH is the province’s only tertiary referral center, serving a primary catchment population of approximately 2 million people. The Women and Newborn Hospital receives referrals for high-risk pregnancies, including those with complex medical histories, history of prior preterm birth, stillbirth, or pregnancy loss, and has a very busy labor ward with approximately 18,000 deliveries per year18. Study participants are recruited from the UTH and five nearby high-volume Lusaka district health clinics. We established this cohort with the aim to better characterize demographic determinants, biomedical causes, and underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with adverse birth outcomes in Lusaka, Zambia. Through the Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, we collaborate with a consortium of international scientists, many of whom are also working in LMIC countries, in order to advance our understanding of the causes of preterm delivery. This study was designed in accordance with the Strengthening The Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines19.

Study participants

Pregnant women who meet the following criteria are eligible for enrollment in ZAPPS: (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) viable intrauterine singleton or twin pregnancy; (3) presentation to antenatal care prior to 20 weeks’ gestation if HIV-uninfected or 24 weeks’ if HIV-infected; (4) residing within Lusaka with no plans to relocate during the study follow-up period; (4) willing to provide written, informed consent; (5) willing to allow participation of their infant(s) in the study; (6) willing to be followed up at home for birth outcomes if necessary. Initially, all pregnant women with a gestational age ≥ 20 weeks by a standard algorithm20 were excluded; however, this criterion was extended to ≥24 weeks for HIV-infected women following a protocol amendment in July 2016 to align this group with related, ongoing clinical trials at this site (NCT03297216, NCT02970552).

In September 2017, enrollment of the ZAPPS Phase 1 – the subject of this report – was completed and enrollment paused as we amended the protocol to focus on HIV-uninfected women only. Phase 2 reopened enrollment in January 2018.

Primary objective

The primary objective of this study is to establish a well-characterized cohort of pregnant women and their infants – and an accompanying specimen biorepository – with follow-up through delivery and up to 42 days postpartum. Our overarching goal is to create a resource in Zambia to better elucidate the biological mechanisms leading to preterm delivery in an effort to identify new strategies for early detection and prevention.

Outcomes

The primary outcome of the ZAPPS cohort study is preterm birth, defined as birth prior to 37 weeks completed gestation. The secondary outcomes are: (1) delivery prior to 34 weeks completed gestation and (2) low birth weight, defined as infants weighing less than 2500 grams at delivery.

Study procedures

Potential participants are identified at an early antenatal visit. Community educators approach participants who may be preliminarily eligible by gestational age criteria based on reported last menstrual period and fundal height. Potentially eligible women are escorted to the UTH study clinic. After an information session, a sonographer performs an ultrasound examination to determine fetal viability and gestational age estimation either by crown rump length (if <14 weeks)21 or fetal biometry (if ≥14 weeks) measurements22. Women deemed eligible for study participation and choosing to participate are administered an informed consent in the language of their choice: English, Nyanja, or Bemba. While screening and enrollment procedures may occur on the same day, women could return on a subsequent day for enrollment to allow time to consider the risks and benefits of study participation and to discuss the study with their family.

Clinical care and follow-up

Study participants receive routine antenatal care at the ZAPPS study clinic at the UTH, with visits scheduled at enrollment, 24 weeks, 32 weeks, and 36 weeks of gestation, according to standard of care in Zambia. Additionally, women are asked to return to the clinic for a postpartum visit, typically 6 weeks after delivery (Table 1).

Table 1. Schedule of events, demographic and clinical data collected among all participants in ZAPPS cohort.

Gestational age (weeks)<20^20-222428323436Delivery42 days
ADMINISTRATIVE/REGULATORY PROCEDURES
Informed consent
Collection/review of locator info
COLLECTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
Age, education, socioeconomic status
Substance use
Marital status
Pregnancy intention
Sexual health
Vaginal practices
Intimate partner violence screening
Nutritional assessment
Maternal depression screen
OBSTETRICAL ULTRASOUND PROCEDURES
Dating biometry ultrasound
Fetal biometry ultrasound
Cervical length ultrasound
MATERNAL CLINICAL HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAM
Obstetrical history
Medical history
Maternal height & weight
Maternal mid-upper arm circumference
Maternal vital signs
Maternal physical exam
Fetal heart rate
Fundal height
Fetal lie
INFANT CLINICAL HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAM
Neonatal physical exam
Neonatal vital status / APGAR
Newborn assessment
Infant physical exam
Infant feeding status assessment
Infant HIV diagnostic assessment (if
exposed)
LABORATORY PROCEDURES
Maternal HIV (rapid EIA)
Maternal syphilis (RPR)
Maternal malaria
Maternal hemoglobin (hemocue)
Maternal urinalysis (& culture if +)
SPECIMEN COLLECTION FOR STORAGE / FUTURE TESTING
Vaginal ± rectal swab storage
Blood storage
Urine storage
Placenta, membranes, cord
histopathology, and storage
Infant blood sample via heel prick

