Keywords
burn injury, Aloe vera, macrophages, fibroblasts, epidermal thickness
This article is included in the Plant Science gateway.
burn injury, Aloe vera, macrophages, fibroblasts, epidermal thickness
Burn injury is a damage to the skin or other tissues that can be caused by heat, radiation, electricity, chemicals, or friction, but most often caused by heat (American Burn Association, 2019). Burn injury that is due to heat consists of three causes, which are burns due to hot liquids (scalds), flames (flame burns), or hot solids (contact burns) (World Health Organization, 2018). Burn injury can be divided into four degrees based on its depth. A first-degree burn is limited to the epidermis. Second-degree burns involve both epidermis and dermis. Third-degree burns involve epidermis, dermis, and dermal appendages. Lastly, fourth-degree burns can penetrate into subdermal fat, underlying fascia, muscle, and/or bone (ABA, 2018).
Burn injury can cause high morbidity and mortality and its treatment requires high cost. This is because of the long-term outpatient care, such as dressing changes and some even require surgical reconstruction (Smolle et al., 2017). WHO stated that around 180,000 deaths every year are caused by burns and majority occur in lower-middle-income countries due to lack of adequate facilities to reduce the incidence of burns (Menkes, 2019; WHO, 2018). According to the data from “Riset Kesehatan Dasar” RISKESDAS (Basic Health Research, Indonesia) in 2018, the proportion of burn injury in Sumatera Utara was 1% and based on the medical record data from Haji Adam Malik Hospital in Medan, North Sumatra-Indonesia, there were 353 cases of burns in 2011–2014 (Maulana, 2014).
There are three phases of wound healing, namely the inflammatory, proliferative and remodeling phases. The inflammatory phase is characterized by the migration of leucocytes such as macrophages to burn site to degrade debris or microbes. Next is the proliferative phase where the process of angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, and fibroblast proliferation occurs. Lastly, the remodeling phase is characterized by collagen remodeling, wound contraction, and decreased blood flow (Reinke & Sorg, 2012).
Several studies have shown that the use of silver sulfadiazine drug can cause side effects such as leukopenia and renal toxicity (Chaby et al., 2005; Fuller & Engler, 1988). Therefore, alternative treatments such as the use of herbal medicine is relatively safer. A number of medical plants grow in Indonesia due to favorable tropical natural conditions. The information about these herbs is passed down from one generation to another, and they are commonly used in traditional medicine, forming an integral part of Indonesian cultural heritage (Gazali et al., 2013). One of the herbs that can be used for the treatment of burns is Aloe vera. The active chemical constituents found in Aloe vera such as glucomannan and acemannan can stimulate the activity and proliferation of fibroblasts. Acemannan can also increase the number of macrophages and stimulates fibroblast to produce keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1) for re-epithelialization process (Jettanacheawchankit et al., 2009; Sierra-García et al., 2004; Surjushe et al., 2008). This study aimed to determine the effect of Aloe vera extract in repairing post-burn skin in rats that was analyzed from the number of macrophages, and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.
This is an experimental study in an animal burn-model with a posttest-only control group design. This study is reported in lines with the in-vivo Animal Research: Reporting guidelines ARRIVE.
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Sumatera Utara (No. 711/KEP/USU/2021). This study was conducted at the Pharmacology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Healthy male Wistar strain rats, 10−12 weeks old, weighing 150−200 g were purchased from the Department Biology of Mathematics and Scientific Faculty, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Before starting the experiment, the animals were adapted for 7 days. They were kept in plastic cages (30 x 20 x 20 cm) and covered with fine wire mesh; base of cages was covered with rice husks as thick as 0.5–1 cm and replaced every day during the study. They were kept in 12 hours of daylight (06:00 A.M. – 06.00 P.M.) and 12 hours of dark cycle (06:00 P.M. – 06.00 A.M.) and fed with standard feed (CP 551 from PT Charoen Pokphand-Indonesia) and water was given ad libitum. They were kept in cages that were maintained at room temperature and humidity at normal ranges.
All animals were randomly divided into three big groups by simple random sampling. Group I (standard) consisted of normal rats, group II (negative control) was inflicted a burn wound and treated with gel base, and group III (treatment group) was inflicted with a burn wound and treated with Aloe vera gel. Each group was subdivided into three smaller groups (n = 6 per group) according to the time the when the lesions were evaluated. They were treated twice a day according to the groups.
