ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Physical therapists’ use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus collection.

Abstract

Background: Physical therapy (PT) services can be essential for recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Maintaining an efficient healthcare service is achieved by ensuring the safety of a well-informed healthcare practitioner. This study aimed to assess the sources of knowledge, attitude, experience, and accessibility to the personal protective equipment (PPE) of the physical therapists working in Saudi Arabia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to survey on-duty PT practitioners using a web-based questionnaire. Licensed PT practitioners were invited to participate, and a sample of 424 therapists responded. The questionnaire comprised of 22 questions covering the demographic data and the following domains: sources of knowledge regarding the pandemic, experience, and attitude of the therapists during the pandemic, and accessibility to the PPE.
Results: Around 83% of the participants (352) completed all the survey questions. Governmental websites were the most used source of knowledge (39%). Hand sanitization was implemented by the majority of participants (81%). Participants, mainly males and experienced therapist, were willing to treat COVID-19 patients. The COVID-19 complications of prolonged ventilation and immobilization were successfully treated by 91.2% of participants who treated positive cases. About a third of the participants were part of COVID-19 management planning teams or received training to deal with the pandemic. Most of the necessary PPE was adequately accessible during the pandemic.
Conclusions: Therapists implemented the recommended hygienic practices and had no problems accessing the necessary PPE. More efforts should target therapists’ education about the social media misleading information and involving the therapists in the pandemic management planning teams.

Keywords

COVID-19, Attitude, Protection, Physical Therapy, patient care, Rehabilitation

Introduction

Since the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), in China in December 2019,1 the world has been encountering unprecedented challenges and COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic in March 2020.2 Numbers of infected cases have been escalating rapidly worldwide, and the governments across the world have had to impose stringent measures to control the rapid spread of the disease. These measures included lockdown, social distancing, travel limitations, public use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and rearrangement of health administrations.3

The crisis the world has been facing because of the pandemic is attributed to the fast and vast spread of the disease among the population.4,5 This resulted in overloaded healthcare systems and an extensive burden being placed on healthcare workers all over the world.6–8 Reports have shown increased stress and anxiety of the healthcare providers due to increased workload and fear of contracting and transmitting the disease to family and friends.9–12 This may impact the attitude and performance of the healthcare provider and accordingly, the efficiency of the whole healthcare system.13,14

During such a crisis, it is important to maintain an efficient healthcare system. This could be achieved by providing training to, updating the knowledge of, and protecting the healthcare providers. Unfortunately, some reports revealed a shortage of knowledge in healthcare workers regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia, with estimates that only about 45% of healthcare workers have a good awareness of COVID-19 when measured in March and April 2020.15 Misleading information and myths about the pandemic have gone viral across the different media channels, contributing further to limiting the knowledge of the healthcare workers.16 Furthermore, protection of the healthcare providers should be ensured by sufficient supplies and ease of accessibility to the PPE. Recent reports showed that shortage of the PPE supplies is associated with increased risk of infection and severity of symptoms and elevated anxiety among the healthcare providers.17

Physical therapy (PT) services are essential for the comprehensive recovery of some COVID-19 patients. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in acute and post-acute settings can significantly maintain and improve the pulmonary functions.18,19 Physical therapists also manage patients recovering from a COVID-19 infection to help them restore mobility and lung functions. This exposes the physical therapists to a high risk of contracting the infection, considering that the physical therapy practice requires prolonged physical contact with the patients.20

Therefore, collecting information regarding healthcare workers’ sources of knowledge and their attitude and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and accessibility to the PPE is important to assess and maintain the efficiency of healthcare systems. Findings retrieved from such information could help decision makers find weaknesses and strengths in order to improve the services provided to the patients. To the authors’ knowledge, no studies have assessed such information among physical therapists working in the Saudi healthcare system. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess and report the sources of knowledge, attitude, experience and accessibility of PPE for physical therapists working in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Design

This study implemented a cross-sectional design that was based on an online questionnaire to survey physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia in September 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed the participants’ sources of knowledge, attitude, experience, and accessibility of PPE during the pandemic.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia (IRB No: IRB-2020-PT-032). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before proceeding to the survey by providing it at the cover letter and having each participant accepting it by clicking start to proceed to the survey. Anonymity of the participants was ensured and no personal identifier was obtained.

