Diagnosis of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection using immunochromatography among patients attending Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study

Rawda Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor; Wafaa Mohammed Abdalla; Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla; Ahmed Ibrahim Hashim

doi:10.12688/f1000research.25237.1

Home Browse Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using immunochromatography...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using immunochromatography among patients attending Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved]

Rawda Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor¹, Wafaa Mohammed Abdalla², Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla ³, Ahmed Ibrahim Hashim²

PUBLISHED 27 Aug 2020

Author details Author details

¹ Microbiology, Tamboul teaching hospital, Tamboul, Gazira State, 11111, Sudan
² Microbiology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan
³ Parasitology and Medical Entomology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan

Rawda Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation

Wafaa Mohammed Abdalla
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision

Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla
Roles: Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Ahmed Ibrahim Hashim
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori causes a major health problem worldwide; more than half of the world’s population are infected with this pathogen. The diagnosis of the infection was initially made through invasive methods, but now non-invasive methods have been developed to make diagnosis easier. This study aimed to screen the presence of H.pylori antibodies and antigen among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at Tamboul City in Gezira State.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tamboul city, Gezira State, Sudan between March 2016 and December 2019 to compare between antigen and antibody tests results used for diagnosis of H. pylori infection among symptomatic and asymptomatic Sudanese patients. Stool and blood samples were collected and analyzed for presence of antigen and antibodies to H. pylori using immunochromatography (ICT) cards.
Results: Serum and stool samples were collected from 100 patients; 50 were symptomatic and 50 were asymptomatic. In symptomatic patients, 18/50 (36%) were men (32; 64%, women) with mean age of 16.7±24.6 years. In this group, 35/50 (70%) showed positive results for stool antigen, while 30/50 (60%) were positive for serum antibodies. In asymptomatic patients, 19/50 (38%) were men (31; 62%, women) with mean age of 16.7±20.4 years. In this group, 18/50 (36%) were positive for stool antigen and 25/50 (50%) for serum antibodies. There was a significant association between antigen results and patient group (P=0.001), but there was an insignificant association between antibodies results and patient group (P=0.317). Age group, history of infected persons in the family, blood group, and previous treatment were all not associated with H. pylori infection (P≥0.05).
Conclusion: The frequency of H. pylori antigen was higher than antibodies in symptomatic patients, while the frequency of H. pylori antibodies was higher than antigen in asymptomatic patients.

Keywords

H.pylori, Tamboul, ICT, Gazira state.

Corresponding author: Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2020 Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor R, Mohammed Abdalla W, Abd Alla AB and Ibrahim Hashim A. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using immunochromatography among patients attending Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1054 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25237.1) First published: 27 Aug 2020, 9:1054 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25237.1) Latest published: 27 Aug 2020, 9:1054 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25237.1)

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative, microaerophilic, spiral-shaped bacteria that inhabits the mucous layer of the antral gastric (Basher et al., 2011). Humans are living things infected (Abdallah et al., 2014). H. pylori is typically symptomless and has no clinical manifestations. Signs and symptoms associated with the disease are mainly due to gastric or peptic ulcer disease or duodenal inflammation. Other symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, and stomach pain, can be related to other gastrointestinal diseases (Gold et al., 2014). The prevalence of H. pylori is still high in most countries, with approximately one-third of adults infected in northern Europe and North America, while the prevalence in southern and eastern Europe, South America and Asia is higher than 50% (Eusebi et al., 2014). Up to 93.6% of adults in developing countries are infected with H. pylori (Olokoba et al., 2013) and the prevalence of infection in Sudan was estimated to be between 65.8% and 80% (Abdallah et al., 2014).

The attachment of H. pylori to the gastric mucosa is mediated by the Lewis (Le6) antigen. The availability of these receptors may be reduced in blood groups A and B compared to blood group O. H antigen is also an important gastroduodenal mucosal cell receptor for H. pylori attachment (Alcout et al., 2000).

Laboratory testing for H. pylori infection is very important part of the diagnosis process for gastric and duodenal inflammatory disease. A number of different diagnostic test methods, both invasive and non- invasive, are available. Invasive methods, such as antibody (Ab) detection is cheap and easy to perform, but may give false positive results (Quartero et al., 2000). The stool antigen (Ag) test has recently become more acceptable as it is non-invasive, convenient for patients and can be performed easily even in small laboratories. Other non-invasive tests may also include detection of H. pylori antigens in saliva (logan & walker, 2001; Malfertheiner et al., 2007).