^ Extended to <24 weeks for HIV-infected in July 2016 Additional visits for participants with short cervix * Birth weight, birth length, head circumference, foot length, physical and neuromuscular maturity

After enrollment, all participants return for universal cervical length evaluation between 20 and 24 weeks’ gestation. Those with a short cervix by transvaginal ultrasound, defined as <2.5 cm23, then attend additional visits scheduled at 28 and 32 weeks’ gestation for repeat cervical length ultrasounds and are referred to a study physician at the UTH for further counseling and follow-up. All participants undergo an additional fetal biometry ultrasound, performed at 32 weeks’ gestation. Each study sonographer is trained using curricula adapted from the INTERGROWTH-2121,24 and Cervical Length Education and Review (CLEaR) program for cervical length measurements. All biometry parameters are measured twice and then averaged. Cervical length – measured three times over a period of 3 to 5 minutes – is first measured by transabdominal ultrasound; those whose transabdominal cervical length is <3.5cm or not measurable then undergo transvaginal measurement25,26.

At each antenatal care visit, study nurses perform a vital sign assessment and a physical exam, which includes maternal height and weight; mid-upper arm circumference measurement; fundal height measurement; assessment for pallor, edema, and abdominal tenderness; fetal heart rate assessment; and cervical exam as clinically indicated. We use point-of-care tests for HIV, anemia, malaria, syphilis, and urinary tract infection, and provide tetanus toxoid injection(s), iron, folate, malaria intermittent preventive treatment, and de-worming treatment in accordance with local standards of care. Participants with pre-existing or new HIV diagnoses are counseled and referred to appropriate antiretroviral therapy and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services. At the postpartum visit, study nurses assess maternal and infant interval complications, perform maternal and infant physical exams, assess infant feeding and general well-being, and provide health education counselling. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Screen is self-administered by participants at 24 weeks and again at the postpartum visit. Participants who screen positive are referred for further care at the UTH outpatient psychiatric clinic.

Throughout the study, study nurses assess participants’ past medical and obstetrical history and current pregnancy signs and symptoms. Participants are asked specifically if they have ever been diagnosed with high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, or any other chronic illness. Study staff carefully screen participants at each study visit for the presence of adverse or serious adverse events. Participants are referred to the appropriate higher level care provider at the UTH for any adverse events identified that require medical care beyond the scope of the study nurses’ practice.

To maximize retention, locator information on all participants is collected at screening and reviewed at each subsequent encounter. All participants are informed during the consent process that their locator sources will be used to contact them if they do not attend their scheduled study visits. Missed visits are identified by an electronic database that tracks expected and actual visits. If a participant misses a scheduled visit, study staff follow standardized procedures to attempt to contact the participant through the following mechanisms: (1) phone contact with the participant directly, (2) phone contact with other contacts provided on the participant’s locator information, and (3) home visits.

Data collection and management

Clinical data: After enrollment, study staff collect medical, antenatal, and HIV history data (as applicable) through interviewer-administered questionnaires and review of participants’ medical records. At the time of delivery, or at first contact postpartum, detailed information is collected about the clinical course of the participant’s delivery and delivery outcomes for both the mother and infant(s). This allows clinical phenotyping of all adverse birth outcomes. Shortly after delivery and prior to hospital discharge, the study team documents assessment of infant vital signs, weight, length, head circumference, complete physical exam, and of neuromuscular maturity using the New Ballard Score27. If the infant requires admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, the newborn assessment is done after the infant is deemed stable by the pediatrician.

