ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Assessment of Morbidity Profile and Perceptions in regards to Physical Activity amongst Display Screen Equipment Users working in a University Located in Central Rural India: A Mixed method study

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 21 Mar 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.

Abstract

Introduction

Sedentary nature of desk job workers makes them prone to various diseases, and using display screen equipment increases the risk. This study focused on the intricate associates linked with sedentary behavior, physical activity patterns, and morbidity profiles among display screen equipment users employed at a university in central rural India. Sedentary lifestyles, particularly those prevalent in desk-based occupations, contribute significantly to non-communicable diseases, including hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Display screen users face additional risks such as vision-related issues, strain on eyesight, and musculoskeletal disorders.

Objective

The study aimed to comprehensively understand the morbidity profile and perceptions of physical activity among display screen equipment users.

Method

This shall be a cross-sectional study with a mixed method component conducted at a medical university located in central India from January 24 to June 2024. A sample size of 97 participants was determined based on a previous study, and data collection shall be done utilizing systematic random sampling. Data will be gathered using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and Standardized Nordic Scale for musculoskeletal disorders through an online survey.

Study implication

This study aims to elicit morbidity patterns among Display screen users and their perceptions and practices regarding physical activity. This will also increase awareness regarding physical activity and associated morbidities regarding display screen use.

Keywords

Physical activity, Desk job workers, Display screen users, Sedentary behavior, Morbidity, perception, Mixed method research.

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines physical activity as any movement initiated by the skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure. This includes all types of movement, whether during leisure, transportation, or occupational activity. Participation in both moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activities has been demonstrated to improve overall health.1 Devices or equipment with alphanumeric or graphic display screens such as laptops, touch screens, and similar devices are collectively referred to as display screens.2 In the modern context, the majority of working adults are prone to accumulate a significant portion of their sedentary time in the workplace, surpassing the duration of sitting during leisure activities. Recognized as a distinct risk factor for adverse health outcomes, sedentary behavior is now acknowledged independently of insufficient physical activity.3 Sedentary behavior is described as activities performed while sitting or reclining, with energy expenditure not exceeding 1.5 times the basal metabolic rate. Individuals in desk-based occupations experience extended periods of high sitting times during their work hours.4 Lack of physical activity increases the likelihood of developing cardiovascular diseases and chronic conditions, such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity.5 Nevertheless, occupational sitting stands out as the primary mover of sedentary behavior in numerous industrialized nations, leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to identify the workspace as a high priority for health promotion.3 Work-related energy expenditure has declined significantly over the last five decades, marking a shift towards increased sedentary behavior and reduced physical activity among workers. This trend is expected to persist through 2030.6

Healthcare professionals constitute a group facing both physical and mental burdens. The challenges of rotating work shifts, demanding tasks, and family-related responsibilities create difficulties in planning and engaging in physical exercise. Numerous studies emphasize that healthcare professionals not only lack sufficient physical activity but also engage in unhealthy dietary habits and alcohol misuse, placing them at an elevated risk of professional burnout.7 Individuals who extensively use computers often face a significant issue with work-related musculoskeletal disorders specifically affecting the neck among others.8 Extended duration of sitting in adults are commonly correlated with a heightened risk of diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, lower back pain, and increased overall mortality.9 Based on the report from the National Institute of Family and Health Welfare, India represents 17% of the 11 million occupational disease cases, amounting to 1.9 million cases, and 17% of the global occupational disease deaths, which total 0.12 million.10

Insufficient physical activity is responsible for 6% of global deaths, contrast to a previous study that proposed a higher estimate of 9%.7 There is evidence indicating that the use of digital screens is associated with dry eye disease. Additionally, the use of digital devices has been shown to alter blinking dynamics. Furthermore, it has been established that dry eye can impact the mental health and work productivity of individuals who use digital screens.11 Examining physical performance differences between males and females, particularly in scenarios where time and environmental constraints impose limitations on ergonomic choices for task completion.12 Affecting individuals from various backgrounds who use computers, computer vision syndrome has emerged as a significant public health concern, potentially evolving into an occupational epidemic in the twenty-first century.13 Research conducted in Loni Maharashtra, findings revealed that 93.3% of the study participants experienced more than one health issue related to computer usage. The predominant complaint was musculoskeletal problems (73.3%), followed by ocular issues (65.3%) and psychosocial concerns (46.0%). Another study conducted in India reported that 75.5% and 59.4% of respondents reported discomfort related to musculoskeletal issues and computer vision syndrome, respectively.14

Rationale

A sedentary lifestyle is a high-risk factor for the development of non-communicable diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, stroke, and cardiovascular disease.