This study aimed to screen the presence of H.pylori antibodies and antigen among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at Tamboul City in Gezira State.

Methods

Study design

This descriptive, cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted at Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan, between March 2016 and December 2019.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Scientific Research Committee of the College of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Sudan University of Science and Technology (Ethical No SRC-MLS-01-19). Written informed consent was initially obtained from participants for participation in the study and publication of data; however, the researchers noticed that participants preferred to agree verbally. After requesting permission from the Scientific Research Committee to change the consent process, verbal informed consent was obtained from participants for participation in the study and publication of data.

Patients

Patients were selected by non-probability, convenience sampling and were recruited by physicians.

Patients with and other without symptoms of H. pylori infection with different age and gender were included in this research.

Exclusion criteria: symptomatic patients undergoing treatment of H. pylori infection and patients with other diseases.

A structured questionnaire containing demographic data and medical history was used to collect information from participants.

Sample size

Sample size was determined according to the formula below.

n=t²*p (1-p)/µ²

t=1.96 (t²=3.8416)

p=prevalence (0.80) (80%)

µ=0.05 (µ²=0.0025).

30841*0.8(0.92)/0.0025=113

Due to high cost, the sample size was kept at 100 sera and stool samples; 50 symptomatic patients and 50 asymptomatic patients.

Data collection

Serum sample. Five ml blood sample were collected from each patient in a plain blood container. Serum was then separated by centrifugation (3000 rpm for five minutes). H. pylori antibodies (IgG and IgM) were detected in the serum using ALL TEST (Hangzho Biotics, China; REF IHP-302). 2 drops of sample (about 100µl) were added into the sample well (S) of the test device and then 1 drop buffer was added to this. As the test began to work, a purple color moving across the window to the center of the device.

The presence of two-color bands as test band (T) and control band (C) within the results window, no matter which band appeared first, indicated a positive result. It should be noted that some invalid results are because the directions have been followed incorrectly or the test may have deteriorated beyond the expiration date (Ansorg et al., 1991).

Stool sample. Patients were asked to provide a stool sample at the hospital. Fresh stool samples were collected into spoon-cover and outer-labeled stool container for antigen detection. Using a wood stick, a small portion of the stool sample was transferred into buffer, incubated for 2 minutes and then two to three drops of the mixture were poured in the hole of the ICT of H. pylori stool antigen detection (ALLTEST; Hangzho Biotics, China; catalog number 30226). The color migrated from the well containing the tested sample in the ICT device (Ansorg et al., 1991). The presence of two bands (test band (T) and control band (C)) within the result window, no matter which band appeared first, indicated a positive result.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Science program (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. Frequencies were presented as tables and figures. Chi-square test was used to compare between variables and level of significance was set as P ≥ 0.05.

Results

A total of 100 stool and 100 sera specimens were collected from 50 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic patients, with different gender, age and blood groups. Age was classified as following: <15 years, 15-50 years, and >50 years old.

In asymptomatic patients, the mean age was 16.7±24.6 years. The majority of the patients in this group were women (32; 64%), In symptomatic patients, the mean age was 16.7± 20.4 years, and the majority of patients were women (31; 62%).

For both groups of patients, those who had previous treatment for H. pylori had low frequency of infection compared to those with no previous treatment. For both groups, 60% had family members who had also been diagnosed with H. pylori infection (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic variables for patients with Helicobacter pylori in patients from Gezira State, Sudan.

Variable	Symptomatic patients, n (%)	Asymptomatic patients, n (%)
Total	50	50
Gender
Men	18 (34)	19 (38)
Women	32 (64)	31 (62)
Family history
Yes	30 (60)	30 (60)
No	20 (40)	20 (40)
Previous treatment
Yes	14 (28)	13 (26)
No	36 (72)	37 (74)
Age group, years
<15	2 (4)	0 (0)
15-50	40 (80)	45 (90)
>50	8 (16)	5 (10)

There was a higher number of symptomatic patients with a positive antigen result (35/50; 70%) compared with asymptomatic patients (18/50; 36%). There was a significant association between antigen result and patient group (P=0.001; Table 2).

Table 2. Association between Helicobacter pylori antigen results and study groups.