The sample size was calculated according to Federer’s formula: (Federer, 1963)
t = the number of groups
n = the number of samples
n = 2.875 ≈ 3 rat/group
Considering the NC3Rs principal in experimental animal, statistical analysis necessity, and the possibility of drop out, the number of rats per group were determined to be six. All 54 rats were given a number (1–54) using a marker pen, then randomized by putting the numbers in an envelope and dividing them into 9 groups, according to the numbers taken from the envelope (Russell and Burch, 1992).
To ensure that the rats remain in a comfortable condition, they were given anesthesia before performing the burn. The animals were anesthetized with Ketamine/Xylazine 0.2 mL by intraperitoneal injection (in accordance with the provisions of Vertebrate Animal Research). The hair at dorsal region was shaved and cleansed with alcohol swab. Second-degree burn wound was inflicted using iron plate measuring 2×2 cm2 which was warmed in boiling water for 5 minutes and placed for 30 seconds on the shaved area (Kristyaningsih, 2016).
About 2000 g of Aloe vera leaves were collected. The bottom part and the serrated edges of Aloe vera leaves were cut and peeled to obtain the inner clear gel. About 1000 g of inner gel was weighed and washed thoroughly and cut it into small pieces. Then, the small pieces of gel and 2000 mL 70% ethanol was blended and poured into a closed container (stirred occasionally for 6 hours, then set aside for 18 hours). This mixture was then filtered to obtain the filtrate (I). The extraction process was repeated on the residue using 1000 mL 70% ethanol to obtain another filtrate (II). The filtrate (I) and (II) were mixed and evaporated using a vacuum rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) at 400C to obtain a thick extract.
• Gel base
About 400 cc of distilled water was taken into the mortar, then 12 g of 3% Sodium-Carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) powder was evenly added. It was closed and set it aside for 15 minutes. After which it was ground and 4 g of 1% glycerin was added until a homogeneous gel base was formed.
• Aloe vera gel
Put 40 g of Aloe vera extract into the mortar then add 360 g of gel base gradually while grinding it until homogeneous.
Six animals of each groups were sacrificed on the 3rd, 14th, and 21st days after injury by injecting 100 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneally. Then, the injured tissues were carefully dissected and fixed with 10% formalin. All samples were taken to Anatomic Pathology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara for H&E staining. The number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness was evaluated using Olympus CX21 light microscope with 400× magnification and three fields of view.
The results obtained from the study are shown in Fig. 1−3. From the one-way ANOVA results, there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness in all groups (p < 0.05). Then, least Significant Difference (LSD) test was conducted to determine the differences among groups.
On the 3rd day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (0.50 ± 0.45 vs 7.77 ± 0.62; p=0.0001), group I-3 vs III-3 (0.50 ± 0.45 vs 9.00 ± 0.47; p=0.0001), and group II-3 vs III-3 (7.77 ± 0.62 vs 9.00 ± 0.47; p=0.001).
On the 14th day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (0.61 ± 0.39 vs 6.22 ± 0.98; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs. III-14 (0.61 ± 0.39 vs. 5.33 ± 0.42; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs. III-14 (6.22 ± 0.98 vs 5.33 ± 0.42; p=0.013).
On day 21st day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (0.55 ± 0.40 vs 4.72 ± 0.87; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (0.55 ± 0.40 vs 3.16 ± 0.34; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (4.72 ± 0.87 vs 3.16 ± 0.34; p=0.0001).
On the 3rd day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (3.77 ± 0.34 vs. 4.61 ± 0.49; p=0.047), group I-3 vs III-3 (3.77 ± 0.34 vs. 6.44 ± 0.74; p=0.0001), and group II-3 vs. III-3 (4.61 ± 0.49 vs 6.44 ± 0.74; p=0.0001).
On the 14th day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (3.94 ± 0.38 vs 8.11 ± 0.68; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs III-14 (3.94 ± 0.38 vs 21.55 ± 1.02; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (8.11 ± 0.68 vs. 21.55 ± 1.02; p=0.0001).
On the 21st day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (3.72 ± 0.38 vs. 9.05 ± 0.80; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (3.72 ± 0.38 vs 6.66 ± 1.05; p=0.0001), and group II-21 vs III-21 (9.05 ± 0.80 vs 6.66 ± 1.05; p=0.0001).
On the 3rd day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the standard group (I), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the negative control group (II). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (5.88 ± 0.76 vs 2.43 ± 0.45; p=0.0001), group II-3 vs III-3 (2.43 ± 0.45 vs. 5.15 ± 0.36; p=0.0001), while group I-3 vs. III-3 (5.88 ± 0.76 vs. 5.15 ± 0.36; p=0.182) did not show a significant result.
On the 14th day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (6.01 ± 0.54 vs 11.46 ± 0.92; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs III-14 (6.01 ± 0.54 vs 16.75 ± 1.31; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (11.46 ± 0.92 vs. 16.75 ± 1.31; p=0.0001).
On the 21st day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (5.92 ± 0.68 vs. 23.10 ± 1.37; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (5.92 ± 0.68 vs 30.47 ± 1.25; p=0.0001), and group II-21 vs III-21 (23.10 ± 1.37 vs. 30.47 ± 1.25; p=0.0001).
Macrophages are cells that multiply when there is a wound to phagocytose debris and bacteria and they are the predominant cells on the 3rd day post wound infliction (Gurtner & Wong, 2013). This study showed that both negative control and treatment groups had more number of macrophages than standard group on the 3rd day after injury. On the same day, the treatment group had more macrophages than negative control group because there is acemannan in aloe gel that could increase the number of macrophages (Sierra-García et al., 2014). The results of this study showed that there was reduction in number of macrophages in the treatment group than negative control group on the 14th and 21st day after injury. Souza et al. (2017) reported decrease in the number of macrophages in burn rats treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine.
In this study, both the 3rd and 14th days after injury demonstrated higher number of fibroblasts in the treatment group than negative control group. This might have happened because of interaction between glucomannan in aloe gel and gibberellin, a growth hormone, with growth factor receptors on fibroblast. This interaction stimulated fibroblast activity and proliferation that could increase collagen synthesis (Chithra et al., 1998; Surjushe et al., 2008). Besides that, there was also acemannan in aloe gel which could increase the proliferation of fibroblasts (Xing et al., 2014). Fibroblasts are cells that will increase its migration during proliferation phase of wound healing. Therefore, this study showed highest number of fibroblasts on the 14th day after injury in the treatment group which was earlier than the negative control group that had the highest number on the 21st day after injury. At some point during the proliferation phase, there may be apoptosis of fibroblast when collagen matrix has filled the wound cavity (Gurtner & Wong, 2013). Therefore, there was reduction in the number of fibroblast on the 21st day after injury in the treatment group.
Re-epithelialization occurs right after injury that consists of migration, proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes (Gurtner & Wong, 2013; Isrofah and Afandi, 2015). Acemannan could stimulate fibroblast to release keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1) that could hasten the re-epithelialization process by keratinocyte which could increase the epidermal thickness (Jettanacheawchankit et al., 2009). The result of this study showed that there was an increase in the epidermal thickness in both, negative control and treatment groups from the 3rd day to 21st day after injury. But the treatment group had thicker epidermis than negative control group that might be caused by acemannan. An in vitro study conducted by Teplicki et al. (2018) demonstrated that Aloe vera could speeded up the migration and proliferation of keratinocyte. Another study conducted by Atiba et al. (2015) showed that Aloe vera could enhance the re-epithelialization process in corneal alkali burn in normal and diabetic rats.
This study showed that Aloe vera extract gel could accelerate the healing process of burns in rats.
Figshare: ARRIVE checklist for ‘Effect of Aloe Vera in Post-Burn Skin Repair in Rats’ (Aulia and Pane, 2022)
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Aulia L: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; Pane YS: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
The authors give their appreciation and thanks to the Pharmacology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara for allowing them to use the facility for collecting data for this research.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Stem cell
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Physiology human, exercise, and much research-related use plants as herbal medicine
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 3 (revision) 28 Feb 23 |
read | ||
Version 2 (revision) 29 Jul 22 |
read | read | |
Version 1 11 Feb 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)