Biological specimen collection: Trained study nurses collect maternal specimens at enrollment, 24-week, and 32-week visits, as well as at delivery (Table 1) following approved standard operating procedures to ensure quality and uniformity. While the 24- and 32-week study visits are scheduled according to gestational age, in the event that a participant misses her appointment, specimens may be collected as soon as possible once she returns to clinic. Trained study nurses collect maternal specimens pre-delivery as well as placenta and cord blood specimens immediately following delivery. All specimens are stored and transferred in insulated containers with continuous temperature monitoring to the on-site lab by clinic staff within two hours of collection. Study lab staff process all specimens according to assay manufacturers’ instructions, analyzing some specimens immediately per standard antenatal care guidelines and storing others for later study-related analyses (Table 1). HIV-1 plasma viral loads are performed for participants identified as HIV-infected at enrollment. Lab staff follow strict quality protocols for maternal blood processing to produce aliquots of whole blood, serum, plasma, and buffy coat for storage in barcoded cryotubes. All specimens are stored at -80°C in temperature-controlled freezer systems equipped with continuous temperature monitoring and text message notification of temperature deviations. The UTH serves as the primary biorepository for stored specimens, with redundancy at a central project repository in Seattle, Washington and at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Chapel Hill, NC.

Ethical considerations

The ZAPPS protocol was developed in consultation with a local community advisory board to ensure study procedures are acceptable in the communities from which participants would be recruited. The study and its protocol revisions undergo continuing ethical review by the relevant research ethics authorities at the University of Zambia School of Medicine (Reference number: 016-04-14) and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine (Study number: 14-2113). Participation in all study activities is voluntary, and each participant provides written, informed consent prior to enrollment.

To address the minimal risks associated with participation in this non-interventional study, all study personnel have been trained on standard operating procedures to protect participant privacy and confidentiality. Staff receive protection of human research participants training prior to conducting any study activities and every two years thereafter. Key research staff members complete Good Clinical Practice or Good Clinical Laboratory Practice training, as applicable. All study-related and unrelated adverse events and social harms are graded using the National Institute of Health’s Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events. All adverse events are reported to regulatory authorities, according to their individual guidelines.

All participants in this study may benefit from enhanced health education and close clinical monitoring. The knowledge generated from this observational study regarding maternal risk factors and neonatal outcomes of preterm birth are expected to outweigh the risks of participation. Conclusions drawn from this knowledge may inform future clinical trials on the prevention of adverse birth outcomes in low-resource settings, which may in turn enable policymakers worldwide to make informed decisions regarding effective interventions for the improvement of maternal-neonatal health.

Results

Characteristics of cohort at enrollment

Between August 2015 and September 2017, 1784 women were recruited and screened from local antenatal clinics by ZAPPS study staff. Among them, 1450 (81.3%) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Of the 334 not enrolled, 260 (78%) were at advanced gestational age on ultrasound, 18 (5%) had a non-viable pregnancy, 15 (4%) were unwilling to provide informed consent, 10 (3%) were less than 18 years old, 7 (2%) were unwilling to remain in the study area, 3 (1%) were not willing to be contacted by study staff, 2 (1%) were not willing to attend study visits or deliver at UTH, and 19 (6%) were not enrolled for other reasons.

The median age of participants in the cohort is 27 years (IQR 23–32) (Table 2). Most women (n=1202 of 1437; 84%) are married or cohabiting with their partner, and have been pregnant at least once in the past (n=1042 of 1450, 72%). Among participants with a prior pregnancy, 19% (n=194) reported a prior miscarriage. Among parous participants (n=992), 41% (n=411) reported a prior preterm birth and 14% (n=126) reported a prior stillbirth. Participants are enrolled at a median gestational age of 16 weeks (IQR 13–18); 427 of 1450 (29%) enrolled prior to 14 weeks’ gestational age.

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of ZAPPS cohort, N=1450.

