Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Institutional Validation of Prognostic Nomograms

  • Sarcoma
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prognostic nomograms for patients with resected extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) include the Sarculator and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) nomograms. We sought to validate these two nomograms within a large, modern, multi-institutional cohort of resected primary extremity STS patients.

Methods

Resected primary extremity STS patients from 2000 to 2017 were identified across nine high-volume U.S. institutions. Predicted 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases cumulative incidence (DMCI), and 4-, 8-, and 12-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated with Sarculator and MSKCC nomograms, respectively. Predicted survival probabilities stratified in quintiles were compared in calibration plots to observed survival assessed by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Cumulative incidence was estimated for DMCI. Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) assessed discriminative ability of nomograms.

Results

A total of 1326 patients underwent resection of primary extremity STS. Common histologies included: undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (35%), fibrosarcoma (13%), and leiomyosarcoma (9%). Median tumor size was 8.0 cm (IQR 4.5–13.0). Tumor grade distribution was: Grade 1 (13%), Grade 2 (9%), Grade 3 (78%). Median OS was 172 months, with estimated 5- and 10-year OS of 70% and 58%. C-indices for 5- and 10-year OS (Sarculator) were 0.72 (95% CI 0.70–0.75) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.70–0.75), and 0.72 (95% CI 0.69–0.75) for 5- and 10-year DMCI. C-indices for 4-, 8-, and 12-year DSS (MSKCC) were 0.71 (95% CI 0.68–0.75). Calibration plots showed good prognostication across all outcomes.

Conclusions

Sarculator and MSKCC nomograms demonstrated good prognostic ability for survival and recurrence outcomes in a modern, multi-institutional validation cohort of resected primary extremity STS patients. External validation of these nomograms supports their ongoing incorporation into clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon SS. The New American Joint Commission on cancer staging system for soft tissue sarcomas: splitting versus lumping. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1101–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N, Singer S. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2014;260:416–21 (discussion 421-2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher CD. The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours—an update based on the new 2013 WHO classification. Histopathology. 2014;64:2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher SB, Chiang YJ, Feig BW, et al. Comparative performance of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cates JMM. AJCC eighth edition for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:2023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cates JMM. The AJCC 8th edition staging system for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk: a cohort study of the SEER database. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16:144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, et al. Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:671–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kattan MW, Leung DH, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:791–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW, et al. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer. 2005;103:402–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Callegaro D, Miceli R, Mariani L, Raut CP, Gronchi A. Soft tissue sarcoma nomograms and their incorporation into practice. Cancer. 2017;123:2802–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tseng WW, Pasquali S, Hu JS, Menendez LR, Gronchi A. Staging systems and nomograms in soft tissue sarcoma: outcome prediction by categorization or personalization? Chin Clin Oncol. 2019;8:S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: an update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:200–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagaria SP, Wagie AE, Gray RJ, et al. Validation of a soft tissue sarcoma nomogram using a National Cancer Registry. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S398-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eilber FC, Brennan MF, Eilber FR, Dry SM, Singer S, Kattan MW. Validation of the postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific mortality. Cancer. 2004;101:2270–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eilber FC, Kattan MW. Sarcoma nomogram: validation and a model to evaluate impact of therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:S90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33:37–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasquali S, Colombo C, Pizzamiglio S, et al. High-risk soft tissue sarcomas treated with perioperative chemotherapy: Improving prognostic classification in a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer. 2018;93:28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pasquali S, Pizzamiglio S, Touati N, et al. The impact of chemotherapy on survival of patients with extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: revisiting the results of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019;109:51–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vos M, Koseła-Paterczyk H, Rutkowski P, et al. Differences in recurrence and survival of extremity liposarcoma subtypes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1391–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartlett EK, Curtin CE, Seier K, et al. Histologic subtype defines the risk and kinetics of recurrence and death for primary extremity/truncal liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2019;273:1189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Crago AM, Dickson MA. Liposarcoma: multimodality management and future targeted therapies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25:761–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fiore M, Grosso F, Lo Vullo S, et al. Myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic liposarcomas: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2007;109:2522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trovik C, Bauer HCF, Styring E, et al. The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Central Register: 6,000 patients after 25 years of monitoring of referral and treatment of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcoma. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cahlon O, Brennan MF, Jia X, Qin LX, Singer S, Alektiar KM. A postoperative nomogram for local recurrence risk in extremity soft tissue sarcomas after limb-sparing surgery without adjuvant radiation. Ann Surg. 2012;255:343–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gronchi A, Casali PG, Mariani L, et al. Status of surgical margins and prognosis in adult soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a series of patients treated at a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:96–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gronchi A, Lo Vullo S, Colombo C, et al. Extremity soft tissue sarcoma in a series of patients treated at a single institution: local control directly impacts survival. Ann Surg. 2010;251:506–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, et al. Development and external validation of a dynamic prognostic nomogram for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma survivors. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;17:100215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rueten-Budde AJ, van Praag VM, van de Sande MAJ, Fiocco M, PERSARC studygroup. Dynamic prediction of overall survival for patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:695–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rueten-Budde AJ, van Praag VM, van de Sande MAJ, Fiocco M, PERSARC Study Group. External validation and adaptation of a dynamic prediction model for patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:1050–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gundle KR, Kafchinski L, Gupta S, et al. Analysis of margin classification systems for assessing the risk of local recurrence after soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:704–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MHS, CGE, JHB, CJA, MHJ, JCP, JSK, MBL, NLG, JSH JCS, RSP, KC, and JHH contributed to the conception/design of the work; MHS, CGE, JHB, MM, NLG, MN, WA, RSP, RCF, BAK, MB, KV, KC, VG, KKR, JT, GP, and TT contributed to the acquisition of data; MHS, EED, CJA, MHJ, JCP, JSK, SJT, JCS, KC, JHH contributed to the analysis/interpretation of the data; MHS, JHB, EED, JCS, KC, JHH drafted the manuscript; all authors critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content; all authors approved the final version submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm Hart Squires MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors have no financial or conflict of interest disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Squires, M.H., Ethun, C.G., Donahue, E.E. et al. Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Institutional Validation of Prognostic Nomograms. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 3291–3301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11205-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11205-5

Navigation