Display screen equipment users have an additional risk of screen time, leading to morbidities such as ophthalmic complaints, headache, vertigo, and other vision deformities.

This study assesses the pattern of physical activity level and morbidity profile simultaneously and aims to provide a holistic understanding of the health status of display screen equipment users.

This comprehensive approach allows for the identification of potential associations between sedentary behavior and health conditions among desk job workers, while qualitative inquiry with the study participants will enable a better understanding of their subjective perceptions.

Aim

Assessment of Morbidity profile and perceptions regarding Physical Activity among display screen equipment users working in a university located in central rural India.

Objective

  • 1. To study the socio demography profile of display screen equipment users.

  • 2. To determine the Morbidity profile amongst study participants.

  • 3. To study the display screen use duration and association with morbidity amongst study participants.

  • 4. To assess the perceptions in regards to physical activity amongst study participants.

Methods

Study design

The current study will utilize a cross-sectional design incorporating a mixed-method approach.

Study setting

The current study will be conducted at a university located in rural central India.

Study participants/population

The male and female employees (>18 years) using Display screen equipment.

Inclusion criteria

Study participants working at the university using display screen equipment and were willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

The study participants not using Display screen equipment shall be excluded from study.

Study duration

The study will be carried out between January 2024 to June 2024.

Sample size

Considering the prevalence reported in previous studies to be 0.933.14 The sample size was calculated using the following formula:

nZ1α/22×p1pd2

Alpha (α) 0.05

Estimated proportion (p) 0.933

Estimated error (d) 0.05

Estimated sample size = 97

Sampling method

A systematic random sampling procedure will be used, where a list of all eligible employees will be extracted from the head office, and the sampling fraction will be obtained by dividing the total population by sample size, which will be used as interval(n). The 1st number will be chosen randomly, and then every nth number after the 1st will be included as a study participant. An interview technique using the online tool Kobo Collect (https://www.kobotoolbox.org/) will be used. This will be done until the desired sample size is achieved.

Variable

The study variables that shall be studied are as follows:

  • 1. Demographic data

  • 2. Job desk workers

  • 3. Display screen users

Study tools

This study will be using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)13 and the Standardized Nordic Scale for musculoskeletal disorders.14 Participants will engage in face-to-face interviews utilizing a pre-tested questionnaire after obtaining their informed consent. This tool will be referred to as the Kobo collection tool. The pre-structured questionnaire will be used to collect information about the physical activity among job desk workers with the help of the kobo collection tool. The questionnaire will contain sociodemographic data, display screen use, and morbidity patterns.

An in-depth interview guide will be used to conduct qualitative inquiries among randomly selected participants until data saturation is reached. All important information about variables, data sources, and methods is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Important study parameters, their variables, data source, and data collection method.

Key study parametersVariablesData sourceData collection method
Socio-demography profileAge
Sex
Marital status
Yearly economic status
Year of experience
Job desk workers used display screen equipment working in university central rural area WardhaOnline questionnaire
Job desk workersSitting
Walking activity
Exercise
Everyday function
Online questionnaire
Type display screen userComputer
Laptop
Tabs
Mobile
Online questionnaire
TimeWorking hours
Daily activity hours
Physical exercise
Rest and sleep
Online questionnaire
MorbidityNeck pain
Shoulder pain
Elbow pain
Wrist/hands pain
Upper back pain
Thighs/hips pain
Knees pain
Ankle pain
Foot pain
Eye sight problem
Online questionnaire

Procedure of data collection

The list of all eligible employees shall be obtained from head office.

The study participants shall be selected using a systematic random sampling method. To ensure that participants fully understood the research goals, the purpose of the study will be explained to them in their local language. Those willing to participate asked to provide written informed consent. Similarly, in-depth interviews with randomly selected study participants will be conducted until the point of data saturation.

Bias

There may be some bias include in the study,

  • 1. Recall bias: Bias arises when the participants inaccurately remember the report information about past exposure and health problems. To minimize recall bias, the standardized well-structured questionnaire is used, and training the interviewer and establishing a rapport with participants can enhance the accuracy of the information provided.

  • 2. Social desirability bias: In qualitative inquiry related to perceptions and practices in regards to physical activity bias may occur as participants tend to give information to be aligned with existing social norms.

Ethical consideration

The Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Ethical approval (DMIHER (DU)/IEC/2023/36) was granted by the Institutional Ethical Committee on Human Research for this study on dated 20/12/2023. Additionally, written informed consent will be obtained from all the participant before their inclusion in the study. Privacy and confidentially will be maintained throughout the study. Measures will be taken to minimize any potential harm or risks to the participants such as referrals for the medical consultation if needed.