Patient group	Antigen results, n (%)		Total	P value
Patient group	Positive	Negative	Total	P value
Asymptomatic	18 (36)	32 (64)	50	0.001
Symptomatic	35 (70)	15 (30)	50
Total	53	47	100

Similarly, there was a higher number of symptomatic patients with a positive antibody result (30/50; 60%) compared to asymptomatic patients (25/50; 40%). There was no significant association between antibody results and patient group (P=0.317; Table 3).

Table 3. Association between Helicobacter pylori antibody results and study groups.

Positive results were those with the presence of both IgM and IgG; presence of either was considered a negative result.

Patient group	Antibody results, n (%)		Total	P value
Patient group	Positive	Negative	Total	P value
Asymptomatic	25 (50)	25 (50)	50	0.317
Symptomatic	30 (60)	20 (40)	50
Total	55	45	100

Symptomatic patients in the 15–50 years age group had the highest number of positive results for antigen and antibodies (antigen, 27 (54%); antibody, 24 (48%)). In asymptomatic patients for this age group, a positive antigen and antibody result was seen in 17 (34%) and 23 (46%) patients, respectively. However, there was no association between age group and positive result for antigen and antibodies to H. pylori in either group of patients.

Women showed higher positive results than men for both antigen and antibody in both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups (asymptomatic women, Ag 12 (24%), Ab 14 (28%); asymptomatic men, Ag 9 (18%), Ab 11 (22%); symptomatic women, Ag 21 (42%), Ab 19 (38%); symptomatic men, Ag 9 (18%), Ab 11 (22%)). This association between gender and antigen/antibody presence was not significant in either group of patients.

Patients with O positive blood group showed higher positive results than other blood groups for both antigen and antibody in both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups (asymptomatic O positive, Ab 14 (28%), Ag 17 (34%); symptomatic O positive, Ab 10 (20%), Ag 7 (14%)). The association between blood group and antigen/antibody presence was not significant in either group of patients.

Patients in both groups with family members who also had H. pylori infection showed higher positive antigen results than those without family members who had the infection (symptomatic patients with family infection, 21 (42%), without family infection 14 (48%); asymptomatic patients with family infection, 12 (21%), without family infection 6 (12%). There was no significant association between antigen results and family member infection.

Asymptomatic patients who had no previous treatment for H. pylori showed higher antigen positivity (12/50; 24%) than those with previous treatment. This was similar in symptomatic patients (no previous treatment Ag, 25/50; 50%). There was no significant association between previous treatment and antigen result in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

Discussion

H. pylori infection is a co-factor in the development of three important upper gastrointestinal diseases: duodenal or gastric ulcers, gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (McColl, 2010).

In the present study, H. pylori antibodies were present in 25/50 (50%) asymptomatic patients and 30/50 (60%) symptomatic patients. These results were similar to a study carried by Naji et al. (2014) in Yemen, which found antibodies in 72%. In contrast, our results are higher than those found by Douraghi et al. (2013) in Iran, who found antibodies in 4.6% of patients, and lower than those found by Alfadil (2016) in Sudan who found antibodies in 48% of patients.

In our asymptomatic patients, H. pylori antigen was detected in 18/50 (36%) patients, and 35/50 (70%) symptomatic patients. These results are similar to a study carried out in Nigeria by Omosor et al. (2018), where stool antigen was found in 56% of patients. Our results for antigen were higher than those reported by Douraghi et al. (2013) in Iran (12.4%) and lower than Naji et al. (2014) in Yemen (49%). The variation may be due to difference in socioeconomic status of the patients.

Our study results did not find a significant association between age groups and H. pylori infection (as diagnosed with antigen/antibody testing). This is similar to study done in Iran by Alvali et al. (2010), but it differed from Kabir (2007) in Sweden who reported that the percentage of infection increases with age. In our study, the age group 15–50 years showed the highest rate of infection in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for antigen and antibodies. That may be because the vast majority of individuals acquire H. pylori infection during childhood, and the infection associated with poor hygiene and overcrowding.

We also found that women were more affected than men both in the symptomatic group (62% vs 38%.) and asymptomatic group (64% vs 36%). This was a similar result to that found in Turkey by Kanbay et al. (2005) (60.6% vs 42.9%), but a dissimilar results to those found in Iran by Metanant et al. (2015) (32.8% vs 36.4%). The differences between studies could be due to random selection of patients regardless of their gender in our study.

