Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-Dimensional Guided Cone-Shaped Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Small-sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Middle Third of the Lung Field

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Segmentectomy has been recommended for peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate whether three dimensionally (3D) guided cone-shaped segmentectomy can achieve long-term outcomes comparable with lobectomy for small-sized NSCLC in the middle third of the lung parenchyma.

Methods

This study retrospectively screened patients with small NSCLC (≤2 cm) who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy between January 2012 and June 2019. Tumor location was determined by 3D multiplanar reconstruction. The cone-shaped segmentectomy was performed with the guidance of 3D computed tomographic bronchography and angiography. The log-rank test, Cox hazard proportional regression, and propensity score-matching analyses were adopted for prognostic evaluation.

Results

After screening, 278 patients with segmentectomy and 174 subjects undergoing lobectomy were selected. All the patients had R0 resection, and no 30- or 90-day mortality was observed. The median follow-up time was 47.3 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.6 %, and the disease-free survival (DFS) was 97.5 % for the patients undergoing segmentectomy. After propensity score-matching, the patients with segmentectomy (n = 112) had an OS (P = 0.530) and a DFS (P = 0.390) similar to those of the patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 112). The multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated no significant survival differences between segmentectomy and lobectomy [DFS: hazard ratio, 0.56 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.16–1.97, P = 0.369); OS: HR, 0.35 (95 % CI 0.06–2.06, P = 0.245)] after adjustment for other factors. Further analysis showed that segmentectomy achieved comparable OS (P = 0.540) and DFS (P = 0.930) for NSCLC in the middle-third and peripheral lung parenchyma (n = 454).

Conclusions

For selected NSCLCs size 2 cm or smaller in the middle third of the lung field, 3D-guided cone-shaped segmentectomy was able to achieve long-term outcomes comparable with lobectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolf AS, Richards WG, Jaklitsch MT, et al. Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for small (≤2 cm) non-small cell lung cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1819–23; discussion 1824–1825.

  2. Altorki NK, Wang X, Wigle D, et al. Perioperative mortality and morbidity after sublobar versus lobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: post-hoc analysis of an international, randomised, phase 3 trial (calgb/alliance 140503). Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:915–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, et al. A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (jcog0802/wjog4607l). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:271–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, et al. Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:895–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai C, Shen J, Ren Y, et al. Choice of surgical procedure for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ≤1 cm or >1 to 2 cm among lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang C, He Z, Cheng J, Cao J, Hu J. Surgical outcomes of lobectomy versus limited resection for clinical stage C ground-glass opacity lung adenocarcinoma 2 centimeters or smaller. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;22:e160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (jcog0802/wjog4607l): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eguchi T, Sato T, Shimizu K. Technical advances in segmentectomy for lung cancer: a minimally invasive strategy for deep, small, and impalpable tumors. Cancers Basel. 2021;13:3137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamoto K, Omori K, Nezu K, Lung Cancer Project Group of West-Seto Inland Sea J. Superselective segmentectomy for deep and small pulmonary nodules under the guidance of three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomographic angiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:877–83.

  10. Takamori S, Oizumi H, Suzuki J, Suzuki K, Kabasawa T. Video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for deep and peripheral small lung cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;70:233–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato M, Kobayashi M, Sakamoto J, et al. The role of virtual-assisted lung mapping 2.0 combining microcoils and dye marks in deep lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;164:243–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu W, He Z, Xu J, et al. Anatomical pulmonary sublobar resection based on subsegment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:e447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu WB, Xu XF, Wen W, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography in the preoperative evaluation of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(Suppl 9):S710–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao F, Wu W, Zhu Q, Zhai R, Xu X, Chen L. Thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy with collateral ventilation method. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112:1814–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu WB, Xia Y, Pan XL, et al. Three-dimensional navigation-guided thoracoscopic combined subsegmentectomy for intersegmental pulmonary nodules. Thorac Cancer. 2019;10:41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsubokawa N, Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for radiologically pure solid clinical t1a-bn0m0 lung cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42:2493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao J, Yuan P, Wang Y, et al. Survival rates after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1483–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Onaitis MW, Furnary AP, Kosinski AS, et al. Equivalent survival between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical stage ia lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:1882–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tane S, Kitamura Y, Kimura K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for inner-located small-sized early non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35:ivac218.

  20. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, et al. Segmentectomy for clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma showing solid dominance on radiology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:637–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Handa Y, Tsutani Y, Mimae T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of complex segmentectomy: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:1044–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kagimoto A, Tsutani Y, Mimae T, Miyata Y, Okada M. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for solid predominant cn0 lung cancer: analysis using visual evaluation of positron emission tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;61:279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tane S, Kimura K, Shimizu N, et al. Segmentectomy for inner location small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: is it feasible? Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;114:1918–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank all the study participants, research staff, and students who participated in this study. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82203296 & 81972175) and the Key Project of Jiangsu Commission of Health (ZD2022055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weibing Wu MD or Liang Chen MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 461 kb)

Right S2b+S3a combined subsegmentectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). (MP4 121971 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Xu, W., Wang, J. et al. Three-Dimensional Guided Cone-Shaped Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Small-sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Middle Third of the Lung Field. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 6684–6692 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13772-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13772-1

Keywords

Navigation