Study settings and participants

Physical therapy practitioners working in the Saudi healthcare system (including governmental and private sectors hospitals and clinics) were invited through emails and professional social media groups to fill an anonymous web-based questionnaire. Data were collected during September 2020 by sending the survey to professional physiotherapy groups on social media channels to cover the five geographical regions of Saudi Arabia. Social network channels used were Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Snapchat.

Using the Raosoft calculator, a sample size of 257 therapists was targeted. This was based on an estimated population size of 5000 licensed physical therapists, according to the data available through the World Physiotherapy website,21 and using a confidence level of 90%, and P-value of 0.05. The inclusion criteria were licensed physical therapy practitioners working inside Saudi Arabia only. Participants were excluded if they were not working in Saudi Arabia, or if they were any health care providers other than physical thrapy practiotioners.

Instrument

This study used a web-based survey (QuestionPro) comprised of 22 questions. It covered the participant’s demographic data and the following areas: sources of knowledge regarding the pandemic, experience, and attitude of the therapists during the pandemic, and accessibility to the PPE. The survey tool was developed by the authors in accordance with the guidelines of the World Physiotherapy regarding the PT services during the COVID-19 pandemic,22 and based on a questionnaire for spine surgeons,23 and a study that assessed the PT practice during the pandemic.24

The sources of knowledge about the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed by one question that had four answer categories including news, social media, official websites (e.g. World Health Organization), and family and friends. Each category had a 4-point Likert scale (least used to most used). The attitude topic was assessed by two questions concerned with the type of precautionary measures implemented at home, and willingness of participants to treat a positive COVID-19 patient. Regarding the topic of experience, nine questions were developed to assess training of the participants during the pandemic, their involvement in pandemic management teams, actual treatment of positive cases, and their feedback about the efficacy of the treatment they provided for those cases. Accessibility to the PPE was assessed by one question with six answer categories in order to identify accessibility. The questionnaire can be found as Extended data.52

Procedures

The authors reviewed and confirmed the face and content validity of the questionnaire items. Then, the questionnaire was pilot tested by ten respondents who volunteered to take part of the survey that was announced through professional social networks. They completed the questionnaire online, and their comments about the questions and the cover letter were recorded. Then, the respondents were interviewed via phone and requested to provide responses to the survey items that were rephrased using alternative wording. Their responses were checked against what they provided in the web-based questionnaire. Afterwards, the questionnaire was amended accordingly based on the pilot study results. The formal questionnaire was constructed using QuestionPro software and disseminated during September 2020 through emails and social media. We used various professional social media groups through Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Snapchat.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Completed responses for each variable were examined. Descriptive statistics were performed for all the variables in the form of frequency (percentages) distribution. Univariable analyses were performed to examine the significant differences between the defined parameters among different demographic characteristics. Chi-square test was used for the categorical parameters. The significance level (α) was set at P≤0.05. Variables with significant univariable effects were further processed using multivariable analysis. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between the demographic characteristics and study parameters.

Results

Demographic characteristics

Of the 2021 subjects who viewed the survey, 795 participants started it. A total of 425 physical therapy practitioners completed the knowledge and attitude sections, and only 352 (83%) participants completed the entire survey including the PPE.52 The demographic data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants.

PT=physical therapist.

n%
Age (years)≤3028767.5%
Above 3013832.5%
GenderMale16238.1%
Female26361.9%
NationalitySaudi39492.7%
Non-Saudi317.3%
Work RegionEastern16338.4%
Central11126.1%
Western7818.4%
Northern245.6%
Southern4911.5%
Professional rankAssistant PT348.0%
Junior PT20448.0%
Senior PT15035.3%
Consultant194.5%
Assistant to Head of Department71.6%
Head of Department112.6%
SubspecialtyMusculoskeletal PT7016.5%
Pediatric PT4610.8%
Neurological PT92.1%
Sports PT255.9%
Cardiopulmonary PT163.8%
Women Health PT92.1%
Rehabilitation PT286.6%
General PT20748.7%
Other153.5%
EducationDiploma122.8%
Bachelor degree33879.5%
Master degree5412.7%
Doctoral degree214.9%
Years of experience≤526863.1%
>515736.9%
Type of employerGovernmental institution25960.9%
Non-governmental institution16639.1%

Sources of knowledge about the COVID-19 pandemic

The participants reported that the sources of knowledge they used the most were the official governmental websites e.g. Ministry of Health (n=165, 39%), followed by the social media including Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Snapchat (n=113, 26.7%). Knowledge obtained through colleagues and family members were the least used (n=16, 3.8%). Although not being the most used source of knowledge (n=69, 16.3%), print and broadcast media were significantly associated with age (P=0.016) and years of experience (P=0.043), as older (n=28, 20.4%) and more-experienced (n=32, 20.5%) participants reported using it as the most used source of knowledge, more than their younger (n=41, 14.3%) and less-experienced (n=37, 13.8%) counterparts.