In the current study, patients with blood group O positive had the highest frequency of positive H. pylori infection, both for symptomatic (48%) and asymptomatic (38%) patients. These results were the same as another study done in Gezira State, Sudan by Mohammed et al. (2015), who found that 58.1% of blood group O positive patients were positive for H. pylori infection. This is in contrast to a study done in Turkey by Kanbay et al. (2005) who was reported that patients with blood group A positive had a higher frequency of H. pylori infection than other blood groups at 38.2%. This dissimilarity may be due differences in ethnic background, and the fact that blood group O positive is the most frequent blood group in Sudan (Hassan, 2010).

In this study, 12/50 (24%) of asymptomatic patients who had family members with H. pylori infection were positive for antigen and/or antibody. These results are similar to Gravina et al. (2016) in Italy, who found H. pylori infection in 28.4% household contacts. However, this study was higher than Mabeku et al. (2018) in Cameroon (80.39%). In symptomatic patients, the frequency of antigen and antibodies with family member infection were 21(42%) and 20(40%) correspondingly, that were similar to result of Gravina et al. (2016) in Italy who found H. pylori infection in 43.2% household contacts. This finding was higher than Manfredi et al. (2016) in Italy (81.7%), and variation may be due to personal hygiene.

In the current study, the frequency of antigen in asymptomatic patients who had previous treatment for H. pylori were 12% (6/50) while in symptomatic patients this was 20% (10/50). This agreed with a study carried out by Gisbert et al. (2005), but was higher than the results reported by Nanivadekar et al. (1990) in India (2.4%), and lower than the results found by Bapat et al. (2000) in India (60%). This discrepancy may be due to resistance of standard triple therapy. In this study, the association between previous treatment and H. pylori reinfection was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The frequency of H. pylori antigen was higher than antibodies in symptomatic patients, while the frequency of H. pylori antibodies was higher than antigen in asymptomatic patients.

Data availability

Underlying data

Fighshare: Diagnosis of H. pylori in Tamboul Hospital in Gazira State, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12488432.v2 (Abd Alla & Alhassan, 2020).

