Keywords
western blot artifacts,egg white proteins,enhanced chemiluminescence,ghost band,green tea polyphenols,horseradish peroxidase,protein-polyphenol interactions
western blot artifacts,egg white proteins,enhanced chemiluminescence,ghost band,green tea polyphenols,horseradish peroxidase,protein-polyphenol interactions
Western blotting has been used extensively to identify and quantify relative amounts of specific proteins in complex mixtures. Proteins are identified using antigen-specific primary antibodies followed by various enzyme-coupled secondary antibodies. Commonly used conjugated enzymes are alkaline phosphatase and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)1. HRP is more popular due to its stability and smaller size, which allows for conjugation of multiple HRP moieties per secondary antibody and increased sensitivity2. Avidin-biotin systems can also be used to amplify reactivity and luminol-based enzyme substrates are commonly used to create a visible chemiluminescent signal.
We recently described an approach to reduce the allergenicity of light roasted peanut flour through complexation of peanut proteins with plant polyphenolic compounds. Peanut proteins formed stable aggregate particles with polyphenols and those particles showed substantially reduced allergenicity based on complementary assays, including chemiluminescence-based Western blotting3. In the present study, this blotting technique was used to investigate the binding of IgE antibodies to hen egg white proteins complexed with green tea-derived polyphenols. The polyphenols were mixed with the protein, frozen then freeze dried, which allows for stable protein-polyphenol aggregate particles to form. For detection on the blots, we used primary antibodies from allergic human plasma, secondary biotin-coupled goat anti-human IgE, avidin-HRP, and an enhanced luminol substrate.
Precast mini TGX 4–20% polyacrylamide gels were purchased from BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA). Nitroblue tetrazolium and glycine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All other SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting reagents used are listed elsewhere3. Egg white protein (EWP) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Commercially available organic dry green tea leaves (Camellia sinensis [L.] Kuntze) were provided by QTrade Teas & Herbs (Cerritos, CA, USA). Ground leaves were extracted and stored until further use as previously described1. Extraction was performed for 2 h at 80 °C.
The total phenolic content in the green tea extract was determined (36.8 mg mL-1 ± 0.26 mg mL-1, see Table S1) according to the 96-well microplate-adapted Folin-Ciocalteu method by Zhang et al.4 with modifications described by Herald et al.5. The amount of extract (mL) and protein powder (g) required to generate dry, stable protein-polyphenol aggregate particles containing 5, 10, 15, 30, or 40% polyphenols after complexation was added together and mixed under constant agitation for 15 min at room temperature. Mixtures were subsequently frozen at -20 °C and freeze-dried (FreeZone12, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) to form stable protein-polyphenol aggregate particles.
Following transfer of proteins by electroblotting from unmodified EWP and aggregate particles to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, the membrane was briefly hydrated in 100% methanol and polyphenol-modified proteins were detected with NBT and glycinate as described by Hagerman [6; www.users.muohio.edu/hagermae/]. At alkaline pH, the catechol moiety of polyphenols catalyzes redox-cycling in the presence of glycinate, generating superoxide that reduces NBT to insoluble, visible formazan7.
Amounts of protein-polyphenol aggregate particles or unmodified EWP were normalized to provide 2 mg protein for SDS-PAGE. Samples were prepared in sample loading buffer containing 5% β-mercaptoethanol, resulting in 10 µg protein in 10 µL. Samples (10 µg protein/10 µL) were incubated for 5 min at 95 °C, loaded onto a gel, run (40 min at 200 V), and then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB). The immunoblotting method used, including reagent sources, is described elsewhere3. The following minor modifications were made: Pooled human plasma (containing polyclonal antibodies, among them egg white-specific IgE) from 7 egg white-allergic individuals (PlasmaLab International, Everett, WA, USA; 1:80; v/v) was used to bind antigens on the membrane. EWP-specific IgE levels ranged from 15.4 to 100 kU L−1 as determined via ImmunoCAP (Phadia, Uppsula, Sweden). Biotinylated polyclonal goat IgG anti-human IgE (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratory, Inc., reference no. 01-10-04, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 1:8,000; v/v) and NeutrAvidin HRP conjugate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA; 1:20,000; v/v) were used to bind plasma antibodies.
In separate experiments, proteins in aggregate particles containing 15% polyphenols were blotted onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was subsequently cut into strips and subjected to various combinations of immunoblotting reagents. Transferred proteins from unmodified EWP served as a control and underwent full immunoblotting procedure.
The major EWPs ovotransferrin (76.6 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa) and lysozyme (14.3 kDa)8 from both aggregate particles and unmodified EWP were separated by SDS-PAGE and identified by staining with CBB (Figure 1A). An increase in molecular weight of ovotransferrin and ovalbumin, but not of lysozyme, was observed and this was polyphenol concentration dependent (Figure 1A). In fact, NBT staining indicated that ovalbumin and ovotransferrin, but not lysozyme were modified by polyphenols and the degree of staining was dependent on the concentration of polyphenol (Figure 1B). The staining also revealed several additional proteins not stained with CBB, suggesting that the NBT staining of polyphenols more sensitively reveals the presence of protein than does CBB staining. As expected, control EWP did not react with NBT (Figure 1B). The finding that polyphenols remain bound to proteins following SDS-PAGE and membrane transfer suggests a strong, perhaps covalent association between the molecules.