Attitude of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic

Hand sanitization and washing clothes were the most commonly implemented precautionary measures reported by 81.1% and 80.9% of participants, respectively. Self-isolation was implemented by 26.8% of participants, and about 8.0% reported implementing other additional measures, which were implemented by women more than men (P=0.037) (Table 2).

Table 2. Precautions implemented by participants at home due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Values indicate number (%) of participants who reported implementing those precautionary measures (n=425).

Age (y)GenderExperience (y)Institution
≤30>30MaleFemale≤5>5Govern.Private
Self-isolation n=114(26.8%)85(29.6%)29 (21.0%)42 (25.9%)72 (27.4%)76 (28.4%)38 (24.2%)66 (25.5%)48 (28.9%)
Hand sanitization n=344(81.1%)232 (80.8%)113 (81.9%)126 (77.8%)218 (82.9%)219 (81.7%)125 (79.6%)215 (83.0%)129 (77.7%)
Washing cloths n=343(80.7%)228 (79.4%)116 (84.1%)129 (79.6%)214 (81.4%)215 (80.2%)128 (81.5%)215 (83.0%)128 (77.1%)
Other measures n=34(8.0%)19 (6.6%)15 (10.9%)7 (4.3%)26 (9.9%)17 (6.3%)16 (10.2%)19 (7.3%)14 (8.4%)

Furthermore, about half of the participants (52.1%) reported their willingness to manage and treat COVID-19 patients. This positive attitude towards the COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with gender (P<0.001) and experience (P=0.027). Male and more-experienced therapists were more willing to manage positive COVID-19 patients than their female and less-experienced counterparts (Table 3).

Table 3. Attitude and experience of participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Values indicate number (%) of participants who answered “yes” to the questions (n=425).

Age (y)GenderExperience (y)Institution
≤30>30MaleFemale≤5>5Govern.Private
Willingness to manage a COVID-19 patient? n=222 (52.2%)149 (51.9%)73 (52.9%)102 (63.0%)120 (45.6%)129 (48.1%)93 (59.2%)137 (52.9%)85 (51.2%)
Involvement in COVID-19 management teams n=132 (31.1%)80 (27.9%)52 (37.7%)68 (42.0%)64 (24.3%)66 (24.6%)66 (42.0%)99 (38.2%)33 (19.9%)
COVID-19 training n=134 (31.5%)92 (32.2%)42 (30.4%)60 (37.0%)74 (28.1%)79 (29.5%)55 (35.0%)88 (34.0%)46 (27.7%)
Diagnosed as a COVID-19 patient n=46 (10.8%)32 (11.2%)14 (10.2%)20 (12.4%)26 (9.9%)26 (9.7%)20 (12.8%)23 (8.9%)23 (13.9%)
Treated a COVID-19 patient n=99 (23.3%)59 (20.8%)40 (29.4%)49 (30.6%)50 (19.2%)49 (18.4%)50 (32.5%)75 (29.2%)24 (14.6%)
Managing consequences of prolonged ventilation and immobilization n=116 (27.3%)81 (29.6%)35 (26.5%)52 (33.1%)64 (25.7%)73 (28.3%)43 (29.1%)78 (31.6%)38 (23.9%)
Positive impact of PT on patient’s condition n=115 (27.05%)76 (89.4%)39 (95.1%)58 (96.7%)57 (86.4%)64 (87.7%)51 (96.2%)80 (90.9%)35 (92.1%)

Experience of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic

At the institutional level, participants reported that they were involved in management teams of the COVID-19 pandemic (30.9%). However, this was associated with age ((P=0.036), gender (P<0.001), experience (P<0.001), and type of institution (P<0.001). The results revealed that older and more experienced male therapists working in governmental institutions were more involved in the pandemic management teams. Unexpectedly, only 134 participants (31.6%) received training to deal with the pandemic (Table 3).