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

Abd Alla A, Alhassan R: Diagnosis of H. pylori in Tamboul Hospital in Gazira State. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12488432.v2
Abdallah TM, Mohammed HB, Ali AA: Sero-prevalence and factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in Eastern Sudan. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014; 4(2): 115–119. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Alcout A, Blackwell C, Weir D: Increased inflammatory responses of persons of blood group O to Helicobacter pylori. J infect Dis. 2000; 181(4): 1364–1569. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Alfadil A: Compression between antigen and antibodies detection test in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection (MSc thesis). Sudan University for Science and Technology. 2016; 24.
Alvali SM, Adel SH, Raja AR: Seroprevalence study of Helicobacter pylori infection among visitors of cardiac patients in Razi Hosbital in Ahvaz, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010; 3(1): 28–31. Reference Source
Ansorg R, Von Recklinghausen G, Pomarius R, et al.: Evaluation of techniques for isolation, subcultivation, and preservation of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 1991; 29(1): 51–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Bapat M, Abraham P, Bhandarkar P, et al.: Acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection and reinfection after its eradication are uncommon in Indian adults. Indian J Gasteroentrol. 2020; 19(4): 172–4. PubMed Abstract
Bashir AH, Yousif SM, Mahmoud MO: Clinicoepidemiological study in Sudanese patients: prevalence and effect of eradicative triple therapy on extra digestive Helicobacter pylori skin manifestations, EdHpSm. Clinical reviews and opinions. 2011; 3(2): 14–9. Reference Source
Douraghi M, Nateghi M, Goudarzi H, et al.: Comparison of stool antigen immunoassay and serology for screening for Helicobacter pylori infection in intellectually disabled children. Microbiol Immunol. 2013; 57(11): 772–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Eusebi LH, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2014; 19 Suppl 1: 1–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Gold B, Gilger M, Czinn S: New diagnostic strategies for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in pediatric patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014; 10(12 Suppl 7): 1–19. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
Gisbert J, Trapero M, Pajares J: Evaluation of 3 different tests for the detection of stool antigens to confirm Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. A pilot study. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. 2005; 28(10): 615–618. Publisher Full Text
Gravina AG, Federico A, Dallio M, et al.: Intrafamilial Spread of Helicobacter pylori Infection. J Gatroenterol Hepatol Endosc. 2016; 1(1): 1003. Reference Source
Hassan MF: Frequency of ABO, subgroup ABO and Rh(D) Blood Groups in Major Sudanese Ethnic Groups. Pak J Med Pes. 2010; 49(1): 21. Reference Source
Kabir S: The current status of Helicobacter pylori vaccines: a review. Helicobacter. 2007; 12(2): 89–202. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kanbay M, Gür G, Arslan H, et al.: The relationship of ABO blood group, age, gender, smoking, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2005; 50(7): 1214–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Logan RP, Walker MM: Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Helicobacterpylori infection. BMJ. 2001; 323(7318): 920–2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Mabeku LBK, Ngamga MLN, Leundji H: Potential risk factors and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among adult patients with dyspepsia symptoms in Cameroon. BMC infect Dis. 2018; 18(1): 278. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Malfertheiner P, Megrand E, Morain C, et al.: Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Gatroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 28(16): 167–180.
Manfredi M, Iuliano S, Gismondi P, et al.: Helicobacter pylori infection: We Should Always Verfiy the Interfamilial Transmission. Biol Med. 2016; 9: 1. Reference Source
McColl KEL: Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(17): 1597–1604. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Metanant M, Sharifi B, Izadi S: Prevalence of Helicobacter pyloriinfection in healthcare workers. TurK J Med Sci. 2010; 40(6): 965–969. Reference Source
Mohammed M, Suliman O, Khalfalla O: Association between Helicobacter pylori infection, ABO Blood Groups and Rhesus factor in Peptic Ulcer Disease patients, in Gezira, Central Sudan. BJMM. 2015; 7(1): 11–16. Publisher Full Text
Naji SA, Ameri AG, Alkadasi NM, et al.: Comparison of stool antigen and blood antibodies test methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and risk factors. Int J Microbiol App Sci. 2014; 3(12): 118–127. Reference Source
Nanivadekar S, Sawant P, Patel H, et al.: Association or peptic ulcer with Helicobacter pylori and the recurrence rate. A three year follow up study. J Assoc Physician India. 1990; 38 Suppl 1: 703–6. PubMed Abstract
Omosor KI, Omosor OH, Adejumo BG, et al.: Comparative evaluation of stool antigen and blood antibodiestest methods for the screening of Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic adult population in Delta State, Nigeria. J Mol Microbiol. 2018; 2(1): 3. Reference Source
Olokoba AB, Gashau W, Bwala S, Adamu A, Salawu FK: Helicobacter pylori Infection in Nigerians with Dyspepsia. Ghana Med J. 2013; 47(2): 79–81. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
Quartero A, Numans M, de Melker R, et al.: In-practice evaluation of whole-blood Helicobacter pylori test: its usefulness in detecting peptic ulcer disease. Br J Gen pract. 2000; 50(450): 13–16. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 27 Aug 2020

Author details Author details

¹ Microbiology, Tamboul teaching hospital, Tamboul, Gazira State, 11111, Sudan
² Microbiology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan
³ Parasitology and Medical Entomology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan

Rawda Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation

Wafaa Mohammed Abdalla
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision

Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla
Roles: Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Ahmed Ibrahim Hashim
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 27 Aug 2020, 9:1054

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25237.1

Copyright

© 2020 Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Mohmmed Elhassan Ali Noor R, Mohammed Abdalla W, Abd Alla AB and Ibrahim Hashim A. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using immunochromatography among patients attending Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved] F1000Research 2020, 9:1054 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25237.1)

NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 27 Aug 2020

Views

8

Reviewer Report 23 Nov 2021

Vikram Kate, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, Puducherry, India

Gurushankari Balakrishnan, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, Puducherry, India

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27851.r97083

The authors have demonstrated the use of immunochromatography in this cross-sectional, hospital-based study conducted at Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan, between March 2016 and December 2019. In the introduction the authors could have mentioned some studies which used immunochromatography for ... Continue reading

The authors have demonstrated the use of immunochromatography in this cross-sectional, hospital-based study conducted at Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan, between March 2016 and December 2019. In the introduction the authors could have mentioned some studies which used immunochromatography for the diagnosis of H. pylori. This is an upcoming non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

The test was carried out for both antigen and antibody. Sera and stool samples were used. The H. pylori status was compared with different parameters in this study. However, it would have been desirable to compare the test results with a gold standard which was not carried out in this study. The gold standard could have been to stool antigen test against which the serology could have been compared, as done in a study by Obaid et al. (2021)¹. The statistical analysis could have determined the sensitivity and specificity of this test with the gold standard. That would have given the efficacy of this new test with the existing standards. The authors could have given the details of the data tables which would clarify the results better. This helps the readers to interpret the results better.