CharacteristicNValue*
% or Median (IQR)
Age, years140927 (23,32)
   <201117.9
   20–34111679.2
   ≥3518212.9
   Missing41-
Marital status
   Not married and not
cohabiting
23516.4
   Married or cohabiting120283.7
   Missing13-
Education
   None261.8
   0–12 years122585.4
   ≥12 years18412.8
   Missing15
Source of drinking water
   Piped134093.3
   Other966.7
   Missing14-
Toilet facilities in
household
   Flush or Pour76253.0
   Pit or Latrine67346.8
   Other20.1
   Missing143-
Floor material in home
   Natural/rudimentary1389.6
   Finished129990.4
   Missing13-
BMI, kg/m2136623.6 (21.2,27.2)
   <18.5715.2
   18.5–30.0110380.8
   >30.019214.1
   Missing84-
GA at enrollment, weeks145016 (13,18)
   <1442729.4
   ≥14102370.6
Gravidity14502 (1,4)
   Primigravid40828.1
   Multigravid104271.9
Parity14501 (0,2)
   Nulliparous45831.6
   Parous99268.4
Prior miscarriage, n=1042
   Multigravida, no prior
miscarriage
84881.4
   Multigravida, ≥1 prior
miscarriage
19418.6
Prior PTB, n=992
   Parous, no prior PTB58158.6
   Parous, ≥1 prior PTB41141.4
Prior SB, n=992
   Parous, no prior SB78086.1
   Parous, ≥1 prior SB12613.9
   Missing86-
Blood pressure at
enrollment
   Normotensive136796.3
   Hypertensive^523.7
   Missing31-
HIV serostatus at
enrollment
   Negative109775.8
   Positive35024.2
   Missing3-
Syphilis at enrollment
   Non-reactive127294.8
   Reactive705.2
   Missing108-
Hemoglobin at
enrollment, mg/dL
102512 (11,13)
   ≥10.588586.3
   <10.514013.7
   Missing425-
Malaria at enrollment
   Negative114399.6
   Positive50.4
   Missing302-
Urinalysis at enrollment
   Normal130295.0
   Abnormal695.0
   Missing79-

IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; GA, gestational age; PTB, preterm birth; SB, stillbirth

* Not all columns sum to 100% due to rounding

^ Defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90

† Defined as 1+ leukocyte esterase and/or + nitrites

The baseline HIV seroprevalence in our cohort is 24% (n=350 of 1447), of whom 55% (n=186 of 340) had undetectable viral load. Nearly 4% (n=52 of 1419) of participants had elevated blood pressure (≥140/90) at enrollment; 5% (n=69 of 1371) had a urinalysis consistent with bacteriuria or urinary tract infection (1+ leukocyte esterase and/or nitrites). Syphilis was prevalent in 5% (n=70 of 1342) of our cohort at baseline. Malaria is uncommon in our cohort: 5 of 1148 participants (0.4%) tested positive for malaria by rapid test. 14% (n=140 of 1025) were anemic (Hgb <10.5mg/dL) at baseline.

Discussion

The underlying pathological processes responsible for activation of the common parturition pathway in preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and preterm delivery are incompletely understood. A comprehensive investigation of these processes could help define clinical signs and biological markers of high-risk pregnancies and allow the development and application of early preventive interventions targeted to those women at highest risk. Our cohort study will describe the frequency, predictors, and potential confounders of preterm birth and other adverse outcomes in HIV-infected and uninfected women. Our biorepository is being established in parallel to investigate biological correlates of these outcomes.

Future planned analyses of the ZAPPS cohort data will investigate frequency and determinants of the following adverse birth outcomes, both individually and in composite: preterm birth (delivery <37 weeks), very preterm birth (delivery <34 weeks), stillbirth, low birthweight (<2500g), very low birthweight (<1500g), small for gestational age (<10%ile), and very small for gestational age (<3%ile). We will define birthweight-for-age according to INTERGROWTH-21st standards24. We will distinguish spontaneous preterm deliveries from provider-indicated preterm deliveries and investigate the prevalence and distribution of preterm phenotypes28, both within our cohort and relative to other studies29. Specimens stored at our UTH laboratory will be used for study-related analyses to identify inflammatory markers (e.g., chemokines, cytokines), microbiome community states, metabolic analytes, proteins, hormones, transcripts, and various infectious factors that may be predict adverse birth outcomes. As nearly one-fourth of our cohort was HIV-infected at enrollment, we will conduct specific analyses within this population to better understand the effect of both HIV and antiretroviral therapy on adverse birth outcomes.

Gestational age can be estimated by patient report of the last normal menstrual period (LMP), ultrasound biometry24,30, or a combination of the two20. Our experience in Zambia is that the LMP is an imprecise measure that artificially inflates the actual rate of preterm birth in the population31, and that it may in fact introduce bias32. We chose to establish gestational age by ultrasound alone in this cohort.