In total, 99 participants (23.6%) reported treating positive COVID-19 patients. Managing infected patients was significantly associated with gender (P=0.007), experience (P<0.001) and type of the institution (P<0.001). Around 47.8% of participants who treated infected patients handled five or less patients, while around 63.3% treated more than ten patients. The number of COVID-19 cases treated by participants was associated with gender (P=0.008) as male therapists reported managing more infected patients than female therapists. Only 7% of them felt unconfident treating COVID-19 patients (Table 4). About 28.4% of participants treated the complications of prolonged ventilation and immobilization associated with the COVID-19 infection, and 91.2% of them reported a positive impact on the patient’s condition. The reported data regarding the impact of the physical therapy treatment were associated with the participant’s gender (P=0.041).

Table 4. Management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Values indicate number (%) of participants who reported treating COVID-19 patients (n=91).

Age (y)GenderExperience (y)Institution
≤30>30MaleFemale≤5>5Govern.Private
Number of COVID-19 patient managed1-5 n=43(47.3%)26 (47.3%)17 (47.2%)18 (38.3%)25 (56.8%)24 (52.2%)19 (42.2%)32 (46.4%)11 (50.0%)
6-10 n=15(16.5%)10 (18.2%)5 (13.9%)5 (10.6%)10 (22.7%)9 (19.6%)6 (13.3%)13 (18.8%)2 (9.1%)
>10 n=33(36.3%)19 (34.5%)14 (38.9%)24 (51.1%)9 (20.5%)13 (28.3%)20 (44.4%)24 (34.8%)9 (40.9%)
Level of confidence dealing with a COVID-19 patientVery confident n=43(47.3%)24 (43.6%)19 (52.8%)26 (55.3%)17 (38.6%)17 (37.0%)26 (57.8%)32 (46.4%)11 (50.0%)
Somewhat confident n=41(45.1%)24 (43.6%)17 (47.2%)18 (38.3%)23 (52.3%)24 (52.2%)17 (37.8%)32 (46.4%)9 (40.9%)
Not confident n=7 (7.7%)7 (12.7%)0 (0.0%)3 (6.4%)4 (9.1%)5 (10.9%)2 (4.4%)5 (7.2%)2 (9.1%)

Accessibility to PPE

Participants reported that accessibility to most of the protective equipment and sanitization supplies was not problematic during the pandemic. Availability of hand sanitizer, gloves, surgical masks, and gowns was of no or little problem for 93.5%, 93.5%, 89.8%, and 87.2% of participants, respectively. However, accessibility to respiratory masks and face shields/goggles was a huge problem for 23.3%, and 16.8% of participants, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5. Accessibility to personal protective equipment (PPE).

Values indicate number (%) of participants (n=352).

