Keywords
Dengue, Record based Study, Tertiary care Hospital, South India
This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.
This article is included in the Neglected Tropical Diseases collection.
Dengue is an emerging global viral disease with an increase 30-fold in incidence in the past fifty years. In the past decade it was restricted to only few a states of South and Northern India but in the recent past it has affected almost all the states in India. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical profile, trends and outcome of dengue cases.
This retrospective record based cross-sectional study was conducted in tertiary hospital, Mangaluru in Southern India. The study population included all dengue positive cases diagnosed either by IgM Capture ELISA or Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen over a period of five years. Information from pre-recorded case sheets were used for data collection. The data was analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Results from the analysis have been expressed in percentages, means and graphs.
The study included 401 dengue cases. Most cases were in the age range of 20-40 years with a male to female ratio of 3:2. Overall seropositivity rate was 23.94% with High IgM prevalence. Monthly distribution showed a maximum cases were in the months of June and July and minimum were in January and February. Among the study participants, 91.5% of patients recovered completely and 1.7% of patients had died. 6.8% of patients were discharged against medical advice.
Dengue continues to be major public health problem in this part of the globe affecting mainly the working age group. Low seropositivity with High IgM prevelance makes dengue an important differential for febrile illness of vague nature and invokes the need for robust public health response to curb the hyper-endemicity.
Dengue, Record based Study, Tertiary care Hospital, South India
All the comments by the reviewer were addressed and necessary changes have been done.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Zinia Nujum
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Biju Soman
Dengue is an emerging global viral disease with an increase in incidence of 30 times in the past fifty years. Nine countries were affected before the 1970s but now more than 100 counties have severely been affected with dengue epidemics with the Southeast Asian region and the Western Pacific region being the most severely affected. 390 million cases of dengue occur annually with 96 million showing clinical manifestation.1
The first case of dengue was reported by Benjamin Rush in 1789. Up until the middle of 20th century it was restricted to few geographical locations, but with the population movement during the Second World War there were recurrent epidemics with the re-emergence of the disease.2
Even though the first epidemic of dengue was reported from Chennai in India, the virologically proven epidemic occurred in Kolkata in the 1950s. There were cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome in Delhi and Lucknow in the year 1996, thereafter with a cyclical pattern occurring every 2-3 years.2
In the past 20-30 years it was mostly restricted to only a few states of South and Northern India but in the last decade it has affected almost all the states of India.3
Dengue is viral vector borne disease spread by the day-biting endophilic Aedes mosquito. Its clinical features tend to be vague and nonspecific, ranging from fever to hemorrhage to shock with no specific treatment but supportive care.4,5
Geographically, dengue is more prevalent in tropical countries like India. With that background understanding, we conducted our study in the coastal part of South India where developmental activities are on a rise with rapid urbanization where the study population is at a high risk of being affected with dengue. Our study was conducted to determine the socio-demographic and clinical profile along with the disease outcome of dengue patients. As information regarding the trend, burden and distribution of the disease is vital to plan disease control strategies and optimum utilization of the resources, our study aims to further contribute to the knowledge base regarding this disease.
The study was conducted at Government Wenlock Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated to Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore.
Being a hospital which receives a confluence of patients from neighbouring districts of Karnataka and from northern parts of Kerala. However, this being a district hospital and suggest that the trend in this hospital could reflect what is happening in and around this location.
All dengue patients admitted to Government Wenlock Hospital within the time frame of five years from 2013 to 2017 were included in the present study. This includes patients from Dakshina Kannada district of Karnataka, northern Kerala districts such as Kasargod, Kannur and Wayanad with minimal number of patients from other districts of Karnataka as well.
Inclusion criteria: Clinically confirmed Dengue cases admitted at the above-mentioned time period. IgM Capture ELISA and Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen test which is a rapid test kit, were used for the diagnosis of Dengue in the study participants.
Exclusion criteria: All case sheets with inadequate or incomplete data were excluded from the study.