The strength of ZAPPS is found in its size (nearly 1500 participants enrolled to date) and its design (a prospective antenatal cohort enrolling in early pregnancy). We note that our cohort is at risk of attrition, a well-known challenge of antenatal cohorts, as well as biases of selective participation contributing to a cohort not fully representative of the general population. We enroll pregnant women in the nation’s capital of Lusaka, and we have specifically prioritized the enrollment of HIV-infected women, relaxing the eligibility criteria for gestational age at enrollment for this population. This over-representation of HIV-infected participants in our cohort will enhance our ability to investigate epidemiologic and mechanistic associations of HIV and preterm birth. We acknowledge substantial missingness of key point-of-care results (hemoglobin, syphilis, and malaria) as another important limitation to our cohort. Since our study is integrated with routine care at clinical sites, several participants—particularly in the early conduct of the study—did not undergo repeat testing at the study clinic if they had recently done so at the clinic from which they were recruited. This has been rectified in Phase 2 of the cohort.

In summary, we have established a well-characterized antenatal cohort in Lusaka, Zambia that benefits from ultrasound gestational age dating, longitudinal clinical assessments, biological specimen collection and storage, and careful classification of birth and neonatal outcomes (including phenotyping of all preterm births and stillbirths). The knowledge gained from this study has the potential to drive future research in preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes, to inform the development of novel preventive therapies and treatments, and to influence clinical care and health policy worldwide.

Collaboration

The ZAPPS study is part of the Preventing Preterm Birth Initiative of the Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS). The Zambia cohort is co-led by the University of Zambia and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Study findings will be made available through appropriate local channels, including academic and public health research symposia. Our primary purpose is as a shared resource and we invite collaborators with high-impact ideas to apply for access to data and stored specimens from the ZAPPS study as well as other sites in the GAPPS biorepository network. Potential collaborators are invited to contact GAPPS directly (info@gapps.org) or the ZAPPS principal investigators: Jeffrey Stringer (jeffrey_stringer@med.unc.edu) and Bellington Vwalika (bvwalika@unza.zm).

Data availability

De-identified individual patient data underlying Table 2 are available on Open Science Framework: http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UNE9Y33

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 02 May 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
Gates Open Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Castillo MC, Fuseini NM, Rittenhouse K et al. The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS): Cohort characteristics at enrollment [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] Gates Open Res 2019, 2:25 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12820.3)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 04 Dec 2018
Revised
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Jan 2019
Fyezah Jehan, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 
Approved
VIEWS 12
Thank you for uploading a revised version. The paper has improved greatly in ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Jehan F. Reviewer Report For: The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS): Cohort characteristics at enrollment [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. Gates Open Res 2019, 2:25 (https://doi.org/10.21956/gatesopenres.13986.r26804)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 02 May 2018
Views
26
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 May 2018
Fyezah Jehan, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 26
Overall an important report of a biorepository cohort in LMIC, in a high prematurity setting defining baseline characteristics of the cohort at enrollment. Some recommendations for improvement :-

Abstract: Needs to be realigned with the article text. Methods ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Jehan F. Reviewer Report For: The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS): Cohort characteristics at enrollment [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. Gates Open Res 2019, 2:25 (https://doi.org/10.21956/gatesopenres.13888.r26413)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 Dec 2018
    Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
    04 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    Fyezah Jehan, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 
    Approved with Reservations
     
    Overall an important report of a biorepository cohort in LMIC, in a high prematurity setting defining baseline ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 Dec 2018
    Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
    04 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    Fyezah Jehan, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan 
    Approved with Reservations
     
    Overall an important report of a biorepository cohort in LMIC, in a high prematurity setting defining baseline ... Continue reading
Views
27
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 May 2018
Zahida Qureshi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya 
Approved
VIEWS 27
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the research article entitled “The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS: Cohort characteristics at enrollment)”
 
Overall the study is important to understand the dynamics of preterm birth in ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Qureshi Z. Reviewer Report For: The Zambian Preterm Birth Prevention Study (ZAPPS): Cohort characteristics at enrollment [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. Gates Open Res 2019, 2:25 (https://doi.org/10.21956/gatesopenres.13888.r26410)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 Dec 2018
    Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
    04 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    Zahida Qureshi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya 
    Approved
     
    Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the research article entitled “The Zambian Preterm Birth ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 Dec 2018
    Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
    04 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    Zahida Qureshi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya 
    Approved
     
    Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review the research article entitled “The Zambian Preterm Birth ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 02 May 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Are you a Gates-funded researcher?

If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.

You must provide your first name
You must provide your last name
You must provide a valid email address
You must provide an institution.

Thank you!

We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research

Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.