However, this study shows that non-invasive methods can be used to test H. pylori for antigen as well as antibodies. That’s a message taken from this study. The authors concluded that the frequency of H. pylori antigen was higher in symptomatic patients, while the frequency of H. pylori antibodies was higher in asymptomatic patients when compared to the antibodies. This indicates that in symptomatic patients it may be more prudent to use antigen related tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori and for screening antibody test can be recommended using immunochromatography.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

References

1. Obaid JMAS, Ayoon ANN, Almurisy ONM, Alshuaibi SMS, et al.: Evaluation of antibody immunochromatography testing for diagnosis of current Helicobacter pylori infection.Pract Lab Med. 2021; 26: e00245 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Gastroenterology

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

12

Reviewer Report 14 Dec 2020

Milagrosa Montes, Department of Microbiology, Donostia University Hospital-Biodonostia Institute, San Sebastián, Spain

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27851.r75335

The authors describe two ICT methods to diagnose Helicobacter infection in two population groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic.
I see two major errors. The first one, to use the detection of antibodies (Ab) to diagnose Helicobacter infection. Serology should only ... Continue reading

The authors describe two ICT methods to diagnose Helicobacter infection in two population groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic.
I see two major errors. The first one, to use the detection of antibodies (Ab) to diagnose Helicobacter infection. Serology should only be used for epidemiological studies as it does not differentiate between current and past infections. The second failure that I observe is that speaking of non-invasive diagnostic methods to detect Helicobacter infection, they do not name the urea breath test (UBT), which, to date, is the non-invasive test with the highest sensitivity and specificity, and the one recommended by all Helicobacter infection diagnostic guidelines.
My suggestion to the authors would be that they write another paper with the stool antigen data, saying that it is a good technique to detect Helicobacter infection when UBT is not available, it is logical that positivity is higher in symptomatic subjects (70 % vs 36%), and to use the serology data to give the seroprevalence in Gezira State; 55 patients have Ab (30 in the symptomatic group and 25 in the asymptomatic group) a figure lower than the 65-80% reported for Sudan by Abdallah et al.
They should further describe in detail the test used to detect Helicobacter Ag in feces, whether it uses monoclonal or polyclonal Ab.
It would be good to give the data of each test in previously treated patients, it would give an idea of the treatment failures.
The heading of Table 1, "Demographic variables for patients with Helicobacter pylori in patients from Gezira State, Sudan" is not correct, since the 100 patients of the study are included, those with and those without infection, it should say "Demographic variables of the 100 patients from Gezira State (Sudan) included in the study".

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Graduated in Pharmacy (1988) and Doctor in Pharmacy from the Universidad de Navarra (1996). Specialist in Microbiology and Clinical Parasitology (1991). I currently work in the Microbiology Service of University Hospital Donostia. I have participated in more than 15 scientific projects, and in more than 95 scientific publications related to the molecular mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials, diagnosis and epidemiology of Communicable Infections, especially those that are preventable by vaccination, in infection by Streptococcus pyogenes and Helicobacter pylori.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 27 Aug 2020

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 1 27 Aug 20	read	read

Milagrosa Montes, Donostia University Hospital-Biodonostia Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
Vikram Kate, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Gurushankari Balakrishnan, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

23 Nov 2021 | for Version 1

Vikram Kate, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, Puducherry, India

Gurushankari Balakrishnan, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, Puducherry, India

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The authors have demonstrated the use of immunochromatography in this cross-sectional, hospital-based study conducted at Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan, between March 2016 and December 2019. In the introduction the authors could have mentioned some studies which used immunochromatography for the diagnosis of H. pylori. This is an upcoming non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

The test was carried out for both antigen and antibody. Sera and stool samples were used. The H. pylori status was compared with different parameters in this study. However, it would have been desirable to compare the test results with a gold standard which was not carried out in this study. The gold standard could have been to stool antigen test against which the serology could have been compared, as done in a study by Obaid et al. (2021)¹. The statistical analysis could have determined the sensitivity and specificity of this test with the gold standard. That would have given the efficacy of this new test with the existing standards. The authors could have given the details of the data tables which would clarify the results better. This helps the readers to interpret the results better.