The IEC (Institutional Ethics Committee) of Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (Manipal Academy of Higher Education) has reviewed the study and has granted approval prior to the onset of the study. Owing to the nature of study design as retrospective record based study, informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee. Confidentiality of the present study data was maintained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Our study was able to reinforce the prevalence of certain demographic trends that has been observed among patients affected with Dengue. Out of the 401 patients studied, 245 (61%) were males with a male to female ratio of 3:2. Majority of the cases fell under the age bracket of 20-40 years (169 cases, 42.1%) (Table 1). Certain demographic details such as occupation, marital status, place of residence were not available for all the patients and hence were not reported upon in our results.
The most common and consistent clinical feature with which most of the patients presented with was fever (398, 99.3%) proceeded by chills and rigor (256, 63.8%) followed by myalgia (194, 48.4%) (Table 2).
Clinical presentation | Number* | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Fever | 398 | 99.3 |
Chills and Rigor | 256 | 63.8 |
Myalgia | 194 | 48.4 |
Headache | 171 | 44.6 |
Vomiting | 152 | 37.9 |
Pain abdomen | 090 | 22.4 |
Arthralgia | 059 | 14.7 |
Diarrhoea | 031 | 07.7 |
Melena | 018 | 04.5 |
Breathlessness | 013 | 03.2 |
Rash | 012 | 02.9 |
Hematemesis | 012 | 02.9 |
Haematuria | 007 | 01.7 |
In line with expected trends, it was observed that most of our cases (n=368, 95.8%) had thrombocytopenia. 81.6% of patients had elevated SGOT and 48% had elevated SGPT enzyme levels indicating certain degree of hepatocyte injury during the acute phase of the infection.
However, a closer look at the seropositivity rate amongst the study population posed some interesting queries. Out of the 401 cases, only 96 cases showed elevated IgG or IgM (total seropositivity rate of 23.94%). Separately, seropositivity rate of IgM was 22.9% and of IgG was 2.7%. Sex wise distribution shows 25.7% seropositivity in males and 22.72% seropositivity among females. Dengue Non-structural Protein NS1 antigen test which is a rapid test kit, was used for the diagnosis in the remaining cases.
But amongst the seropositive patients 57.29% (55 cases) were female and 42.7% (41 cases) were male (Table 3).
Frequency distribution of seropositive cases with respect to age showed that most cases (36, 37.5%) were in the age group of 20-40yrs followed by <20yrs (32, 33.3%).
Our study revealed that regardless of the initial presentation and clinical progression, the majority tended to recover, with a recovery rate of 92%. (n=367). Case fatality rate was recorded to be 1.7% (Table 4).
Dengue being a vector borne disease was expected to boom in accordance with the monsoon seasons and our study was able to confirm this. As depicted by Figure 1 [Month wise distribution of dengue cases (n=401)], most of the cases were found to have been admitted during the months of June and July with a declining trend both pre- and post-monsoons. The months of January to April were shown to have a consistently lower admitted case load. Figure 2 represents the year wise distribution of Dengue cases admitted in the hospital.
Dengue is an upcoming and swiftly spreading vector borne disease that has taken strong hold in India.4 Owing to the complicated interplay between the host, agent, vector, and environmental conditions, the number of cases in India has consistently increased substantially over the past ten years.6 It is now even considered as a hyper endemic disease in certain parts of India. As Das et al. demonstrated in their study, the available data on dengue prevalence in India is just the tip of the iceberg and that further weighs down the preventive measures taken to reduce the brunt of the burden.7 Having recognized the need for comprehensive stratified data on dengue prevalence and its trends to further the knowledge database in Indian population, we focused our study to assess the various clinical, sociodemographic and climactic factors.