Age (y)GenderExperience (y)Institution
≤30 n=235>30 n=117Male n=139Female n=213≤5 n=221>5 n=131Govern. n=219Private n=133
Respiratory mask (N95, KN95, or other)No problem n=12680 (22.7%)46 (13.1%)57 (16.2%)69 (19.6%)78 (22.2%)48 (13.6%)78 (22.2%)48 (13.6%)
Little problem n=14495 (27.0%)49 (13.9%)51 (14.5%)93 (26.4%)91 (25.9%)53 (15.1%)93 (26.4%)51 (14.5%)
Huge problem n=8260 (17.1%)22 (6.2%)31 (8.8%)51 (14.5%)52 (14.8%)30 (8.5%)48 (13.6%)34 (9.7%)
Surgical maskNo problem n=241158 (44.9%)83 (23.6%)93 (26.4%)148 (42.1%)149 (42.3%)92 (26.1%)152 (43.2%)89 (25.3%)
Little problem n=7552 (14.8%)23 (6.5%)34 (9.7%)41 (11.6%)49 (13.9%)26 (7.4%)41 (11.6%)34 (9.7%)
Huge problem n=3625 (7.1%)11 (3.1%)12 (3.4%)24 (6.8%)23 (6.5%)13 (3.7%)26 (7.4%)10 (2.8%)
Face shield/gogglesNo problem n=201131 (37.2%)70 (19.9%)80 (22.7%)121 (34.4%)128 (36.4%)73 (20.7%)127 (36.1%)74 (21.0%)
Little problem n=9266 (18.8%)26 (7.4%)40 (11.4%)52 (14.8%)58 (16.5%)34 (9.7%)51 (14.5%)41 (11.6%)
Huge problem n=5938 (10.8%)21 (6.0%)19 (5.4%)40 (11.4%)35 (9.9%)24 (6.8%)41 (11.6%)18 (5.1%)
GlovesNo problem n=288192 (54.5%)96 (27.3%)110 (31.3%)178 (50.6%)182 (51.7%)106 (30.1%)174 (49.4%)114 (32.4%)
Little problem n=4127 (7.7%)14 (4.0%)16 (4.5%)25 (7.1%)26 (7.4%)15 (4.3%)31 (8.8%)10 (2.8%)
Huge problem n=2316 (4.5%)7 (2.0%)13 (3.7%)10 (2.8%)13 (3.7%)10 (2.8%)14 (4.0%)9 (2.6%)
GownsNo problem n=246168 (47.7%)78 (22.2%)91 (25.9%)155 (44.0%)156 (44.3%)90 (25.6%)153 (43.5%)93 (26.4%)
Little problem n=6138 (10.8%)23 (6.5%)28 (8.0%)33 (9.4%)35 (9.9%)26 (7.4%)39 (11.1%)22 (6.2%)
Huge problem n=4529 (8.2%)16 (4.5%)20 (5.7%)25 (7.1%)30 (8.5%)15 (4.3%)27 (7.7%)18 (5.1%)
Hand sanitizerNo problem n=289190 (54.0%)99 (28.1%)112 (31.8%)177 (50.3%)174 (49.4%)115 (32.7%)181 (51.4%)108 (30.7%)
Little problem n=4028 (8.0%)12 (3.4%)15 (4.3%)25 (7.1%)34 (9.7%)6 (1.7%)24 (6.8%)16 (4.5%)
Huge problem n=2317 (4.8%)6 (1.7%)12 (3.4%)11 (3.1%)13 (3.7%)10 (2.8%)14 (4.0%)9 (2.6%)

Discussion

During the past year, several studies examined how the healthcare practitioners handled the COVID-19 pandemic.9,15,25–30 However, studies focusing on the PT profession were scarce.24,31–33 Physical therapists typically spend extended periods of time treating patients through prolonged and direct physical interaction with patients.20 In the current pandemic, physical therapists play an important role providing respiratory support and active mobilization to COVID-19 patients both inside and out of an acute care setting.18,19,34,35

The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented medical situation that has been associated with extreme measures imposed worldwide. Accordingly, it was essential to assess the knowledge of physical therapists about the new viral infection. Our results showed that nearly 40% of the physical therapists were responsible enough to seek knowledge about the new pandemic from trusted sources such as the official websites. Meanwhile, more than one quarter (26.7%) of the participants used social media as their main source of information. This may suggest that the physical therapists may have developed misconceptions about the pandemic because of the invalid information about how the virus spreads and any myths about the virus symptoms through the social media.16,36 Other studies investigated the community knowledge about the pandemic and found a significant knowledge gap among the public37,38 and healthcare providers.15

The current results indicate commitment from most of the physical therapists to apply the recommended precautionary measures. More than 80% of the participants reported using hand sanitizers and washing clothes once they return home. Previous reports revealed an increased anxiety among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia during April 2020 because of the pandemic.28 One of the main reasons for increased anxiety was the fear of contracting the infection and transmitting it to family and friends.15,39 In the current study, women were more inclined than men to apply additional precautionary measures, which reflects a greater protective attitude. This is in accordance with previous studies that showed hygienic practices were positively associated with women,37,40 and they were more compliant than men with the imposed public policy measures while dealing with COVID-19 pandemic as mandating the use of face masks, quarantine the infected cases, etc.41