However, this study shows that non-invasive methods can be used to test H. pylori for antigen as well as antibodies. That’s a message taken from this study. The authors concluded that the frequency of H. pylori antigen was higher in symptomatic patients, while the frequency of H. pylori antibodies was higher in asymptomatic patients when compared to the antibodies. This indicates that in symptomatic patients it may be more prudent to use antigen related tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori and for screening antibody test can be recommended using immunochromatography.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

References

1. Obaid JMAS, Ayoon ANN, Almurisy ONM, Alshuaibi SMS, et al.: Evaluation of antibody immunochromatography testing for diagnosis of current Helicobacter pylori infection.Pract Lab Med. 2021; 26: e00245 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Gastroenterology

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

12 Views

14 Dec 2020 | for Version 1

Milagrosa Montes, Department of Microbiology, Donostia University Hospital-Biodonostia Institute, San Sebastián, Spain

12 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

The authors describe two ICT methods to diagnose Helicobacter infection in two population groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic.
I see two major errors. The first one, to use the detection of antibodies (Ab) to diagnose Helicobacter infection. Serology should only be used for epidemiological studies as it does not differentiate between current and past infections. The second failure that I observe is that speaking of non-invasive diagnostic methods to detect Helicobacter infection, they do not name the urea breath test (UBT), which, to date, is the non-invasive test with the highest sensitivity and specificity, and the one recommended by all Helicobacter infection diagnostic guidelines.
My suggestion to the authors would be that they write another paper with the stool antigen data, saying that it is a good technique to detect Helicobacter infection when UBT is not available, it is logical that positivity is higher in symptomatic subjects (70 % vs 36%), and to use the serology data to give the seroprevalence in Gezira State; 55 patients have Ab (30 in the symptomatic group and 25 in the asymptomatic group) a figure lower than the 65-80% reported for Sudan by Abdallah et al.
They should further describe in detail the test used to detect Helicobacter Ag in feces, whether it uses monoclonal or polyclonal Ab.
It would be good to give the data of each test in previously treated patients, it would give an idea of the treatment failures.
The heading of Table 1, "Demographic variables for patients with Helicobacter pylori in patients from Gezira State, Sudan" is not correct, since the 100 patients of the study are included, those with and those without infection, it should say "Demographic variables of the 100 patients from Gezira State (Sudan) included in the study".

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Graduated in Pharmacy (1988) and Doctor in Pharmacy from the Universidad de Navarra (1996). Specialist in Microbiology and Clinical Parasitology (1991). I currently work in the Microbiology Service of University Hospital Donostia. I have participated in more than 15 scientific projects, and in more than 95 scientific publications related to the molecular mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials, diagnosis and epidemiology of Communicable Infections, especially those that are preventable by vaccination, in infection by Streptococcus pyogenes and Helicobacter pylori.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] Abd Alla A, Alhassan R: Diagnosis of H. pylori in Tamboul Hospital in Gazira State. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12488432.v2

[2] Abdallah TM, Mohammed HB, Ali AA: Sero-prevalence and factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in Eastern Sudan. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014; 4(2): 115–119. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[3] Alcout A, Blackwell C, Weir D: Increased inflammatory responses of persons of blood group O to Helicobacter pylori. J infect Dis. 2000; 181(4): 1364–1569. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] Alfadil A: Compression between antigen and antibodies detection test in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection (MSc thesis). Sudan University for Science and Technology. 2016; 24.

[5] Alvali SM, Adel SH, Raja AR: Seroprevalence study of Helicobacter pylori infection among visitors of cardiac patients in Razi Hosbital in Ahvaz, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010; 3(1): 28–31. Reference Source

[6] Ansorg R, Von Recklinghausen G, Pomarius R, et al.: Evaluation of techniques for isolation, subcultivation, and preservation of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 1991; 29(1): 51–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] Bapat M, Abraham P, Bhandarkar P, et al.: Acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection and reinfection after its eradication are uncommon in Indian adults. Indian J Gasteroentrol. 2020; 19(4): 172–4. PubMed Abstract

[8] Bashir AH, Yousif SM, Mahmoud MO: Clinicoepidemiological study in Sudanese patients: prevalence and effect of eradicative triple therapy on extra digestive Helicobacter pylori skin manifestations, EdHpSm. Clinical reviews and opinions. 2011; 3(2): 14–9. Reference Source