Our study was able to demonstrate a significant male preponderance (male = 61%, females = 39%) in cases of dengue reporting to this hospital with a male to female sex ratio of 1.5:1. Similar observations have been made by a multitude of studies, yet a conclusive reasoning has not yet been attributed to this trend.8 Doke and Pawar has attributed this finding to the nature of dressing among women which reduces the amount of skin exposure.9 Other studies have explained this as a product of reporting bias among females as it has been seen that traditional practitioners are the first point of contact for the large majority of symptomatic female population.10 A few studies even postulated that this disparity could be due to the skewed sex ratio leaning towards the side of males in the general population.11
Apart from the male preponderance, our research found that the productive working class aged 20-40 years was the age group most affected. Owing to the declining rate of incidence with advancing age, it could be said that infants, adolescents and young adults are at higher risk of developing dengue. Similar trend has been observed in other studies wherein they found that dengue is a disease that primarily affects the children and the young adults.3,12–15
Combined, the age and sex distribution findings could be attributed to the complex interplay between outdoor nature of work (among men),9 dressing patterns (among women), skewed sex ratio and diurnal feeding habbits of Aedes aegypti.4
Most of the cases were found to have occurred in the months of June and July, with the maximum being 120 cases. A study conducted by Kumar et al. in a coastal city of Karnataka revealed the maximum cases were found to have occurred in the month of September while a meta-analysis conducted by Ganeshkumar et al. found that most cases were seen in the monsoon and post monsoon seasons.13,16 The peri-monsoon seasonality of dengue has also been promptly emphasized by a number of studies which implicates that there is a strong correlation that exists between temperature and humidity to the favourable breeding conditions for the mosquitoes.3,13,14 During rainy season environmental changes such as artificial water stagnation, especially in low lying areas, labour settlements and small collection of water in tyres and flowerpots act as favourable breeding grounds for the vector which conclusively explains the precipitous climb of dengue cases during June to September.14
The clinical picture of patients in our study revealed that fever was present in almost all cases (99.3%) followed by chills and rigor (63.8%). Haematological symptoms included hematemesis and haematuria which were present in 12% and 7% of cases respectively. A meta-analysis conducted on a global scale on dengue outbreaks came to an almost similar picture with fever (98.1), chills (65.3), myalgia (64.2), arthralgia (53.6), body pain (67.2), vomiting (39.8) etc. with similar haematological symptoms like haematuria and hematemesis which were seen in 5% and 13.4% of cases respectively.17
Liver functions test showed abnormal rise in almost 99% of patients of SGPT and SGOT levels but SGOT levels were more prominent in most patients as compared to SGPT, similar research done in Punjab in 2007 had similar results with 98.9% of patients showing a rise in either of SGPT or SGOT levels indicating a strong heptic predeliction for dengue virus.18 A dedicated study regarding dengue and hepatopathy also revealed similar results of elevated SGOT and SGPT with the former being more elevated than the latter.19
Thrombocytopenia is the most common laboratory finding in dengue patients and is referred to as an early marker and prognostic factor for the management and recovery of dengue fever.20 Of 384 dengue patients studied, 368 patients had thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000 per mm3).
Our study revealed a seropositivity rate of 23.94% which is similar to another study conducted by Kalita et al. where they repoted a seropositivity of 14.85%.21 Along with having a low seropositivity rate, it was seen that High IgM prevelance was noted in our study. As concluded by Eshetu et al., high IgM prevelance is indicative of active transmission of dengue which could account for the hyperendemic status of dengue in Southern India.22
Our study included 401 serologically confirmed dengue cases out of which 367 cases (91.5%) were found to have recovered completely. Seven deaths were recorded (1.7%), and 27 cases (6.8%) were found to have been discharged against medical advice. A meta-analysis conducted in India, found that the pooled CFRs of the studies was 2.6% which was in line with findings of the present study.16
Dengue remains to be a major public health problem in this part of the globe, affecting mainly the working age group. With vague nonspecific clinical features combined with low seropositivity rate, it is of paramount importance to keep dengue as a key differential when a patient presents with febrile illness of nonspecific nature. High IgM seropositivity also hints at the fact that a strong and robust vector control programme must be implemented to at least make a dent in the hyperendemic status of dengue especially during the monsoon seasons.
Figshare: Data.xlsx (demographic and medical information of patients), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21257040.v1. 23
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: I came across a few of the authors at a conference, a couple of weeks back.
Reviewer Expertise: Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Modeling, GIS in public Health, Data Science, Health Technology Assessment
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Modeling, GIS in public Health, Data Science, Health Technology Assessment
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neglected Tropical Diseases
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Modeling, GIS in public Health, Data Science, Health Technology Assessment
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neglected Tropical Diseases
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 3 (revision) 11 Mar 24 |
read | |
Version 2 (revision) 23 Feb 24 |
read | read |
Version 1 11 Jul 23 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)