In the current study, physical therapists showed a positive attitude towards managing COVID-19 positive cases. Despite of the documented concern and anxiety among healthcare providers regarding the pandemic,15,39 more than half of the participants were willing to treat a COVID-19 patient. Physical therapy services by nature require extended and direct physical interaction between the therapist and the patient, which would potentially significantly increase the risk of contracting a highly contagious infection such as COVID-19. Thus, it is expected that physical therapists might be hesitant to manage a positive case, which was reported by almost half of the study participants. Meanwhile, men as well as more experienced therapists, were more motivated to treat COVID-19 patients. This finding is counterintuitive considering the reported fact that older adults and males are more likely to be at greater risk of serious morbidity and higher mortality.42–44 However, this interesting finding could be explained by reports of the gender-based differences regarding attitude and risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women reported greater fear and health-related negative expectations than men.41,45 Additionally, experienced therapists are commonly assigned to higher administrative positions that limit direct interaction with patients. Furthermore, they are typically older than less experienced therapists. Therefore, they are considered amongst the high-risk group for contracting infection and experiencing serious health consequences. Thus, they had limited or no interaction with patients, which may explain their positive attitude and limited concern regarding treating patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

Unfortunately, only about one third of the participants (30.9% and 31.6%, respectively) reported being involved in management and planning teams of the pandemic or receiving training to deal with the pandemic. This surprisingly low percentage indicating the need to provide more training programs for rehabilitation professionals by the governing authorities. However, it could be justified by the fact that COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease for which, the first line of treatment is medical rather than rehabilitative. Thus, it is reasonable that physicians and nurses become the focus group for treatment planning and training efforts during the pandemic. This should not underestimate the valuable role physical therapists have in acute settings for treating COVID-19 patients.19 Our findings also indicate that involvement in management teams was positively associated with male, older and more experienced therapists working in governmental institutions. This further corroborates the finding discussed here above regarding gender-based differences about worries, fear and negative expectations toward the pandemic that are more associated with women. This could potentially be a barrier for female therapists to participate in management and planning teams. Additionally, the measures imposed by the Saudi Ministry of Health targeted primarily the governmental medical institutions that are more capable to accommodate the increased number of COVID-19 cases.46 This may explain the interesting finding favoring therapists working in governmental institutions. This argument is supported by the reported data regarding actual treatment of positive cases. The majority of therapists who reported treating COVID-19 cases were mostly working in governmental institutions, and male therapists treated higher numbers of patients compared with female therapists.

The results revealed that accessibility to the PPE was not a problem for the majority of the participants. This indicates the preparedness of the Saudi healthcare system to face the pandemic and equip the healthcare providers with the necessary protective equipment.46 This is particularly important considering that more than 60% of the participants work in governmental institutions. Protection of healthcare providers during a pandemic is crucial for the quality and efficiency of the service provided. Reports have shown a significant shortage of PPE in some healthcare systems. In Italy, only 13% of physicians reported to have access to PPE every time they needed to.47 Another study in Ethiopia identified a critical shortage of PPE that is significantly associated with high levels of dissatisfaction amongst healthcare workers.48 This should be a warning to the governing authorities to continuously provide sufficient supplies of PPE and avoid shortage using different resources,49,50 given the findings revealing that limited access to or shortage of PPE is significantly associated with increased risk of contracting the COVID-19 infection and increased severity of symptoms among the health care workers.17

The current study has some limitations that should be noted. The data collection process was not carried out at the time of the lockdown during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic during March to June 2020.51 Therefore, the data obtained were collected retrospectively. Thus, it may likely suffer the recall bias inherent with retrospective self-reported data. The five geographical regions of the Saudi Arabia were not equally represented, which may limit the generalizability of the obtained findings. However, successfully recruiting participants more than the required minimal sample size could provide credible data.

In conclusion, the current study showed that physical therapists were knowledgeable about best hygienic practices. Furthermore, sufficient supplies of the PPE were available through the Saudi healthcare system, which indicates appropriate planning by the authorities. Physical therapists showed a positive attitude towards COVID-19 patients. Yet, this could be improved significantly by implementing a stringent plan to educate the physical therapy practitioners about misleading information on social media as a source of information and involving them more in management planning teams.

Data availability

Underlying data

Open Science Framework: COVID-19 influence on rehabilitation service providers in Saudi Arabia. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4M7GV.52

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • • Raw Data with codebook.csv (dataset)

  • • CodeBook-Raw Data.csv (codebook)

Extended data

Open Science Framework: COVID-19 influence on rehabilitation service providers in Saudi Arabia. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4M7GV.52

This project contains the following extended data:

  • • Questionnaire.pdf

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Elsayed W, Albagmi F, Alghamdi M and Farrag A. Physical therapists’ use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] F1000Research 2022, 11:918 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110204.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.