Data analysis

The data will be analysis by the ‘R’ statistical software 4.3.2 version, available at https://www.-project.org/ and the data entered in Microsoft excel spreadsheet. Graphs, proportions, and frequency charts will be ustilized to present the descriptive data. The chi-squared test will be used for comparative analysis.

The qualitative data analysis will be done using Thematic content analysis.

Expected outcomes/Results

This study shall generate evidence regarding the existing patterns of physical activity and the use of display screens. Morbidity among the study participants, which should also lead to sensitization of study participants and intervention strategies to be planned accordingly.

Discussion

A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in Mumbai by Shrivastav et al. India (2011). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of health issues among professionals in the software industry. In total, 178 participants were included in this study. The prevalence of visual is 67%, musculoskeletal is 63%, and stress is 44% are found. This study focused on ocular discomfort, musculoskeletal disorders, and psychosocial problems among computer screen users.14

The qualitative study was conducted in a United Kingdom city of a small software engineering company, on “they should stay at their desk until the work is done”: a qualitative study examining perceptions of sedentary behavior in a desk-based occupational setting to explore the desk-based office workers’ perception of factors that influence their behavior. It is essential to consider this discovery when implementing modifications that diminish sedentary behavior in the workplace.3

Gurhan Kayhan conducted a survey involving young female desk job workers to investigate the relationship between daily physical activity (PA) level and low back pain (LBP) in young women, to take an appointment for physical examination at the personal nutrition training center in Ankara, Turkey. To explore the correlation between daily physical activity levels and the occurrence of lower back pain. A total of 240 job desk women were included in the study, and the main finding was a U-shaped relationship between physical activity and lower back pain disability score in young women.9

Shah and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study in Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence rates of cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, and job-related stress among individuals who use visual display screens in office settings. Among the study population, 36.7% experienced work-related stress, which was moderately challenging to manage. Additionally, this research aims to comprehend the awareness and utilization of preventive measures in this population. This study had 95% CI factors associated, and prevalence is (<0.01) was considered statistically significant.13

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India to evaluate work-related neck pain among individuals with desk-based occupations. The study included a total of 441 participants, revealing a higher prevalence of this burden among females than males in the desk job workforce. The primary factor identified was prolonged computer usage of 4-6 hours, which emerged as the most significant predictor for WRNP. Subsequently, work-related aspects, such as screen height and posture, were also found to be associated with WRNP.8

A systematic review conducted by Garlich et al. at the Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, indicated that the connection between screen use and dry eye was particularly noteworthy. This is because patients experiencing dry eye may have a detrimental impact on their quality of life, potentially attributable to ocular pain and visual disturbances arising from tear film instability. The interconnection between dry eye and quality of life was observed in both health- and vision-related aspects. Furthermore, there is a correlation between dry eye and mental health, especially among individuals with an extensive use of digital screens.11

Yu et al. conducted a survey on Musculoskeletal problems among visual display unit workers in an international bank in Hong Kong. A self-administered questionnaire was used to gather information pertaining to work that involved the use of a visual display unit. All 121 employees were included in the study, of whom 70 were male and 51 were female age–18-41 years. Musculoskeletal issues, particularly neck, back, shoulder, and wrist pain, were most frequently observed. Employees predominantly experienced 30% of the back pain and neck pain cases.15

Kristel Oha et al. conducted a cross-sectional investigation of individual and work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal pain in computer users at two universities in Estonia. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) across different body parts in the preceding year and explore its correlation with individual attributes and work-related risk factors. The study included 412 participants. High prevalence rates were observed, with neck pain being the most common at 51%, followed by low back pain at 42%, wrist/hand pain at 35%, and shoulder pain at 30%.16

Implication of study

  • 1. To increase employees’ awareness of the importance of physical activity and strategies to mitigate health challenges associated with prolonged display screen equipment use by desk workers.

  • 2. The insights obtained can help healthcare professionals understand the problem and interventions planned to promote physical activity in display screen users.

  • 3. Recommendations on employee well-being programs that address both physical activity and morbidity identified in this study contribute to a healthier workforce and work environment.

Limitation

The cross-sectional nature of the study restricts the generalization of the findings to other settings, so the findings could have limited external validity.

Study status

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The supervisor created and approved the study’s data collection tool, which will now be evaluated for piloting in the study area.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Mar 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Khode D and Mudey A. Assessment of Morbidity Profile and Perceptions in regards to Physical Activity amongst Display Screen Equipment Users working in a University Located in Central Rural India: A Mixed method study [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] F1000Research 2024, 13:200 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147462.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Mar 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.