Cannabinoid receptor type-1: breaking the dogmas

Introduction

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is composed of G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, namely cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB₁) and cannabinoid receptor-2 (CB₂)^1,2; the endogenous cannabinoids called endocannabinoids, such as the lipids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol^3,4; and the enzymes involved in their synthesis and inactivation⁵. The family of endocannabinoids has recently grown to include a group of peptide ligands (so-called pepcans) and other lipid molecules, such as lipoxin and pregnenolone, interestingly acting as allosteric enhancers or signal-specific inhibitors (SSIs) of CB₁ receptors⁶.

One of the main characteristics of the ECS is its broad distribution throughout the body. In this review, we will specifically focus our attention on the CB₁ receptor-dependent functions in the nervous system (particularly the brain). The CB₁ receptor is considered the most abundant metabotropic receptor in the brain⁷. It was cloned in 1990¹ and its distribution has been well characterized in both rodents^8,9 and humans¹⁰. These receptors are particularly rich in the central nervous system^11,12, where they control a wide spectrum of physiological and pathological conditions, including brain development, learning and memory, motor behavior, regulation of appetite, body temperature, pain perception, inflammation, and they are involved in various psychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental disorders^13–17.

This review highlights recent findings that challenge or extend accepted “dogmas” of CB₁ receptor signaling. Thus, it discusses where CB₁ receptors are localized, the importance of CB₁ receptors outside the brain, and new strategies to pharmacologically act on these receptors. Importantly, the understanding of where, which, and how CB₁ receptor function is mandatory to improve the pharmacological strategies to act on this promising therapeutic target.

Localization of CB₁ receptors in different neuronal types

CB₁ receptor localization has been widely studied during the last few decades¹⁸. Thus, early studies provided strong evidence for a presynaptic localization of CB₁ receptors, from where they can control the neurotransmitter release^7,19. However, the somatodendritic localization of CB₁ receptors cannot be discarded, as processes of self-inhibition through these receptors have been demonstrated in the cortex^20–23. According to this, recent work describes that somatodendritic CB₁ receptors control a specific postsynaptic signaling cascade important for the cognitive impairment induced by cannabinoids²⁴. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the relative involvement of pre- or post-synaptic CB₁ receptors in brain functions and how this can affect our general view of how the ECS controls synaptic transmission.

Interestingly, new experimental approaches (e.g., imaging tools) have shown the expression of CB₁ receptors in different neuronal types, including GABAergic, glutamatergic, and serotonergic neurons, among others^8,25–28. Moreover, although the anatomical presence of CB₁ receptors in cholinergic, noradrenergic, or dopaminergic neurons has not been fully characterized, cannabinoids are known to control acetylcholine and dopamine release^29,30. For example, it has been recently shown that CB₁ receptors can specifically control cholinergic over glutamatergic transmission at single synapses that co-release both neurotransmitters³¹.

Importantly, the expression levels of CB₁ receptors can drastically differ among different cell types and can diverge between different brain regions^12,25,32,33. This widely distributed and differential expression in the brain reflects the complexity, and can explain the variety of functions, of the ECS. For instance, this specific distribution can explain some of the bimodal effects of cannabinoid drugs^34,35. Thus, recent studies demonstrated how CB₁ receptors localized in GABAergic neurons can control food intake³⁴, running related behaviors^36,37, drug addiction^38,39, and learning and memory processes^40,41, among other behaviors, whereas CB₁ receptors localized in glutamatergic neurons control neuroprotection⁴², olfactory processes²⁵, fear memories⁴³, social behaviors⁴⁴, and anxiety³⁵, among others. Moreover, CB₁ receptors present in serotonergic neurons can modulate emotional responses⁴⁵.