[9] Douraghi M, Nateghi M, Goudarzi H, et al.: Comparison of stool antigen immunoassay and serology for screening for Helicobacter pylori infection in intellectually disabled children. Microbiol Immunol. 2013; 57(11): 772–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] Eusebi LH, Zagari RM, Bazzoli F: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2014; 19 Suppl 1: 1–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] Gold B, Gilger M, Czinn S: New diagnostic strategies for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in pediatric patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014; 10(12 Suppl 7): 1–19. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[12] Gisbert J, Trapero M, Pajares J: Evaluation of 3 different tests for the detection of stool antigens to confirm Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. A pilot study. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. 2005; 28(10): 615–618. Publisher Full Text

[13] Gravina AG, Federico A, Dallio M, et al.: Intrafamilial Spread of Helicobacter pylori Infection. J Gatroenterol Hepatol Endosc. 2016; 1(1): 1003. Reference Source

[14] Hassan MF: Frequency of ABO, subgroup ABO and Rh(D) Blood Groups in Major Sudanese Ethnic Groups. Pak J Med Pes. 2010; 49(1): 21. Reference Source

[15] Kabir S: The current status of Helicobacter pylori vaccines: a review. Helicobacter. 2007; 12(2): 89–202. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] Kanbay M, Gür G, Arslan H, et al.: The relationship of ABO blood group, age, gender, smoking, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2005; 50(7): 1214–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] Logan RP, Walker MM: Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Helicobacterpylori infection. BMJ. 2001; 323(7318): 920–2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] Mabeku LBK, Ngamga MLN, Leundji H: Potential risk factors and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among adult patients with dyspepsia symptoms in Cameroon. BMC infect Dis. 2018; 18(1): 278. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] Malfertheiner P, Megrand E, Morain C, et al.: Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Gatroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 28(16): 167–180.

[20] Manfredi M, Iuliano S, Gismondi P, et al.: Helicobacter pylori infection: We Should Always Verfiy the Interfamilial Transmission. Biol Med. 2016; 9: 1. Reference Source

[21] McColl KEL: Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(17): 1597–1604. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[22] Metanant M, Sharifi B, Izadi S: Prevalence of Helicobacter pyloriinfection in healthcare workers. TurK J Med Sci. 2010; 40(6): 965–969. Reference Source

[23] Mohammed M, Suliman O, Khalfalla O: Association between Helicobacter pylori infection, ABO Blood Groups and Rhesus factor in Peptic Ulcer Disease patients, in Gezira, Central Sudan. BJMM. 2015; 7(1): 11–16. Publisher Full Text

[24] Naji SA, Ameri AG, Alkadasi NM, et al.: Comparison of stool antigen and blood antibodies test methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and risk factors. Int J Microbiol App Sci. 2014; 3(12): 118–127. Reference Source

[25] Nanivadekar S, Sawant P, Patel H, et al.: Association or peptic ulcer with Helicobacter pylori and the recurrence rate. A three year follow up study. J Assoc Physician India. 1990; 38 Suppl 1: 703–6. PubMed Abstract

[26] Omosor KI, Omosor OH, Adejumo BG, et al.: Comparative evaluation of stool antigen and blood antibodiestest methods for the screening of Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic adult population in Delta State, Nigeria. J Mol Microbiol. 2018; 2(1): 3. Reference Source

[27] Olokoba AB, Gashau W, Bwala S, Adamu A, Salawu FK: Helicobacter pylori Infection in Nigerians with Dyspepsia. Ghana Med J. 2013; 47(2): 79–81. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[28] Quartero A, Numans M, de Melker R, et al.: In-practice evaluation of whole-blood Helicobacter pylori test: its usefulness in detecting peptic ulcer disease. Br J Gen pract. 2000; 50(450): 13–16. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using immunochromatography among patients attending Tamboul Hospital in Gezira State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study design

Ethical considerations

Patients

Sample size

Data collection

Statistical analysis

Results

Table 1. Demographic variables for patients with Helicobacter pylori in patients from Gezira State, Sudan.

Table 2. Association between Helicobacter pylori antigen results and study groups.

Table 3. Association between Helicobacter pylori antibody results and study groups.

Discussion

Conclusions

Data availability

Underlying data

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated