Keywords
Fabry disease, enzyme replacement therapy, ultra-rare disease, α-galactosidase, globotriaosylceramide, globotriaosylsphingosine
Fabry disease, enzyme replacement therapy, ultra-rare disease, α-galactosidase, globotriaosylceramide, globotriaosylsphingosine
Fabry disease (FD) is an ultra-rare genetic lysosomal storage disease caused by pathologic gene variants resulting in insufficient expression of α-galactosidase A (GLA).1 This enzyme deficiency leads to accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (GL-3) and its deacylated form, globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-GL-3), in plasma and in different cells throughout the body. Accumulation of GL-3 and lyso-GL-3 causes major organ damage which leads to multiorgan complications involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, kidney, and heart that decrease the quality of life and shorten lifespan.1 FD is largely underdiagnosed and diagnosis is most often established only after target organ damage has already occurred.
The introduction of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in 2001 revolutionized the treatment landscape of FD. Clinical studies have proven the efficacy of ERT in the treatment of FD. Specifically, it has been shown that ERT inhibits the progression of target organ damage and stabilizes or even improves organ function. Therefore, international standards and guidelines recommend ERT as the optimal treatment of FD, although for some patients with amenable mutations, an alternative oral chaperone therapy is also available.2,3
The available ERT treatment currently includes recombinant α-galactosidase A enzymes: agalsidase alfa (Replagal, marketed by Shire) and agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme, marketed by Sanofi Genzyme). In the EU, both agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta have been approved and available for 20 years. Agalsidase alpha and beta are administered every two weeks by intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively.4,5 Although two ERT preparations are currently available and approved for the treatment of FD, there are ongoing debates as to what dose of agalsidase preparation may offer better target organ protection. Two recent national guidelines suggested that higher doses of the recombinant enzyme may result in better clinical outcomes, at least in males with a classic phenotype.6,7
Until 2018, reimbursed ERT for FD was available in all EU countries except Poland, where only a limited number of patients who participated in clinical trials or compassionate drug use programs received the treatment.8 To help patients with FD obtain access to the therapy, emphasize the challenges they face, and gain public attention, the Association of Families with Fabry Disease, with the help of medical professionals and parliament members, initiated several public campaigns such as “Where is Fabry,”9 “Who is Fabry,”10 and “Fabry Disease – a burning problem”.11 After an initial rejection of the application in 2014, the Polish Ministry of Health eventually included ERT for FD to the list of reimbursable drugs in 2019.
Initially, one of the major challenges in the treatment of FD in Poland was a lack of guidelines for diagnosis and management of the disease.12 In 2020, an interdisciplinary group of Polish clinicians prepared a comprehensive position statement providing practical recommendations for physicians who treat patients with FD. The position statement was approved by the Boards of the Polish Cardiac Society, Polish Society of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Polish Society of Internal Medicine, Polish Society of Nephrology, and Polish Society of Neurology.13
The introduction of the reimbursable ERT was a major step towards the improvement of the quality of life of Polish patients with FD. However, to date, the results of this treatment program in Poland have not been published. The choice of one of the two available recombinant drugs was the sole decision of the treating physician, but patients had to be centrally approved for the participation in the program by a group of rare disease experts.
In 2021, two years after the introduction of reimbursed ERT therapy for FD in Poland, we designed a short survey to gather data on the FD patients currently treated in rare disease centers. The survey was distributed via e-mail to the Fabry disease attending physicians at seven largest academic centers in Katowice, Kraków, Wrocław, Poznań, Gdańsk, Warszawa, and Łódź. The centers were selected based on the number of patients with Fabry disease treated. The questionnaire included the following data: number of patients treated, number of patients qualified for ERT, and patient characteristics (gender, age, date of the qualification to the ERT program, age at the time of qualification, and time from the appearance of the first disease symptoms to the clinical diagnosis).
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Statistica 13.1 PL (StatSoft Polska) software.
The following study was non-interventional, questionnaire-based research, therefore, according to local regulations, Ethics Committee approval and patient informed consent were not required. The authors received permission to collect the data from all the centers involved and the patients' personal data were anonymized.
All centers returned completed questionnaires that included data for a total of 71 patients (28 men and 43 women) as of June 2021. Thirty-five patients with the diagnosis of FD confirmed by genetic testing (22 men and 13 women) had already qualified for reimbursed ERT. Mean (SD) age at the commencement of the ERT program was 39.6 (15.5) years (range 18-79 years). The mean time from the final diagnosis of FD to the beginning of ERT was 4.7 (4.6) years, although there was a substantial delay from the first clinical symptoms reported by the patients to the diagnosis - 21.1 (8.9) years. The centers with the largest number of patients with FD was Łódź, Cracow, and Wrocław. Detailed numbers of the patients diagnosed and receiving ERT reported by each center in Poland are provided in Table 1.
FD is still underdiagnosed in Poland since the reported disease prevalence and number of patients currently receiving the therapy is lower than in other EU countries. For example, in Germany, the estimated treated FD prevalence was 0.85 per 100,000 insured patients from 2010 to 2017,14 which when extrapolated to the Polish population, may suggest that there should be at least 300 patients with FD that may require specific treatment. The situation is improving since the survey showed that almost half (48%) of the Polish patients with FD are already on reimbursed ERT therapy. This reflects the important role that the program has already played, but much remains to be done to implement an effective nationwide screening strategy to identify undiagnosed FD patients and establish close cooperation with a network of rare disease centers to ensure that patients in Poland benefit fully from ERT.
Zenodo: First two years of reimbursed enzyme replacement therapy in the treatment of Fabry's disease in Poland. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5163859.15
This project contains the following underlying data:
Zenodo: First two years of reimbursed enzyme replacement therapy in the treatment of Fabry's disease in Poland. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5163859.16
This project contains the following extended data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The authors would like to thank Proper Medical Writing and Sanofi Genzyme for their editorial support in preparation of this manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Laney DA, Fernhoff PM: Diagnosis of Fabry disease via analysis of family history.J Genet Couns. 2008; 17 (1): 79-83 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Fabry Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Nephrology, cardiology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 22 Oct 21 |
read | read |
Version 1 20 Aug 21 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)