Localization of CB₁ receptors in other cell types or intracellular organelles

The biased neuron-centric view in the ECS field changed when CB₁ receptors were found in another type of brain cells, the glial cells^46–49. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated how the astroglial CB₁ receptor can modulate important physiological functions in behavior and synaptic plasticity such as learning and memory and long-term depression in the hippocampus^50–52. Therefore, this receptor can shape synaptic transmission via astroglial signaling⁵³. By doing this, it modulates the effects of exogenous cannabinoids on working memory⁴⁶ and, notably, can also determine the selective activity of specific circuits in the striatum⁵⁴. Thus, the improvement of the current tools will consolidate this knowledge to better elucidate the role of CB₁ receptors and astrocytes on brain functioning⁵⁵. Interestingly, recent findings have shown how CB₁ receptors can modulate microglia activation, suggesting its presence in this cell type⁴⁹.

Although CB₁ receptors are localized primarily at the plasma membrane, more and more evidence suggests the presence of functional intracellular CB₁ receptors^56,57. For instance, a portion of these receptors is functionally present in cell mitochondria⁵⁸. In the past, previous data showed that cannabinoids can alter mitochondrial functions, but these effects were fully ascribed to unspecific membrane disturbance induced by these lipid molecules^59,60. However, recent results challenge this idea, indicating that CB₁ receptors are also present in mitochondrial membranes in the periphery, such as in spermatozoa⁶¹ or skeletal muscles⁶², and in the brain, where they directly regulate mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity^58,63,64 or can impact feeding behavior⁶⁵. However, further studies and more direct, specific, and powerful tools are needed to investigate the role of mitochondrial or other intracellular CB₁ receptors on synaptic transmission, brain functions, and behavior. Interestingly, brain mitochondrial functions have been recently causally associated to anxiety-related responses in the nucleus accumbens⁶⁶, demonstrating how brain energetics can impact behavior.

Localization of CB₁ receptors in the periphery

In the last two decades, CB₁ receptors have been described in a number of peripheral tissues, including fat tissue⁶⁷, gastrointestinal tract⁶⁸, mouth and oral cavity⁶⁹, eye⁷⁰, cardiovascular system⁷¹, liver⁷², pancreas⁷³, immune system⁷⁴, bone⁷⁵, skin⁷⁶, and skeletal muscle⁷⁷. Indeed, it seems that the ECS is present in a large majority of tissues and its specific functions have recently been investigated⁷⁸.

The complex interactions between peripheral organs and the central nervous system raised a particular interest within the neuroscience field. In this sense, it is worth discussing how the peripheral processes modulated by the CB₁ receptors are affecting the central nervous system functions. A recent study demonstrated that the peripheral sympathetic activity controlled by CB₁ receptors is necessary for central functions, such as hypophagia and anxiety-like effects⁷⁹. Other potential examples of the roles of CB₁ receptors in the periphery-brain connection are the control of the release of stress hormones from the adrenal glands⁸⁰ or the modulation of gut functions impacting on behavioral responses. Indeed, a close interaction between adipose tissue, gut bacteria, and the endocannabinoid system has been proposed in the context of obesity^81,82.

New advances in the CB₁ receptor pharmacology

Several orthosteric ligands of CB₁ receptors have been described in the last few decades, including natural or synthetic CB₁ receptor agonists (e.g., Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], CP-55,940), antagonists (e.g., rimonabant), and orthosteric endocannabinoids^6,83. Moreover, endocannabinoids seem also to target non-cannabinoid receptors (e.g., G protein-coupled receptor 55 receptors)^84,85 and ion channels (e.g., serotonergic, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, or vanilloid receptors)⁸⁶, particularly at concentrations at which they have been found to interact with CB₁ or CB₂ receptors^6,87. Notably, the orthosteric action of CB₁ receptor agonists and antagonists induces important side effects^88,89. For example, rimonabant, known as a partial antagonist/inverse agonist, showed different side effects in humans⁸⁸. In this sense, different strategies have been shown to improve the safety profile and overcome the side effects induced by CB₁ antagonists, such as the neutral CB₁ antagonists⁹⁰.