As shown in Figure 1C, ovotransferrin, ovalbumin and lysozyme in unmodified EWP were recognized by antigen-specific IgE antibodies from human plasma. However, for protein samples that contained polyphenols, ovotransferrin and ovalbumin as well as several of the proteins revealed by NBT but not CBB staining, appeared as white “ghost” bands (Figure 1C). Generally, “ghost” bands occur when the substrate is depleted quickly by the enzyme at that location and ceases to produce light. Commonly, this is a result of a high concentration of one or more of the components of the enzymatic reaction. However, in this case, the phenomenon was not observed for the EWP control sample (which did not contain polyphenols) and increased with increasing amount of polyphenols, suggesting that the polyphenols are triggering the excessive consumption of substrate and appearance of the “ghost” bands. The phenomenon was also observed with other aggregate particles including whey protein isolate-green tea polyphenol and whey protein isolate-blueberry polyphenol aggregate particles (see Figure S1) indicating that “ghosting” was not dependent on specific EWPs.
To further investigate the mechanism underlying “ghost” band formation on those blots, PVDF membrane-transferred unmodified and polyphenol-modified EWPs underwent treatment with a combination of different immunoblotting reagents. Results revealed that polyphenols promoted “ghost” band formation by interacting with HRP during HRP-substrate reactions (Figure 2). “Ghost” bands were only observed on membrane strips containing green tea polyphenols and HRP (Figure 2B, D, and G) and only HRP was required to produce “ghost” bands with polyphenol-modified EWPs (Figure 2G). No “ghost” bands were observed when substrate alone was added to a membrane containing polyphenol-bound proteins (Figure 2E). It should be noted that the light background in Figure 2C, E, and F is caused through a different mechanism than white “ghost” bands seen in B, D, and G. Since HRP is required for signal production, antibody-bound proteins on membranes not exposed to HRP (Figure 2C, E, and F) were not detected, hence, the membrane appeared blank when imaged (grey spotting is an imaging artifact). In contrast, on membranes that were treated with HRP and contained polyphenols (Figure 2B, D, and G), polyphenol-bound proteins appeared as white “ghost” bands due to depletion of locally available substrate and subsequent cessation of local light production. Interestingly, the lysozyme band was unaffected and apparently represents another artifact. This band did not require the presence of the primary antibody (Figure 2D), indicating it occurs due to a non-specific reaction between the secondary HRP-conjugated antibody and the substrate. Further, the intensity of this band increased in the presence of polyphenols (Figure 2A, B and D), which seems contradictory since the NBT stain did not indicate polyphenols bound to lysozyme (Figure 1B). It is possible that in the presence of polyphenols, specific binding of primary and therefore secondary antibodies to proteins may be reduced resulting in excess free secondary antibodies to bind lysozyme (which did not contain bound polyphenols).
Based on this experiment, exact mechanisms of HRP promotion by polyphenols cannot be determined. It is possible, based on the fact that polyphenols are able to act as “bridges” between proteins9, that HRP non-specifically binds to protein-bound polyphenols at high concentrations, therefore rapidly depleting substrate (luminol) in close proximity to the enzyme. Further, it is possible that protein-bound polyphenols are able to promote HRP activity, as has been observed similarly with digestive enzymes10. In both cases, this could result in the cessation of light emittance (depletion of locally available luminol).
It is important to note that the observations made in this study applied to a specific set of protein samples, secondary antibody, enzyme and chemiluminescence substrate. Other types of conjugated or unconjugated secondary antibodies, enzymes (e.g. alkaline phosphatase), or substrates have not been evaluated. However, while proper Western blot experimental designs include appropriate controls such as evaluation of unmodified proteins or antibody-antigen specificity, no control for protein-bound polyphenols as shown above has been described to date. The present study highlights the importance of evaluating polyphenol effects on chemiluminescence-based antigen detection in order to prevent false interpretation of data and reveals a new source of “ghost” band artifacts.
We demonstrated that when attempting to evaluate IgE binding capacity of EWP-green tea polyphenol aggregate particles by enhanced chemiluminescence-based Western blotting, polyphenols which remained bound to egg white proteins after electrophoretic transfer to a PVDF membrane hyperactivated HRP, resulting in “ghost” bands. This study reveals protein-bound ligands as an unintended source of “ghost” band artifacts, and suggests that caution should be taken when evaluating polyphenol-bound proteins by enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting.
Dataset 1: Raw data for Figure 1. Protein distribution visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (CBB), nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining, and IgE binding capacity. (Full legend and table are in the file).
DOI, 10.5256/f1000research.10622.d15236611
Dataset 2: Raw data for Figure 2. Evaluation of horseradish peroxidase hyperactivation by polyphenols. (Full legend and table are in the file).
DOI, 10.5256/f1000research.10622.d15236712
Dataset 3: Raw data for Supplementary Figure S1. Protein distribution, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining, and IgE binding capacity.
(Full legend and table are in the file).
NJP carried out the research, contributed to experimental design and wrote a first draft of the paper. MAL served as corresponding author and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. EAF contributed to the design of experiments and provided expertise in protein chemistry. SML helped design experiments, shared expertise in immunology and was involved in manuscript preparation. All authors were involved in manuscript revision and have agreed to the final content.
The authors declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. The authors acknowledge the generous support for this project provided through the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at NC State University.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
We want to thank QTrade Teas & Herbs (Cerritos, CA, USA) for providing the green tea leaves.
Figure S1: Protein distribution, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining, and IgE binding capacity. (Full legend and table are in the file).
Click here to access the data.
Table S1: Replicate measurements of green tea extract for total phenolic content. SD: standard deviation.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
References
1. Plundrich NJ, Kulis M, White BL, Grace MH, et al.: Novel strategy to create hypoallergenic peanut protein-polyphenol edible matrices for oral immunotherapy.J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62 (29): 7010-21 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 2 (revision) 26 May 17 |
read | read | |
Version 1 13 Mar 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)