Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining Radiofrequency Ablation with Hepatic Resection for Liver-Only Colorectal Metastases: A Propensity-Score Based Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Combining liver resection (LR) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is nowadays an accepted option for treating colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), but the number of lesions ablated is regularly described as a recurrence risk factor. In this study, we report our experience and determine the impact of RFA on long-term outcomes.

Method

This is a retrospective study including patients undergoing LR with or without RFA for CRLM. All variables influencing disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined through a Cox regression analysis before and after propensity-score matching (PSM).

Results

Among the 128 patients included, 71 (55.5%) underwent LR alone and 57 (44.5%) underwent LR+RFA. With univariate analysis, LR+RFA showed a significantly worse DFS than LR alone (p = 0.028), which was not confirmed after PSM (p = 0.064). Thermal ablation did not influence DSS before or after matching (p = 0.282 and p = 0.189). When analyzing the subgroups of patients according to number of RFAs performed, no difference in long-term outcomes was observed (after PSM: p = 0.192 for DFS and p = 0.624 for DSS). Analysis of site of recurrence revealed that neither performing an RFA (p = 0.893) nor the number of lesions ablated (p = 0.093, p = 0.550, and p = 0.087 for 1, 2, and ≥ 2 RFAs) were associated with an increased risk of liver-only relapse.

Discussion

In the setting of a parenchymal sparing strategy, combining RFA with LR is safe in terms of oncological outcomes. Tumor burden, rather than RFA performed, independently influences risk of recurrence and patient survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*stat database: colon and rectum. SEER 5-Year Relative Survival Rates, 2012-2018. Accessed 20 December 2022.

  3. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):254–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cf.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hackl C, Neumann P, Gerken M, Loss M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Schlitt HJ. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases in Germany: a ten-year population-based analysis of 5772 cases of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:810. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Valls C, Ramos E, Leiva D, Ruiz S, Martinez L, Rafecas A. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of recurrent colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatectomy. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finn Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc. 2015;104(3):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496914553147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mimmo A, Pegoraro F, Rhaiem R, et al. Microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and pooled oncological analyses. Cancers. 2022;14(5):1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. van de Geest TW, van Amerongen MJ, Nierop PMH, et al. Propensity score matching demonstrates similar results for radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection in colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48(6):1368–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Masuda T, Margonis GA, Andreatos N, et al. Combined hepatic resection and radio-frequency ablation for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a viable option for patients with a large number of tumors. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(11):6353–60. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solbiati M, Ierace T, Muglia R, et al. Thermal ablation of liver tumors guided by augmented reality: an initial clinical experience. Cancers. 2022;14(5):1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening of the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (8th Edition). American Joint Commission on Cancer: Springer International Publishing; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ivey GD, Johnston FM, Azad NS, Christenson ES, Lafaro KJ, Shubert CR. Current surgical management strategies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cancers. 2022;14(4):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Memeo R, de Blasi V, Adam R, et al. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB. 2016;18(9):781–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Imai K, Allard MA, Castro Benitez C, et al. Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation combined with hepatectomy compared with hepatectomy alone for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2017;104(5):570–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mima K, Beppu T, Chikamoto A, et al. Hepatic resection combined with radiofrequency ablation for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases after effective chemotherapy is a safe procedure with a low incidence of local recurrence. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18(5):847–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0471-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang LJ, Zhang ZY, Yan XL, Yang W, Yan K, Xing BC. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for technically resectable colorectal liver metastasis: a propensity score analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1494-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(1):10–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruers T, Van Coevorden F, Punt CJA, et al. Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Puijk RS, Ruarus AH, Vroomen LGPH, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) - a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):821. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4716-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Martino M, Rompianesi G, Mora-Guzmán I, Martín-Pérez E, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Systematic review and meta-analysis of local ablative therapies for resectable colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46(5):772–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):818–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000128305.90650.71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hao W, Binbin J, Wei Y, Kun Y. Can radiofrequency ablation replace liver resection for solitary colorectal liver metastasis? a systemic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:561669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.561669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hokuto D, Nomi T, Yamato I, et al. The prognosis of liver resection for patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases has not improved in the era of modern chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(8):959–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Margonis GA, Sasaki K, Kim Y, et al. Tumor biology rather than surgical technique dictates prognosis in colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2016;20(11):1821–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3198-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadot E, Groot Koerkamp B, Leal JN, et al. Resection margin and survival in 2368 patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: surgical technique or biologic surrogate? Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):476–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Y, Xu Y, Xu L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiofrequency ablation prolongs survival for ablatable colorectal liver metastasis: a propensity score matching comparative study. Front Oncol. 2021;11:758552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.758552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. de Jong MC, van Vledder MG, Ribero D, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of combined intraoperative ablation and resection for colorectal liver metastases: an international, multi-institutional analysis. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2011;15(2):336–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1391-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Pessaux MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest and no funding source to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (TIFF 6070 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannone, F., Grollemund, A., Felli, E. et al. Combining Radiofrequency Ablation with Hepatic Resection for Liver-Only Colorectal Metastases: A Propensity-Score Based Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 4856–4866 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13530-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13530-3

Navigation