Interestingly, the pharmacology of CB₁ receptors is nowadays also focused in the recent developments on putative allosteric binding sites of these receptors and how this can be translated into new therapeutic approaches. As cannabinoid ligands present an interesting therapeutic profile⁹¹, the development of new and safer drugs such as CB₁ receptor allosteric modulators is needed. Indeed, this strategy has become a hot topic in the G protein-coupled receptors field and there are different positive and negative allosteric modulators described (PAMs and NAMs, respectively)^92,93. Consequently, different compounds have been developed as exogenous CB₁ allosteric modulators, including the indole derivatives (e.g., the NAM “ORG” compounds)⁹⁴, urea derivatives (e.g., the NAM PSNCBAM-1)⁹⁵, and other small molecules that also display a PAM profile, such as RTI-371⁹⁶. Importantly, recent work also identified natural PAMs and NAMs of CB₁ receptors, such as the lipoxin A4, the hemopressin pepcan-12, and pregnenolone^97,98, which might represent model chemical structures for the development of new drugs. Although numerous studies have fully characterized the chemical and signaling properties of these new synthetic or natural compounds^97,98, the in vivo effects of all these drugs modulating physiological or pathological conditions constitutes an emerging area in the cannabinoid field. In this context, the neurosteroid pregnenolone exerts peculiar effects on CB₁ receptor signaling. Indeed, pregnenolone, by binding to a specific identified site on CB₁ receptors, displays an interesting SSI profile: whereas CB₁-dependent modulation of cytoplasmic cyclic AMP signaling is unaltered by pregnenolone, the neurosteroid fully blocks the activation of extracellularly regulated kinases (ERKs) and the inhibition of mitochondrial activity by cannabinoids⁶³. By these mechanisms, the SSI pregnenolone blocks different central effects of THC, including memory impairment, hypolocomotion, and cannabinoid self-administration in rodents⁶³. Other compounds have been shown to alter CB₁ receptor-dependent effects. For instance, the synthetic PAM ZCZ011 reduces neuropathic pain⁹⁹, whereas the PAM lipoxin A4 shows anti-inflammatory effects¹⁰⁰. Interestingly, it was recently shown that cannabidiol, which has been previously reported as a CB₁ receptor antagonist, behaves also as a non-competitive NAM of CB₁ receptors, despite its low affinity to these receptors¹⁰¹.

The allosteric modulators of CB₁ receptors are not the only therapeutic agents recently proposed. Indeed, the effects of several phytocannabinoids in preclinical models of central nervous system diseases and, where available, clinical trials have been investigated, suggesting a promising phytocannabinoid-based medicine¹⁰². Another factor that can change the CB₁ receptor pharmacology is heteromerization with other receptors. Heteromers of CB₁ receptors and other proteins recently emerged as an important target of the in vivo effects of cannabinoids^103–105. Notably, these heterocomplexes could be potentially modulated¹⁰⁴ and this implies another pharmacological tool to act on CB₁ receptor signaling. Moreover, present evidence points to the membrane environment as another critical regulator of CB₁ receptor signaling, and this can be potentially exploited for the development of novel therapeutic compounds¹⁰⁶. Finally, a G protein-coupled receptor such as the CB₁ receptor may also have a constitutive, ligand-free mode of signaling, as has been shown in hippocampal GABAergic synapses¹⁰⁷. All of these new ideas demonstrate that the research community may dedicate more effort to tackle CB₁ receptors.

Conclusions

This short review focused on the new findings in CB₁ receptor research. However, the ECS comprises other components such as CB₂ receptors, the endocannabinoids, and the enzymes responsible for their synthesis and degradation. In this sense, recent advances have demonstrated the importance of CB₂ receptors in the brain^108–110, the presence of other endocannabinoid-like molecules^111,112, other potential receptors that can be activated by endocannabinoids⁸⁷, and interesting findings regarding the localization and pharmacology of the enzymes involved in the metabolism of these endocannabinoids^113,114. In brief, the actual picture of how the endocannabinoid system works is quite complicated and more efforts are needed to try to merge the old and the new ideas in this field (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematic comparison between the classic and the current view of the CB₁ receptor functional expression.

On the left panel, the classic view of the CB₁ receptor is represented. The CB₁ receptor was thought to be exclusively localized in GABAergic neurons, where it was demonstrated to inhibit neurotransmitter release. On the right panel, the current view of the CB₁ receptor is illustrated. Different advances have completely changed this picture: (A) The CB₁ receptor is present in different neuronal types and in glial cells, both in astrocytes (B) and potentially in microglia (C). Furthermore, it is found intracellularly in the mitochondria (D) and endosomes (E). The view of a canonical retrograde system changed after the CB₁ receptor localization in postsynaptic somatodentritic neurons was demonstrated (F). Nowadays, we know that CB₁ receptor presents allosteric binding sites (G) and that it could form heteromers (H). Beyond the brain, the CB₁ receptor is widely expressed in the periphery (I), where it can modulate the periphery-brain connection. All of this new knowledge reflects the complexity of the central nervous system and the advance in neuroscience, positing the CB₁ receptor as an ideal tool for studying brain functions. CB₁, cannabinoid receptor-1; CB₂, cannabinoid receptor-2; eCB, endocannabinoid; NT, neurotransmitter.

An open question in the cannabinoid field is whether the cellular diversity of CB₁ functions could improve the therapeutic exploitation of cannabinoid-based drugs. One can speculate whether different CB₁ ligands can mediate different signaling pathways by selectively controlling different CB₁ receptors present in different cellular populations. Likewise, it is possible that specific drugs could target exclusively mitochondrial CB₁ (mtCB₁) receptors or could avoid activation of intracellular pools of CB₁. More studies will be needed to answer these questions, but there is already some evidence demonstrating a different pharmacological profile between CB₁ receptors expressed in GABAergic and glutamatergic cells. Thus, “glutamatergic” CB₁ receptors are more sensitive to low doses of agonists and are endowed with stronger intracellular coupling, whereas “GABAergic” pools of the receptor are activated by higher doses of agonists and produce lower activation of G proteins^34,35,43,115. Therefore, one could speculate that specific compounds able to selectively activate different cellular subpopulations of CB₁ receptors could be developed. Moreover, combinations of drugs able to modulate glutamatergic or GABAergic neurotransmission with cannabinoid agonists have been shown to promote specific effects of CB₁ receptors and inhibit others¹¹⁶. It is also interesting to note that both perisomatic and dendritic GABAergic synapses use phasic endocannabinoid signaling, but the tonic form of cannabinoid signaling is present only in perisomatic cells¹⁰⁷. Moreover, a recent study⁸⁰ shows that the peptide endocannabinoids, known as pepcans, act as endogenous allosteric modulators of CB₁ activity exclusively on noradrenergic neurons, demonstrating a cell type-specific regulatory role on endocannabinoid signaling. All of these new and exciting findings suggest that the better we understand cannabinoid signaling, the closer we are to developing specific and local pharmacological drugs that may have importance in brain disorders.

Overall, the new and exciting findings suggesting different and specific localizations of the ECS components and the new strategies proposed to tackle their activity of this receptor open the door to new questions (Table 1). Indeed, the endocannabinoid system has been related to many physiological and pathological functions^13,18,117, and the better understanding of these new evidences will bring more light to exploit the therapeutically beneficial properties of this widely spread neuromodulator system in the brain and in the body.

Abbreviations

CB₁, cannabinoid receptor-1; CB₂, cannabinoid receptor-2; ECS, endocannabinoid system; NAM, negative allosteric modulator; PAM, positive allosteric modulator; SSI, signal-specific inhibitor; THC, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol.